Are Italians called stallions because hey have big dicks?

>>690964224
Give me a proof that
>One plus one equals two

>>690964224
What's 2+2?

>>690964224
What's your field of research?

>>690964224
From which century?

>>690964360
15.71 cm average, only France has bigger penis in Europe, but they have niggers.

>>690964386
Ask me a question

>>690964425
4

>>690964224

why are Italians so greasy?

>>690964543
Geometric Analysis and PDEs

>>690964570
23th century, anon. Clinton won.

File: Spaghettios.gif (64 KB, 511x285) Image search: [Google]

64 KB, 511x285

Why do my spaghettios make lightning?

whats the biggest fucking spaghetti

>>690964683
They aren't. Why do you say that, anon?

>>690964597
Can you show me proof that one plus one equals two?

>>690964757
Please remove the pics, it hurts my feelings.

>>690964763
Dunno. We have too many kinds of pasta here

File: 1299444745692.jpg (40 KB, 372x457) Image search: [Google]

40 KB, 372x457

>>690964224
Post picture of your asshole w/ timestamp

>>690964224
Are you zongo the matematitian?

>>690964887
Are you referring to the autistic proof of Russell?
I don't know it Anon, but it's type theory faggotry

File: image.jpg (260 KB, 937x960) Image search: [Google]

260 KB, 937x960

>>690964224

>>690964963
What's this monster

>>690965029
No, sorry

File: IMG_20160622_225937.jpg (2 MB, 3264x2448) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 3264x2448

Could you help me out with exercise number 2? I'm interested in b) and c)

>>690964683
No OP.
That's just crappy american movies.

>>690964224
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

>>690965094
I'm just saying
1+1=2 is an axiom
Not proven but just taken as a fact
If you can't even prove that, why are all of you guys thinking you can work other stuff out?

>>690965248
7

>>690964224
Is OTP a true encryption? In a mathematical manner?

>>690965185
Dunno really, but a friend of mine does this stuff.
I think you have to use the residue theorem or something like this

>>690965094
Yeah, he's probably asking about his proof from Principia Mathematica.

File: image.png (15 KB, 813x264) Image search: [Google]

15 KB, 813x264

>>690964224
What is y when X=4/5?

>>690964224
Is it mathematically true that the sum of all natural numbers is -1/12?

And on a more personal note: what's the deal with curl? How does it (intuitively) relate to anything useful, like flux?

>>690965194
Fucking romanians

>>690964597
Inches bro, inches

>>690965394
You don't need to use the residue theorem for it, but there is a nifty trick with a Laurent series that can be used to prove it.

>>690965425
2

>any mathematical question could easily be answered via Google search engine.

What do you do as a mathematician?

>>690965401
See
>>690965350

>>690965451
>Is it mathematically true that the sum of all natural numbers is -1/12
No, because the Dirichlet series definition of the Riemann zeta function is only valid for complex numbers with real part greater than one. However, it is true that ζ(-1)=-1/12 by analytic continuation.

>>690964224
how do i get my pasta adente?

>>690965194
I will sove it for you, 10$.
All the steps required to do it.
I take paypal.

>>690965194
Are you Romanian, anon?
However for 2 c) you have to integrate by parts, while for 2 b) i think you could prove to use the substitution x= (cos t)^2, it should works

>>690965350
Sorry, but the axioms are others. 1+1=2 is a theorem, not an axiom. It can be proven "easily" via set theory.

Let's see if you're really Italian, anon:

Che film comico fanno ogni fottuto anno a Natale?

>>690965836
Fuck off nigga you just gonna use symbolab

>>690965451
>How does it (intuitively) relate to anything useful, like flux?
Maxwells equations, anything involving fluid flows.

>>690965859
Yes I'm Romanian.

>>690965541
kek

>>690965570
Research in mathematical analysis

>>690965805
Wait water to boil before setting pasta inside the pot. However it's "pasta al dente"

Can u divide by zero

>>690964224
>Italian mathematician everything

Don't need to, we already know that the first desk top size computer was an italian olivetti. You can't beat that......... or something.

>>690965938
I don't need to. I write it on paper, if it makes you feel better.
I can give indications at any step, but that is 15$.

(btw, matematica is better)

>>690965934
Vacanze a sto cazzo

>>690966103
Are you undergraduate?

Explain Szpiro's conjecture to me.

>>690966274
Don't be a bastard and do it for free

>>690966396
Algebra is for faggots, sorry

>>690964224
>What is 1 divided by zero

>>690964224
can u explain me soome example of Hamiltonian An

>>690966292
That f@g ain't even in university.
Not even finished secondary.

>>690964224
Do you work for some university?

>>690966507
It doesn't exists but we have many theories in which something similar is allowed

what's the biggest number you counted to?

>>690966292
I've graduated highschool a few weeks ago and I'm having the stupid bac in 2 weeks.

>>690966644
7

>>690966538
Hamiltonians are just formalism which works for pendulums, but I am a very pure mathematician, anon.

>>690966554
How do you know that?

>>690966607
Next year I will, Satan

File: fLuyzuc.jpg (142 KB, 740x740) Image search: [Google]

142 KB, 740x740

>>690966758
You're no mathematician

The correct answer is over 9000 you newfag

Why do harmonisc in a Fourier Series (given we analize a sinusiodal signal) have their frequency multiple of the fundamental harmonic?

>>690966752
Will you be a mathematician?

>>690966644
8

>>690966907
Alma mater studiorum?

whats 2+2 ?

File: DA_FAQ.jpg (3 KB, 125x120) Image search: [Google]

3 KB, 125x120

>>690966630
Yes is does .99999999~ is the answer
>and u say you can math

>>690966644
>>690966758

wouldn't that be 9, because after that you start over again with 0 ?

>>690967025
Because the system { exp(inx) }_{n \in N} is a complete system in L^2, so it works.

How does string theory make use of the idea that
1+2+3+4+... = - 1/12 ???

How does string theory make use of the monster set?

>>690967132
Oh this one's clever.

Yes, it is correct that all mathematicians are actually computers nowadays

>>690967036
Nope. Im trying to run away from math as fast as I can. I'm simply not intrested in maths. I like physics, programming, everything that "has to do with math" but I don't like mathematics.

>>690967093
Pisa

>>690967124
Are you a fag?

>>690967097
1 in < G₃, + >

Can there exist a point in the plane at rational distance from all four vertices of the unit square? why or why not?

>>690967384
>no but high school starts in September better start studying

>>690967298
It's called the monster group.

Look up normalization for dealing with weird expressions in physics.

>>690967298
String theory is just nonsense, Anon. However I think the idea is to use renormalization (another faggot stuff). I know nothing about the use of the monster group.

>>690967345
Kek

>>690964224
is zero real?

File: 1465111758168.jpg (51 KB, 460x596) Image search: [Google]

51 KB, 460x596

>>690967614
renormalization is not faggot stuff, string theory isn't nonsense you frauds

>>690967345
If you can be a good programmer/any field that has to do with physics (that would include engineering), without good knowledge of maths, please hit me up. Imna give you a car or something.
I tell you, you won't be able to do a thing without maths.
Maybe sweep the floor in a programming company.

>>690967663
No. It's just abstraction, like every number greater than 100 000

>>690964224
Devo passare l'esame di Matematica Discreta all'uni.
Come faccio?

File: pepe_meme'd.jpg (86 KB, 803x688) Image search: [Google]

86 KB, 803x688

>>690967750
Have you a proof of that, Anon?
I will answer for you.
>No

It's just a meme theory

>>690967789
it was a serious question you dumb fuck

>>690967821
Sei di Pisa?

>>690967663
Yes.

ℑ[0]=0

>>690967990
It's a serious answer, Anon. Not joking, think about it: God invented natural numbers, the rest is purely abstraction.
Can you really think a number greater than 100 000?

>>690967985
>Needs proof to be movitated
Oh I'm sorry I thought I wasn't speaking to another calculator

>>690968039
No, Torino. Studio Informatica.

>>690964224
Come si fa la matematica

>>690968163
Stop algebra faggorty, please

>>690968200
>Not an argument.
I meant an experimental proof.

>>690964763
hahahhahahhahaahahahahahahaahhaahahaha
this is the fucking greatest question i've ever seen in my life

>>690968448
You probably think FLT is algebra too.

>>690968283
Impara un fottio di combinatoria, in genere è sufficiente per fare gli esercizi di matematica discreta.

>>690968390
Con molta pazienza

>>690968448
>Mathematics needs experimental proof before investigating further

Okay enjoy verifying the past the rest of your life

>>690967757
The programming and physics we did in school didn't require all the bullshit we learned in math class. We only used the basic stuff like derivatives, integrals, matrices, etc in programming or physics. Am i going to use the Lagrange or Rolle theorem or some specialised bullshit like that at something?

>>690968563
No, but its proof is with algebra methods. You can't deny it.

>>690967985
Renormalization is critical in obtaining finite results from calculations in quantum electrodynamics, and QED is the most accurate theory in the history of science - for example, experiment has verified multi-loop calculations of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron to about one part in a billion.

>>690968798
<3

>>690968685
No, nigger. Physics requires it

File: image.jpg (85 KB, 625x625) Image search: [Google]

85 KB, 625x625

>>690968744
Just look at Wiles's proof.

>>690964224
Dov'è nata la tua passione per la matematica?

>>690968860
But this is math stupid :D

>>690968571
Combinatoria è una cazzata (di solito con quella si fanno 1/3 o 1/4 dei 33 punti massimi), sono le domande su anelli, gruppi e classi che sono un porcoddio.

>>690968798
I am sure about it, but it's a nonsense trick, come on.

Can you explain the relationship between the non-trivial zeroes of the Riemann Zeta and prime numbers? AFAIK the zeroes relate directly to the error you get from the prime number theorem, but I'm not exactly sure what the exact relationship is.

>>690968187
>100 001,100 002...it goes to infinity,that only makes infinity abstract.

>>690968886
I can't understand it Anon and you know it, I am an analyst.

>>690968909
Ho sempre avuto la passione per risolvere problemi. Gioco anche a scacchi, etc

>>690968956
Dai, non saranno mai così difficili. In genere sono qualcosa tipo "fai quello che ti diciamo in più passi"... Per me era la combinatoria quella difficile

>>690964224
Fino alla fine Forza Juventus?

>>690968571
Grazie

>>690968187
Also how you can understand 0 is neutral

>>690969276
It puts a bound on the error of the prime counting function. I'm not versed enough to explain it.

File: Ly6WhER.jpg (480 KB, 5000x5000) Image search: [Google]

480 KB, 5000x5000

>>690965859
>constructing natural numbers
>using set theory

>>690964224
Go home Armando...

>>690969622
Dubs spoke the trurh

>>690969622
check'd

>>690969291
Yes, but you can really think to abstract stuff. Even great numbers cannot be thought: I read some study once, and it showed that people had difficulties even about thinking at group of more than 20 people.

>>690969276
Dunno

>>690969337
You don't need to understand Wile's proof to know it's not 'just algebra'. There is a lot of abstract algebra of elliptic curves in there, but it's got a lot about modular forms and L-functions too.

>>690969011
It is a "dippy process", but it's probably just an indication that our field theories are just low-energy approximations of a more complex field theory governing the first attoseconds of the universe.

And it is not "nonsense" any more than the rest of science. Science is inductive - a hypothesis which cannot be falsified by showing that its predictions fail experimental test is our best explanation for a phenomenon, period. We do not get to then judge theory based on how it appeals to our aesthetic sensibilities.

>>690969622
Wut.

>>690969561
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set-theoretic_definition_of_natural_numbers

>>690969521
Just an axiom.

>>690969561
What do you use, anon?

>>690965425
5

>>690969917
That last sentence is so true.

>>690967546
well?

>>690969740
You said god crated.You must think as god.Don't think in range of zero and infinit.

>>690967546
That's a neat question. What's he answer and the proof for it?

>>690969740
Ultrafinitist please go and stay go
>>690969949
>>690969962
Peano Axioms, for people who don't feel the need to construct every little thing as sets.

>>690969833
It's just because hard problems require lots of different math. Probably Wile will have used all the mathematics used in number theory (so almost all), but it has an algebra core.
Right now I am using algebraic topology for some analysis problem, doesn't mean I am a topologist

>>690969917
>And it is not "nonsense" any more than the rest of science.

Agree on that

>>690969525
Yes from what I know the real parts' supremum is the infimum of B such that O(x^B) (in big O notation) but from what I understand the real parts of the nontrivial zeroes is always half (if the Riemann Hypothesis is correct), so does that mean the error is always root x? That seems too simple to be true

>>690969962
Is math has axioms?

>>690970325
>Ultrafinitist please go and stay go
This.

I prefer the Peano Axioms as well but this doesn't make a set theoretic construction less important.

>>690970455
Cool, then you just do big algebra problems all day. Clearly everything is just algebra in disguise now.

>>690970244
No, it was a quote.

>>690970213
Ask to the one yelling with "muh Wile proof", maybe he knows it.

>>690970325
It's only a philosophical thesis, in real math I use even the axiom of choice.
> Peano Axioms
It's the current year, dude

>>690970287
I don't know I spent four years trying to find the answer and couldn't.

>>690970543
I don't know. I haven't really read into it. I got a book on the zeta function a while ago, I should probably open it.

>>690970787
Are you a cathegorist, Anon?

>>690971023
I don't do much category theory. The most of it I ever touched was in topology.

>>690970866
you are a fucking abacus

>>690970866
It's not my fault that you think all number theory is just algebra.

>>690971188
Weird, you act as cathegorists do.
> Muh algebra
> Muh hipster constructions of things

>>690971443
It's written categorist.

Not every thing is just some big algebra construction, get over it.

>>690971325
I don't think all number theory is just algebra, nigger.
Analytical number theory is not algebra, and we have already discussed about what is algebra and what is not. It's not my fault that you cannot understand it.

>>690970866
Set theoretic construction adds literally nothing.

>>690971612
Completely agree

>>690971660
> Arguing about axioms
Don't be an hipster.

>>690971626
>Analytical number theory is not algebra
No shit.

>>690971855
What?

>>690971854
Whats the point of living if I can't argue about trivial shit with people I will never meet?

>>690972102
You won. May I ask you where are you from?

YOU HAVE BEEN VISITED BY THE JOYFUL NEGRO OF ZIP
░░░░░░░░░▄▄███████▄
░░░░░░░▄██▀▀▒▒░▀███
░░░░░░░██▌▒▒▒▒▒░░▀█▌
░░░░░░░▐█▒▄▒▀▒▒▒▐▒█▌
░░░▄▄▄░░▐▒▒▄▄█▒▒░▒██▄
░█▀▒▒▒▌░░█▀▄▄▀░░▒▒▐██▌
░░▌░░░▐░░░▀▄░░░░▒▒▒█▀
░░▐▒▒▒▒█░░░░█▀▄▒▄▄▀██▄
░░░▌▒▄▄▀░▄███░░▀░░▐█████▄
░░░▀▀▐▐▄████▌░░░░░████████▄
░░░░░▄██████▌░░▀░███████████
░░░░░███████▌░░░░████████████
░░░░▐███████░░▀░░████████████▌
░░░░████████░░░░▐█████████████
░░░░████████░▀░░▐█████████████▌
░░░▐███████▌░░░░▐██████████████
░░░████████▌░▀░░▐██████████████▌
░░▐████████▌░░░░░██████████████▌
POST IN 3 THREADS OR MR.TOPKEK WILL NEVER SIT ON YOUR SHOULDER

>>690964224
Why did you choose to study such a semi science?

>>690964224
How does it feel having filthy moor blood running through your veins?

>>690964224
How do I become better in Maths please?

>>690972196
Egypt. Where are you from?
>>690972346
Go ask >>>/sci/ they love helping people.

>>690971912
You stated almost verbatim 'Wile's proof has algebra at its core' and you make it seem like that makes all of algebra. It's the composition fallacy.

You just said that analytic number theory isn't algebra and Wile's proof contains a lot of analytic number theory. That's my point.

>>690965425
2

>>690972299
Mathematics is not science; you can tell because the methodology for obtaining knowledge is entirely different. However, without analysis there would be no physics, so there's that.

>>690972531
makes all of it algebra*

>>690972299
Exactly because it's a semi science. I hate applied science.

>>690972321
You literally have to be albino to be whiter than me, anon.

>>690972439
Italy, as told. You just reminded me a friend of mine who is a categorist...
>>690972346
Sacrifice something to Satan

>>690964704
I'm taking intro to PDE next semester. Any tips?

>>690972531
Ok, you won. I iwill read about it

>>690972832
Introductory course?
just be prepared to lots of computations. It's hard at first, but then it becomes normal

>>690964757
I think if you add more spoons/forks, it should stop. Say four or more equally spaced. Especially if you place a thin wire connecting their handles. This will help to reset the internal microwave generator.

>>690973105
I'm going to have to say that you should read into Spzino's conjecture too.

>>690973223
it's simply an undergraduate PDE course.

And by computations do you mean algebra or iterative solving with Newton-Raphson etc?

>>690972587
But mathematic is (of course important but) still not usefull without any other kinds of science

>>690972800
You hate applied science because it us actually telling us something about how something works?

>>690973719
It's hard to even say what "useful" means if you're going to put a piece of knowledge into a vacuum.

>>690964224
first name, please. I am italian, I know a mathematician, I know he is on /b/ quite frequently.

>>690973954
Mario. I have a brother named Luigi.

>>690973954
you might even more be him.
c'mon, tell me. my name is alessandro. if you are him, you know who I am.

>>690973691
I will, however number theory is not my subject, so expect I won't understand much...

>>690973693
I mean estimating integrals or computing Fourer transform

>>690973920
Yes

>>690973954
No, you first. Gimme some hint

>>690964597
Prove 2+2=4

>>690974517
>I will, however number theory is not my subject, so expect I won't understand much...
That's fine. There is so much math that specialization is required.

>>690974462
Gimme another hint, man

>>690974677
Are you a PhD?

File: 13530383_1077867702279502_1209089960_n.jpg (23 KB, 405x720) Image search: [Google]

23 KB, 405x720

>>690964224
I think you are a shit mathematician. Solve any of these for me. I dont need the full solution just the answer. Prove it faggot

>>690964224
Please respond to this statement:
There's no such thing as an Italian. If you're from north of Rome or from the city itself, you're French, if you're from south of it, you're Greek.

>>690974894
No. Grad student.

http://www.strawpoll.me/10557651/r

>>690974517
my name is alessandro.
i have a beard.
i play chess.

>>690975063
kek

>>690974969
Being italian is more a state of mind than a racial matter.

>>690975001
Just ended my master. Pwned by a grad, what a shame...

>>690970555
Nice trips

>>690975123
I know one Alessandro with a beard (and he is a fag) and one who play chess, but not both, Anon.

Are you genderfluid?

>>690975289
>Pwned by a grad, what a shame...
Shit happens man.

At least you're not a professor getting pwned by an undergrad.

>>690974966
Go fuck your little anus.

>>690975473
nope. 100% straight.

>>690975603
It happens sometimes here. We have autistics from Scuola Normale, so sometimes the pwn some professor

>>690975665
Do you study in Milano?

>>690964224
I'm italian too, and maybe next year i'm going for a University in Mathematics.
My problem is that i'm not really that good in the subject, only trough really hard working i was able to get some results.
Based on your personal experience, do i have any chances to become a reasercher in mathematics, also if i wasn't gifted or didn't really develope my ability in mathematics when i was younger?

>>690976025
It's very hard anon, very very hard, especially at first.
However I just become Ph.D and I am more an hard worker than a genius born, so I wouldn't stop you. However be prepared. Where are you going?

>>690964224
will i ever have a happy life

>>690976282
I'm going to Sapienza, is it good? Most people told me not really

>>690976300
It depends on many things. If you are a white straight man in America or Europe yes; in any other case it's better to resign, especially if you are nigger

>>690976617
Dunno, but I don't think it's too bad. It's just huge.

>>690976743
On the long run did you regret something about your first days at the University any advises?

>>690977074
Nothing.

>>690964224
Riddle me this, prove yourself!

File: image.jpg (39 KB, 480x441) Image search: [Google]

39 KB, 480x441

>>690977149
Forgot picture.

>>690977149
Are you a nigger

>>690977209
It's the ultimate answer.

>>690975833
nope.

>>690977149
Assume OP doesn't exist.
OP is always a fag.
If OP doesn't exist then OP isn't a fag.
Therefore our original assumption must be false and OP must exist.

>>690974966
Not OP here, not having to ever used Lim on paper like that, is the first answer 1?

>>690977407
We probably don't know each other, sorry Alessandro with beard and who play chess

>>690977209
u faggot haha btw it's 48..

>>690976617
I'm not op,
but I studied engineering at Sapienza. here's my thoughts:
most of the professors in the scientific area are really good and super competent.
the downside is this : it is a super-unorganized university due to its humongous size. things don't function well and aren't controlled at all. this will somehow affect your productivity up to a point.

>>690977209
Bitch we're not 5 year olds, just use symbols like alpha, beta or omega for fucks sakes.

>>690974966
Replace the integrals with their asymptotic approximations.

>>690977209
11


OP do you think the Goldbach conjecture or the Hodge conjecture will ever be proven?

>>690977789
No, it's 42.
horse = 10
that stuff horses have on their clogs = 4
boot = 2

Will 3.14 ever end

>>690978073
*22 sorry

how does it feel to get beat by potato fags?

>>690978073
Not OP but I think it's only a matter of time until those are proven or disproven.

>>690978073
The Goldbach conjecture is true for very large numbers, but we are not still able to prove it for "small numbers".
Don't know about Hodge conjecture so much

>>690978160
It's a transcendental number.

>>690964224
P=NP?

>>690965425
2

>>690977587
Yep, that much I already gathered by myself.

>>690978084
lol u true /b/ro, now im rly fcked up haha wtf is wrong with my basic maths

>>690978160
Give every letter in your pad a number. Then your whole life is written in some part of 3.14. It's kinda weird

>>690978524
Know nothing about P= NP, sorry

>>690978623
Nigger or burger? Or both?

File: 1347396803966.jpg (636 KB, 3500x2355) Image search: [Google]

636 KB, 3500x2355

>>690964386
Assuming Peano axioms and calling S the successor function, we have by definition
1+1 := 1 + S(0) = S(1+0) = S(1) =:2

working in the standard model for naturals with addition where 0 = {} and n+1 := n union {n} we have
1+1 := 1 union {1} = {0} union {1} = {0,1} =: 2

>>690978633
>Then your whole life is written in some part of 3.14
It's not known if π is a normal number and that's not what it means to be a normal number.

Given a normal number like the Champernowne constant and an arbitrary interpretation you can pull any 'information' out of it from any place in the sequence. That means it's completely arbitrary and doesn't matter.

>>690964224
Is an inaccessible Cardinal higher than aleph null, or does it just come after?

>>690975770
When i was in Italy i heard that people from Scuola Normale are all geniuses in Matemathics and Physics is it true? Is it like Princeton?

>>690978633
irrational ⇏ normal

>>690978979
Library of Babel

>>690979323
That's an interpreter and its arbitrary.

>>690978979
Sorry, I was trying to play to "magician" role.

>>690979032
Most are more kinda weird autistics who watch animal porn, but some of them are really good. Normally every year one or two of them is a genius, the others are fags

>>690978992
isnt the existence of an inaccessible cardinal independent from ZFC or something? either way aleph_1 is not inaccessible by definition.
always assuming the def where aleph_0 does not count as inaccessible of course

>>690978160
>>690978633
>>690978979
it is 22/7 and as you can see it has end

>>690964224
Everything?

>>690964224
How do you do reasearch in pure Mathematics? Do they pay you to solve theorems?

>>690964224
>Itsa me integralio

>>690964597
Bosnians have bigger dick average

>>690979503
Yes

>>690979631
22/7 is an approximation to π.

>>690979799
1) I try to solve theorems
2) Yes

>>690979808
I don't speak arab, what's that language

>>690964224
Why is my pp hard?

>>690964224
what do you think about Ramanujan?

>>690979631
22/7 is a non terminating rational number with period 6.

>>690978913
>axiom
>proof
try again

>>690980083
autist

>>690964224
What progress have you made on proving or disproving the Collatz Conjecture?

>>690980183
It's not an axiom. It can be proven with propositional calculus.

>>690964224
Do you make money in Italy as a mathematician? Don't you become a techer in most cases?
That's why i took engineering

>>690980347
None. Not my business

>>690980183
i actually dont understand your post at all.
do you mean that 1+1 = 2 is an axiom so its trivial to conclude? then why try again?
do you think its cheating to use the axioms? thats the only thing math does.

>>690980486
I will go in Swiss next year, kek. However mathematicians find work as well as engineers, but normally they aren't so well payed at first

>>690964224
Why are your automobiles so poorly constructed

>>690980736
False.

File: DSC_0300.jpg (55 KB, 3240x842) Image search: [Google]

55 KB, 3240x842

Another Romanian here, just wanted to post this, I don't need to solve it btw.

Any backstage news about current stage in proving Riemann hyp.?