This is the answer (hidden for those trying to solve on their own):
1.6071428*56 (Round to one's place)
90
72
18
0 (100% valid answer)
72 goddamn people.
The answer is fucking 9.
2 does not equal 6, 3 does not equal 12, etc.
It doesn't matter how many wrong solutions are written above the problem, 9=9
>Inb4 "What about another number system"
>>691120741
/thread
90
2*2+2=6
3*3+3=12
4*4+4=20
5*5+5=30
6*6+6=42
9*9+9=90
N=a*a+a
>>691119983
Only for geniuses? for real? This shit is basic
>>691119983
Why does everyone always make it more complicated than it has to be?
2*3=6
3*4=12
4*5=20
5*6=30
6*7=42
Therefore 9*10=90
>>691121040
WHOAH! Outside of the size constraints 0 < gamma(?) < 1 and t > 0, I can actually solve that. Calculus based physics is teaching me things!
>>691119983
tree fiddy
Based on the calculations/numerical statements:
y= x * (x+1)
x = 9
y = 9 * (9+1)
y = 9*10
y = 90
>>691121040
OP here. I've only done undergrad math work as an EE major. I don't know those fancy gamma functions and whatnot
2×3=6
3×4=12
4×5=20
5×6=30
6×7=42
7×8=56
8×9=72
9×10=90
9=90 Dumbasses. Follow the trend.
54
>>691121258
Γ(z) is valid for z∈ℂ\{0, -1, -2, -3, ...}. The constraints are for the contour of integration and the locations of the poles of the integrand.
6 +6 = 12
12 + 8 = 20
20 + 10 =30
30 + 12 = 42
42 + 14 = 56
56 + 16 =72
72 + 18 =90
This la how it goes. 6-8-10-12-14-16-18 so 9 = 90
Easy but nice
>>691121372
ah, overlooked something....
Without any given rule to follow the concideration of a possible formula belongs to the person itself. Therefore any number may be the right one
If 2=6 6=2 not 42
>>691120179
fist answer is best.>>691120960
also correct but really asshole answer lol
>>691121339
That is undergrad math.
>>691119983
90
>>691121029
this tho.
>>691119983
Upside down 2
>>691121905
As an EE, I only took the basic calc up to diffy q's
>>691122112
That would make sense for EE, so I see your point.
>>691120741
Agree
>>691121086
It's a little simpler than that
2*3=6
3*4=12
4*5=20
5*6=30
6*7=42
9*10=90
>>691119983
The answer is 90. The pattern is n = n(n + 1).
/thread
>>691121086
Or N=a*(a+1)
>>691122223
Now that I can do, but I'm too lazy. Something like let u=that stuff in ln, and then IBP. Maybe some trig subs. It's summer man
>>691121029
Thr numvers on the left could be shorthand for saying 1st in the sequence, 2nd, etc...
>>691121086
You could even just figure out the pattern
2*3=6
3*4=12
4*5=20
5*6=30
6*7=42 therfore following the pattern 9*10=90
>>691122350
even simpler
0 + 6 = 12
12+ 8 = 20
20+10= 30
30+12= 42
42+14= 56
56+16= 72
72+18= 90
>>691122472
You almost have the first substitution right but trig subs aren't the next step.
90 you cunt
>>691119983
>Reply
90
>>691122622
That is definitely not simpler. It also has no relation to the actual question.
90
>>691121063
>Saying /thread when you can't even do basic math
KYS faggot
>>691119983
72 or 90 and that is why this is bait.
NERDS
>>691123345
>>691123266
OP here. The answer is 90
90
Tricky bastard
84
The answer is 58. Thanks for admitting I am a genius OP
>>691122675
Well I may not know enough math to do this. Looking at the w|a solution, I don't recognize this Li function
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+sqrt((1-t+)%2F+(1%2Bt))+*+log(sqrt((1-t+)%2F+(1%2Bt)))
>>691124113
OP here. You have officially earned this badge of honor.
This goes for anyone saying the answer is 72 as well
>>691124165
You don't have to compute the indefinite integral to do these. Li₂(s) is the dilogarithm and there are simpler ways to do the integral (and in general the whole class of integrals) than using it.
>>691124503
Wait it's a cube root? The other image had a square root
90. It isn't hard, retards
>>691124688
It's a square root in the other image. The two integrals I just posted are different than the previous two I posted, but they are of the same type.
>>691119983
An = n(n+1)
A9 = 9*10
A9 = 90
>>691119983
90
9*10
1/3
1/4
1/5
1/6
1/7
1/8
1/9
1/10
Im going with 75, what say you OP?
>>691119983
MUSLIMS DID GERMAN MASS SHOOTING
>>691124864
Wow, you morons now how to make shit difficult. The right column is inreasing by 2 ie; 6,8,10,12 etc. now if you can't do simple edition, this is truely a place for faggots
>>691121537
That's how I figured it out as well, some people took the fucking hard way it seems
Also, fucking store fronts every godamn time!
2 - 6
3 - 12
4 - 20
5 - 30
6 - 42
7 - 56
8 - 72
9 - 90
>>691119983
i hacked it with python m9s
>>691126783
fake
>>691126783
Bush strikes again
>>691126783
>python
>>691121086
It's n * ( n + 1 )
>>691128630
Same thing. The difference of letter choice and choosing to factor the product or not makes no difference.