yes it somewhat does...but it won't look exactly like that but very close

File: uncut1437207719663.jpg (237 KB, 750x562) Image search: [Google]

237 KB, 750x562

>>690733641
why would you even?

You like the smell of dickcheese?

>>690733736
Is it even worth it to go through with it? Will it really be that different?

>>690733641
The pros and cons of foreskin restoration?

I tried it for a while, the pull and hold, pull your skin down and hold it, repeat. After about 2 months. It did look off but someone natural when soft. But gave up as it was too much of a pita for me to keep doing.

File: tumblr_n409r41Y0c1rlb6iho1_400.gif (1 MB, 375x210) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 375x210

>>690733641
A mutilated penis could not look less natural...

So a restored one will always look more natural than a cut one.

Plus, some sensitivity could come back.

>>690734084
My only worry is the aesthetics of it. If it doesnt look like the real thing then whats the point?

File: uncut1404049264741.jpg (41 KB, 1000x666) Image search: [Google]

41 KB, 1000x666

>>690734114
disgusting

Does restoring foreskin even revive the head back to being not-dry and bright pink?

>>690734274
I feel ya. I was worried about it too. Theres a few men forums that have posts about this I was looking at, the few that was actually able to see though all the work, they looked pretty natural. I was surprised. I think the only reason mine looked some what off is I didnt stay with it, had I kept going I think it could of worked. One guy showed pic taken over about 3 years and you couldnt tell he was ever cut. I think a lot has to do with your penis too.

>>690734563
Ive been wanting to see some before/after or progress pics but i cant seem to find any online

>>690733873
Ah the classic dickcheese argument.
I'm uncut and I've never seen dickcheese, because I was regularly. Simple as that.
There is literally no valid argument for circumcised being superior, yet they try every time. It's adorable.

>>690733873
if you aren't jewish, simple hygiene would prevent that

File: Plastie-du-prepuce.jpg (57 KB, 425x309) Image search: [Google]

57 KB, 425x309

>>690734284
you know you can treat phimosis without cutting all the skin right ?

>>690734743
The really fucked up thing is people defending the actions of other people (i.e. their parents having them circumcised or not) as a means to justify further male genital mutilation.

>most cutfags didn't have a choice
>they are unfortunate, not inferior
>enjoy the dick you have

>>690734743
Simply because I wash regularly ***

>>690734535
Yes, if well done and early enough !

>>690734728
Me too

File: uncut1425226320235.jpg (663 KB, 1749x1835) Image search: [Google]

663 KB, 1749x1835

>>690734958
but why would I want and ugly smelly foreskin? I prefer to have a dick girls will suck

>>690734966
It's just a shitty American practice and I can't believe it's still a thing. I do pity them, to love in a country where being cut is the norm and people think it's weird that you aren't

http://www.foreskinrestore.com/results_1-24months.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9UrxAKeyV4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_852038&feature=iv&src_vid=7YPnszNqs3Q&v=eeRFCu5yPF4

>>690735264
>>690734728
>>690735109
forgot to tag ya in post /fail Here ya go heres a few.

>>690735196
>american girls
Kek

>>690735196
You must be a dirty bastard anyway to think like that...
Did you shower this week ?

An uncut dick is a lot smoother for the girl to suck on.

>>690734084
>pita

>>690735212
The ironic thing is that the US's jewiness is what is making circumcision less popular. Government insurance no longer covers it in some states, so a lot of parents don't have it done because it costs about $600.

>>690735196
>this upset that he got his dick rekt by Jews

>>690735196
>I prefer to have a dick girls will suck

you mean a dick that AMERICAN girls will suck because they've grown up with mutilated joes

>as if what some women say they prefer is important
>as if men said they preferred women without clits and labia and women would remove it to please them (excepting stupid muslim women who don't have a choice)
>as if unecessary genital surgery is ever of benefit

File: 1465143374918.gif (912 KB, 240x176) Image search: [Google]

912 KB, 240x176

>>690735196
Foreskin or not, no one is going to suck your dick dude.. be honest with yourself.

File: 35655664968.jpg (35 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]

35 KB, 480x360

>>690735196
LMAO this pathetic mutilated dick damage control.

As a gay dude i would never choose a disgusting scarred dick over a sexy natural foreskin.

By the way if you get dick cheese you're just a disgusting scumbag bum who doesn't know how to take a shower LMAO

>>690735443
The only other people that share the same practice as Americans are shitty third world countries.
That's when you know they are doing something wrong.

>>690735494
Most people get upset being ripped off by blacks. Having your dick rekt by jews should be upsetting.

>>690735735
>The only other people that share the same practice as Americans are shitty third world countries
America is like this with religion as well. I think it's getting better over time, just like with decreased circumcision.

File: uncut1459442366988.jpg (54 KB, 572x756) Image search: [Google]

54 KB, 572x756

>>690735340
>>690735357
>>690735494
>>690735621
>>690735669
>>690735681
so many mad yuropoors. I'm sorry you all have such hideous cocks.

>>690735894
I'm not even European, but keep it up.
It really shows how upset you are

File: 356556649628.jpg (35 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]

35 KB, 480x360

>>690735894
>natural
>hideous

Are you actually retarded? Go cut off your fingers, lips and eyelids.

>>690735894
Would you prefer it if I had a pretty cock you little faggot?

>>690735681
This. Washing behind the foreskin is literally the most easy shit in the world. Uncut dicks all the way!

>being this fucking upset about being circumcised
>tfw I am and don't really give a shit
>tfw people feel the need to insult dudes who are cut and don't care
You have fun with your dick, I'll have fun with mine. Arguing that something is better because it's natural is a fallacy. Neither one is better.

>tfw one of the gayest things you can do is care about another dude's dick

>>690736262
I hope your dick has a wonderful day

>>690736262
>neither one is better
Although I agree that there isn't much point in arguing about it that is literally wrong.
An uncircumcised penis is superior, it's just a fact.

>>690736395
Thanks, anon. I have a date with Palmela Handerson scheduled tonight. If I play my cards right, I might even get a tugjob.
I hope your dick has a wonderful day too.

>>690734274
Depends on where you live

>>690735264
first video impressve ! i wonder if the new skin is sensitive? it must actualy be, natural new skin replicated by the body itself

second video - not muh progress

>>690733873
I've never even heard of that.

>>690736514
>there isn't much point in arguing about it but my opinion is objectively right
This guy.

>>690735196
Cool have your fat American slob women suck your mutilated cock.. Women in my country and pretty much every other country around the world like real dick not some cut up poor excuse for a dick

>>690736796
I know it's a pointless argument but I'm bored so I'll argue anyway.
And it isn't even an opinion. An uncircumcised penis can do everything a circumcised penis can, only more sensitivity. It's an objective fact.

>>690735894
>implying that women think dick is attractive
Hahaha you've been lied to clearly

>>690736655
The stretched skin won't be particularly sensitive. Dekeratinization of the glans will make it more sensitive and elastic, but since it's already been stretched by post-circumcision erections, it won't be as smooth and elastic as a glans that's been always protected. The true male O trigger, the frenulum, will not grow back in restoration, as it's been removed forever. The frenulum is by far the most sensitive part of an intact dick.

>>690733641
what?
did you lose yours?

>>690737080
And more.

This from a guy circumcised in his late thirties. I know have to be actually horny and have some stimulus to be able to rub one out.

>>690737080
>muh sensitivity
Every time I hear that, I laugh. It feels damn good on my end. At that point, it's redundant. It's not going to feel NOT great with or without foreskin. By your logic, having a bigger dick is better because you have more surface area to experience feeling. If you NEED more sensitivity on your dick, I can promise you the problem isn't foreskin or lack thereof.

>>690737381
Ive heard differently from dudes who've done it. They say they cant even retract it sometimes because its so sensitive. Obviously it wont be as it was originally, but it can bring you up to an 8/10 when it comes to sensitivity (according to the interwebs)

File: rate.png (598 KB, 800x615) Image search: [Google]

598 KB, 800x615

>>690733641

>>690737555
It still makes it objectively better.
I'm not saying I need the sensitivity. No one needs it, but it's obviously better to have it and therefore makes it superior.
It's simple to understand.

>>690734274
The big draw for restoring is you receive the gliding motion back and the head is protected and becomes sensitive once again.

>>690733641

Stop obsessing about your fucking dick, chicks don't care even half as much about it as you do.

>>690734743
Isn't a matter of simply just washing.
I got circumcised during adulthood, if I had been working all day and my lady went down on me when I came home. Mouth full of dick cheese, so she stopped doing it.
Got cut dick cheese stopped, she started doing it again then we had kids and it all stopped again.

It's always the ones that got cut up without any choice who are the most upset on these threads. I mean someone who's studying psychology it makes sense..

>>690737967
That seems like a problem on you're end.
I work as a manual labourer 4/5 days a week and still have never seen dick cheese on myself and neither has my girlfriend

>>690738044
As someone*

>>690738108
Your end*

File: Who Is She.gif (714 KB, 480x193) Image search: [Google]

714 KB, 480x193

>>690738044
This guy knows my Rage

>>690735621
Some chicks have flaps that look like an Arbys sandwich. In that case why yes it would benefit them to be circumcised.

>>690737855
>a mansion with 15 bedrooms is objectively better than a mansion with 12
Bigger numbers always make it objectively better, right?
Nigga, a dick is a dick. If you're so obsessed with how it needs to feel amazing, why not blow yourself? After all, you're the one who knows what your dick likes the most.

>>690735196
Uncut here, this shit is irrelevant and only happens when YOU DON'T SHOWER LIKE THE FUCKING IDIOT YOU ARE

>>690738201
Those girls typically do that's how Arbys gets it's shipments every week.

>>690738224
I probably would if I could.

>>690733641
ITT: Mutilatefags will attempt to defend themselves and fail horribly

>>690738201
There's no benefit there though.

>>690738044
I dunno. Might be biased, but I'd say the ones who are uncut and insisting that someone should be ashamed of their dick or that their dick isn't as good are the most upset.

>>690737133
No...

woman at lest in the west really like it cut. For one thing even soft a uncut dick looks more aroused then one that's shriveled inside it's-self, and an aroused partner speaks to our natural urge to breed with someone healthy.

Thus when flaccid cut is MUCH more attractive, when hard both look similar so it's not much of a big deal. There is a valid reason woman like cut men but even with their preference it's still unnecessary and not really worth it imho.

>>690736514
>Most circumcised dudes don't care either way
> circumcised dudes post how their dick is superior
It's like the are you jealous white boy threads, it's bait and if the person behind was serious it's because they're insecure about themself and have to bash something to make them feel good about themself.

>>690738445
We live in the age of sexting.
If you sent a picture of roast beef flaps most dudes would send it to their friends to laugh at.
Then they'd block your ugly ass and swipe left on some more bitches

Scientist have found that Circumcision plays a key role aggressive behavior and it could explain why the US is so violent.

>>690738450
If you think mutilating natural skin to look good when you're not even hard is worth it you're delusional. The idea of circumcision stems from delusion not reason and now that the damage has been done you're trying to justify the delusion. Circumcision is human error

foregen.org - donate and spread the word

>>690738681
Yeah high schoolers would.. Adults don't do that

>>690738832
Nigga can you read
>it's still unnecessary and not really worth it imho.

Settle down son.

>>690738957
>only highschoolers would do <x>
Adults are still petty and gossip as much. The water cooler is the new lockers. Let's be honest.

>>690737953
you sir are a fagget, and fucking the wrong chicks!
cause the ladys i fuck, love my dick

>>690737555
>It's not going to feel NOT great with or without foreskin.
>muh personal experience

You don't know anything. A shit ton of people have their dick screwed because of their fucking circumcision, including me. Painful erection, lack of sensitivity which leads to being unable to climax, or even just a lack of fucking skin.

>>690733873
Fucking jews get the fuck off my board

>>690739654
>doctor fucked up a surgical procedure and that screwed me over
So remind me again why that is impossible for any surgery at all? That's a risk of surgery, not exclusive to circumcision. If the doctor fucks up, the doctor fucks up. That's usually a problem, regardless of what's under the knife.

Another thread with insecure fags, cut and uncut is the same. Stop fighting on which of you has the better dick.

>>690740131
It's a risk his parents made for him. He didn't make it himself. It's not something that is detrimental to the child's health and well-being like eye surgery or removing a kidney. It's a piece of skin. Why risk it just for a "hurr i want it to look like his daddy's"?

>>690740868
>children have no rights to decide on procedures for themselves until 18
Tell me something I don't know.

>>690733873
he was asking about foreskin, not 5skin.

>>690737133
THIS!

Women aren't attracted to penis or men at all sexually. They are attracted to your wallet. They feign being "hungry for your cock" in order to get closer to your wallet and make you addicted to them sexually.

You can 'restore' the foreskin, but you can't restore the feeling you lost being circumcised in the first place.

File: cp1lj34zbfb7re0tr5dn.jpg (18 KB, 320x223) Image search: [Google]

18 KB, 320x223

>>690741829

>>690742335
You're all stupid faggots, but you especially.

>>690742515
Don't be mad at me for stating fact. Be mad at your parents for being religious idiots who hate you.

File: image.jpg (140 KB, 750x1147) Image search: [Google]

140 KB, 750x1147

>>690733641
OP here is my restored foreskin, I was cut kinds loose but with manual tugging and the tugger X i was able to get full coverage

File: image.jpg (222 KB, 960x1161) Image search: [Google]

222 KB, 960x1161

>>690742696
Another pic

>>690738748
In countries where men are in charge of children girls are more likely to be circumcised and in the US women have the legal rights to choose so they outlawed for themselves and apply it to those that are not like them.

>>690742357
Hey,I've seen a set of pictures of those two before.Sauce?

File: image.jpg (272 KB, 1280x960) Image search: [Google]

272 KB, 1280x960

>>690742737
One more

>>690741829
>Says the pale basement dweller whose only ever seen a vagina once but that was at birth

>>690737555
> I'm already experiencing something
> anything more would be overkill
> therefore it's unnecessary to have a foreskin
> since obviously the experience is good enough without it

> I'm already having a horse guide my carriage
> using an engine would be overkill
> therefore engines are completely unnecessary
> since I'm obviously already getting from place a to b without it.

>>690741829
Not true, ghetto people have way more sex than people from the suburbs, if you want easy sex make poor life choices.

>>690738450
> in the west
You mean the USA, right? Cause all the remaining countries of 'the west' don't really do it.

File: 1463218215255.gif (3 MB, 408x218) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 408x218

>>690742696
Show the scar.

Or did "manual tugging and the tugger X" make it disappear?

>>690742964
>comparing something objective (speed/distance) to something subjective (sensitivity/feeling good)
Anonpls

File: image.jpg (290 KB, 952x1280) Image search: [Google]

290 KB, 952x1280

>>690743119

>>690743278
> claiming that something can't be better, because you're convinced you're already having the best experience
come on ... It's like every idiot insisting on keeping deprecated technology ever.
> No, i'm gonna keep my vinyls, why should I ever need CDs?!

>>690743396
Does the restored foreskin naturally go over the glands or do you have roll it over them, also does it stay over them or does it want to retreat to be shaft-like?

>>690743591
>implying I ever made the claim that it can't be better
One hell of a strawman you got there, bud. I never said it can't be better. I said it's subjective. I said it's redundant. If you're going to argue, at least argue with what I'm actually saying.

>>690742814
Can you answer this >>690743739

>>690744104
> redundant
Isn't it exactly that what I'm arguing against?
Redundant means the extra amount of pleasure you may or may not receive, might as well not be there, therefore not noticeable, therefore you're implying that it feels the same with or without.
Furthermore you're saying that there is a base level of enjoyment, which is obviously sex while being circumcised, I mean that's just logical right?
And anything on top of that is "redundant", hence more than we can use.

I'll give you that you're trying to keep it from an objective better and pull it on the level of "you can't feel if it's better", which is even more idiotic.

>>690742805
dont have sauce. All i know is that they posted a set a few years ago. they were doing heroine

>>690745418
I remember that thread

>>690744813
I'm saying that "it feels better" is a moot point when you're dealing with something that's subjective and feels good regardless. You can't compare the experience of pain from person to person, and you can't compare the experience of pleasure from person to person. There's no real way to quantify it, because they're both 100% subjective. More is better based on the assumption that bigger numbers is always better. I don't really see that as valuable. Theoretically, if there was a way to quantify sensitivity numerically, you could find a ratio of size of dick to lack of foreskin that would equal out in terms of sensitivity. But that's not the case.
Also, I'm tired as fuck and rambling, so I should probably take that as my cue to head off. Have a good morning, day or evening, anon.

>>690737855
>noone needs it
Then why did we evolve with it?

File: image.jpg (1 MB, 2432x3171) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 2432x3171

>>690743739
It stays over the glans when soft, when it's hard it has the gliding motion and slides up over the glans when I stroke the shaft

>>690745889
Well ok, maybe the words where chosen unfavorably for our discussion.

Have a nice day too.

all these kikes desperately defending the genital mutilation of boys

>>690745889
>what are nerve endings

>>690746810
Genital mutilation \ne Circumcision. Enjoy riding in the bandwagon though.

File: quasidmodo.jpg (39 KB, 960x536) Image search: [Google]

39 KB, 960x536

I don't see why I should care about the lack of foreskin, It wasn't really my choice to begin with, which is kind of shitty.

But it's not like i'm going to fuck anyone, too fat and ugly.

>>690746084
Thanks

I was manually tugging for about a year and could barely tell a difference, maybe a quarter of an inch difference so I just started forgetting to do it, I might get the tlc x but I am not even sure if I have enough skin for that.

>>690747019
> let's call it something different
> surely no one will realize it's basically the same thing

>>690747019
Your shekelsteinberg ancestry is showing

>>690733641
How to make my dick smell better, Should i air it out a little after a shower or what

>>690747187
No, it is medically recognized as different. Just the modern thought is genital mutilation is circumcision, when it is not. Same thing for female genital mutilation and female circumcision. There not the same thing, and are seen as different in the medical community.

>>690747387
Probably have Jewish ancestry (I do have ME roots), but I do not identify as Jewish in either race or religion. (I do not buy into the bullshit that being Jew is a race.)

>>690747432
Pull your for skin back when peeing, keep it dry.
The more drops of bodily fluid reside under there, the more it will stink.

>>690747432
Let air dry after shower
Wear boxers
Don't sit with your legs to close together
avoid sweat
shower

>>690747869
Jewish ancestors makes you Jewish.

>Get off /b/ Shekelberg

>>690747869
Well buy into it faggot cause Jews are a different race

>>690747869
> it is medically recognized as different.
> what is a lobotomy
I get that you differ between "medically supervised with intent to cause as little damage as possible" and "let's just cut it off and wrap it" .
But in the end you're still cutting body parts from a person that can and at this point probably doesn't approve.

>>690747999
Trips check

>>690748103
* that can't and at ....

>>690747999
Trips make it fact

>>690747869
kys kikenstein
Cutting away at small children's healthy organs and removing parts of them is mutilation.

>>690747999
> implying I buy into shit religion.
> implying that probably means certainly

It would have served you better to call me a sandnigger, as that is a superset.

>>690748068
You are more of a Jew than me, if you buy into that Jewish propaganda.

>>690748232
The CDC thinks otherwise you fascist dictator. Do you enjoy taking dick up your arse to turn a blind eye?

>>690748103
You do realize circumcision is not limited to happen during infancy, right? Also this argument is morally void, the child never asked to be given life to yet to people copulated to have the child. Morally void, and by definition without consent.