>>686321295
>for all intensive purposes
Kill yourself

>>686321295
so if i draw someone who's being killed, i'm a murderer? should i be arrested?

>>686321295
nice bait.

>>686321295
maybe because it doesnt actually hurt anyone? i suppose thats why hentai beastiality is legal. just taking guesses here

>>686321486
I second the motion.

>>686321295
Let us discuss this matter further. Post more so we may see the scope of the matter in greater detail.

>>686321486
Top kek

>>686321295
>intensive

Intents and purposes*

Fuck off!

File: 27.jpg (256 KB, 1200x1704) Image search: [Google]

256 KB, 1200x1704

http://www.pomfpomf.moe/doujins/27/

It's illegal in the US. But not enforced very strictly if I recall.

File: simpsons lisa bart3.jpg (10 KB, 253x179) Image search: [Google]

10 KB, 253x179

>>686321295
after we make homosexuality illegal. if we are going to thought-police we might as well start with what doesn't increase the population and causes aids.

>>686321295
Under the rule of the constitution Drawn porn loli is protected by it, because art.

>>686321295
it is porn with no children involved so there is no child porn in it. Just as Genki is not octopus porn it's porn including octopus charackters

File: 1454535382590.jpg (91 KB, 600x800) Image search: [Google]

91 KB, 600x800

>>686321295
>>686322092
it is illegal you fagboi
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

>>686322092
Only in some parts.

>>686322438
I bet Texas has it illegal like butt sex.

Prove me wrong.

>>686321295
because the cp law is made to protect the image of the exposed child and not to punish the audience. without the legal object there is no crime.

File: 1366685664137.jpg (106 KB, 595x546) Image search: [Google]

106 KB, 595x546

>>686322596
>>686322565
>>686322438
>>686322339
>>686321295
>>686321554
JUST GOOGLE
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children

File: sjtASrl.jpg (172 KB, 1200x848) Image search: [Google]

172 KB, 1200x848

>>686323067

I agree, but even if it saves only one kid from being actually molested or raped Im fine with it

B A I T

File: 1454194437550.jpg (496 KB, 860x1214) Image search: [Google]

496 KB, 860x1214

>>686323358
I personally don't give a fuck what people fap to but i just hope people know it is illegal to own/distribute loli

File: azFzAyd.jpg (763 KB, 1225x1062) Image search: [Google]

763 KB, 1225x1062

>>686323825

>>686323943
bullshit. its physically impossible to fit inside such a young girl

File: fqPssGr.jpg (69 KB, 550x780) Image search: [Google]

69 KB, 550x780

>>686324117

File: 1454835927993.jpg (589 KB, 1200x876) Image search: [Google]

589 KB, 1200x876

>>686324005

>>686323067
Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUT, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that
—
There is a fine line between sharing and distribute, but it still exists.

File: CCvxfQu.jpg (533 KB, 2367x3348) Image search: [Google]

533 KB, 2367x3348

>>686324359

I'll just leave this here... es2adizg32j3kob5 (dot) onion

File: YmN4vcv.jpg (175 KB, 1200x848) Image search: [Google]

175 KB, 1200x848

>>686324487

>>686321295
Technically it is
>>686322565
It's illegal federally but rarely enforced unless found with real child pornography, sort of like jail bait girl images

>>686321295
Drawings are not reality, when you outlaw fiction you are going against the freedom of speech of others. Confusing a drawing or a book, ideas or anything that is not real to actual reality has even a medical name, it is delirium, it is when people cannot differentiate between both.

So It is only illegal in countries where freedom of speech and creativity are greatly censored, shit countries like the US.

>>686324487
see
>>686323943
>>686324005
>>686324261
>>686324380
>>686324524
>>686324737
this dude is clearly distributing child pornography

File: f55N5m5.jpg (987 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]

987 KB, 1000x1000

>>686324993

>>686321295
>intensive purposes

I hate this loli shit too but come the fuck on

>>686325101
If you are going to dump, post real lolis not those dwarves.

File: I66tqfO.jpg (60 KB, 600x700) Image search: [Google]

60 KB, 600x700

>>686325159

>>686325181
Toddlercon is best -con

>>686325311
this one is ok, i'm not into chubbies.

>>686325311
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children

File: lmrcNAN.jpg (417 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]

417 KB, 1000x1000

>>686325417
How about dis?

>>686325480

>>686325311
Toddlers are da bestest

File: 1454546086539.jpg (30 KB, 489x399) Image search: [Google]

30 KB, 489x399

>>686325560

>>686325480
Good thing these aren't children, dumbass. Look up the definition. Do these look like "Real and identifiable" to you? These are drawings of figments of the imagination.

You should try to shut down Hollywood with stupid logic like that, since, you know, all the murder, rape, and all. Since you're so worried about figments of the imagination and fictional characters.

File: D2EecUg.jpg (57 KB, 554x760) Image search: [Google]

57 KB, 554x760

>>686325813

how can a drawing have an age?

>>686324955
>Uses freedom of speech as a shield for loli porn

File: Justdoit.jpg (48 KB, 516x508) Image search: [Google]

48 KB, 516x508

>>686326023

>>686326023
loli is art. plebs don't understand.

>>686321295
>>686321486
Straaaiiight up

>>686321486
>>686322012

To be fair:
Purpose: intention or objective
Intent: intention or purpose.
Intensive: thorough or vigorous

So, intents and purpose = purposes and purpose
Intensive purpose = thorough purpose

It's a common enough mistake since most people consider intent and purpose the same thing. Granted purpose is the point of the object, intent is the reason for it.
I.e. a Gun's purpose it to shoot a bullet, it's intent is to make sure OP kills them-self.

It's a doggy dog world out there op

>>686321295
It's illegal i Sweden

>>686326023
Show me one instance of these drawings growing up to be contributing members of society and I'll agree it's messed up.

>>686321295
They're drawings you nigger

>>686326368
everything good is illegal in Sweden

>>686322364
>"it's illegal in the U.S. But not enforced very strictly if I recall"
>"it's illegal fagboy"

Kill yourself anon

>>686326163
Don't get me wrong, I'm all about lolis, but when you're bringing the first amendment into it... It doesn't matter to me man. My phone, PC, and google drive, which isn't encrypted, is all flooded with this shit, and nothing has happened to me so I'm not worried about it being illegal. It's pretty hard to get arrested for doing shit on the surface web as long as you're not completely autistic

>>686326239
No, dude, just no . It completely changes the meaning.

It's intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.

"all intents and purposes" is completely inclusive. "All intensive purposes" is specifically ONLY the intensive purposes.

>>686321295
why is CP illegal? no one is hurt in loli, cp cant say the same thing

>>686322104
Yeah I agree, heroin addiction is a horrible thing that causes aids

File: QZrMzfR.jpg (118 KB, 800x600) Image search: [Google]

118 KB, 800x600

>>686326674

>>686326368
Well, Sweden is obviously too busy turning into New Iraq to do anything right.

>>686326741
>I.e. a Gun's purpose it to shoot a bullet, it's intent is to make sure OP kills them-self.
>missing the point.
>entire thing was for a joke.

File: image.jpg (736 KB, 1200x1600) Image search: [Google]

736 KB, 1200x1600

Lolicon is OBJECTIVELY the most satisfying thing to masturbate to. You honestly have some sort of degenerative brain disease if you think otherwise.

File: qWa1PSZ.jpg (297 KB, 873x1261) Image search: [Google]

297 KB, 873x1261

>>686326772
2D porn is best porn, no women hurt in 2D porn.

>>686326023
I don't care about loli, but put anything in there instead of loli and it fits, loli will only not fit for you because you are offended by it, in the end it is just a drawing and fiction, it is something that didn't happen in reality.

The only point you made was show me that you are okay with censoring stuff you don't like and you can't differentiate between reality and fantasy.

Even in japan there are tons of people that cringe at loli and shota stuff, but they know it is just fiction, just drawings so they don't give a shit, because they are not retarded christian moms in the US.

>>686326674
My hard drive and google drive is full of cp/jb and nothing has happened to me. Must mean those things are legal ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>686326772
Loli hurt too, they can injure your wrist.

>>686325813
i totally agree with you that it should not be illegal. but it sadly is
"visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct"

>>686326972
real cp was legal in Japan until very recently. The US is kind of a bully about spreading its laws to other countries.

File: rZDKPHZ.png (385 KB, 600x674) Image search: [Google]

385 KB, 600x674

>>686327047

File: 01.jpg (160 KB, 1719x1151) Image search: [Google]

160 KB, 1719x1151

Stupid child molesters, you just attracted Dr. Seuss to this thread.

File: 02.jpg (205 KB, 1711x1154) Image search: [Google]

205 KB, 1711x1154

>>686327125

File: 03.jpg (113 KB, 1727x1155) Image search: [Google]

113 KB, 1727x1155

>>686327174

File: 4ebf64ba8c434f838e9c3db6786b1cc5.jpg (576 KB, 1006x1000) Image search: [Google]

576 KB, 1006x1000

>>686326849
So she finally got the D from her teacher.

File: SJXKfUY.jpg (612 KB, 800x1131) Image search: [Google]

612 KB, 800x1131

>>686327125

>>686326953
Funfact. the women who drew that was molested as a little girl.

File: 04.jpg (210 KB, 1723x1150) Image search: [Google]

210 KB, 1723x1150

>>686327223

>>686326972
I literally responded to the first response to that post and said I like lolis. It's just hilarious that people are trying to defend it with freedom of speech. People use freedom of speech for everything, it's a shield for so much shit. There's a lot of reasons I think loli porn is fine, like it being visually satisfying, and a healthy alternative for people with sexual desires for children, but freedom of speech? Cmon man

File: 4L_7xWLmHL0.jpg (132 KB, 800x550) Image search: [Google]

132 KB, 800x550

>>686326972
>Implying only Christians are disgusted by child pornography
Quite the opposite actually.

Pic related

damn, why do I like little girls so anons?

>>686324993
I don't understand in that way, the people who came here came with the intention of share this material send and receive. He could be held liable if in an inappropriate place he as the only holder of that kind of material distribute for a large number of people

>WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUT

>>686325813
(c)Nonrequired Element of Offense.—
It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.

They changed and updated it to that about a year back.

>>686327377
Actual christians are, I never said anything about the priests kek

File: wqbOOHF.png (421 KB, 600x780) Image search: [Google]

421 KB, 600x780

>>686327314
>>686327359

>>686327047
My point was that if I haven't been caught yet I'm not worried about getting caught at all.

>>686327082
>that depicts a minor
"minor" is a legal term.

In US law, if you look into it further, you will find that a "minor" is a real and identifiable person under the age of 18.

Federally, Loli is without a doubt legal in the US. Some states might have some old obscenity laws that might include loli, but as a nation, loli is legal. And it only makes sense. How could you enforce the law? Who is harmed? A drawing can't be harmed, it can't sit in court and cry or write to politicians. It's just a drawing, and it's not illegal.

If you made real cp and did line drawings of it, that would be illegal because it depicts a real person. These are cartoon characters, bro. relax, don't listen to the trolls.

In some other countries, you might look at the law, since it's different in places, but in the US, you're good.

File: 05.jpg (220 KB, 1722x1140) Image search: [Google]

220 KB, 1722x1140

>>686327359

>>686327546
See
>>686327416

>>686327407
Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, RECEIVES, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting
>RECEIVES

>>686324359
more please?

File: 06.jpg (169 KB, 1728x1155) Image search: [Google]

169 KB, 1728x1155

>>686327619

File: a482c7fae1b0e6d44f1715defd866fa4.gif (1 MB, 800x600) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 800x600

>>686327619

>>686327391
Because they're soft, curious, cute, harmless, and easily manipulated.

File: 07.jpg (171 KB, 1730x1149) Image search: [Google]

171 KB, 1730x1149

>>686327687

>>686327314
She like then, good. no harm done

File: 1453413460596.gif (102 KB, 300x225) Image search: [Google]

102 KB, 300x225

>>686327687

File: 1464113353847.png (1 MB, 1134x1504) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1134x1504

>>686327683
allright

>>686321295
It's never been quite "legal" albeit you OP are a fucking sniveling faggot and that makes your opinion worthless. People will fap and that is always gonna happen regardless of what material they fap to. No one is hurt MAKING loli only that it hurts your special snowflake feelings when some one takes the time to make-draw obscene fiction to cater to sick fucks that fap to just that. You believe they will go on to rape or abuse children you sorry fucking white knight. Go back to {insert some SJW flame site"; this shit belongs away from /b/.

>>686327360
Where do you draw the line?
Does the book "lolita" count? I would say that's straight up art man. I'm not comfortable with the implicit censorship.

>>686327639
They're still neither real, nor are they identifiable.

They don't have birth certificates, IDs, or any other actual identification outside of a few anime.

File: 1453417915959.gif (3 MB, 160x220) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 160x220

>>686327755

What about nudist crap and creepshots how illegal is that?

>>686327391
Ahh, yes, that is correct. And cuddly and loves giving/getting lots of hugs and kisses!

>>686326948
yeah im clearly retarded for not getting my dick hard to children
top fucking kek

>>686327639
>>686327416
No, that's old and has been repealed as unconstitutional.

If you don't believe it, show me this law right now. Reference it, please, so I can enlighten anyone interested.

They tried and failed years ago. So if you think you know what you're talking about. What is this new law? (which doesn't exist)

>>686327360
Yes man, freedom of speech. Forget the loli concept.

Let us think about something else, let us say that from now on movies that depict violence were banned. Illegal.

That means people that write scripts that include violent acts are then censored to include it in their productions.

That means their freedom of speech is affected as creators.

Not to show you that you are indeed biased, change "violent acts" for "loli".

It IS the same, they are all just ideas, and ideas getting censored are an attack of people's freedom of speech yes.

I don't know why people think it is BS, it is very simple and easy to see, but people have their bias.

>>686327751

Ahh, yes, that is correct. And cuddly and loves giving/getting lots of hugs and kisses!

File: 1452345782022.gif (4 MB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]

4 MB, 1000x1000

>>686327949

>>686327391
Because they are the best.

Depends on the state and country, but in the united states even if your state deems it illegal, it is still not enforced and you could probably talk your way out of it in court.

>>686327975
Few typos there but should be understandable...

File: image.jpg (112 KB, 1024x576) Image search: [Google]

112 KB, 1024x576

>>686327797
oh god. is it bad this gives me erection? want my gf to cut her hair short dye it and wear boots. I always wanted to be trap/trans but she wont support. so ima turn her instead
>her butt

>>686327969
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

Section (c)

>>686327797
I'll take moar all day Anon

File: 1399055487122.jpg (413 KB, 1002x882) Image search: [Google]

413 KB, 1002x882

>>686328180
I approve of reverse trapping her. Then fuck her ass.

File: 1458951006264.gif (1 MB, 720x480) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 720x480

>>686327975
i agree that it should not be illegal but it is you fucktard just read
18 U.S. Code § 1466A

File: CT_logo2.png (14 KB, 320x177) Image search: [Google]

14 KB, 320x177

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors#United_States

Without any doubt, loli is legal in the US on a federal level. Just look into it yourself and don't get trolled by ignorant fucks trying to get a rise out of you.

Some countries it is illegal, but freedomland loves its artistic expressions.

File: image.jpg (98 KB, 800x800) Image search: [Google]

98 KB, 800x800

>>686327841
I don't draw a line and personally I'm against censorship. I can't think of the specific case but there's always people, especially SJW's going on about freedom of speech and expression. So maybe if I were to draw a line, I'd say shit like trying to "free the nipple" or whatever is pretty fucking rediculous. I don't consider my opinion to be above any other /b/ros (except cucks and feminists) but that's my two cents on the subject. I'll contribute some stuff in the meantime

File: 1461705719157.jpg (363 KB, 740x1036) Image search: [Google]

363 KB, 740x1036

>>686328296

>>686328450
It doesn't matter, I know it is illegal in your shit country, but it is not on mine so I don't really give a shit.

I was just making my point.

File: image.jpg (121 KB, 1024x576) Image search: [Google]

121 KB, 1024x576

>>686328390
i only ass fuck her as punishment. gonna make her plug both holes though.
thanks for supporting. validation is good.
>got a few mor if wanted

/r/ing a loli for my 4inch penis

>>686328474
lol there are no sources on that wikipedia article you retard
read 18 U.S. Code § 1466A

File: 0d812f74f1b82414ad5af04ca50474cf.jpg (64 KB, 525x955) Image search: [Google]

64 KB, 525x955

>>686328606

>>686328206
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
Still has the 'minor' defintion, which falls into
>>686327891

If you can provide legal IDENTIFICATION for these minors depicted in these cartoons, you'll have a leg to stand on in court.

File: 0dc7ff32c37505f9dac388e201874ffd.jpg (256 KB, 900x1200) Image search: [Google]

256 KB, 900x1200

>>686328691

>>686328734
She might work, but I think I might need smaller

>>686328599
Fucking duuuump

>>686328776
I want to give that lesbian the dick

File: 1b34980f799739b1831f041ffa30cc9a.jpg (397 KB, 465x800) Image search: [Google]

397 KB, 465x800

>>686328788

watch?v=5bHimOJb-Xw

I'm going to babysit a 4 year old girl tomorrow. Ideas as to what to do?

>>686328874
Oh hey it's Puru

File: image.jpg (113 KB, 1024x576) Image search: [Google]

113 KB, 1024x576

>>686328791
oh Anons.
loli pervs be gone. this is not a how to reverse trap your gf thread
>picture more booty

>>686323825
Not in america

File: CG_1 - 08.jpg (110 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

110 KB, 1024x768

>>686328776

File: 1463894179336.jpg (149 KB, 686x1000) Image search: [Google]

149 KB, 686x1000

>>686321295
Because drawings aren't illegal,

File: 1abaeb3fcda693fe1677bc018a73c79d.png (454 KB, 962x1591) Image search: [Google]

454 KB, 962x1591

>>686328788
or dis

>>686328955
someone is going to end up ass raped in prison because of you

>>686328877
Make her favorite food. Read her a book.

>>686328691
see
>>686328738

>>686328877

give her food, take care of her, make sure she's safe, put her to sleep early.

File: 3DNCFY2.jpg (335 KB, 1024x1024) Image search: [Google]

335 KB, 1024x1024

>>686328877

>>686329045
She's super cute but maybe even too small!

File: CG_1 - 09.jpg (83 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

83 KB, 1024x768

>>686328877
Kill yourself.

>>686328858

>>686328206
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

So in other words, if the minor is dead, or can not be found i.e. does not exist. Again, a minor is a real person, not a drawing.

Seriously, man, don't be afraid. Look at any case law in the US. They don't prosecute for cartoons. If someone gets convicted, it's because they had real cp. I know of no cases in the US where someone was jailed on federal charges for just looking at cartoon porn. It would be completely absurd.

you sick fucks this is disgusting

File: CG_1 - 11.jpg (100 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

100 KB, 1024x768

>>686329045
>>686329159
Finny thing - female hand there.

File: 1f8755741318de0f62021160cc3d638e.png (533 KB, 700x800) Image search: [Google]

533 KB, 700x800

>>686329170

>>686329156
Nice cocks

>>686328955
It is legal to WATCH, just not download or distribute. Just like child porn; it is legal to WATCH just not download or distribute.

>inb4 it is illegal
>inb4 anon doesn't know what he's talking about

>>686328738
https://web.archive.org/web/20060913090237/http://www.fbi.gov/page2/march06/obscenity031006.htm

File: CG_1 - 10.jpg (88 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

88 KB, 1024x768

>>686329304
Presenting lolis are the best.

File: 3a0c3f6ad009b30e56913f24ee6ec776.jpg (426 KB, 700x700) Image search: [Google]

426 KB, 700x700

>>686329281

>>686327118
Pressure Japan to join the rest of the modern world in banning the fucking molestation of children.

>bully

>>686329156
That looks fun, will do do that with me?

>>686329081
>>686329131
Plan on it!

File: 2ea096e352677c6d90d03f0c55e6dfec.png (1 MB, 1000x1400) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1000x1400

>>686329381

>>686329381
>https://web.archive.org/web/20060913090237/http://www.fbi.gov/page2/march06/obscenity031006.htm
>He was convicted of 74 counts of obscenity and CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.

Yes, and?

File: 1bf37a0b9fae288fa5012f65128f6cee.jpg (247 KB, 874x1330) Image search: [Google]

247 KB, 874x1330

>>686329510

>>686329440
I want to break Tomoyo

>>686327673
RECEIVES with intent to distribute

>>686321295
you are right. it's a breeding ground for pedofiles.

>>686329061
Show me a SINGLE example of a case in the US where someone was jailed for ONLY cartoon porn. You can know of none because there have been none in the US.

Surprise me, come on, show it.

>>686329510
Morality is relative.

File: CG_1 - 12.jpg (91 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

91 KB, 1024x768

>>686329381
Um....they actually cought him with real CP, you know. And that's the basis of his conviction.

>>686328858
You sure you don't want to give her girlfriend the dick? She'll help!

>>686329850
How will she help?
Will she give my dick attention or just guide me?

File: CG_1 - 13.jpg (97 KB, 1024x700) Image search: [Google]

97 KB, 1024x700

>>686329724
Sakura may want you to.

>>686321295
in Texas they said that it was okay because it give people with impulses they couldn't control an outlet where noone was harmed.

>>686329510
Their civilized and ages old culture that stretches into antiquity doesn't need the barbaric presumptions of some new country that won't exist in another hundred years, anyway.

>>686327314
Lots of people who were molested are into it. Male or female. Cycle of abuse and all that.

>>686321486
for all intense porpoises?

File: CG_1 - 27.jpg (101 KB, 1024x819) Image search: [Google]

101 KB, 1024x819

>>686329984
Maybe both. She probably would lick, just to taste Sakura on you.

>>686321295
Because lolis are sexy and something sexy should be protected and encouraged

>>686329994
I know I want me to.

File: CG_1 - 28.jpg (85 KB, 1024x715) Image search: [Google]

85 KB, 1024x715

>>686330180
Reluctant Sakura is reluctant.

>>686327910
Is no one gonna answer this because i'm curious too

>>686330138
I like the idea of her licking my balls and the underside of my shaft

File: 1463327887149s.jpg (4 KB, 250x227) Image search: [Google]

4 KB, 250x227

>>686321295
It just needs its own containment board along with shota, trap, lolli, and furr
>/mi/
Mental illness
>/mi/
A place for faggots

File: CG_1 - 29.jpg (87 KB, 1024x770) Image search: [Google]

87 KB, 1024x770

And that's all my lesbian loli dump for today. Source is Fuji Shinobu, easy to find on Gelbooru.

File: 4a0d6773f1715993916dc32734694e0e.jpg (303 KB, 827x900) Image search: [Google]

303 KB, 827x900

>>686330375

>>686330375
What do you think /b/ is you enormous faggot?

>>686330305
I want to force my cock in her

File: CG_1 - 22.jpg (96 KB, 1024x710) Image search: [Google]

96 KB, 1024x710

>>686330334
>>686330180
Well, okay, just for you.

File: ct.jpg (81 KB, 467x467) Image search: [Google]

81 KB, 467x467

Restricting sexual expression in drawings or animated games and videos actually increases the rate of sexual crime by eliminating an outlet for desires that could motivate crime.

There has been much evidence as countries ban it, that shows that banning child pornography has been directly correlated with a dramatic increase in child sexual abuse.

Politicians are fucking with nature and shit they simply don't understand because they are pandering to their perceived constituency. It's dangerous to restrain the free expressions of people's natural impulses and countries that do so, inevitably fail or must change.

>>686330581
Random. It's not random if it's constantly flooded with the above mentioned cancer threads. They did it for /mlp/.

>>686327910
Umm, not illegal, unless you don't have their express consent and it is not taken while in a sexual manner. Creepshots/upskirt shots of kids, are completely legal, at least here in the USA (minus the specific states where it is illegal)

>>686330698
Untainted lesbo loli pussy is the BEST

File: 2e5b2a241091d2c9cfa0b610f3c56abd.jpg (283 KB, 583x700) Image search: [Google]

283 KB, 583x700

>>686330805

>>686329261
I can accept that as a take on it, as well, I found this:

18 U.S. Code § 2252A
(c) It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge
(2) the alleged child pornography was not produced using any actual minor or minors.

So, it's not considered child porn under
18 U.S. Code § 2252A (not less than 15 years nor more than 40 years)

However, they still could be tried for 18 U.S. Code § 1466 (imprisonment for not more than 5 years) for obscene material depending on the court.

>>686321295
Will you hold cartoon depictions of other heinous crimes (murder, torture, rape (of adults)) to the same standard? Why or why not?

File: 1458500687682s.jpg (4 KB, 97x125) Image search: [Google]

4 KB, 97x125

>>686330805

>>686330805
So I should bang more kids to watch less child! Thanks anon!

File: 1462543888765.jpg (100 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]

100 KB, 400x400

>>686330805

>>686330809
No, /mlp/ was a joke that got way the fuck out of hand. Its just to bad the Mods lost their nuts and stopped banning those faggots after the first wave. Now were stuck with a pointless board that should have stayed balled up in this cesspool where it belongs.

File: jewlover.jpg (36 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]

36 KB, 480x360

>>686326023
you are now an a accomplice to OJ

turn yourself in

"Humbert fantasizes about meeting and eventually molesting the 12-year-old daughter of an impoverished family, the McCoos, from whom he agreed to rent an apartment."
"Even after finding out Humbert is a pedophile"

>>686331157
>>686331160 (literal retard)
>>686331196
He's right you know.
A dumb reaction image won't change it.

>>686331196
this is completely irrelevant and was a waste of your time

File: ass-rash.jpg (49 KB, 800x600) Image search: [Google]

49 KB, 800x600

>>686331196
i posted a jpg i win !!!!
way to go fagget

>>686331458
Don't tell them that. It's all they have in the face of facts.

It's legal since they are fictional drawings and can't be proven to be minors even if they are depicted that way

File: gaypornbeating.jpg (70 KB, 752x520) Image search: [Google]

70 KB, 752x520

everybody is now an accomplice too the wonderland murders

everybody turn yourself in

>>686331480
> It's completely irrelevant that he's seventeen
> says the other teenager
Yes, his post must've been very stirring to those in the crowd so young they've never heard it said before.
Everyone and their dog has thought and said something similar.
Long story short: the world is a thousand times more complicated than you think it is, and your impotence is very apparent.

File: art_houdini_082914.jpg (179 KB, 584x360) Image search: [Google]

179 KB, 584x360

Many qualify as obscenity under current statute. But it's legal to own since without a victim it still fails to meet the standard specific to child porn.

It's legal magic that keeps the people who post it from not going to jail and the website that briefly hosts it from having to report it and the admins on the street. If the website hosting it specifically had a board for it which they charged access to they'd go to jail for distribution of obscene materials. Until recently they couldn't go after the person who made the obscenity but now if you sell it to someone who distributes it you can go to jail. This was constitutionally tested on people who made films. See http://boingboing.net/2008/10/07/adult-film-director.html

Anyway on many levels unless it is perceived to specifically pass Miller you can go to jail. The three prong test. You probably learned about this in high school journalism or ethics class. Unless your school wasn't up to Kansas standards and have you seen Kansas? They go after nude statues in parks as obscenity.

>>686332109
>the world is a thousand times more cimplicated than you think it is
>trust me, i'm from 4chan

Sure. Chances are I'm older and have experienced more than you, but whatever you say.

>>686332109
Dude, I bet most people here are not only over 17 but older than you.

>>686322968
Sauce?

File: This-is-how-you-sound.png (5 KB, 563x86) Image search: [Google]

5 KB, 563x86

>>686321295
Don't be a fag OP.

Also:
>For all intents and purposes.

>>686332447
Lol, if you believe the only problem here is some boogyman politician you've got some more of the world to see.

Too much jibber jabber and not enough loli.

Who gives a shit? Even if it was illegal here, (and it's not) why would I give a shit? Unless you advertise it to everyone or fuck up and show someone who's got a stick up their ass about it, nobody cares or even knows.

tl:dr who gives a fuck