102

> inb4 102

>>689529430
102

81

its 101. theres only one yellow in the bottom line

>>689529741
This

>>689529689
20+20+20=60
20+5+5=30
5-2=3
1+(20x4)=81

Pff...27 :) proste jak drut :D

>>689529430
101

81

>>689529689
22*5=110

>>689529814
Oh shit I didn't count petals

>>689529741
And only 4 petals on the blue flower.
See >>689529814

84

>>689529881
O FUK

>>689529430
last blue flower has just four petals so you dont know which number it is
equation should be as followed:
1+20*x=y
to lazy to solve.

20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - (1+1) = 3
1 + 20 * 5 = 105

File: gotcha.gif (487 KB, 253x187) Image search: [Google]

487 KB, 253x187

110

>>689530329
PEMDAS, it is 1 + (20 x 5) = 1 + 100 = 101

Fucks sake, there's one of these threads every other day. It's worse than Buzzfeed clickbait and they're always so absurdly simple you'd have to be under the age of ten to get it wrong.

>>689530511
Well what is the answer then? You felt the need to comment.

105 ez

>>689529430
Red is 20
Blue(5 petals) is 5
Yellow (double) is 2
Blue(4 petals) and Yellow(single) require more information.

"?" cannot be solved for, yet.

51

>>689531364
This

>>689530602
Well if you insist...
Assuming a strictly increasing and concave utility function for each flower type, we can safely assume that red flowers have significant associated utility, blue flowers are near worthless and yellow flowers may have disutility to the representative consumer. As much we can conclude that the utility of the final line of the puzzle is approximately equivalent to that of one to two red flowers, though actual expected utility is impossible to derive without unreasonable assumptions.

>>689529430
r=20, b=5, y=2
102
hurr durrr

As I said, 4th grade stuff.

>>689529430

They are indeed dumb

105

105

>>689529430
60/3 = 20 = Red
(30 - 20)/2 = 5 = Blue
5 - 2x = 3. x = 1 = Yellow
1 + 20 x 5 = 1 + 100 = 101

Ez as fuck.

81
You have to count the petals !
And there are 2 yellow flowers in the 3rd line.
But I was wrong 2 times before I get it, not gonna say "easy af" like a bastard

>>689532171
>>689532119
>>689531797
>>689530801
>>689530474
>>689530329

So why does the bottom blue flower only have 4 petals, not 5?

File: autism.png (10 KB, 280x336) Image search: [Google]

10 KB, 280x336

>>689532119
>>689531797
>>689531620
>>689531053
>>689530801
>>689530329
>>689530182
>>689529982
>>689529855
>>689529817
>>689529814
>>689529657
>>689529621
>>689529596

>>689532703
That's irrelevant. It's still one blue flower.

>>689530374
only you got it right, sad to see

>>689531797
Well the answer is 81, so...
Count the petals: the last blue flower has only 4 petals. 5 on the line above and the flower has 5 petals, so the number of petals is important.
+there are 2 yellow flowers in 3rd line so "yellow=1"

>>689529430
84 biyatch

>>689532871
It's completely relevant as the number of petals directly correlates with the number the flower is worth.

Your excuse is like saying "it still means two because the colour is yellow"

>>689533669
You are right

>>689529430
60/3=20=1 red flower
(30-20)/2=5=1 blue flower
5-2x=3. 5-2=3. x=1=1 yellow flower

1 yellow flower + 1 red flower x 4/5 of a blue flower (note petals)
=
1+20 x (4/5 x 5)= 1+20 x 4= 1+80= 81.

Solved.

>>689533669
Then it's actually unsolvable since you can't see how many petals the yellow flower pair has in the third equation.

>>689529814
>>689529881


NOTHING says what the value of a blue 4 petal flower is

>>689534991
it's actually unsolvable because the blue flower in the last equation only appears there, so there are two unknown variables.

>>689535123
AND you dont see the 2nd yellow flower. maybe 1-2 spikes are missing and there's a whole new value to it

>>689529430
The only correct answer here is 105

>>689535453
nvm, fuck that last blue flower, son of a bitch

File: 0f6dc5e6d27b0de6f4fe86b9a60b6f8f.jpg (25 KB, 650x366) Image search: [Google]

25 KB, 650x366

>>689535123
>>689535377
Answer this then

>>689533669
But that would render the puzzle unsolvable since you can't see how many petals the yellow flower dual has. The only way to solve it is to assume that only the color matters.

>>689535921
So if I replaced the yellow flower with a giant yellow dildo, only the colour matters?

>>689529430
105
Last line is 1+20 x 5

>>689535873
15?

>>689529817
wypierdalaj stąd z tymi emotami

>>689536108
Yes. It's algebra.

>>689536108
What? You're not allowed replace anything, what are you even talking about?

>>689535873
you cant. you need an exact definition.

it's like saying X is 24, because it's the 24th letter in the alphabet and Y is 25 without having any proof. it's just retarded logic

>>689536428
So YF(yellow flower) = YD(yellow dildo)? You might want to check your algebra.

>>689529430
2 + 20 x 5 = 103

>>689536108
Yeah, it wouldn't make a difference.

>>689536771
I just realized the yellow flowers are overlapping so it would be 101.

>>689529430

2 important things to note before you solve the problem

1- notice 2 yellow flowers in equation 3
2- notice 4 petals in the blue flower in equation 4

3x=60, x=20
x+2y=30, y=5
y-2z=3, z=1

z+(4/5)xy = 1 + (4/5)*20*5 = 81

>>689535873
10 + 4 + 2 = 16

potatoe

>>689536587
Well you could reasonably make the assumption that the banana is essentially 4x and the coconut is 2y but the flower petal thing doesn't really work due to the fact a flower isn't wholly composed of petals. You could possibly argue it's 1/6 of a flower or that somehow the petals are the only important part but there isn't anyway to know for sure.

>>689536738
The dildo and the flower have the same value assuming the only thing that matters is color, so YF(yellow flower) = YD(yellow dildo) would be correct.

>>689535873
14

>>689537003

if 1 yellow flower is y then 2 of them will be 2y

if 1 blue flower with 5 petals is z, then a blue flower with 4 petal will be 0.8z

>>689529430
It cant be DONE!!!!

>>689529430
The answer is 42. I ran this problem in a super mathemizergizmotronic and it gave the answer as 42 with 200 % certainty.

>>689537408
Except there is nothing to signify that only the color matters except for some rule you made up.

>>689536210
>IT'S 101 PLEASE

>>689529430
81 but its a stupid challenge

390

>>689529430
Last blue flower is different so it cannot be done

File: 127095609349.jpg (21 KB, 450x299) Image search: [Google]

21 KB, 450x299

>>689529430
red = 20
blue = 5
yellow = 1
1+20 x 5
1+100 = 101

>>689535873
Easy

3x=30, x=10
x+2y=18, y=4
y-2z=2, z=1

x+y+z = 10+4+1 = 15

okay
red+red+red=60 so red=20
red+blue+blue=30 so blue=5
blue(5)-two yellow flowers =3 so one yellow flower=1
bloody hard so: one yellow(1)+ red(20)xblue(5)=101

>>689537839
there are only three bananas in the last line so it's 14

>>689537580
And there is nothing to signify that the color rule is invalid either. The puzzle can't be solved without it, so the answer either undefined or 101. The puzzle simply doesn't give us enough information to solve it properly, thus OP is a faggot for making this pointless thread in the first place and waste everyone's time.

101 faggot

>>689538314
The thing that makes the color rule invalid is there is nothing to prove it correct. All rules are assumed to be wrong until proven otherwise. Unless there is some rule stating that only color matters we assume that color is irrelevant.

>>689538285
correct

4 bananas = y
3 bananas = 0.75 y

x +0.75y + z = 10+4*0.75+1 = 14

>>689537580
Nothing signifies that blues with 4 petals is worth 20% less than a blue with 5, yet you assume it and made up that rule anyway. So why is the color rule so absurd? At least with that rule it's possible to solve the puzzle, faggot.

>>689538878
I never said that a blue petal is worth 20% less than a blue flower with 5, faggot. You can make the assumption that 2 yellow flowers can be halved but a blue flower with 4 petals is unsolvable because we don't know the proper value of a petal.

>>689539243
we dont need to know the proper value of a blue petal. If a bunch of stuff is assumed to be X then we know that half of it must be X/2 so on..

>>689532729
Too retarded to realize they're right

81

>>689539243
>never said that a blue petal is worth 20% less than a blue flower with 5, faggot
But you kind of did. You're arguing that color isn't the only thing that matters, therefore some other characteristics of the flowers make a difference, with petals being the only other difference, so obviously you think petals affect the value of the flower somehow even though nothing signifies that, thus you're making up rules and assumptions too while telling me I'm wrong for doing the same. Hypocrite.

>>689539402
And that is the problem with this equation. It is represented by pictures and the last part of the equation changed the pictures. The yellow flower I don't consider a problem but the blue flower is. You can definitely make the argument that the petals don't matter and if so, it's 101. If the petals do matter, which can be argued by the fact that the amount of yellow flowers matter. Then you would need to figure out what a missing petal would constitute. Sure, if you are a retard and believe only petals matter then it's 81, but that is making the assumption the stem and center of flower have no value. Since you don't know the proper value of each co.ponent of the flower you would have to assume that it is an unknown variable that cannot be solved.

>>689539972
No it's the combination of the flower as a whole retard. Just because the color isn't the only thing that matters doesn't make something else the only thing that matters. Learn to logic.

Are you autists still arguing over this?
Christ, play some vidya, jerk off, or god forbid, go outside...

>>689539972
I think the problem you might have is you are working on the assumption that this is solvable and quite frankly, it isn't.

>>689529430
27
20+20+20=60
20+5+5=30
5-2=3
2+20+5=27

just divide the final number up and give each flower there number

>>689529430
102

>>689540331
Yeah, I already know that, you retard. That's what I've been saying this whole time. It's unsolvable since the flowers aren't exactly the same every time. I only make up the color rule so that it would become solvable, it doesn't matter anyway because there is no way to know if the color rule (or the petal rule) applies or not, just like how there is no way to objectively solve this puzzle.

>>689540331
>Just because the color isn't the only thing that matters doesn't make something else the only thing that matters. Learn to logic.
Kek. Learn to grammar.

>>689540749
The only way it could possibly be solved, is if the color rule applies, too bad there is no way to know if it does.

>>689541190
No you have been arguing that only color matters and then trying to argue that only somehow I implied that only petals mattered. If you realized that then why have you been shitting out your terrible logic all over this post when you know that it isn't a valid rule? Quit being a retard and once again, learn to logic.

>>689529430
20+20+20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5-1-1 = 3

1+20 x 5 = 101
or?
1+20 x 4 = 81

>>689529430
101 bye

(same shit different day)

>>689541649
Exactly! That's why it is unsolvable because the color rule isn't a rule you can follow.

>>689532877
omg
learn order of operation faggot

it is not
2+20=22
22*5=110

it's
2+(20*5)=102

>>689541309
Yeah, I realized after posting that was fucked. Grammar is not my strong suit.

>>689535873
10+10+10=30
10+4+4=18
4-2=2

1+10+3= 14

>>689541656
>No you have been arguing that only color matters and then trying to argue that only somehow I implied that only petals mattered.
No, I never said the color rule applies (since there is no way to know), I said that the puzzle is only solvable if it applies, you autist. And you did imply that petals mattered since you objected to my rule without saying if you're for or against the petal rule.
>If you realized that then why have you been shitting out your terrible logic all over this post when you know that it isn't a valid rule?
That's what I'm going saying the whole fucking time. If you didn't shit your terrible understanding of English all your posts, you'd realize that you're arguing against someone who actually agrees with you, you fucking idiot.
>Quit being a retard and once again, learn to logic.
Yeah, and you quit being a retard and learn to English, you fucking autistic immigrant piece of shit.

Guys, it's 101.
Notice that yellow flowers equal 1 and line 3's problem has two of them

84

Wheres my medal ?

20+20+20 = 60
20+5+5=30
5-2=3
Do The multiplication first , tards. 20x5 = 100. 2+100 = 102. Ugh

File: lemon.jpg (1 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1920x1080

The question is odd, because you use the yellow flowers twice and the last blue flower has 4 leaves instead od 5

guessing the 2 flowers mean times each other and the last blue flower is the same as the rest of the blue flowers, we can calculate this :

Red = A
Blue = B
Yellow = C

A+A+A=60 A=20
A+B+B=30 B=5
B-C*C=3 C=1.414
C+A*B=
1.414+20*5
1.414+100=101.414

The answer is 101.414

>>689529430
Answer is zero. Blue flower with 4 petals equals 1/20

>>689529430
3x=60
x+2y=30
y-z^2=3
z+x*y=a

x=20
y=5
z=2^.5
a=100+-2^0.5

>>689542881
Bringing it up in the first place means you support it, retard. If you agreed with me you would have said it is unsolvable and left it at that.
>hurr durr you arguing against my shitty argument clearly means you support that petals are a clear value
I don't know how you come to the conclusion that me not being for or against petals clearly means I am for petals having a definable value but you keep on living in your magical world.
>I have no real argument against you so I'm just going to call you on your shitty grammar
Good job there bud, you got me right in the feelings. I am so wounded I may have to go and cry about the mean ol anon on the internet. Does your tard handler know you're shit posting on the internet? He/she should really monitor you better.

>>689529430
>14:48:23
110

File: An0n.png (57 KB, 300x122) Image search: [Google]

57 KB, 300x122

>>689532729
Boy if you don't stop it with that fuck shit

>>689543548
also 98.5858

>>689529430
102

101

File: strawberries.jpg (1 MB, 2560x1600) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 2560x1600

>>689535873
14

A+A+A=30 A=10
A+B+B=18 B=3
B-C=2 C=1
C+A+B=14

81

>>689542881
>Yeah, and you quit being a retard and learn to English, you fucking autistic immigrant piece of shit.
>That's what I'm going saying the whole fucking time.

Best take your own advice there, bud.

>>689543995
>Bringing it up in the first place means you support it, retard
No, it doesn't.
>If you agreed with me you would have said it is unsolvable and left it at that.
I already did that a long time ago and you're still arguing with me, you autistic fuck.
>I don't know how you come to the conclusion that me not being for or against petals clearly means I am for petals having a definable value but you keep on living in your magical world.
Google what "imply" means, you immigrant shit of piece.
>I have no real argument against you so I'm just going to call you on your shitty grammar
I never said anything about your grammar, I said that your ability to comprehend English is so bad that you're literally wasting your time arguing with someone who agrees with you, retard.
>Good job there bud, you got me right in the feelings. I am so wounded I may have to go and cry about the mean ol anon on the internet. Does your tard handler know you're shit posting on the internet? He/she should really monitor you better.
Clearly you're crying since you keep replying to me with butthurt posts and insults.

>>689529430
Either 101 or 102 if the single yellow is less than the double in the second line

101.5

102

26 obviously

fucking retards

101 you dumbasses. anyone remember pemdas?

>>689544871
There is a difference between making a grammar mistake in a rush and being so retarded that you completely fail to understand simple English sentences and end up arguing and raging at someone who is on your side.

>>689529430
105

>>689535873
16

>>689529430
110

>>689529814
nigger you just contradicted yourself. in the second line you said 20+5+5. meaning the blue flowers are 5. And in the fourth line you said (20x4) meaning the blue ones are 4. you dumb fucking idiot. its 101

File: 1465914590010.jpg (71 KB, 470x470) Image search: [Google]

71 KB, 470x470

>>689529430 the answer is
Error: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again.
Kill yourselfKill yourselfKill yourself
a is etc this is no spam sysfags

  ▲
▲ ▲

>>689529430
84

File: 13445563_1620936978197669_7407356745116806075_n.jpg (28 KB, 500x375) Image search: [Google]

28 KB, 500x375

101. Fucking retards.

102

105

>>689546008
The petals are different

File: 1425237168140.jpg (114 KB, 1080x1920) Image search: [Google]

114 KB, 1080x1920

The answer is 102 if you put 102 your an idiot... order of operations......

>>689545059
I can't handle this amount of terrible anymore. I would have to write an essay on how bad this response is. To sum up though apparently you can imply things and I can't. Insulting my grammar somehow implies that I didn't understand what you were arguing. Finally your comeback was weak. Now hand the keyboard to your tard handler and make sure you don't rip it from the computer. That's enough internet for the day for you.

>>689546402
I'm done so you can keep making your terrible arguments to someone who moved to a different post. You get that pat on the back for being such a retard you made someone tired of arguing with you.

>>689546402
>>689546757
Samefag to clarify.

101

110

red is 20
blue with 5 petals is 5
2 yellow flowers is 2
therefore 1 yellow flower plus one red flower times blue flower four petals is 84
there is no brackets used so it is 84 not 81
1+20*4=84
fucking clickbait