>>679327893
The Brits are salty but I think America would win by virtue of numbers

Depends on who invaded who as well

Well the US have already fucked up all the Muslim States they've invaded so far....

Probably the world.

>>679327893
Maybe britian could hold out an invasion if they were prepared but that's all the UK could not invade the us alone

Britain bcuz has better/prettier women

>>679327893
The US, hands down

>>679327893
USA by far. Especially if Britain invades first.

One U.S super aircraft carrier has more aircraft then the entire British military combined. And we have like 14 of them. It would be over in 2 weeks tops. The British don't even have the naval or logistical ability to invade the US. They depend on our military a lot.

This is coming from a brit, but the USA would win, I would suffer heavy losses, but victory would totally go to the US. But it doesnt matter cus id never happen

>>679327893
US. Britain is scared of knives and guns.

>>679328238
This. The US constantly lends the UK with weapons and equipment.

File: William-tea_1.jpg (136 KB, 1368x1026) Image search: [Google]

136 KB, 1368x1026

>>679327893
>1812
>be a leaf
>get help from glorious empire
>burn those silly yanks stupid house to the ground
>mfw

>>679328186
Top kek
A 7 in America is like a 9 in Britain. The only hot British girls are all models. The rest are fucked up inbred have.
Seriously, British girls are the laughing stock of the world.

>>679327893
If you wanted to make it more fair, you could have the UK vs one of the larger states alone. Texas or California would still win most likely.

Considering the size of the two countries? USA. This is obvious.

>>679328390
>1930s and 1940s
>europe
>be building
>oh wait
>there were no buildings left

>>679328402

and a seven in america is a 4 in sweden

File: 1362664721985.jpg (136 KB, 540x720) Image search: [Google]

136 KB, 540x720

>>679327893
ITT: butblasted POMS

>>679328390
Only the UK would think they won a war because they burned down one building.

>>679328238
Err, no.

USS George W. Bush has max 16 F18's.

We have 226 Typhoons.

Like we would ever fight anyway, we're family.

>>679328600
>implying America has low enough standards to slide it's tounge between some horse teeth

US would win, as its military budget is huge! The downside is that all that money should have been spent on the US education system.

>>679328600
Agreed, but we're not talking about sweden

File: lol-americans-.jpg (13 KB, 304x266) Image search: [Google]

13 KB, 304x266

>mfw USA vs Vietnam = VIETNAM WINS
>mfw USA with guns vs Natives with arrows = NATIVES WINS
>mfw USA vs. Japan = JAPAN WINS (oh wait, with atomic bombs we will win!)

USA: the clown of the World

>>679328670
>Yanks still mad about 1812

>>679328600
Too bad only Abdul fucks swecucks

>>679328723
Oh we all know how many wars native Americans won (protip: it was zero)
You need to retake a history class

America in 4. Sweep the brits!

File: 1384627864448.jpg (217 KB, 858x990) Image search: [Google]

217 KB, 858x990

>>679327893

Nobody wins, both sides have nukes.

There aren't a whole lot of (if any) countries in the world that could take 'merica one on one in a war and ultimately win.

>>679328812
>know its the truth
>gets mad
>goes directly to the memes

>>679328888
And the quads makes a good point

>>679328414
seeing as texas and california don't have formal army, against the SAS, GL buddy

File: 1421724095537.gif (2 MB, 224x332) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 224x332

>>679328923
>7-11 never forget
>invades sandmonkeys that still lives in the dark ages
>get ther asses kicked

File: image.jpg (46 KB, 483x317) Image search: [Google]

46 KB, 483x317

British people would lose to lack of hygiene

America would win; due to logistics, domination of the air & sea, more support vehicles, and superior power projection abilities.

>>679328723
>a bunch american colonial farmers vs British military

Brits give up after sustaining too many loses

>>679329000
>no formal army
>texas rangers don't exist

>>679328739
>Yanks literally don't care about 1812 because Britain didn't take Maine and the British Navy stopped trying to force American merchant ships to pay royalties so we got what we wanted
>Britain still bragging about 1812 because "hurr Durr we burnt your house down"
>America builds a new house and doesn't give a shit
Stop patting yourself on the back kid

>>679328686
>16 MAX
Is this bait?
http://www.militaryfactory.com/ships/detail.asp?ship_id=USS-Nimitz-CVN68
I know it not the same ship in its designation, but it's the same class.

What is it with all you people and war

>>679329000
>no formal army
>navy seals, MARSOC, marine corps infantry permanently stationed there

>>679328723
Japan was more than likely about to surrender before 'merica dropped the nukes, the US mainly did that just to prove a point.

>>679327893
USA:
>air superiority
>land superiority
>bigger force
>national patriotic support
>can royally fuck your entire support line with drones before you can deploy

Brits:
>got some boats

>>679329199
welcome to >>>/k/ >>>/int/ and >>>/pol/

File: 1460413796272.jpg (10 KB, 261x181) Image search: [Google]

10 KB, 261x181

>>679328888
>9/11
>Quads
>Bush
God dammit.

>>679329000
http://www.tx.ang.af.mil/

Right now the US would win. Wait a few years while ISIS grows in the UK and it will be a different story.

>>679329199

Honestly I'm much more interested in sex.

The U.K has lots of fatties and this pleases this fat fetishist.

>>679329231
They were planning a conditional surrender to the Soviets who would be more lenient with their terms of surrender. The US insisted on achieving an unconditional surrender, so using overwhelming force was necessary.
If we hadn't, the Japanese empire might still exist today

Uk being safe in recent conflict because they are an island not because they better than others, the us has the money... US win by 2000 billions $

>>679328238
Britain uses warships that can take dozens of jets out simultaneously.

The outcome would depend on who attacks and who defends. The attacker will lose, regardless of who they are. Given global events of the last few years the attacker is most likely to be America.

>>679327893
BOTH HAVE THE UGLIEST GIRLS IN THE PLANET.

True fact.

>>679328175
This is the mostly likely answer.

>>679329231
>making up facts
even after the nukes a large part of the Japanese parliament remained in favor of continuing the war. Japan was leagues ahead in biological warfare , if they struck back it would hurt a lot, just not as much as the nukes...

>>679329070
You mean the french had to come and rescue your sorry arses. Frog eating pricks.

>>679329000
Texas has a few bases and ports that are packing enough large scale firepower to decimate the UK alone. Dont forget Texas Industries. They do shit other than make calculators, mate. Shit that we wouldn't want turned against us. Their resources are much higher. Their citizens have some of the highest densities of firearms in the world.
I love my country, but let's be real here.
I'm damned glad they're on our side if I'm honest.

File: inbred anglos.jpg (111 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]

111 KB, 960x960

>>679328350
And spoons m8
>>679328402
Can confirm large numbers of lower class brits are fucking inbred

>>679329396
You'll probably find this an interesting read:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/07/20/sex-statistics-who-does-it-the-most.html

>>679329504
You've obviously never been to America
We not only have some of the ugliest, we also have some of the hottest.

File: Gavin.png (42 KB, 244x249) Image search: [Google]

42 KB, 244x249

>tfw American's think they can win by air and sea but fat people are unfit for war

>>679329040
Last I checked the US has ultimately steamrolled over anyone or anything in their way in the Middle East since 2001.

Black hawk down.... enough said.

>>679327893
This is easy

The usa would win given the numbers and landmass .

However if it was a 1 on 1 basis as in there was the exact same amount of troops per side america would get kicked to fuck . An average british squaddie is worth more than one american soldier in the field . This doesnt devalue the usa whatsoever , a soldier from the usa is worth 2+ french etc etc , its simply britain and its soldiers are a little bit outside the norm

But nukes means its bye bye everyone regardless

>>679329762
Apparently not completely controlling the entire middle East all at once means you got your asses kicked.

The US alone has 25% of the worldwide armed forces, all the oil Britain has would be roughly enough for 3 days of US army movement. If the US seriously decides "Hey today I want to buttfuck a single country as hard as I can" they can do so without blinking. The only reason the terrorist wars lasted as long as they did was because as much as they just wanted to gun down everyone get more oil and walk away, there are more advantages to pretend there's anti terrorism going on and not making it a full on war to prevent war crimes. So yes summarily, dem 'muricans would win

File: 1459465892191.jpg (8 KB, 205x246) Image search: [Google]

8 KB, 205x246

You guys will debate anything.

>>679329762
Erm.... I don't think so...

>>679329762
Like afghanistan and iraq?

accept it, they both where a huge misstake.

>>679329762
The US have been fucked up badly in just about every conflict they've entered. They rely on numbers and firepower over intelligent strategy and it just doesn't work.

>>679328686
Gerald R. Ford - 85
John F. Kennedy - 85
Enterprise -85
=455
You have 226 typhoons?
KEK

i was going to say merica but them i remembered Vietnam, if you cant kill stick people you cant kill shit

>>679329727
However, American's do a pretty good job at killing each other senselessly so it'd be pretty close

>>679329533
>If Japan had continued fighting they might have done some damage
Except they didn't, they surrendered and the US won.

>>679328074
Hahahaha

File: 1457376921177.jpg (27 KB, 300x300) Image search: [Google]

27 KB, 300x300

>>679328924
http://countrymeters.info/en/Sweden

>>679328600
There is a shit ton of people with Swedish ancestry in the American Midwest. The US has the greatest diversity of hot chicks in the world. Much like our military this is not even a contest people.

>>679327893
The largest flying fleet in the world is the USAF. The second largest is the USN. The US wouldn't even have to put boots on the ground. Unless, of course, we were invaded. But it wouldn't be our military the UK would have to worry about in that case; it'd be every redneck and patriot with a firearm.

>>679329983
Wanna check those sums mate?

>>679330056
And your point is ?
How is that relevant to the statement you made?

File: 1455540298352.jpg (203 KB, 640x960) Image search: [Google]

203 KB, 640x960

>>679328074

>A country with less than 5% Muslim population is a "muslim state".

I guess the USA fell to the Niggers a long time ago.

USA is officially a Black/Mexican country.

>>679327893
U.S. spends over 500 billion more dollars on military expenditures. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures. if you choose britain you are a fucking retard.

>>679329239
The USA can't "royally" fuck anything anymore

File: d08ac14f-771a-4ba4-99b2-140a6ecfa296.png (814 KB, 960x885) Image search: [Google]

814 KB, 960x885

>>679327893
>>679327893
>implying

>>679330143
/thread
And I'm a britbong

>>679329887
>>679329882
Sadam was deposed, a democratic government was established. Mission complete. Just because Isis invaded after the US left Iraq doesn't change the fact that the US didn't achieve its goals.

Plus, the Taliban's influence in Afghanistan has consistently been weakened since the invasion and AL Qaeda is weaker than ever.

>>679329887
No shit they were a huge mistake, but that doesn't mean the US lost per-se.

>>679327893
I have nothing but love for the UK and wish them no harm but this is a retarded hypothetical question. US wins easily.

>>679329069

I'm not saying it would be a total rout for the British.

They'd employ their special operations efficiently, wrecking havoc behind our lines in bold moves.

They'd use the urban terrain to their advantage.

They'd likely use their aircraft to strike targets directly in America, instead of using them up in futile air superiority battles.

I seriously doubt England wouldn't inflict damage on us by being timid with their naval and air assets. They'd be aggressive.

And the urban warfare itself would be long and brutal.

>>679330219
>deluded brits
Hers a (you)

>>679328100
Underrated post.

Both sides would have Nuclear weapons
Nobody wins apart from Ireland and Mexico who will inhabit both lands after the radiation has gone down

>>679330056
I didn't make the original post, I was just trying to illustrate that what you called a meme is in fact, the truth

>>679330143
The US wouldn't get near the UK if they tried to invade. All those planes and boats mean nothing if they're destroyed before even seeing land.

It literally just depends on who invades who. Neither country could successfully invade and neither could take over the other.

Even if England some how invaded, we all have guns and nothing Unites the US more than kill foreigners.

On the other hand England would have an insurgency of billy-clubs and knifes

File: 1459508503862.jpg (4 KB, 202x192) Image search: [Google]

4 KB, 202x192

or you could just as easily say hey, who would win, a grizzly bear or a fat-tailed scorpion?
america could throw all its weight at it and however it ends the bear will have been covertly struck a fatal, poisonous deathblow.

get real americunts. your soldiers train on call of duty.

>>679327893
UK would lose easly
UK doesnt have enough agriculture in that island to feed all of its population, that is why it is dependent on import/export for foods
A war would fuck all the balance in UK, that is why in case of world war or nay war, UK is in danger of mass starvation
Also USA has the best funded and most technologically advanced military with the most experience in modern warfare and a huge population of war glorifying retards who would gladly die for their country.
anyone who is sayign UK has a chance is delusional

USA vs Vietnam= USA lost
USA vs Somalia= USA lost
USA vs terrorism= USA still losing

See the pattern here.. All 3rd world mother fuckers with sandels and two teeth, you lot still can't win. 'Most powerful' army in the world.. Top kek

>>679327893

Brit here. Most likely the US down to sheer numbers. All other reasons i'll let you faggots argue over

File: 1432971211030.jpg (13 KB, 201x201) Image search: [Google]

13 KB, 201x201

>>679328723
This is too retarded to even begin to be offensive.

http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.asp?form=form&country1=united-states-of-america&country2=united-kingdom&Submit=COMPARE

just gonna leave this here

>>679330322

Speaking as an American, that's what I'd do if I was a British general.

I'd boldly strike with my naval and air assets against American Forward Operating bases, while protecting my ground forces with urban terrain and using my special operations to wreck havoc behind enemy lines.

File: gsx.jpg (24 KB, 508x493) Image search: [Google]

24 KB, 508x493

>>679328390
>Last relevant victory was in 1812

File: o-QUEEN-LAUGHING-facebook.jpg (320 KB, 2000x1000) Image search: [Google]

320 KB, 2000x1000

>>679330336
I bet you'd love to get royally fucked

>>679330322
Britain would cease to have an air force at all within the first hour of the war.

British special OPS are among, if not the best in the world. But at that stage, I doubt Britain would continue a guerrilla campaign that would drag on in urban environments causing massive civilian casualties. Britain would surrender to avoid any further bloodshed.

>>679330538

>most experience in modern warfare

Name one single technologically advanced country that the USA has fought against in the last 15 years.

Western nations don't have jack shit experience with fighting "modern wars". We only know how to Drone strike Goatfuckers in caves.

>>679327893
I think tits always win, proof
http://1312484.igenapps.com/go-figure#0

Fuck this. Why are we killing each other when we could both go at the French!

>>679330548
>implying anyone won against Vietnam
France couldn't take them, and even China couldn't for the thousand years they tried
>implying anyone can win in Somalia
It's an unstable lost cause
>implying anyone can win against terrorism
For every terrorist you kill, 2 more take his place. The US isn't the only one fighting terrorism, they're just the ones fighting it the most.

>>679330417
There's maybe 65,000 American soldiers on the other side of the English Channel. The US already has the army in Europe to invade the UK if it wanted to.

>>679330538
Why would import and exports stop if the US attacked?

Neither country would stand a chance. The defensive powers of both nations are too great to be overcome.

File: image.jpg (23 KB, 223x226) Image search: [Google]

23 KB, 223x226

>>679328402
>models

>>679328723
>mfw a bunch of farmers beat the British army
>mfw the us killed a fuckton of native Americans
>mfw you never took history class
>mfw I have no face

>>679330707
The US engages in a cyber war with China every single day. That's about as modern as you can get

>>679330783
American soldiers are some of the worst in the world. The actual soldiers aren't a threat - only bombs and missiles are.

>>679329842
Good thing your using logic you stupid fucking 14 year old

File: TheMainDifferenceBetweenEuropeAndUSA.jpg (135 KB, 712x515) Image search: [Google]

135 KB, 712x515

>>679327893
Britain of course.

If the USA can't beat Korea, Vietnam, Iraqi insurgents, the Taliban, ISIS, they haven't got a hope in hell against a professional fighting force.

It's ok guys.. Both are fucked when putin presses the button anyway.

>>679327893
Nigger we already decided that

>>679330654

Unless Britain dismantled its air force, smuggled the individual components out, and re-assembled them elsewhere. Don't tell me it's impossible, Stalin did it with entire factories in the Second World War II moving them east on trains.

Time-consuming but let's face it. Using them for air superiority is pointless in the face of American aircraft. They're much better for guerilla strikes, attacking as individuals.

>>679330536
>rustled jimmies detected
Get real. Texas would, by itself, destroy us. Mate, you're taking pride into something we shouldn't be proud of. Our country is in shambles succumbing to a slow invasion we ultimately won't survive, and you're barking up to the most horrifically violent country on earth. Americans are wonky as fuck, but don't get your pez dispenser fucked up -they'd butt fuck everything you hold dear and have your descendants saying GOOD JAAAAAB

>>679328723
you do know that in the pacific theatre USA was fuckin destroying japan? even without the atom bomb they would've fucking died.

>>679328584
underrated post is underrated

Man for man the British army is better than American. But the american army is a lot bigger than ours. If it was a battle of equal amounts Britian would win , if it was a war America would win

>>679330629
Let me see your drones do anything.We have all our shit spread across our country. All your shit is clustered up.

We are the nations military.Bush was all o nit sending aid to everyone who needed it.We took on entire nations,while you brits say back and mocked bush. Now that obama pulled back globally,your nations are being fucked with terrorist and refugees.Have fun in the next 10 years without our support ridding your country of terrorists

Your RJ-35's we made for you are inferior to the FA-22.

>>679327893
Already played this game. the reason it's the USA and not some British shit hole...

fucking british faggots never give up.

File: 1374043462897.png (78 KB, 1021x746) Image search: [Google]

78 KB, 1021x746

>>679330857

>Farmers

M8 the war was 90% France and 10% colonists. France threw so much into that war that they bankrupted their entire Empire and their King was beheaded shortly after. Not to mention Spain was also involved.

It's like if Texas decides to secede, USA says "no" and "invades". Texas National Guard Mobilises. Russia and China then both land troops in Texas to fight the USA. Russia meanwhile bankrupts its entire country by committing 100% to a war that the USA isn't even fully invested in. Eventually the USA decides it isn't worth it and lets Texas be their own country.

200 years later Texan hillbillies shitpost about how they "kicked your asses" on a Tibetan engraving board.

>>679330901

All western nations are engaged in a cyber war with China/Russia.

>>679328924
>implying these memes aren't originating from facts

stay mad swedecuck and keep sucking that nigger dick

>>679330612

Though speaking as an American fat fetishist, I'd much rather fuck fat British women.

>>679327893
It would obviously be he US, the US' annual war budget is 550 billion nad the British war Budget is 65 billion. Oh and the US are five to six times more. The brits would have definitely won before the second world war, their empire was a third of the ground surface on earth

It's an American victory before the Brits can even put their tea cups and pinkies down

Britfag here. US would win because of manpower numbers, finance and nukes; the US has much more than us. But in terms of technology and strategy I don't think there would be much difference.

>>679331246
>M8 the war was 90% France and 10% colonists.
Top kek

File: 1459832552676.jpg (33 KB, 600x335) Image search: [Google]

33 KB, 600x335

>>679330783
>implying your cucked shitfest doesn't only exist because the royals and bankers are friends with israel and zionists

mfw americunts are this stupid

>>679330207
I didn't know you had internet inside the mosque

Im British and even I'll accept the US would win. However I believe we'd be able to hold of an invasion (no nukes I assume) US just has sheer numbers. UK troops are better trained though

>>679331246
Butthurt british cuck

File: 9e6db4f18dda08009373c36742154943.jpg (85 KB, 736x552) Image search: [Google]

85 KB, 736x552

>>679331487

I didn't know you had electricity m8

File: SpidermanDissappointed.jpg (12 KB, 273x185) Image search: [Google]

12 KB, 273x185

>>679331246
cringe.jpeg

>>679331246
You really think TEXAS would let a bunch of commies onto their land and take the chance that they'll proceed to be ruled over by a bunch of foreigners?

>>679331015
/thread

>>679331593
Lol we invented electricity m8

>>679331643

And then you became an African nation.

>>679328723
Nigger you were only right on one of three points. You dont see many native americans around anymore and we were still beating japan, the issue was they werent surrendering even after knowing they couldnt win. We were preparing for a mainland invasion when we decided to use the atomic bombs to try to save more american lives. Like please go read a history book.

>>679331643
>invented electricity
How dumb can you ameritards get?

>>679331246
>Texan
>hillbillies
heh.

The US should just attack daily at 5'clock and sign a ceasefire at 5:30....There will be nobody to fight against

If you could even up the numbers then Britain. The British forces pretty much train every military in the world anyway. Or they at least use British techniques.

But sheer overwhelming numerical advantage, US takes it.

>>679329070
>France and a bunch of colonial farmers
you can correct that

>>679328739
>Britts still think were mad about 1812
We literally go over the war of 1812 in 2 days of history classes in school and then we never bring it up again because its so fucking pointless to say "Nothing changed, Brits bitched some more."

>>679330627
>implying Canada didn't contribute the most to WW1

File: 21651464687468.png (1013 KB, 1007x635) Image search: [Google]

1013 KB, 1007x635

>>679331612
>hurr durr lets google fat soldiers and pretend this is what all American troops look like.

>>679331176
FA-22 isn't getting past a Type 45 Destroyer

File: 1446055426466.gif (537 KB, 480x270) Image search: [Google]

537 KB, 480x270

>>679328226

>>679331015
Problem being the U.S. has been fighting fights with a conventional military against a non-conventional one. Which all masters of strategy know is a terrible idea.

I think in a straight up battle the U.S. would crush Britain, but chances are that they could just then move to a non-conventional style, and the U.S. General retards would lose the war after that.

>>679331823
To be fair, France didnt really jump to our aid till the end.

America, being only 240ish years, has built the worlds strongest military and would wipe the fucking Brits off the map and barely slow down. Love all the Britfags in here trying to defend their shit tier military and country. You USED TO be an EMPIRE, now you ain't shit

>>679331829
>Implying that means anything anymore

Yay Canada used to do things.

File: C425G4_2013543c.jpg (46 KB, 460x287) Image search: [Google]

46 KB, 460x287

>>679331360

Seriously Britain, you got some hot fat chicks.

>>679331364

From one American to another, no it would not be that easy. It's a huge urban environment defended by a modern military, one which has done plenty of joint exercises with us.

>>679331960
>projecting this hard
>acting like america suddenly evolved into such a civilisation in that period of time

>>679328739
I am so mad I forgot it happened... grrr, I guess.

File: 1459589824125.jpg (16 KB, 236x236) Image search: [Google]

16 KB, 236x236

>>679331444
this. america couldn't start a war "if it wanted to" since they're too cucked by jews and royals, uk win by default

fucking checked

>>679331960
Like the US wiped Vietnam and Afghanistan from the map? Oh yeah...

>>679328704
get out bernie fag

>>679331080
Texas has less than half the population of the UK and far less soldiers and equipment. Texas on it's own could not take on the UK retard. Texas could barely take on London on its own.

>>679328723
'Merica vs. Canada, 1812. Canada wins

>>679331960
The real /thread.
Brittfags want to believe they would win, but they could never take the entire US and would just straight up never beat our military.

>>679331938

The war lasted 1775-1783, France joined in on 1778.

>>679332067
Ya actually it would, the cucks would surrender before we even got out of first gear

File: 1460563713585.gif (73 KB, 129x150) Image search: [Google]

73 KB, 129x150

>>679331960
>lost a war to untrained poor farmers with ww2 era weapons
>thinks they can beat a professional, modern and well armed military
kek, dream on amerifat

File: images.jpg (5 KB, 150x149) Image search: [Google]

5 KB, 150x149

>>679331444
>>679332111
holy shit, checked

A much better question is US v Europe.

US gets pwned

>>679327893

Right answer.. everyone loses. Nuke states. Although in the prolonged war scenario which would put Britain on the defense, a launch wouldn't be a likely scenario. Brits would surrender to save population of both countries.

On the other hand invading Britain would, counting USA's past "success" in such operations, just cost too much for the war to be profitable and/or politically feasible as it would cost millions of American lives to keep and hold a hostile Britain.

Result: Pyrrhic victory for America, no real hold of the Islands. No nuking ensues.

File: kike.gif (3 MB, 419x313) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 419x313

>>679332126

>>679332126
Jesus dude, Americans showed restraint in wars. They have they capability to wipe anyone off the map and your denials won't stop it.

>>679332295

>implying the USA would ever invade a modern nuclear power

What's to stop the UK from turning the 225 biggest US cities into the new location for Fallout 5? You think a nation about to collapse under invasion wouldn't get that desperate?

>>679332363
>was also fighting a war against France, the greatest land force in the world, at the same time.

The US government burns all its taxpayer's money on military for this reason: USA and it's no contest.

I hate our fucking government.

>>679332509
So would the UK, Germany, Russia, etc.
With nukes...

>>679331080
that's very retarded mate, Texas? having even the slightest chance? are you mad?

>>679332149
ITT UK fags mad bc they're more obese than the US, becoming infested with Muslims, and would be crushed by the only world superpower

>inb4 "china's a superpower" kek

>>679332375
Sure bud, you liberal pussies can't even fight off some Muzzie immigrants

>>679329471
Yeah but UK Warships < US Warships, We have alot more and they are better equipped, also Submarines.

>>679332599
>putting a ''kek'' in the greentext itself
Oh, please kill yourself you newfag.

>>679332375
That's a much more likely scenario. UK vs US would likely end in a deadlock as both nations would struggle to get past the enemies defence. EU vs US would be much more interesting, and I don't think the US would be able to hold off the attack for too long.

Citizens own guns in America... this was a retarded question

>>679332599
im not even a britabong tho. i think you're replying to the wrong person

>>679332517
It's called mutually assured destruction, hence the surrender, the only option. Dumbfuck

>>679332363
What is conventional warfare
Do you realize the stupid buttfuck backwards "rules" we had "fighting" those poor fucks?

'Merican would win straight up war against any other single nation

>>679332585
If we're talking nukes then we have enough to ensure everyone dies. I think the idea is that even without nukes, if decided to say fuck precision strikes, and fuck civilians, we could still wipe most of Britain of the earth.

>>679329648

Texas INSTRUMENTS, faggot. I work there. Don't fuck with us

>>679331853
Retard level:
>bomb at risk targets with drones
>send in fleet to rek remaining forces
Tactical:
>Send multiple f22's outside of range and shoot SDB's
More desperate:
>send drone with emp capabilites
>suicide one drone to disable entire brittish fleet

>>679332509
No they don't. They don't even have the capability to defeat some farmers in Afghanistan who live in caves and use 100 year old rifles and RPGs.

>>679331246
agreed, France helped the Americunts get their independance and that's what provoked the revolution in France, why? because it gave the population the motivation to do so
>inb4 France was retarded

Its time for America to come full circle and start rightfully taking control of other countries.

>>679332835
And so could the UK.

>>679332585
I'm not even talking about nukes,maybe a couple tactical if necessary, but just conventional weapons

File: 1460449444494.jpg (71 KB, 526x397) Image search: [Google]

71 KB, 526x397

>>679332509
americunts couldn't take gooks given 10 years. nuff said.

>>679332862
Except they do. If the Americans decided not to care about public opinion they could just level city after city until the only people left are the ones hiding in caves.

>>679332842

Oh shut up Texas. You're not the only state in the South, and your arrogance is tiresome.

>>679328414
Err, no. We have a hugely powerful military, vastly disproportionate to our size and population. Nukes aside it would take even you, the greatest military power in the world months and months (if not years) to subdue us. But this is all nonsense anyway, our command and control are so homogenised that militarily speaking we are practically the same country. It would be more like a civil war.

>>679327893
Is this even a question that needs to be asked? The US Navy outnumbers the Royal Navy, in terms of combined fleet tonnage, by 12 to 1. The US Air Force outnumbers the Royal Air Force, in terms of number of combat aircraft, by 8 to 1. The US Army outnumbers the British Army, in terms of personnel, by 6 to 1. The annual output of the US economy is 7 times that of Britain and the US population is more than 5 times greater. The winner should be pretty obvious.

>>679332855
That would only work against an unintelligent target. The US has one of the worst histories when it comes to military strategy too, so counting on them to pull off a simple strategy against a stupid target is still a tall order.

>>679332730
I'm dabbed out m8, blimey!

>>679327893
the US BELONGED to the UK. And whatever happens, you will never change that fact. Deal with it.

>>679333134
>[citation needed]

>>679331938
till then end? yeah, you guys were just holding out the Brits, you were no where near doing any damage to the British army, they were beating you down, it's a fact

>>679328698
That's total aircraft, dumshit. I'm talking about actual attack aircraft. Even our new queen Elizabeth class ones can have like 60 odd if you include all the heli's and stuff.

File: FB_IMG_1460558287561.jpg (64 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]

64 KB, 960x960

>>679329040
The only reason the middle east hasn't been completely conquered and all terrorists wiped from the face of the earth is the USA military's required to follow protocols in warfare now. We have to get permission to kill them, and are limited on what amount of force we can use. If we were allowed to just do the job as it needs to be done, the conflict wouldn't have lasted a month.

File: 126022.jpg (466 KB, 833x768) Image search: [Google]

466 KB, 833x768

>>679327893
>Bong here
>USA clearly
>Fucking obviously

Why is this even a question?

>>679333054
That wouldn't be winning the war though. That would be committing genocide, which would probably result in the rest of the world fucking up the US beyond recognition.

File: image.jpg (68 KB, 300x467) Image search: [Google]

68 KB, 300x467

US due to the fact they put all their healthcare and education funding into guns and tanks because freedom. And because of the sheer size of the US.
However pound for pound the UK would fucking obliterate the US armed forces.
We used to own a third of the planet less than 100 years ago until we gave everyone their shit back. We can be savage cunts when we apply our armies. Also we made the colonisation of North America so really you're all just English people with funny accents on our language. And fat.

>>679327893
u fokin wot m9? uk armed with 1mil chavs that wil bang u out

>>679333187
Used to, we'd wreck your ass now, get over it cuck, we have

>>679333134
Numbers matter more than strategy, and the US is heavy in both, so long as Hillary doesn't become commander in cheif

>>679329765
You're an idiot

>>679327893
If we are talking end game, British nukes are kept on submarines and nobody knows where they are apart from those controlling them, if they surfaced one day to learn that the UK was nuked or attacked, they could simply nuke the USA and get the last shot in, then hide.

The submarines are so stealthy that they literally once crashed into another submarine, in all of the whole fucking ocean.

But its a pretty stupid question really, America is a bigger country a larger military,, has a significantly bigger military budget is more than most other countries' budgets combined, they will obviously have more troops and more fire power.

America is Gay.

>>679329175
That's total aircraft, you gumbah, I'm talking about attack planes

File: nige.jpg (18 KB, 460x276) Image search: [Google]

18 KB, 460x276

>>679328074
kek

I just want to fuck British fat chicks.

Is that too much to ask?

>>679333334
So close fam

File: 1460364550134.png (35 KB, 1024x1024) Image search: [Google]

35 KB, 1024x1024

>>679332910
dream on you cucked faggot. americas place is at the heel of the jews boot as it has and always will be.
look at how your kids are all metro and your women's heads filled with faggotry, your nation's mentality is already dead in the water. denial is a bitch

>>679333385
We MADE you. Deal with it.

>>679333374
/thread

>>679333285
Hey dumbfuck, read this

http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.asp?form=form&country1=united-states-of-america&country2=united-kingdom&Submit=COMPARE

>>679332585
/thread

>>679333407
You think the U.S. doesn't have subs? It sounds like the brits are fucking incompetent if one of their nuclear subs ran into another one lol.

>>679333527
No, we made ourselves in a very short period of time and surpassed your pitiful military. I think we've dealt with it, you've got some unresolved issues with it though kek

>>679329983
I'm talking about attack aircraft, dummy. Nimitz class can support 16 F18's for about 20-25 sorties each before they need to take on supplies.

Smeg-head.

>>679333407
derp...UK has 10 subs and the US has 75, you're fucked

The US of course. Much bigger army.

Now ask which country will end up falling faster than the Roman Empire with it's citizens bathing in nuclear radiation and screaming for their lives with their capital city in ruins
The US still.

File: 1422900102272.jpg (34 KB, 367x384) Image search: [Google]

34 KB, 367x384

There is so much bs in this thread. For a start individual states couldn't take on the UK, thats just being dumb. Second the us would clearly win due to numbers overall. Thirdly it would last longer than people are saying; the UK has some of the best intelligence agencies, this would play a huge role and is one of the reasons the UK was never taken over back in the 1940s. The war wouldn't be this big battle between ships and soldiers, i doubt the military would even set foot in either border. It would be who can do the most economic damage with systematic drone attempts and hacking. end. stop arguing you patriotic retards ;)

>>679333629
The US has bombed and killed its own troops on dozens of occasions. Two submarines colliding is nothing compared to the Mr Bean military of the United States.

>>679333752
No actually i'm LOVING it, i'm loving the fact that the British Empire was literally the biggest empire in history. And Victorian Britain was the center of the world. You have not matched that.

>>679333374
well, everything's said

>>679332599
ITT sad fat americunts who never stop whining about their government and jews take the opportunity to give it the old HURR AMERICA FUCK YEAH NO 1 bullshit lol

>Fix'd

>>679327893
Which country has the biggest airforce? the US Airforce. Which country has the second biggest Airforce? ...the US Navy. That's right! deal with it.

>>679328704
Memes aside, our education system is fine. The issue is we have so many minorities (predominantly black) that pull our test scores down.

>>679333752
Bow to your Queen, Amerifags!

>>679331026
>>679333586
Ok, well those figures for fixed wing attack planes (I. E. Fighter jets) are wrong. I would know.

>>679333951
WAS. your time has passed, stop living in the past bud, you ain't got shit on us. tea time for you pussies isn't it? go have some and talk about your glory days

Reminder for anyone who thinks numbers will win a war:

China has the largest military in the world
United States has the second largest
India has the third largest

>>679334192
How about fuck off and go lose another war amerifag

>>679327893
Britfag here, if nuclear weapons are allowed, USA wins, if not, Britain wins.
You wont be able to break the stiff upper lip attitude and guerilla warfare in the cities.

>>679330538
Why do you think the EU would side with you? Also I think that the invading country would lose regardless

>>679334192
Yeah, as i was saying, the pleasure is that it is a historical fact which you can NEVER change. Hahahaha!

>>679334229
It's not just the size. The US put all their money into their shit tier military which is why they suck at everything else. They could win against almost any individual country but like somebody said, they'll end up dying of nuclear radiation in complete anarchy one day because of how sucky they are as a country.

>>679334141
http://www.businessinsider.com/military-aircraft-strength-of-every-country-2015-1

It's not even close bud

>>679334192
Yeah, well. We had our day in the sun, and the we lost it just like every other Empire. Dont worry, it will happen to you too.

>>679334229
Those are just people.
Equipment is more important.

The Soviets "won" WW2 due to shear numbers, but they would've lost badly had it not been for the US giving them most of the supplies they used.
Everything from the trucks they drove to the boots they wore to the food they ate came from the US. Had it not been for that, the Russian soldiers couldn't have possibly defeated Germany with all the numbers in the world.

>>679334336
kek, you ain't mad that you're irrelevant now, are ya?

File: Img_0355.jpg (34 KB, 506x651) Image search: [Google]

34 KB, 506x651

>>679334336
>>679334192
Yeah! Bow to your Queen Amerifag! Elizabeth Regina (ER)