2

>>688263349

well if you divided that shit first by 48, wbhy the fuck immediately mulllltiply iy againn by 9+3? tardd

>>688263349
potato ?

>>688263636
Concur.

File: 1442200195336.jpg (79 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]

79 KB, 640x480

>>688263349
219

>>688263349
48/2(9+3) = 48/2(12)
48/2(12) = 24(12)
24(12) = 288

>>688263349
288
anyone who says otherwise is baiting

>>688263349
stop writing math problems with poor formatting

144

>>688264009
this is bait

>>688263891
>>688264009
what

>>688264150
pemdas you retard

>>688264060
It isn't poor formatting it is a matter of your education system being shit. Teachers should teach that division and multiplication are left to right and have equal precedence. Same for addition and subtraction. BE(D + M)(A + S) not BEDMAS.

>>688263891
Can't tell if this is just bait or actual autism...

File: mathcommlogo.jpg (22 KB, 427x419) Image search: [Google]

22 KB, 427x419

>>688264292
>>688264292

>>688263891
And here we have a proper understanding for order of operations

288 I got that fukin autism I don't under stand the question,,,,,,,,,,,,,,!!!!!!!!!!

File: 1454980567984.jpg (85 KB, 559x581) Image search: [Google]

85 KB, 559x581

>>688264459
>calling correct math bait and autism

>>688264459
your response is actual autism

this isn't a very good troll because the answer is clear

the one with the fraction is better

File: _.._.___.__._._..__.___._..._.__._..__._.__..____.gif (49 KB, 69x120) Image search: [Google]

49 KB, 69x120

>>688264320
Unless you're a fin

its 4 you retards

File: uh hu.gif (788 KB, 235x240) Image search: [Google]

788 KB, 235x240

>>688264320

File: uh huh.gif (788 KB, 235x240) Image search: [Google]

788 KB, 235x240

>>688264808

283

File: file.png (67 KB, 775x653) Image search: [Google]

67 KB, 775x653

>>688263891
Correct.

>>688264150
>>688264459
You're actually fucking retards.

>>688263349
2

File: uh huh huh.gif (384 KB, 235x240) Image search: [Google]

384 KB, 235x240

>>688264946

It's actually 2, because 2(9+3) is an implied multiplication. While multiplication and division are usually equally precedent (and, in fact, 48÷2×(9+3) is 288), implied multiplication (i.e., multiplication that is implied by putting two operands together, without writing down the sign) takes precedence over explicit operations in general.

This is also why 1/2x is 1/(2x) and not 0.5x.

File: uh huhuhuhuhu.gif (191 KB, 235x240) Image search: [Google]

191 KB, 235x240

>>688265029

>>688264459
You're the most autistic here, that post is the correct answer
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=48%2F2%289%2B3%29

File: uhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuh.gif (86 KB, 235x240) Image search: [Google]

86 KB, 235x240

>>688265114

>>688265056
shut the fuck up

File: uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu.gif (35 KB, 235x240) Image search: [Google]

35 KB, 235x240

>>688265172

>>688263349
Ive asked my professor these retarded questions... and they say there is no real answer because the questions would never be worded like that now adays,.

So for the real answer, unlike all the trolls who insist they are right.. there IS no real answer because it's phrased wrong.

>>688265257
except youre a fucking idiot whos never met my dear aunt sally.

>>688264808
>>688264946
>>688265029
>>688265172
>>688265114
>>688265252
All my keks

>>688264180
>>688264459
nice b8

You guys are retards think about the order of operations

>>688263349
>48/2(9+3)=?
>48/2(12)
>48/2x12 or 24(12)
>24x12
>288
Here you go you retards.

>>688265257
you're actually autistic
there is no wording, there is a right answer, and you get it by simply following the order of operations

File: 1457656772540.png (1 KB, 119x28) Image search: [Google]

1 KB, 119x28

>>688265004
Lier.

>>688265257
math is a language, there is an order of operations to it and when you want to express certain values, you take that into consideration. your professor is an idiot.

>>688263349
48/2(9+3) = 48/2(12) = 48/24 = 2

Yes, I'm retard.

>>688263349
2

>>688265004
lmao wow, what u put in to the calculator is not the same as what is asked

>>688266248
Thats correct.
x/2y=(x)/(2*y)

>>688265000
how the FUCK did you get 283????
I couldn't get that even if I tried

It's 288 if you follow the order of operations and it's 2 if you solve according to the distributive property.

>>688263349
2

File: 1462335154241.jpg (35 KB, 598x820) Image search: [Google]

35 KB, 598x820

And here I thought autism related to the ability to think objectively and not subjectively, therefore making it a stereotype that autistic people were usually the ones that were good at math and history.

>>688265004
implying google hasnt electronic autism

>>688266542
He's trolling, 283 is prime so he couldn't have gotten it from multiplication.

File: 288.png (8 KB, 628x291) Image search: [Google]

8 KB, 628x291

>>688263891
>>688264009
>>688264535
>>688265004
>>688265883
>CORRECT ANSWERS!

>>688263666
Hi satan

>>688266568
You have to rewrite the question when calculating using distribution. Distributive property can't contradict the order of operations.

File: 1461223424271s.jpg (6 KB, 250x187) Image search: [Google]

6 KB, 250x187

>yfw Everybody posting in this thread has slight to extreme social autism, including me

>>688266248
You have two sets of dubs, 66 and 88 so you must be correct.

https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html

File: 1464795266343.jpg (41 KB, 576x521) Image search: [Google]

41 KB, 576x521

>>688267381

>>688267246
Yeah, you should definitely disambiguate with parentheses/brackets. It's a loaded question imo.

The answer is there it's obviously ?
No wonder kids are so dumb they don't even read the whole thing

>>688263636
This sonuvabitch is sort of right. He distributed the 2 to the numbers in the parenthesis, and then continues with the operation. He's not wrong, and neither is 288. The order of operations is very ambiguous. Minute Physics did a great explanation of it

My calculator says 2 faglords

>>688266568
you only distribute after all other operations have been taken care of

10/5(2+4x)
2(2+4x)
4+8x

not

10/5(2+4x)
10/10+20x
1/1+2x

very different answers

>>688263349
(9+3) = (12)
48 / 2 = 24
24(12) = 288
288 is the answer

Is this an autism joke because 288/2 is 142?

People wonder why /b/ counting to 5 is a decent test of our abilities.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SB3Ekgt1pHw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

>>688263349
don't be stupid it's 36

>>688263349

48/2(9+3) = X
48/2 = X/(9+3)
48 = 2(X/12)
48 = 2X / 24
48/24 = 2X
2 = 2x
X = 1

48/2(9+3) = 1

if you're not retarded and can do OOO

48/2(9+3) - parenthesis first
48/2(12) - left-to-right div/mul
24(12) - left-to-right div/mul
288

File: IMG_20160606_013449.jpg (306 KB, 600x972) Image search: [Google]

306 KB, 600x972

Just use Wolfram Alpha, you retards.

wolframalpha
dot
com
slash
input/?i=48%C3%B72%289%2B3%29&x=8&y=7

>>688269729
Brackets first laddo

>>688263349
You deserve do die if you don't calculate 288. Google will back me up, wolfram alpha will back me up. Anyone studying math or computer science will back me up.

>>688269810
the answer is still 2 imo

>>688263349
2

>>688270881
He did the brackets first you dull twit. They're called parentheses to all but the illiterate dull citizens of the U.K. Enjoy your bovine spongiform encephalopathy

Fucking pre-algebra-taking 8th graders know that the answer is 288.

>>688269040
Where's the joke?

>>688270881
There are no [brackets] in the equation only (parentheses). Therefore the order starts with the latter.

>>688271255
() = parentheses
[] = brackets
{} = braces

2 is a simpler and more elegant solution than 288 and God likes this solution better

so it is 2

File: download (1).jpg (6 KB, 258x196) Image search: [Google]

6 KB, 258x196

some of you dont know pemdas fucking autistics haha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB3Ekgt1pHw

Are any of you more qualified than this bearded Berkley bro?

>>688263349
Nobody fucking writes equations this way, it's deliberately confusing and has nothing to do with autism.

>>688271512
The order is innermost to outer. The order is traditionally (parentheses), then [brackets], then {braces}.

PEMDAS motherfuckers

Its 288.
Everyone else is either wrong or trolling

>>688271605
Agreed

Pemdas so 2, not hard

File: 1458356670892.jpg (69 KB, 465x377) Image search: [Google]

69 KB, 465x377

>>688269040
>288/2 is 142

>>688271950
What's your point. There's only (). That's what comes first. Then left to right in this evaluation.

>>688272343
what do you think pedals means?

File: Screenshot_2016-06-07-01-08-46.png (70 KB, 600x1024) Image search: [Google]

70 KB, 600x1024

>>688269810

File: uI7A5Vg.jpg (19 KB, 600x591) Image search: [Google]

19 KB, 600x591

>>688272613
u got it bud

>>688272920
Something a car has?

This isnt facebook, and your not my fucking aunt

>>688272343
left to right you stupid fuck
288

>>688273194
So why bring up {} and []. Stay white and innumerate.

>>688273440
*you're, honey. <3 Your Aunt

>>688273684
u right. enjoy this garlic bread meme 4 ur troubles

File: a0ixVAD.jpg (81 KB, 609x887) Image search: [Google]

81 KB, 609x887

>>688273684
>>688274089
oops 4got 2 upload

>>688273547
M before d so 2

>>688273982
Which one

>>688273684
You're probably not the person I thought I was originally replying to bit still kys and don't forget to add 0i to the answer, twit.

>>688263891
PEMDAS bitch

>>688263891
Are you fucking daft?
PEMDAS.
48/2(9+3)
48/2(12)
48/24
2
dumb cunt

>>688274266
Don't take pemdas so literally.
The order is as follows:

Parentheses/brackets/braces
Exponents
Multiplication/division from left to right
Addition/subtraction from left to right

Consider finishing middle school.

>>688274266
multiplication and division have equal weight, left to right

>>688274544
That nigga pemdas'd that 'quation like you mom suck my cock.

>>688274762
you went full retard

>>688263891
correct,

I got 36 too, am I a tard?

>>688275216
you are a very special kind of tard

Nobody uses the obelus you douches. But if you do, everything before it is the numerator. Everything after is the denominator. Then follow your orders of operation.

2

>>688274762
I'll take the bait.
P
E
(MD)
(AS)

Multiplication and Division have the same precedence, so you solve them left to right.

Same with Addition and Subtraction.

Why the fuck are you multiplying the 2(12) before dividing if they have the same precedence?

>>688263349
48 ÷ 2(9+3)=
48 ÷ 2(12)=
48 ÷ 24=
2

>>688274762
3 step you went right to left which is wrong
wrong
WRONG

>>688275397
But also this:
48 ÷ 2(9+3)=
48 ÷ 2(12)=
(48 ÷ 2)(12)=
24 * 12=
288

2
Brackets first, then multiply by two. Divide 48 by the product.

high levels of autism are being detected ITT

>>688274762
> u stoopit
> [thing I don't know]
>[demonstration of thing I don't know]
>[demonstration demonstrates you don't know thing you don't know]
>"qed, faggots"

File: F-Fail.jpg (69 KB, 430x279) Image search: [Google]

69 KB, 430x279

>>688275662
NO

http://www.matthewcompher.com/posts/trouble-with-semantics-the-obelus-or-division-symbol-%C3%B7/

File: well?.jpg (492 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]

492 KB, 1920x1080

>>688276027
well, what is it then?

File: tumblr_o4dg98shVY1u0fuseo1_1280.jpg (113 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]

113 KB, 960x960

>>688263636
>>688263666 (checked)
>>688263745
>>688263771
>>688264143
>>688264150
>>688264180
>>688264459
>>688264797
>>688265000 (checked)
>>688265016
>>688265056
>>688266248
>>688266282
>>688266411 (checked)
>>688266568
>>688266598
>>688268364
>>688269040
>>688269441
>>688269464
>>688271019
>>688271176
>>688271626
>>688272343
>>688274266 (checked)
>>688274544 (checked)
>>688274762
>>688275216
>>688275309
>>688275397
>>688275662

PEMDAS is utter trash, people.

Use GEMA.

Grouping
Exponents
Multiplication and Division (same precedence)
Addition and Subtraction (same precedence)

The answer is 288, and if you don't think so, then you might as well microwave yourself.

File: bBOZPrWtNUthS0d7KG4yy-zrm1sukqU5er7n8NKbfHo.png (51 KB, 412x280) Image search: [Google]

51 KB, 412x280

>>688276649
kek

File: 1464499844708.png (811 KB, 1080x702) Image search: [Google]

811 KB, 1080x702

>>688276887
I approve.
Here is spaghetti dog of approval, just for you.

>>688276365
288
brackets first
divide 48 by 2 (because you go left to right)
24 (12)
288

>>688276206
There's no ambiguity here or trouble with semantics. We've got two cases: the problem it the OP 48/2(9+2) which is un doubtably 288 or 48/(2(9+2)) which is different. I didn't even bother to read you shit article. The answer to the question is 288. It will never be 2.
Pro tip, your a faggot.

For those still not convinced it's 288, remember that a/b = a*(1/b). Therefore, the problem can be reworked.

48/2*(9+3)

= 48/2*12

= 48*(1/2)*12, since 48/2 = 48*(1/2)

= 24*12

= 288

>2004 study

Ideas.

>>688276649
I'll just leave the checking to you

>>688263349
48÷2(9+3)

If you follow PEMDAS, that means you do parenthesis first, then exponents
9+3=12^2, equalling 144. 48÷144=.3333

Or, I forget what it's called, where you multiply each parenthesis number itself by the number outside
>2x9=18
>2X3=6
>18+6=24
Making that the end of the equation
So
>48÷24 = 2

File: well no shit.jpg (52 KB, 624x425) Image search: [Google]

52 KB, 624x425

>>688277194
ah, I see where you went wrong.
After you solve the bracket, you gotta do the closest operation. In this case, it's multiplying by 2

Divide 48 by 24. You get 2.

it's 2 anon

>>688274762

You do the part in the parenthesis first then go left to right. Also, please keep in mind that division and multiplication are different sides of the same operation, thus have the same priority.

>>688263349

48/2(9+3) = x
>multiply both sides by 2
48/(9+3) = 2x
>addition in parentheses
48/12 = 2x
>divide 48 by 12
4 = 2x
>divide both sides by 2
2 = x