>>686137185
how is this cringe tho

>>686137409
OP is gay..?

>>686137185
We do, maybe we should start one

>>686137553
No shit

>>686137409
>Shad

>>686137920
Shad is probably better than whatever meme artist you love

>>686138014
>Shad
>better than anyone

>>686138147
>doesn't name an artist

Looks like I'm right

>>686138014
Unless you like disproportionate bodies, moles, freckles on characters that don't have them and a whole bunch of unnecessary shit then no, Shad is a hack.

>>686138266
You're going to say they're shit anyway so what's the point?

DarkDP is the best hentai artist like ever

>>686138423
Autism

>>686138598
Said the pot to the kettle.

>>686138766
Get help

>>686138766
I love starting shit this

File: 1459109365439.gif (4 MB, 347x244) Image search: [Google]

4 MB, 347x244

>>686138423
>You're going to say they're shit anyway so what's the point?
What an argument.

>>686138858
Why would I? That was my first post in the thread friendo.

>>686139034
Congratulations autismo

>>686138978
There was nothing to argue in the first place. Someone's taste being shit or not doesn't make Shad a good artist.

>>686139091
Get help

>>686138978
>implying there's a point in arguing with someone who's just going to go "NO HE'S SHIT REEEEE" just to defend Shad's shit art

>>686139213
Get help

>>686139346
Het Gelp

>>686139457
pleh teG

>>686139527
pleG teh

File: 1451290334664.png (119 KB, 370x480) Image search: [Google]

119 KB, 370x480

>>686139172
>>686139339
So, why exactly is Shad a bad artist? What makes a good artist?

>>686139614
Decent anatomy and perspective helps. OP already provided a bad example.

>>686139614
>So, why exactly is Shad a bad artist?
see >>686138423
Specifically
>disproportionate bodies, moles, freckles on characters that don't have them and a whole bunch of unnecessary shit

>>686139614
Not be shadman, fuck shad I hate him I hate him I hate him fuck him that fucking asshole piece of shit RRRREEEEEEEEEEE

>>686139614
Disproportionate bodies is the only valid argument against shad. Everything else like moles and freckles and piercings are a design choice and only butthurt fags nitpick against it because they just don't like it

>>686137185
I'm guessing it's because of how wonky her leg anatomy looks..?

>>686140009
>Everything else like moles and freckles and piercings are a design choice
There's a "design choice" and then there's overloading it on a character that didn't have them in the first place.

>>686140009
As someone that hates Shad's art I agree.

>>686139810
I mean i'd like to see you draw something better

File: 37622446e0f0429acb55acd142ddcccf50db09ca420e5fa3a81fe40190975c6a_1.jpg (19 KB, 360x253) Image search: [Google]

19 KB, 360x253

>>686139751
OP here, i just dont give a fuck

>>686140357
This is bait. Nobody believes this line anymore.

>>686140357
If you pay me for it.

>>686140303
Yeah you don't like it, dont confuse your personal taste with shit art, retard.

>>686140687
Even though you're right about cosmetic details, that doesn't excuse shit like the gross stump legs in the OP pic.

>>686140836
Ur negativity gives me a raging boner

>>686139810
>Moles, freckles on characters that don't have them

You're honestly arguing this?
Omg this guy drew my cartoon character but didn't represent him with 100% realism

Get a life

>>686140687
Take your own advice there jackass.
If a character has none of those defining features that's not an excuse to go buck wild on it with gaudy shit that doesn't look good.

Take this thread to /ic/ they'll love it

>>686141127
>my character isn't being accurately portrayed waaaahhhh

Cry more faggot

>>686141129
/ic/? U mean >>>/trash/?

File: 1464185267257.gif (742 KB, 340x256) Image search: [Google]

742 KB, 340x256

>>686139751
>>686139810
Well, if you're going to complain about adding freckles to characters that usually don't have them, you might as well also complain about every other porn-artist, drawing cartoon and / or anime characters in an out-of-character scenario (i.e. participating in sexual acts). I can definitely see why that would upset you and make you dislike his work as you obviously have other preferences, but honestly, that really isn't an argument when it comes to an artist being shit or solid.
Like >>686140009 said, it's a design choice and part of an artists style.
Shad also seems to at least have basic anatomy down / is at least over-average regarding cartoon-style drawings.
He does make mistakes and is far from absolutely perfect, but literally saying he's bad even though his overall work is pretty solid, just isn't right.
You can find little flaws like the "stump legs" in OPs pic in most pics from any artist, and even professional ones. Sure it would be better without those, but my guess is that you'd be looking for the 1% if you really consider everyone making those mistakes bad.

I DO acknowledge that he oftentimes has a lot of trouble in terms of perspective, I'll give you that.

>>686141244
>hey you know what'll make the Mona Lisa look better
>a mustache!
>Hey it's my design I can do what I want even if it ruins the image

>>686137185
I heard you like cock.

Honestly, I thought you were saying sexual cartoons in general were cringe.
But you're only hating on one artist? For no good reason except that you're unhappy with how his drawings represent your lovable waifu fetishes?

You're the cringe one here

>>686141350
>in an out-of-character scenario
Yeah no, there's a difference between design and setting anon.

>>686141468
No thats ur father faggot

>>686141398
You're funny flim-fam, I'm done arguing with you tho. Stay mad

>>686141398
Yeah that's about how art works

>>686141521
He is gonna have a hard time when he is being skull fucked by maggot.

Why not promote the artists you find good instead of bashing the ones you don't like?

All your thread will have done in the end is give Shadman a bit more attention, and probably a new fan or 10

File: Tip+top+kek+_1b54ab487802dfba2fd46e60fb6713ca.gif (114 KB, 300x150) Image search: [Google]

114 KB, 300x150

>>686141703
At least he won't resist

>>686137185
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JF3yrdv3eY8
cringey

God Mode Cringe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4r91mc8pbo

File: 8870e86ac09740ab0a98475f5174d27e.jpg (41 KB, 500x308) Image search: [Google]

41 KB, 500x308

>>686142139
>>686141942

File: 1464185354854.gif (2 MB, 238x174) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 238x174

>>686141517
Sure there is, but the point mostly remains the same. I'm sure you know what I'm getting at, even if you don't agree.
Hey, believe or not, but as much as I'm defending Shad for being a good artist, they don't fit my personal taste either. I mean, call him mediocre / average all you want, but literally calling him bad (not in your opinion, but in general) for stuff like that? Come on, bro.

I never really found what is so appealing about shadman's drawings. He puts way too much unneeded details that it makes his pictures borderline uncomfortable to look at.

This is the best cringe thread ive ever seen, faggots arguing over hentai artists