27

102?

26

>>688845883
answer is 102.

>>688845883
101

>>688846082
That's what I got. X x 3 = 60
Red = 20

20 + 2x = 30
Blue = 5

5 - X = 3
Yellow = 2

Order of operations says multiply before adding, so 5 x 20 = 100 + 2 , so 102

>>688846082
>>688846270

Nope

102

>>688846435
No

>>688846075
>>688846231
>>688846363
Nope.

>>688846488
Nope right back at you.

>>688846561
Still no...

105

>>688846649
101

>>688846666
What a waste

105 faggots

>>688846718
the yellow flower =1

>>688845883
81

>>688846435
One yellow flower vs. two yellow flowers. 101 not 102.

>>688845883
105

>>688846666
This fag can't do maths

>>688845883
20+20+20=60
20+5+5=30
5-2=3
2+20*5=102

File: 1465481255237.png (19 KB, 800x700) Image search: [Google]

19 KB, 800x700

>>688845883

Wasn't there like a movie about this?

But like instead of flowers it was about dogs.

And a bunch of people bought the dogs like they were in the movie but a lot of people did not care for them and so many ended up getting abandoned.

Dalmations

it was something Dalmations.

???

>>688846788
anon did not see that there are two yellow flowers in the third line. Stupid summerfag, go back to school

>>688846873
Derp, good eye.

Sorry, I'm in summer mode, I'm not thinking about teaching math again till late August ;)

102

>>688846900
101. The end.

>>688846975
101 actually since it's two yellow flowers.

>>688846975
no yout autifag...

2 flowers = 2

1 yellow shiny edgy thing = 1

tards

>>688845883
101

>>688847058
Yes the yellow flower got me, I will now go back to my corner

/b/ are you blind or wut? 101 is the answer

>>688847021
yeh which is why 1 yellow flower = 1 you retard

Its 81 you fucking retards. Count the petals

>>688847032
>Still being in school
>2016

105, /thread.

>>688847137
This guy gets it.

155?

>>688846865
This is the answer you failures

Is the blue flower(last row) counted as different or the same as the other blue flowers

its 81, there is one petal less in the blue flower and only one yellow flower. Unless there is some other bs that i missed.

>>688845883
You're all wrong. The last blue flower is a four leaf clover in disguise. The answer is yellow red luck

File: 1465216297699.jpg (23 KB, 714x514) Image search: [Google]

23 KB, 714x514

>>688845883
Already posted this morning.

Blue (5 petals) =/= Blue (4 petals)
Yellow (2) =/= Yellow (1)

>undefined + 20 * undefined = ?

Unsolvable you stupid fucks.

Red=20
Blue=5
Yellow=1

21x5=105

Retarded faggots.

Answer is 81. Red flower = 20, blue flower with five petals = 5, yellow flowe by itself = 1.
Last part's tricky because the blue flower in the final problem only has 4 petals, which is 4/5 of a blue flower.

1+(20x4) = 81

>>688846873
Why this guy is correct technically it's impossible to know the answer because wouldn't one yellow flower have a different value to 2 bunched? Otherwise why wouldn't there just be a bunch of 3 red flowers = 60 in the first question and so on for the blue ones too?

101.41421356237

Final row is
1+20*4

Some of you are fucking dumb.

y + r + b = x

r + r + r = 60
60 / 3 = 20
r = 20

r + b +b = 30
30 - 20 = 10
10 / 2 = 5
b = 5

b - 2y = 3
5 - 2y = 3
5 - 3 = 2
2 / 2 = 1
y = 1

so,

y + r * b = x
1 + 20 * 5 = x

you multiply first;

20 * 5 + 1 = 100 + 1
100 + 1 = 101
x = 101

Basic maths and 90% of you struggle. Goddamn KFC.

B - 2

>>688847352
Can't believe you saw that wow. It's 25

>>688846435
105
third line there are 2 yellows

Undefined. The images of yellow flowers are different. We can't find the actual value of the yellow flower in the last equation, we can't assume it's half of the yellow flower in the previous equation. In the top row, we don't see three red flowers stacked on each other, we just see "red + red + red". In the second, the two blues aren't stacked, its "blue + blue".

So, yeah, no way of knowing the true value. Undefined.

>>688846602
>>688846488

Order of operations.

Ans is 102.

>>688847565
The final blue flower is 4/5 of the other blue flowers

>>688845883
101, btw its amazing ppl are so dumb and cant see there are 2 yellow flowers, each as 1 xD

>>688847685
Still blind check the final blue flower with the others

110

>>688846075
Yeah, it's definitely 102.

110
Red flowers are 20 each, 20 + 20 + 20 = 60
Blues are 5, 20 + 5 + 5 = 30
Yellows are 2, 5 - 2 = 3
2 + 20 x 5 = 110

>>688847846
Bro, are you serious,
20 x 5 = 100 right?
100 + 2 = 102

Basic math, multiplying is always the first.

>>688847846
the multiply goes before the addition

also this pic is retarded because some dipshit wants to be autistic by removing some leafes from the blue flower.

mathematically it's not solvable because this new flower generates a new unknown value

it's something like
blue crippled flower = 1 yellow flower + 1 red flower / blue crippled flower

or 101 if you want to set the same value to the blue crippled flower

It's 210 fags

>>688847846
(2+20)*5=110
2+20*5=102

Y'all are retarded, fuck the fucking yellow flowers, you guys are blind.

>Red flower represents 20 (basics fuckin math)
>Blue flower represents 5 (with its 5 petals)
>2 yellow flowers represent 2 (1 for each flower)

Here we fucking go bois
>20+20+20=60
>20+5+5=30
>5-(2*1)=3

Are you /b/tards ready?

>1+(20*((4/5)*5))=81
>1+(20*4)=81
>1+80=81

ARE Y'ALL CONFUSED?

THE BLUE FLOWER HAS 4 PETALS NIGGERS, PAY ATTENTION.

assuming ab=a*b,
?=101.414, since yellow = sqrt(2)

File: tempFile_2016-02-14-19-32-06.png (183 KB, 683x884) Image search: [Google]

183 KB, 683x884

All of the above.

Red flowers are 20 each, 20 + 20 + 20 = 60
Blues are 5, 20 + 5 + 5 = 30
2Yellows are 2,
1yellow=1
So it's 1+20×5=101

>>688848797
Fuck you

>>688848797
who said that the blue flower represents 5 because of the 5 petals

that's just an assumption

>>688845883
101

60 DIVIDED BY 3 = 20 R=20
20+B+B= 30 B=5
5- 2 Ys = 3 Y=1
Y+R x B = 1+20 X 5
21 x 5 = 105

I failed maths GCSE but I'm sure this is right

>>688849195
It was for the bottom equation, seeing as the bottom has 4 petals or also 4/5s of the flower, maybe it's not because of the 5 petals, but it doesn't change the math

>>688849130
Mad cause retarded?

Does a flower with 0 petals = 0?

>>688845883
I dont know because the bottom flower is different. It has 4 petals rather than 5

>>688846865
>>688847236
>>688847347
>>688847452
>>688848797
the only non-tardo's in this thread

>>688849292
You added before you multiplied. Never do that.

>>688849292
>Y+R x B = 1+20 X 5
>21 x 5 = 105

Gee, I wonder why did you fail that test...

File: 1465409227765.gif (465 KB, 200x317) Image search: [Google]

465 KB, 200x317

81

>>688849507
If it's supposed to be one of the blue flowers, then yes.

File: 1465231012383.png (266 KB, 380x380) Image search: [Google]

266 KB, 380x380

if you count the petals on the blue, consider each one value for (1), then the last blue flower means (4). also, notice the two yellow flowers in 3rd row, that means each yellow flower is 1.

in the end it's 1 + (20 x 4) = 81

>yfw red is still red

>>688846649
101 is the answer, idiot

>>688845883
101 easy i'm 11 old

>>688846082
Theres only one flower in the last one

>>688849432
that's right.
But like i said, the 4 petal blue flower is a new graphic and it's not defined by any value. If you assume that it's meant to be a % value of the 5 petal blue flower you are right.
It could also be another blue flower with a whole different value = unknown. It's just all based on assumption and the author of this didn't give any instructions.

101

>>688845883
16.8

>>688845883
27

>>688849292
Let's stick with
>I failed maths GCSE
here

>>688849966
I mean, if this was done with real objects and symbols instead of numbers, you could assume that each symbol is different anyways and the answer could be 42. Because even though the symbols look the same sometimes doesn't mean they are representing the same thing under each number. The same logic applies to the 2 yellow flowers and single yellow flower. Making it so this would be unsolvable.

everyone who says 102 is wrong is an average 4channer = a dumb retarded autistic virgin loser

>>688850258
This

File: 1417992999237.gif (236 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]

236 KB, 500x500

81.414, since aa=a^2, and the blue flower is missing a fifth of its mass.
∴ √(2)+20*((4/5)(5)) = 81.414 (3 d.p)
if four petal blue =/=(4/5)(5), let four petal blue = b
√(2)+20*b = 20b+1.414 (3 d.p)

>>688845883
81???

20+20+20=60
20+2 (5)=30
5-2 (1)=3
1+20 (5)= 101

itt:
inbreeds who think xx=x+x
lrn2alg3br4h

File: flowers.jpg (61 KB, 637x578) Image search: [Google]

61 KB, 637x578

>>688845883

File: 1465576101786.jpg (21 KB, 506x124) Image search: [Google]

21 KB, 506x124

>>688845883
                  =>
                                        ?=26

>>688845883
>20+20+20 = 60
>20+5+5 = 30
>5-2=3
>1+(20×4)=81
EZ

The answer is 110.

>>688845883
>>688845883
This equation cannot be solved.
We do not know the value of the single yellow flower, there is no correlation between there being two and one flower(s) meaning 2 or 1 respectively. Therefore it would be (flower) + 100

>>688845883

x*3=60
x=20

x-2y=30
y=5

y-z*z=3
z=SQRT(2)

z+x*y=a
a=100+SQRT(2)

File: 1417993901640.gif (2 MB, 300x168) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 300x168

>>688849575
>Calling people tardos
>Is wrong mathematically
>Can't even use a fucking apostrophe
Try again, faggot.

>>688851267
(x)(x) = x*x

File: 369507f4e40e5894089b0de742c62bd7.jpg (202 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

202 KB, 1024x768

>>688851540
yeah, i fell for it, the two flowers are a big distraction :/

>>688851361
>if we know the value of two identical objects, there is no way we can figure out the value of one!
Even if you were not retarded you would still be wrong

>>688845883
81, faggots

>>688851540
>1×1=1+1
:^)

>>688845883
>x+x+x=60
>x+y+y=30
>y+z=3
>Herp+x*Derp=? >:(

Just typing out what I see.

File: 1417921361445.gif (48 KB, 640x442) Image search: [Google]

48 KB, 640x442

>>688851540
>>688850876
>>688850610
Three posts out of 106 aren't wrong, and only one of them is entirely correct
you disappoint me, /b/.

>>688845883
Ok guys, you need to get a brain there
1st line
>3*X = 60
>So x = 20

2nd line
1. Blue flowers have 5petals
so
>X + 2Y = 30
>2Y = 10
>Y = 5

3rd line
>Y - 2z = 3
>Y = 3 +2z
>z = 1

4th line
>1z + X*(4/5 of Y)
>1 + 20*(4/5 * 5)
> 1 + 80

> 81

>>688847216
81 tardy count the petals on the blue flowers

>>688850610
I didn't even notice one of the blue leaves missing, but it's not possible to get the answer since we don't know the mass of the flowers stalk

>>688845883

red = 20 => (20 + 20 + 20 = 60)
blue = 5 => (20 + 5 + 5 = 30)
yellow = 1 => (5 - 2 = 3)

answer: 1 + 20 x 5 = 1 + 100 = 101

>>688845883
20+20+20=60
20+5+5=30
5-2=3
1+20x5=105
Are you fucking kidding me OP? This took me 10 seconds.

>>688852415
fucking retard, you messed up the order of operations
>you would have gotten it wrong anyway

>>688852415
1+20x5=/=(1+20)x5
(1+20)x5=105
1+20x5=101
and neither are correct anyway.

>>688847403
the answer is 21 undefineds then

I'm sure OP is just rolling (maybe with rick) at all you anon counting the flowers.

https://youtu.be/oHg5SJYRHA0

>>688852694
see the second solution of
>>688850610

>>688852401
yellow equals 2, your answer is off by 1

>>688851540
So it should be
~1.4+20×4=~81.4

OP here. I didn't need you faggots to solve it, I simply want images of similarly irritating puzzles.


Its 81 btw

Kek had a flower captcha

>>688852415
>1+20x5=105
kek

File: Kekulé.jpg (78 KB, 772x896) Image search: [Google]

78 KB, 772x896

>>688853291
>Its 81 btw
top pic related

102

>>688852891
Yellow equals 1
There are two yellow flowers in the third equation.

JUST because you remove a leaf and take away a flower, doesn't mean anything. You can assume what each variable is, but changing the visual representation doesn't actually change anything other than making it "unknown".

But if you really want to follow that dumb way of thinking, the answer is 84.

The yellow flower = 1
If you have two of something they arn't multiplied by each other
If I had two identical dildos and I told you that they are worh $100 that means they are worth $50 each
2x=100 -> x=50
There are 2 dildos not dildo^2
$50 dildo + $50 dildo = $100 worth of dildos
If it was dildo^2 you would say each one was worth $10
You could make a fortune if that were true, buy two $10 dildos put them together and bam $100

101 actually think instead of just writing out the basic algebra retards

81 the blue flower is 1 for each petal

>>688854400
>year of our lord 2016
>not understanding fundamental algebra
unit-less quantities don't follow the same rules as scalars, faggot.

>>688845883
81

Red = 20
Blue with five petals = 5, so assume blue with four petals = 4
Two yellow = 2, so one yellow = 1

Multiply first : 20 x 4 = 80
Then add : 1 + 80 = 81

>>688845883

101

84 you fucking morons

>>688845883
The bottom blue flower only has 4 petals while the other blue flowers have 5 petals, thus you can't solve the problem because there's 1 equation with 2 unknowns because you don't know what a 4 petal blue flower is worth.

>>688847251
I teach high school sped / math.

>>688854852
But there was never any basis to assume that each petal lets you change the value of a flower aside from that very one case of 5 petal blue vs 4 petal. So you really can't assume that a 4 petal is worth 4.

>>688854777
>flower = 1.414
>second identical flower = 1.414
>Place one flower next to the other
>both flowers = 2
I understand you want to turn them into variables as they resemble them in an equation, but you can honestly argue either way and having the double flower = 2 flowers instead of flower^2 makes much more sense.

81 retards

File: 1465565966056.jpg (198 KB, 637x578) Image search: [Google]

198 KB, 637x578

>>688845883
84.3333333329

>>688856267
84 retard. Learn basic math.

>>688856484
>Learn basic math.
Y-you too

>>688856484
B8 or retarded

102

>>688854633
Fucking retards u gsve vision issues do u not see its not a same flower...

>>688856864
b8

>>688845883
20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - 2 = 3
2 + 20 x 5 = 22 x 5 = 110

>>688845883
>>688846082
>>688846270

Pretty sure it's 101.9999...

>>688857113
Sorry, that's wrong, 102 is correct. Forgot to multiply first.

>>688857113
>addition before multiplication

>>688857113
Hahahahaghahaagahahh aga ut
WHAT IS THIS SOME murrifag LOGIC THEY TEACH YOU THAT 2 + 20 x 5 = 110 H AH AH AH AH AH AH A HA H also its 1 + 20 x 4 = 81

>>688857235
102 is not correct dear god vision issues ppl dear god

>>688857113
lulz xD

>>688857235
Also in one pic it's 2 yellow flowers and in the other it's just one.

It should be 101

ITT: We find out whos an Americunt and whos a Eurofag

File: filename-0.jpg (68 KB, 323x535) Image search: [Google]

68 KB, 323x535

bump

>>688857777
If you say so Quads

>>688857777
americunt: its 110 shiz gimmie a gun now stoopid fags kek lel
Eurofag: 81

81

The final line introduces two new symbols that aren't anywhere else, so this is unsolvable.

>>688845883
110 -.-

>>688846602
yes retard kys you fucking stoopid fggt u mk me so fucking angry im pulling my hair out fuckfuckyou

>>688845883
245

>>688845883
Red = 20.
Blue = 10.
Yellow 3.5.

3.5 + 20 x 10 = Kill yourself.

>>688861901
Dude, seriously?
If blue = 10, then red + blue + blue = 40, kill yourself!
Blue= 5

>>688861901
>20+10+10=30
Fucking retard.

>>688861901 blue is 5 fag go kill yourself !

>>688845883
>x+x+x=60
>3x=60
>x=20
>x+y+y=30
>20+2y=30
>2y=10
>y=5
>y-(2z)=3
>-2z=-2
>2z=2
>z=1
>z+x*y=?
>1+20*5=?
>remember PEMDAS
>1+(20*5)=?
>1+(100)=?
?=101

This only works in the assumption that two yellow flowers is equal to the single yellow flower, twice.

27 my friend !

>>688862305
prove me wrong

Protip:
>These meme-arrows make me 100% correct

>>688845883
6/3=20 red
20-30=10/2=5 blue
5-2=3
1 per yellow
1 yellow + (1 red * 1 blue) = 1 + (20*5) =1+100 =101

84

/Thread

>>688846363
It's this guy

>>688862305
-1z you stupid fuck ffs I did that shit in my head god damn go back to school

>>688857367
>20+4+4=30
=britbong mathematics in a nutshell

>>688847422
this

20+20+20=60
20+5+5=30
5-2=3
20+5+2=27
I'm à King of the nord !

>>688845883
rot = 20
blau = 5
gelb = 1

1 + (20 x 5) = 101

scheiß nigger ihr könnt alle garnichts

>>688862852
I take this back, order of operations makes it 81

>>688862873
there are two yellow flowers you nig

>>688845883
101

>>688846363
>>688846082
>>688846363
>>688846435
Notice the number of blue petals and yellow flowers.

It's 81

>>688847422
Ah, yes, the order of operations

>PEASMD

>>688845883
26.5

Red=20
Blue=5
Yellow=2

>>688847422
blue flower petals are what counts as digits
forgot order of operations
tard master

>>688845883
red flower = 20
Blue 5 petal flower = 5
yellow flower = 1
Assuming 1 blue petal = 1
Then ? = 1 + 20 x 4 = 81

File: 5766_fd5c_729.jpg (97 KB, 729x1051) Image search: [Google]

97 KB, 729x1051

>>688863335
youtube.com/watch?v=blGNsJl7Ku8

>>688863294
retard

>>688863062
> /threading your own post
>getting it wrong

101 or 111

>>688846865
This. The blue flower at the end only has 4 petals, not 5.

The amount of retards in this thread amuses me. 81 btw

110

>>688845883
Flowers in the picture.
r1 - Darker red flower, red flower (or orange) x 2
r1 30+15+15 = 60
r2 dark red flower, blue flower (5 petals)
r2 30+0+0 = 30
r3 Blue flower (5p) and yellow flowers
r3 0-3=3
r4 yellow flower, red flower and blue flower(4p)
r4 1.5+(30*(Four Fifths of 0 = 0)=1.5+0 =1.5 This answer theoretical is correct.
as such this proves that this question is moronic since as long as the answer is met you can place any number in any place as long as the answer is met.

>>688847347
Since when are we going by number of petals, theres nothing to indicate that means anything, why is it that the blue flower is the only one affected by how many petals it has

100

>>688851268
MFW you're actually baiting the shit out of everyone by switching numbers around.

>>688864361
A blue flower with 5 petals has a separate value from a blue flower with 4. They're two different variables. Since the 5 petal flower is equal to 5, we assume the 4 petal flower is equal to 4.

>>688845883
red flower = 20
blue flower = 5
yellow flower = 2

20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - 2 = 3
2 + 20 x 5 = 102

>>688845883
The answer is 1/20 or 0.05 if we're not using retarded logic

>>688864734
Moron

>>688864734
>MFW when he's not
> Two yellow flowers =/= One yellow flower
> Five petal blue flower =/= Four petal blue flower

>>688864802
Prove that, for all you know a four petal blue flower is equal to 100, it only makes sense to treat it as an unknown

81 is the only right answer. Blue flower has one less than the others (minus 1 therefore 4) and there is only 1 yellow in the last one (minus 1 therefore 1)

red = 20
blue(5) = 5 - each = 1
yellow(2) = 2 - each = 1

1+20x4 = 81

>>688865036

The entire image is based around figuring out the value of variables by their relative value. Since we don't have an equation to relate it to, we relate it in the only other logical way.

105?

>>688865036
For all we know One yellow flower is worth 753. But we use this thing called a brain to deduce that if two yellow flowers are worth 2 then one yellow lower should be worth 1.

File: 1423851326015.png (69 KB, 265x200) Image search: [Google]

69 KB, 265x200

>>688845883
102

>Red Flower = 20
>Blue Flower = 5
>Yellow Flower = 2

2 + 20 x 5 = 102

File: 1465576101786.jpg (298 KB, 637x578) Image search: [Google]

298 KB, 637x578

>>688845883

>>688845883
This can't be solved since u got 5 variables but only 3 equations. Assuming "double yellow flower"=2x"single yellow flower" and "5 petal blue flower"=4/5x"4 petal blue flower" the answer is 25.
side note: I have no idea if pedal is the correct word here

>>688845883
20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5
5 - 2 (2 flowers, 1 flower equalling 1) = 3
1 + 20 + 5
9 + 10 = 21

get off my board, get off my liefe

>>688866026
I misread the last line. The answer is 81

>>688846082
Well done

>>688866026
>answer is 25
How the fuck did you fail that hard?

>>688866303
here
>>688866186
is the answer

>>688866178
What are you solving? Because it is definitely not what OP posted

102 = z + (x*y)
x=20
y=5
z=2
x*3=60
x+ 2y= 30
y - z = 3

>>688845883
20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - 2 = 3
2 + 20 x 5 = 110

>>688845883
102

>>688866518
yeah i saw i fucked up

its 1 + 20 x 5

i also saw that it pulls brand new variables on you. i honestly didnt see the blue flower with only 4 petals, but whatever.

9+10=21 is a joke

>>688865863
>>688864802

That's true, but we're talking about the two blue flowers, one with 4 petals and one with 5, if the flower with 5 petals was just represented by X then why would the flower with 4 petals automatically be X-1, four petals is a different image, so it can be any other variable
Counting petals has nothing to do with it, that's the last trick

>>688845883
110

>>688863001
damn nazis, english motherfucker do you speak it

>>688867438
That's one approach but it assumes that the image isn't supposed to have a solution.

So I would say that's the biggest assumption within the image.

If it's not supposed to be solvable then we don't know the value of one yellow flower or a blue one with four petals.

If it is solvable then we must assume that one yellow flower is 1 and a 4 petal flower is worth one less than a 5 petal flower.

14?

>>688864217
>0-3=3
what is math

>>688845883
>red=x blue= y yellow=z
>red:
x*3=60
x=3
>blue:
x+2*y=30
y=5
>yellow:
y-2*z=3 (note that there are 2 yellow flowers in the 3rd row)
z=1
>final:
z+(x*y) (order of operations)
1-(20*5) = 101
>final result is 101

>>688867946
y + 20x = 0, maybe? Idk.
I guess it's not really clear what logic we should use

>>688868585
so 5-2y=3
but its inconsistent why represent that as 2y when the others are clearly divided by parts like y+y

>>688845883
101

>>688869161
becouse its the same? why wouldnt i?

File: 0e2.png (144 KB, 500x430) Image search: [Google]

144 KB, 500x430

>>688869488
Cause its bullshit meant to confuse people, thats why

>>688866011
nice dubs

>>688846865
Same

>>688869645
math is not meant for niggers to understand.

>>688847013
101 Dalmatians? I loved that movie!

>>688865971
>there's only one yellow flower in the third equation
>the blue flower in the third equation has four petals and not five

>>688845883
Dont know, we dont know what the yellow flower is on the bottom since the row above it doesn't have a single flower to represent, only a two flower symbol.

>>688845883
27

>>688870706
oh sorry, that's a times.

102

My eyes get fucked

File: 1465344884788.jpg (31 KB, 514x536) Image search: [Google]

31 KB, 514x536

it is 245 you tards

*R(20)* + *R(20)* +*R(20)* = 60
*R(20)* + *B(10)* + *B(10)* = 30
*B(10)* - *Y(3.5)* + *Y(3.5)* = 3
Y(3,5) + R(20) x B(10) = 245

>>688845883
26.

>>688846666
nice quads, tho

20 + 20 + 20 = 60

red = 20

20 + 5 + 5 = 30

blue = 5

5 - 2 = 3

2 yellow = 2

1 yellow = 1

1 + 20 * 5 = 1 + 101 = 102

81

>>688870864
20+10+10=30 eh?

>>688871237
I like how you wrote all that out and still came out with the wrong answer. What a fuckstain.

24

>>688845883
84
Either use algebra, or count the spokes. I used common sense though.

>>688872024
whoa, fuck, there are different numbers of petals on same-colored flowers?!

I didn't even see that

seems like 101 then, not 102

>>688845883
R=20 B=5 Y=2
20x5=100 (order of operations)
2+100=102

>>688845883
101 is the most logical answer