>>681291474
5

without looking, yes

>>681291474
Tacos

You would've used 6 to make that arrangement.
>5

>>681291474
can be 6 or 8 depending on if there are 4 halfs missing or not

0 you retards

>>681291474
well, first you have to define what "here" is

haha none nigga I ate em all

>>681291905
Bump 6 or 8

8, the question does not specify whole watermelons.

>>681292258
fucking copycat of >>681291885

>>681291474
there's 5 of them

>>681292340
It doesnt specify pieces of watermelon either you fuckwit. If there is a piece of watermelon on the table u dont go like: hey look, its a watermelon

>>681292340
>>681292631
it's one of those questions that are intentionally made to be vague and interpreted by everyone their own way
like, you'll get an answer and the asshole that made the picture will be like
>nah anon, that's not right

not a single person recognized the lines made by the mirrors.

fucking dumbcunts everywhere.

8.
Each piece is from a different watermelon.

>>681292631

No, but you would say: "There's watermelon there", and if you sliced up a watermelon, if one were to ask "how much watermelon do we have" you wouldn't say 'one'.

Each watermelon in the OP can be considered it's own but the ambiguity of question, and thus the most logical answer would not be to hastily combine them together. Your misunderstanding is forgiven.

>>681292879
that's because there isn't any faggot

File: perfectlynormalstar.png (9 KB, 543x534) Image search: [Google]

9 KB, 543x534

>>681291474
2 and 12/4's you fucking retard

>>681291474
Pretty sure the right answer is four.

>>681292879
so its just two and a half

>>681291474
There are only two watermelons.

The 3/4 watermelons in the corners are not complete, and therefore does not constitute a full watermelon. The four halves in the middle however, are obviously two watermelons that have been cut down the middle. It is impossible to tell where the missing 1/4 pieces from the corner melons are, so I can only assume they've been eaten by niggers.

>>681292879

Each piece has a clearly definable rind, there's no mirrors.

>>681292631
>>681292857
It's not 'vague' you fucking autists, it starts with "how MANY", not "how MUCH"

how much = 8 pieces
how many = 1.25*

*becuase of the 3 mirrors.

>>681293245
there's no mirrors you ragingfaggot

>>681293245
Where's the 3 mirrors cunt?

>>681293206
the rind looks reversed in each mirrors: its exactly the same as normal human mirrors.

They're not fucking Vampire melons, faggit.

>>681293423

Each rind is unique, none of them are even reversed from each other, this is without mentioning the shadows in the image as well. What's sad is you're not trolling, you actually think you're smart.

>>681293615
You're fucking stupid. Go look yourself at the mirror.

File: solution.jpg (215 KB, 683x753) Image search: [Google]

215 KB, 683x753

here the solution, all you had to do was reverse image search the first post.

(look at the shadow cast by the 3/4 melon, it always go's toward the center)

>>681293615
>>681293846

DAD STOP YELLING AT MOM PLEAAAASE ;'(
I AM GOING TO CALL THE POLICE

>>681293935

Some real tryhard trolling here, anon.

>>681293615
the shadows aren't different, they all fall towards the center of the picture, thanks for pointing out EXACTLY WHY YOUR WRONG

INB4: There's 4 light sources

>>681293935
all the rims look different, you're wrong

even if there were mirrors the picture doesn't say
>how many real melons are here

>>681291474
8. They're all watermelons. Doesn't say whole melons

>>681293935
what are multiple light sources
and the camera angle and mirror locations won't get you that shot w/o the mirrors giving themselves away

>>681293206
why do you think they could photoshop the number of watermelonses, but not the rind covers of them?

>>681294049

It's a stock image that's professionally lit, so yes, there is likely several light sources.

>>681292631

I do that all the time

>>681291474
5. What retard fails at this?

>>681291474
There's fucking 6.


SIX.


How dumb are you mother fuckers?

>>681294176
you motherfucker!

>>681294177
this guy >>681293935

>>681294144
If the mirrors are larger than the Mise-en-scène then the audience will never notice, or suspect it.

Do you even Film-studies bro?

>>681291474
There are no melons. It's a picture, not your waifu.

>>681293935

I dunno what would be funnier: if you were serious or if you put this much effort into a joke

>>681292879
You may be the retard master

>>681291474
6
Issume the halves go together then the 4 corner ones

>>681291474
It depends on which way you want to measure the amount of melons.
Are we talking about 1/1 units, or individual melons?
If first, then 5, if not then 6.

>>681294326

Failed your course yet?

it's 'Mise en abyme' when you place multiple mirrors to get the shot like the Op did, not 'mise en scene'.

>>681294118
Then it's fucking 9 nigger.

NINE

>>681294523
there's no obvious cuts in the halfs that would indicate 1/4's glued together.

try again.

There are zero "water melons" in the picture. Because it's fucking watermelon morons.

Theres actually only one half of a watermelon and several mirrors. At least five mirrors. A better question would be "how many mirrors are here?"

File: 15242478522.gif (2 MB, 416x320) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 416x320

>>681294652
>this anon is right

File: abime.jpg (28 KB, 400x300) Image search: [Google]

28 KB, 400x300

>>681294539
>it's 'Mise en abyme' when you place multiple mirrors to get the shot like the Op did

Ding Ding Ding, we have a winner finally.

>>681294326
>>681294539
there's no mirrors tryhards

>>681294539
well, it also happens to be a mis en scene
anyway, its six or eight.
we're talking melons, not fractions.

>>681294529

Or it could be 8 due to how its being phrased.
Its not stated how much watermelon counts as a "watermelon", so by that logic, it could also be 6 as there are "8 pieces of watermelon"

partial watermelons? potentially 8.. probably 6

whole watermelons? precisely 5.
>4 corner melons with 1/4th missing on each. That's 3 whole melons. Four melon halves in the middle, is 2 melons.
3+2=5

THERE IS NO WATERMELON ONLY MIRRORS

>>681294766
You cant see mirrors that are part of a scene, the human eye only recognizes them when you see a partial edge or a reflection of something else in the Mise-en-scene.

It would work exactly the same in real life if there were mirrors that were larger than the range of your peripheral vision.

>>681295075
>tryhard tries hard

>>681295075
>It would work exactly the same in real life if there were mirrors that were larger than the range of your peripheral vision.

hurr durr, how do mirrors work is it magic.

go to school cunt.

>>681294908
HOW CAN MELLONS BE REAL IF OUR EYES ARENT REAL?

>>681294881
IT WOULD BE NINE FUCKING PIECES

'WATER MELON' COUNTS BITCH

NEVER SAID IT WAS STRICTLY LIMITED TO THE IMAGE OF THE FRUIT

>>681294149
>watermelonses

Its ok dude, nobody was expecting you to get this right.

>>681295261

Is the elvish word for "friend" somehow related to watermelons?

>>681295261

WATERMIRROR MELON MAN

>>681294759
you cant see the camera in the photo though?

>>681295535

I'm afraid I have to answer your question with a question:

Will you ever get laid ever

>answer is no definitely not

>>681295555
what camera?

>>681295612

MIRRORS

What the fuck do you gain if you get the roght answer anyway?

>>681295666
Satanic trips don't lie

>>681295666
Ah, but you are mistaken.
I have already fathered two children, and I am married (yes, to a woman). We last had sex yesterday.

>>681295555
Photoshop the camera out. That's why the background is probably white, it's easy to rotoscope.

>>681295690

Quads don't lie, he's right.
This photo wasn't taken with a camera,
It was taken with
A mirror

>>681295777
Aw, damnit! You are right.
Therefore these past 12 years must be a figment of my imagination. It's a disturbing thought, but I suppose I can adapt to it.

>>681295902

Back to back trips confirms you are a permanent kissless virgin neet faggot

>>681295690
its not a painting you dip

the ones in the middle are quarters, not halves

>>681295955
So I see.
Therefore I can only only conclude that nothing is real. I am living in my own dream world, and I guess robots are tapping my body heat for power as we speak.

>>681296082

No you're just a highly autistic neckbeard

>>681291474
0, their is 4 half of a melon and 4 3/4 watermelons.

>>681291474
there are 4 watermeloans trust me im a black i got dis

>>681291474
It depends on you definition of a watermelon the are eight if you count seperatly but 5 if you count together

>>681296082

How autistic do you even have to BE

Your whole life you've been staring into a mirror thinking things were happening around you. But in In reality you've been watching things go by. Everything you think you've accomplished was a reflection of someone else's doing.
You don't understand it.
You sit in silence as everyone else begins to judge you.
>No faggots there's five of him!
You are watermelon.
And you are alone.

>>681295830

So the photo is shot with mirrors, then the camera is removed with photoshop, the rinds are altered to be 8 unique rinds with photoshop, and the shadow are adjusted to appear to becoming from several separate light sources with photoshop.

Nigga, then why would they even use the mirrors?

>>681291474
0 - René Magritte, 2016

>>681296486

There is no camera or rinds or Photoshop or shadows or light sources in the first place


Only mirrors

>>681291474
6 or 8. 1/2 or 3/4 of a Watermelon doesn't make it
"not a watermelon"

>>681296583

then who was mirror?

>>681296174
would be zero if a nigger were their

>>681296657
What we have here is a picture of a dimension populated by infinite fractal mirrors where absolutely no true watermelon can exist, only the illusion of watermelon

>>681292258
>>681291885
lol, i also thought the same way, brain connection confirmed

>discussing fagbook shit
sure is summer in here

>>681296869

>damage control from disinfo agents from mirror dimension

>>681297109

Please fucking kill me

>>681291474
(4)(0.75)+(4)(0.5) = 5

>>681291474
no im stupid af

6 or 8 Depends how you look at it.
/thread

>>681291474
You could make that image with less melons.

The corner melons could be two melons and the center could be one other ones.

So 3.

File: 1461247351006.gif (3 MB, 480x292) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 480x292

>>681291474

0

there's only 2.5 melons, not 5.

You can only see the top half of the melons, not the bottom halfs because they're not there.

I wish the white males in here would stop imposing their definitions on the entities in that photo. Only they can answer the question.

it's made from 6 melons and anyone who says otherwise is fucking autistic retard

>>681291474
There are six watermelons in this picture, cut such that five melon's worth of fruit is in frame while the four quarter sections from the melons in the corners are out of the frame.

>>681301458
You made the pic?

>>681295555
Are you retarded? You can clearly fucking see the cellphone.

File: butthatswrong.jpg (22 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]

22 KB, 400x400

>>681293935

>>681291474
There is no watermelon

>>681291474
to create this photo you'll need 6 water melons,

depending on what you think is a whole watermelon, there is either none, or 5 melons in this picture

/thread

>>681291474
5

>>681303925
>to create this photo you'll need 6 water melons
/thread

File: answeris8.jpg (9 KB, 255x197) Image search: [Google]

9 KB, 255x197

If there was a nigger, there were 0 watermelons.

It's 6 you dumbshits