Filmed very well, shots were well taken, acting was extremely well, props to the child actors, overall 8/10.

Saw it in cinema, it was pretty good tbh. But I'm easily impressed. It went a bit over the top in certain parts like the giant CGI crooked man.

>>691498910
Was pretty good, was dampened by the fact there was a lot of retarded chav's in my cinema screaming and the load of jump scares in the film didn't help that. Still give an 8/10 tho

>>691498910

I watched a little more than half of it and was enjoying it but decided to shut it off because the copy I got of it wasn't that great and it was hard to see a lot of the stuff in the dark.

The first conjuring is one of my favorite movies so I shut off part 2 while there was still enough of the movie left that I could enjoy it when a good copy comes out.

>>691499370
this

>>691499457
I had the best audience, this old guy next to me just kept laughing every time there was a jumpscare lol

>>691498910
Should have had the CGI bit be just a shadow or something. Took all the suspense out of it. 7/10.

>>691499370
the crooked man wasn't actually CGI (except for the part where he transforms). it was a real actor with marfan syndrome which gave him really long arms