>>678025618
If a woman is alone with 100 men an offspring may be created every 9 months. A man alone with 100 women can produce 100 offspring every 9 months.

It isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it does likely point to certain character traits.
Mind you the same goes for men.
If all you knew about a man/woman was the number of people they've slept with, you could probably guess certain character traits. Mind you those traits aren't necessarily bad, it's just certain people don't like them.

File: 1429036255494.jpg (78 KB, 680x581) Image search: [Google]

78 KB, 680x581

>>678025618
>criticizing a shitty analogy to defend a shitty analogy

top cucc

>>678026134
/thread

>>678026839
cheerios have feelings too bro

Outside of the tumblrsphere and the feminist world, everyone who is a decent person is selective when it comes to dating someone who has fucked around a lot. This goes for both men and women.

Someone who has a trail of previous sexual partners is a massive red flag not only for possible STIs, but also for possible relationship breakdown and lack of passion/intimacy.

People who hold sex cheap and do not make it sacred will undoubtedly have a lot of emotional baggage or lack of emotion completely. That is why I don't date women who have had multiple sexual partners.

>>678027262
Cereal deserves a pure marriage with a partner who's a cereal virgin.

Having multiple cereal partners is degenerate.

>>678025618
>never having loose pussy

No, sir, it is you who is the virgin.

Or you haven't slept around enough.

Either way, you're a fag, defending loose pussy

File: 9b2.png (124 KB, 650x548) Image search: [Google]

124 KB, 650x548

>>678025618

If they've slept with a lot of people it means they're a slut/whore. I don't like sluts or whores.

It's not like eating a new bowl of cereal... it's about a history of consistently bad behavior and decisions.

File: zzKofCq.png (100 KB, 291x277) Image search: [Google]

100 KB, 291x277

Women complain all the time, It's just that in a liberal society in which we live in they actually have a voice.

>>678025618
women are different then men, they can get free sex anytime, but any girl who does that and racks up a high n count is a called a slut rightfully so because 1 it took no effort and 2 if she was respectable she would try to instead find the best man for her child, biologically we will always look favorably upon men bedding multiple women and negatively upon women doing same, this won't change no matter what sort of bs sjw shaming occurs, women instinctually know this and will ALWAYS lower their n count if possible

File: 1454466233114.jpg (214 KB, 840x960) Image search: [Google]

214 KB, 840x960

For real

Cereal consumption has no link to emotional stability or long term sexual health. Making that comparison is like comparing getting AIDS to playing a game of basketball.

If you think someone who fucks 100 people per decade doesn't have some sort of emotional issue, you're naive as shit.

Women are held to a different standard because they chose that standard. Think about boys and girls during k-12. Boys are into boobs sex and all that jazz. Girls on the other hand are not. Ok that's fair. But they go beyond and slut shame the boys calling them pervs and what not all while holding themselves up to some higher status. Eventually everyone grows up and them men have earned their right to fuck a lot because they have been brutally honest about it from the get go. Women on the other hand suddenly start getting exposed as the sluts they are, which flies in the face of the high horse front they had been putting on for their whole lives.

Tl;dr women are high horse hypocrites and men are honest degenerates.

Women want to stop slut shaming? Then make sure your daughters aren't judgmental slut shaming prudes themselves.

>>678027397
This

>>678028013
I ate cereal with an unprotected spoon and I got gonorrhea

>sleeps with a ton of guys
>what makes you think you're not just the next one in a long line of men growing longer?
>not wife material because easy
>puts sex above loyalty.

>>678028823
Nigga what if i just want to fuck

>>678027994
so true

>>678028823
>he doesnt pump and dump

>>678028913
go ahead and fuck
and then don't bitch about it when people call you a slut.

WHAT KIND OF STUPID FAGGOT PUTS THEIR DICK IN CHEERIOS?

Because it takes away the ability of " pair bonding" from women. Women can no longer feel intimacy and affection for men once they become whores and sluts : they dont feel it anymore . Men want these things from women : pair bonding, affection, intimacy , love and care . Whores can not provide these .

Whores will always try to find new ways to justify their whorish tendencies .

If you want to be a whore go ahead. I will treat you like one. So will every men.

Men have to work to acquire women, so it deserves praise at least even though it breaks values

Women get to choose partners and if they choose to break values they are degenerates and how no standards

>>678029400
*Have no standards

probably agree

anyway this guy is a pretentious fucking idiot to say the least. It really bothers me when a supposed intellectual obviously falls into dumb "look cool" pursuits he'd never follow was he truly a smart, independent thinking individual.

Grinds my gears

>>678025618
to begin with there's the higher risk of STDs/STIs in people who have slept around a lot.

and then there's the fact that if they've slept with a lot of people they either can't hold a relationship for long, or are more inclined to fooling around than to commit to one person, both traits that might be good for someone wanting a one-night stand but bad for those looking for a partner.

and his cereal analogy was braindead retarded.

>>678025618
Amen. Any man that gets bothered about how many men a woman has slept with is an insecure inexperienced little pussy who can't fuck.

>>678027517
a vagina that has had many dicks in it can still be tight, vaginas lose elasticity with age. They don't get loose from sleeping with 100 guys.

otherwise women who have passed a baby would have softball sized holes and we both know that isn't true.

>>678025618
I don't respect any man more if he's slept with a lot of women, I just figure they're good liars.

File: a197.jpg (254 KB, 600x500) Image search: [Google]

254 KB, 600x500

>>678029788
Enjoy your used up sluts mr feminist

>>678027397
This. I don't care if someone has slept with 100 guys, but I'm not going to date them. Our principles don't line up.

>>678025618
Heres the fucking answer. I got no issue with fucking a chick like that BUT im not getting in a relationship. You cant experience new sex, or experiences or unique bullshit. Shes seen it all and shes sexually jaded.you wont be that boyfriend, uou will be just another name on the list. Its not special its old ground for her, and not you. On the otherhand hand if the guy has done it its more sexuak experience and the man is wanted by other women, therefore hes wanted by new women. Its simply the way that women want an experienced protector (father esq) and men want someone to give experiences too (daughter esq)

>>678025618
It matters because I don't want to catch nasty diseases from someone because they like to sleep around. It's just plain risky. Even if they use condoms the risk is still there, and don't tell me you feel and look clean. You may even test clean. However HIV for example can be totally sentient for months, during that time, you may infect me.
It's not like eating many kinds of cereal. It's fucking around with my health and safety.

Not to mention I'm gay and hold men to this standard that he says only applies to women.

So what this is saying is, I should only date girls who have slept with a lesser number of men than different cereals I've tried? I've probably had maybe 25 different cereals in my life, as a high estimation. Of course, there's also the part in this which can be extrapolated in terms of brand name and store brand cereals. Maybe I should only date girls who eat high quality cereal or something?

>>678030229
I'm guessing you're kinda secretly scared of girls.

In the words of Jim Jefferies, "it is hard to be a stud but it is easy to be a slut."
Contemplate such wisdom

>>678026134
You're right. But in the modern society we don't have to care anymore about population, we already are 7 billion. What you said doesn't add anything to the discussion.

No. It is like eating out of the same bowl of cereallwith your fingers, that 48 other guys have already done the same to. Those 48 guys rejected the bowl of cereal for some reason too, and probably left some things behind.

Or more accurately, stuck their dick in the bowl of rancid milk that you are drinking out of.

People have different sex with different people for different reasons.

One night stand sex is very different to commited relationship sex which again is different to married sex.

The fact that someone has had lots of one night stands doesn't necessarily mean that they'll cheat in a relationship. In fact, in some cases, they'll be less likely. They've done their sleeping around. Someone with only a handful of partners might always be thinking of what they missed out on.

Projecting your insecurities about your own sexual history onto someone else is a fucking Grade A number one way of fucking up something that could be cool. Watch Chasing Amy, Kevin Smith totally nails this whole thing. And it cuts both ways, for men and women.

Ultimately, folks on /b/ get all hot under the collar about it because so many have had so little sex, and are sexually inexperienced. That's understandable. But once you've slept with a few people, it gets to be less of a big deal. And as you grow up and get older, you mature, and realise that experienced sexual partners are often more relaxed, more in control, and far far better in bed.

>>678027994
can we all go home now?

>>678030351
>sentient hiv

you just described yourself

File: CAPN_large.jpg (74 KB, 480x237) Image search: [Google]

74 KB, 480x237

>HOW MANY CEREALS HAVE YOU TRIED?

>idk like 50

>FUCKOFF SLUT

>>678025618
I don't want a box of cheerios that 48 other men have shoved their semen covered hands in to grab a handful before leaving the box open for whatever man fancies a handful next.

If nothing else, cheerios go fucking stale.

>>678027397
Doubtful you get to date anything at all, the internet is an awesome place where ugly and fat people get to pretend to be successful irl

>>678030517
I guess you could say that. It's more along the line of I'm scared of wasting my time trying to build a solid relationship with a woman that views me as a dildo.

>>678028170
go lose some weight fatty

>>678031491
Guaranteed not. 2 sexual partners in my life and no new partners in the past couple years so it would've shown by now.
But yeah all gays have hiv blah blah whatever

>>678027994
fucking this. OP is a fag

File: this is you.webm (3 MB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]

3 MB, 600x450

>>678025618
This is stupid. You are stupid. I don't know or care who John Green is but if he actually said that, then he's stupid too.
Furthermore this was pulled off of tumblr. Only faggots use tumblr for anything other than porn.

Life is unfair and men don't want to marry sluts.

>>678029891
Awww fat and ugly noone talks to you : (

Upstanding members of society aren't promiscuous, and they will always look down on those who are. Whores are whores, male or female (or whatever made up GLBTWTFBBQ you consider yourself to be).

File: 1414308089039.jpg (11 KB, 354x337) Image search: [Google]

11 KB, 354x337

The amount of people you have slept with can tell a lot about your personality.
This applies to both men and women, but if you're fucked a lot of people you either have dated a lot of people, which means you've broken up with a lot of people, which of course means you can't hold down a relationship.
It can also mean you just have a lot of one night stands, that's all fine, I won't judge you for it, but if somebody doesn't agree with sex being that casual, that's their feeling on the matter and they're not shallow for sticking to their personal morals about something as controversial as sex.
TL;DR It's your choice to have sex with lots of people, people have the right to judge you on that choice if it's not something they agree with.Deal with it baby

>>678027994
The pill and condoms ended this. Do keep up.

>>678031590 stop beauty shaming

>>678031890 stop fat shaming

>>678030189
Who are you Mr White Knight faggot, continue to live in your basement and imagine that a girl will ever be into you

File: 9news.jpg (413 KB, 1247x882) Image search: [Google]

413 KB, 1247x882

>>678031503
>d-dad can we have this new capn c-cru- WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU JUST SAY YOU DIRTY HARLOT YOU JUST HAD STAWBERRY FLAVOR LAST WEEK BLABLABLA

>>678025618

>genuinely enjoy your whole-grain crunch

>>678025618
Cannot get erect when hearing that dicks bigger than mine have been inside a girl I'm about to be inside

File: muh cereal analogy.png (371 KB, 525x709) Image search: [Google]

371 KB, 525x709

>>678025618

>>678032286
lol

File: YouNow.webm (1 MB, 544x368) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 544x368

>>678025618
How dare we judge people by their past!
Sluts shouldn't have to feel guilty about their past.
Murderers, pedophiles, rapists, and other criminals shouldn't have to feel guilty about their past either.

>>678026134

Only matters if she had a kid with every guy she'd fucked

>>678031617
I can guarantee no girl is going to use you for sex dood. Stop making excuses and whip your dick out

>>678025618
>A key that opens many locks is a master key, a lock that gets opened by many keys is a shitty lock
That particular analogy was shit from the start.

If a master key can open shitty locks, it's a shitty master key, fam.

>>678025618
It depends, you moron. I am a beta. I will especially seek the slutty ones.

Not only that, but the MAIN argument is that it's really nice to find somebody who has actually tried and failed, 10 times, 20, 100 times, and still keeps trying. And if you are her last, as in, you convince her to settle down, then you are the hero. Think about it, moron.

Men who don't sleep with sluts are so fucking insecure, and that's better for me, more sluts for me!

Refusing to fuck sluts is wrong an many other levels. For one, you want virgins, aka young girls, so that's fucked up. Second one, you want to have good sex, but with somebody inexperienced, so that's fucked up. Third one, you want to have sex with a lot of women, but you won't have time to please all of them, and they're all unpleased because they're virgin and unexperienced, and possibly hungry for cock. So, what the fuck?

>>678027994
>true for nearly most animals too

Nope.

All that you need to meet the definition of a 'male' is that you produce sperm cells.

"Most animals" don't give birth to live young.

"Most animals" don't have to gestate.

Even in quite a few mammals group selection means when it's mating season it's a veritable orgy. This is especially true for animals of the suborder Ruminantia who pretty much exist to be items on the pantry shelf of nature. These are creatures like cows, antelope, sheep etc. Since nature selects for them very effectively there is no need for any sort of sexual selection. They breed like rabbits or rats. Hey, speaking of which, lagomorphs and rodents are mammals as well! HOW ABOUT THAT!?

TL;DR: Read a fucking book.

>>678031617
Not all sex is equal. Folks sleep around cos they know it's just sex. If you get with someone in a relationship, that's different. It's as simple as that. Sure, some people are jerks who fuck about, but I think they're a minority.

A better analogy than cheerios is cars. Some folks don't want the hassle of owning a car, so they just hire them when they need them. And that's fun, cos each car is different. But then they're ready to buy a car, a car they really like, and they want to drive it for a long time, and really get to know how it works. And they feel invested in that car, so they don't just leave it in a ditch and drive the next cool looking car that happens to be available.

>>678032838
Oh, not to mention the Seahorse where the male is the one that falls pregnant.

Hurrdy durr durr.

File: 1457696833153.jpg (40 KB, 600x400) Image search: [Google]

40 KB, 600x400

>>678025618
/thread

>>678025618
If your relationship resembles your use of an inanimate object, YOU are the argument against it.

>>678029307

>takes away the ability

[citation needed]

>>678032524
The state of this...
Sex isn't a crime, dumbass. People are free to sleep with who they want whenever they want.
If you're mad about that, then that says way more about you than anyone else.

>>678025618
if you can eat some cheerios that no one touched or eat some cheerios that some dude came in which one would you choose ?

>>678029400

>values

subjective, ergo irrelevant

>>678027397
>People who hold sex cheap and do not make it sacred
Sacred? Lol. Virgin detected

>>678025618
A man has to try to get laid.
Or pay for it.
A woman has to literally just be there.
If she fucks anyone she's not loyal, not wife material, and easy as fuck.
If a guy is known for shagging everything he can, then the same applies.
Don't be in a relationship with him.
Dumb cunts.

>>678029307
Sex is sex. Love is love. Sometimes the two coincide. Often they don't.
Having lots of sex doesn't limit your ability to fall in love. That's just nonsense.
You sound like a very immature, very inexperienced and very insecure person.

>>678027517
>loose pussy
This isn't about the number of sex partners. Vaginal size varies the same way penis size does.

>>678032838
How about we stick to humans you fucking moron

>>678032181
Unfortunately you're still here
Just have to count on Darwinism for this one

File: api0x3az.yfp.jpg (1 MB, 1181x1181) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1181x1181

>>678029788

Reading all these terrified inexperienced paranoid losers freak out is sure making me feel better about my active and enjoyable sex life. Thanks guys!

a woman just has to be a slut to sleep with 5000 men. She can be the fattest, most disgusting piece of shit and some desperate guy would fuck her as long as she opened her legs.

a man has to be at least decent looking, kind of smooth talking, confident and many other things to sleep with 5000 women. a fat, disgusting piece of shit male will have a horrible time trying to find a girl to fuck.

>>678032122
Never been fat, luckily I got my mom side of the family body type. My brother wasn't so lucky. I might be ugly, I have a large nose.not a jew nose, just big.

>>678033618
Okay then retard.

In humans all cultures and feelings have evolved. This includes your insistence to stay a virgin by having unrealistic standards, and it also includes cuckold fetishes and apathy toward sexual promiscuity.

I thought that much would be obvious, but apparently not to pathological retards.

>>678027994
Nice. This.

>>678032452
I don't understand

Because biology.
No matter what social bullshit says (as a PhD candidate on actual science reject the term 'social science'), male and female brains are wired differently. Several studies have shown how oxytocin works and when is released on men and women. On men it lowers testosterone, thus making him 'less virile', but a the same time reducing the lust for new pussy and violent tendencies. On women it is released in great amounts after giving birth, and in lesser amounts during intense emotional periods and after specially good fucks. So essentially women only bond with their progeny and with those who fuck them. If they fuck around too much, the bonding capabilities are reduced.
Other works show a clear correlation between the pre-marital partner count and the chances of divoce, for both sexes, although the R is stronger in women (don`t remember the exact ratio).

Unfortunately prejudices are mostly based on heuristics. Generally speaking a high partner count is a telltale of possibly undesirable psychological features, such as: poor impulse control, low self-esteem, narcicism, gullibility, selfishness, etc... In most of the population is a clear telltale that as a long term partner that person will be problematic.

PD: you are still totally free and legit to wife a whore, but sciene bets pretty hard against you.

>>678028080
>-> You have been hanging with the wrong women....I've never been ashamed of how many people I've slept with. I'm not a slut and don't care if someone calls me one. I like sex. I like porn. I'm human. Everyone will always have different views...but I can agree that if people would stop raising their children under such stupid stereotypes we may, in time, get over this constant BS.

>>678031214
>disclaimer: I am a virgin

>>678032181

They changed the outcome of the sex, but they didn't change who we are and how we're wired. Trying to talk your way out of our nature doesn't make you naive Progressives somehow enlightened, it makes you a space cadets with trouble functioning in the real world.

Or do you think it's some kind of coincidence that the "social anxiety" and depressive disorder crowd and the loose Progressive crowd just so happen to overlap so strongly?

File: p3qXwwt.jpg (98 KB, 640x500) Image search: [Google]

98 KB, 640x500

>>678025618
>>Hurrr durrr women absorb DNA from semen you guys
>Bunk science
That's no bunk.
Women (at least during pregnancy) DO absorb some of the child's DNA, becoming (technically) a chimera.

>Cooties is not a valid reason. Its a childish response.
If by "cooties" you mean HIV, HPV, herpes, syphilis, gonorrhea, etc., then there's nothing childish about avoiding contact with an overly promiscuous woman (or man).

>>She has daddy issues, psychological issues, she will be an unhappy wife if she slept with a lot of guys...
>Correlation does not equal causation.
No, but causation DOES lead to correlation.
If she has daddy issues, she'll probably not only be a slut, but also a poor wife.
If she's a slut because of unrelated reasons, then that's fine, but that's not usually the case.

>In a sexually repressed society that punishes women's sexuality
Oh, wait.
I thought we were talking about Murrica or Yrope, not Pakistan or India.

>>Loose vagina
>If you argue this you are a literal virgin
Well, yeah.
Jamal's cock isn't going to ruin her cootch.
But having a baby sure can.

>>678032580
I worded that wrong. I have no desire to have sex outside of a committed relationship and I never will. I don't mind if a woman has had a few one night stands out of lust or whatever, but if they actively look for casual sex I don't want to be in a relationship with them.

>>678033434
Couldn't have said it better.

>>678025618
It's psychologically interesting and stimulating to be wanted by someone and needed by someone. It's less of both if that someone has already shared that type of relationship with multiple others.

It makes you less unique as a needed partner, and it makes them less complicated as any partner will fulfill their needs. AKA you're replaceable and it doesn't feel nice.

>>678033767
>I can't get laid.

You see, this always makes me laugh. Sex between men and women is, more or less, a zero-sum game.
In other words, the amount of sex had by men and women in total is roughly the same (we'll discount gay people and bi people who probably work out about even anyway).
So every time a woman fucks, a man also fucks. So this idea that women find it easy is absurd, because an easy woman just makes it easier for men to have sex. So your argument makes no sense.
In reality, men and women average out about the same. Some fuck a lot of people, some fuck a few, and some don't fuck any.
I don't think we have to guess too hard which group you fall into.

>>678031021

>huurrrhh my social studies teacher in 7th grade told me that that that we're all gonna die if I had kids and I believed it

Western countries are in decline, fucktard.

God, I hate that overpopulation myth.

>>678025618

Why do viral pics always have Tumblr comments underneath them now? Look at those comments. They add nothing to the picture. Is it clickbait? Do people actually care about the attached comments? I don't fucking see the point.

Feminists forgot about just one thing...

>men are held 100% accountable for sleeping around, just as much as women

That I can tell you from first hand experience. If you have a reputation for sleeping around, random bitches you don't even know will "call you out" publicly

>>678032864
I agree with you. I wouldn't down someone for having lots of casual sex, but I wouldn't want a relationship with someone that does.

Here is the only argument you need.

She is a slut and a women, she is a tool for the superior privileged white males. When a woman offers herself to a white man that is their way of giving back to her superiors (even though we are entitled to it and can have it whenever we want).

>>678025618
His analogy doesnt track the argument either.
>cereal doesnt cheat on you
>cereal doesnt take your money
>cereal doesnt give me stds

Now for the argument. Fuck bitches.

>>678034243
You think our attitudes to sex haven't really changed. Well, they have. Read a book.

And you think only progressives suffer from depression? Well, they don't. That's not true. But they are probably more like to admit to it and get it treated and recover. So that's cool.

>>678034699
This. Another case of women thinking they are special.

It ain't about quantity, it's about quality. I don't care how many guys you've banged, if they weren't assholes. If you have a history of bad partners, it is a sign that you probably don't have your head on straight.

please get laid.
all of you.

>>678034128
Had 20+ sexual partners. Currently engaged to my dream girl. But nice try.

>>678033434

>Divorce rate rises downright dramatically in correlation with number of sex partners a female has before marrying
>That's just nonsense.

In b4, "muh correlation/causation, it's just a coincidence that whores have failing marriages, I swear!"

Reality doesn't give a shit how mature and special you feel for taking things lightly. Talking down to people with that bullshit oh-so-mature attitude doesn't make the talk you're pulling out of your (clearly VERY experienced) asshole correct, it just makes you an asshole. You faggot.

>>678034404
It's not the number of times males and females as a whole have sex, it's the number of times a single male and a single female have sex. Obviously a man has sex every time a woman has sex, but those times could consist of one woman and 15 men. It's without a doubt easier to have sex with multiple people if you are a woman.

The odds of a single easy woman coming across 15 willing men are much higher than the odds of a single easy man coming across 15 willing women.

>>678025618
All in all the stereotype of women not 'being allowed' or a woman being shamed for wanting the same thing is just dumb. We aren't just hardwired just to make babies (I, personally, have no interest in such nonsense.) Men and women just find it normal for women to be prudes, it's expected...but it doesn't make them monsters or sluts because they want to fuck.
No one, regardless of what rests between their legs, should be shamed for desire and sex.
Granted, everyone has opinions and certain standards. If you dont want to be with somone (man or woman) who has slept with more than three people then fuckin don't. If you want someone who is experienced and numbers don't matter then go get that shit. Everyone is entitled to an opinion...but stop expecting everyone to agree or give to shits about it.
I've been with nine men and two women. Some were relationships some were just fun. I'm not disgusting, I'm not easy and I'm not a slut. I simply know what I like and what I want...and if I can get it I'm going to.

File: 9780765809636.jpg (22 KB, 400x430) Image search: [Google]

22 KB, 400x430

>>678025618
In regards to evolutionary biology-
I think the thought is genetically hardwired, speaking to the fact that we are just animals after all, and the premise to the base meaning of life is to pass on ones genes to secure the bloodline, males are meant to spread their seed far and wide to increase their evolutionary fitness as there is no true way (other than science...but again we're just animals...genetics...and such) for males to be sure of their genetic link to a child whereas women DO have security in their belief that a child is theirs, so it is an advantage to them to have lower partners in an attempt to "secure" one to help them raise the child to increase it's chance at life and to further pass on the genes of the family. A woman with a high number of partners can thus create skepticism in a mans belief about whether or not a pregnant woman carries his child.
>>678031021
It is still genetically hardwired into our being. Population size is irrelevant. Evolutionary fitness makes us selfish in the fact that ultimately it is MY genes that matter, not yours.
>>678032838
>All that you need to meet the definition of a 'male' is that you produce sperm cells.
What about sterile males? Silly me, i thought it was the Y chromosome, for humans, that denotes male gender.

>>678035480
That's only because of the false dichotomy of women being called a whore for sleeping around, and men being studs. So if you want more sex, stop giving women a hard time for wanting the same thing. It's really not that hard.

Also, the men vs women sex numbers in surveys are always skewed. Men have more. This is because men sleep with prostitutes, and prostitutes are rarely surveyed.

fuck off, I can't deal with that "we are just like animals" blullshit. nonsense.

>>678035931
I never said that dude, I didn't say women were whores for sleeping around I just said it's easier for them to sleep around. I don't need any more sex than I'm already getting. I don't fucking care how often girls sleep with guys and those who do are usually just jealous.

My whole point is literally that it's easier for a girl to have sex with a lot of guys.

>>678027994
>hurr durr I'm not talking about biology I'm talking about society

>>678025618
It's my choice to not fuck someone who has no self control, what do you care?

>>678029084
ejaculate and evacuate

>>678035413
Well, at least I'm not sitting around fretting about my future wife hypothetically cheating on me like a little pussy. Go fuck yourself. Clearly no-one else will.

>>678031928
Fucking kek, sentient doesn't mean what you think it means, friend.

>>678032838
Yeah but humans didn't evolve to have corkscrew dicks, cum the consistency of glue, a knot to seal holes with, or barbs to scoop out opposing male cum. We are a type of animal that is primarily based on having high quality children at a slow pace compared to most other animals, excluding some that are even larger than humans. Things like rodents are genetically based to have as many offspring as possible and don't need to have high selective capabilities because birth and pregnancy are short processes that don't put too much inability to function on the rodent, and often enough soon after birth many mothers abandon their young. One example is the case in rabbits where offspring are left alone in a few weeks. The ability to mass produce children makes natural selection more based of who's alive at all, since the death rate for a lot of animals is very high, simply being alive up to the point of breeding is pretty evidence enough you're worth passing your genes.

TL;DR: Human Babies are harder to make, just because other mammals appeal to your kinks doesn't make them the same.

>>678025618

She is at an increased likelihood of having an std. Society is driven by the need for pussy so women who give up their pussy easily harm society as a whole

>>678036434
Well, on a very base level, yeah.
But I think that's more about male desperation than anything else. Some men will fucking anything, but I'm not sure most women would want them.

>>678032757
>If a laser can melt steel, but also burns through paper it's a shitty laser.

That's how stupid you sound.

>>678030260
So you're into virgin teens...cool lmfao. Enjoy your children and cheese grater bjs XD

>>678035752
Labels like slut and stud are labels given by society.
You're not allowed to declare rather you are, or are not one.

>>678036435
Being this retarded.

>>678037232
Males will fuck anything because they can't be sure of the genetic link to their offspring and thus need to fuck whatever whenever they can. Women care more about a good partner (health, attributes, security) because they can be sure of the genetic link to their children

take brake:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoo9Vu1a9bU

>>678025618
THE ARGUMENT:
I don't like Whores.
END.

>>678025618
everybody likes a bowl of cheerios out of a fresh new box. nobody likes cheerios that have been sitting in milk for three days and had a bunch of guys stick their dicks in.

>>678035840
why is the thumbnail of this picture different than when it gets clicked on?

>>678025618
This thread again

>>678025618
Well if the analogy goes both ways then that's a bowl of cheerios eating a bowl of cheerios.

>>678037606
It happens, sometimes intentionally.

>>678034924
Try reading a real book about evolutionary biology instead of some bullshit written by a bunch of liberal arts majors

>>678033054
this is the truest

>>678034924
It's not the attitudes that have remained, it's the reasons and logical basis in why we want to do it that have remained the same since mankind began.

If you want to argue emotions and happiness feel free to complain to tumblr.

>>678037485
Yeah, I mean at a primary animal level, but we're evolved individuals who can make personal choices.
SOME males will act like that. Fewer than you might expect. I am no lothario, but I have turned down sex. With attractive women. A number of times. Why? Because of reasons. Shit that was happening in my life. Personality. Circumstance. Because I didn't fucking feel like it.

This reduction of humans to basic animal behaviour is a gross over simplification of the most complex of societal relationships.

>>678037840
Can you try that again but actually answer the question perhaps? I mean, obviously it happens

>>678037953
>>678038161
Humans are more complex than that. You might not be, but the rest of us are.

>>678025618
If a women is sleeping with a lot of man then out genes say "don't create a family with her, because if she has a child there are more chances that the child is someone elses so you would spend your resources raising him up instead of your own child, so your genes wouldn't get passed along to the new generation". People take that feeling and think they should call the girl a slut, but it's simply a warning created by evolution to ensure the continuation of your bloodline. /thread

>>678025618
Ok, remind me that it's okay I plow your wife every weekend while your out. If it doesn't matter then also let me and my friends run a train while your at work. If the number 9f sexual partners doesn't matter then why would it matter if every person your work with has fucked your wife.

Pro top, it's because it does. You don't want your best friend knowing how it feels to sleep with the one you love.

>>678025618
STDs affect male and females, 1/4 people have them. I care about who she's fucked, she cares about who I've fucked.

>>678027588
i wanted to fuck this cute cashier so bad and i heard from a lot of guys that had so i thought it would be strictly business after introducing myself to her. i met her after work and she asked if i minded riding with her to a few places. she drove a bmw and shifted like paul walker. it was hot. she was selling some pills to people, but herself, she didnt even drink or smoke. it was for the cash. it was hot. we made these trips nearly every night that summer, having a great time enjoying each others company. during the whole time, it got crazy but she wouldnt let me kiss her. she wouldnt let me go under her clothes. i thought i read her wrong and felt embarrassed. it bothered me. i stayed away for a few months. i ran into her one night and she says she wanted to come clean and that she had sex with more than 80 partners, if not more. she didnt kiss me because she didnt want to transmit herpes to me. she didnt want to have sex because she had HPV and it gave her cervical cancer. that whole time, i thought it was me doing something wrong. im so glad she didnt burn me. i dont give a fuck if "75% of sexually active adults have HPV so its ok" that shit is not okay!

>>678038460
Humans on a base level are pretty simple.
Complexity only comes in when people are introduced to society and other internalized concepts.
It's the same reason why people think they're animals trapped in human bodies and believe in head mates, it's mostly new complexities that they've been taught or taught themselves out of a separate desire based less on sex and more on comfort or emotional connections.

TL;DR: Humans are not that complex, people are very complex beyond a biological level.

>>678039136
Both take a test. Done.

>>678025618
I am disappointed. I thought this was a logic puzzle thread, but it is just more SJW v. r9k v. who gives a shit, shit.

>>678038217
The fact that we are aware dof the reason for our urges or behavior doesn't change the fact that those urges exist. It's a matter of whether or not those urges can or should be resisted. It's for those reasons I believe the dichotomy of slut vs. stud exist.
Want a gold star for turning down sex? The fact that men can and have turned down sex doesn't need to be pointed out, just as the opposite (rape) doesn't need to be pointed out (rape, btw, only supports evolutionary biology...and the reduction of human behavior to animal behavior).
Some would argue that colony systems are more complex than human societies, but that's another conversation altogether.

>>678032524
this

>>678025618
lol there is no arguments against this. Men that get butt hurt about this have on self confidence.

>>678039622
Sex is not a crime. You're a moron.

>>678033132
A lot of sex is pretty illegal in a lot of places.
Homosexuality is a big illegal one.

>>678038460
You think you are complex, and yes humans are very complex animals, but we are still animals governed by instinct and it is out of that instinct that we have built our societies and social norms

>>678039720
Anal sex, oral sex, extramarital sex are all illegal in a number of places. So is sex with animals and kiddos

>>678025618
>48 people put the same box of cheerios into their mouths then spit them back into the box, want some?

>>678032524
so like your past actions determine your character? that's bullshit.

>>678039994
And Homosexuality in many places!

I guess it shouldn't matter who I've slept with then BUT there is a breaking point in the discussion when you encounter the possibility that she may have been recorded and put on the internet. Considering this discussion is taking place on the internet and the scope hasn't been abstracted or connoted. I wouldnt want to have a bunch of guys humiliating my woman on a daily basis. This happened with my ex. Pretty much forced me to reconsider the whole trusting women with anything they deliberately bring forward if it's not exactly relevant. She told me she'd been "charmed" once. Turns out she took it in the ass on a daily basis and got recorded sucking dick and put on display.
Funny, I found it on /GIF/.. Would explain why ppl would look at me sorta disgusted when they saw her and looked to communicate something to me. I think they passed it around during HS.

If this happens a lot, I think then you cant bring the key and lock into it and instead treat it as a combination lock. I did it properly and got the benefit of the doubt by being privileged enough to gain access, but I had to work that hard for something the last few wouldnt work for and they even got to show it off AND keep a memento? Fuck that stupid bitch and fuck faggots like this for planescaping this kind of faggotry.

For:
Girls aren't predictable like a lot of negligent guys think. They're complicated, and I guess it's different depending on the girl.
Against:
A girl who cheated on somebody to get with you will do that to you, no doubt. A girl that's fucked a hundred guys when the human limit for name capacity is roughly 200-400 has literally either fucked 100 guys who's name they will always remember, or fucked an indeterminate number of guys who's name she won't remember. By that logic, knowing she's probably fucking you, would likely not have a second thought about fucking some other guy when she bores of you.

Studies show that most successful marriages start with "fresh couples". Fresh being no sex, and limited premarital sexual counterparts.

>>678040260
yes, but definitely not enough places.

>>678040019
^this

Good job faggot, im proud of you

>>678040255
Well... They do in most cases...

>>678038126
There's no truth there it's a suggestion.

>>678025618
Woman do care about the number of women a man has slept with. I dont see what is the problem of men doing the same. The reasons behind it are irrelevant.

>>678025618
you know why this arguement and every arguement like it falls apart in real life? Men arent the ones slut shaming women for the most part. Unless they got dicks in them right that second most men arent going to say no and the name calling doesnt really start unless there is a fight.

Slut shaming is done almost entirely by other women. They talk shit on each other all of the fucking time. They are also fiercely competitive when in comes to mates. If a girl is being called a slut i can almost guarantee you its another woman saying it.

Im not saying some men don't do this shit but it isnt even close to the level of what women do to each other.

File: sexo.jpg (52 KB, 1139x537) Image search: [Google]

52 KB, 1139x537

>>678040421

>>678040478
Leave me alone! Rape! Somebody help!

>>678027397
/thread

>>678025618
>You eat at restaurants from spoons that touched the mouths of thousands of people, you shake hands with hands of people who touched things much worse than penises. Cooties is not a valid reason
Those spoons are washed in hot water and soap, and sanitizer solution. I've never known a fuck to get up afterwards and pressure wash her vagina.

>>678040794
kek

>>678027994
End the fucking thread here

Hello my name is John

>>678041070
Welcome to /b/ can I take your order?

>>678041070
Hi Jhon.

>>678040389
>Studies show that most successful marriages start with "fresh couples"
That claim needs a cite. How is successful defined? Is this cross-culturally, controlled for religion (I imagine most "fresh couples" were pretty religious). What is the threshold for most, to me that is over 50%, and I find it highly unlikely that 50% of successful (married once until death?) marriages came from a union of two virgins. Does this include arranged/forced marriages (you know how them sand niggers like to force 14 y/o girls to get married) and marriages in places where it is virtually impossible to get divorced?

>>678025618
Do you want a bowl of cheerios or a bowl of cheerios that ten people have cum inside?
Sage check my dubs.

File: Can't turn a hoe into a housewife.jpg (264 KB, 1223x1570) Image search: [Google]

264 KB, 1223x1570

>>678025618
>What would be the argument against this?
facts

>>678041234
I see NO DUBS

>>678040781
yah, like i said...not enough places. Interesting how the nigger and sand nigger places got something correct vs the rest of us...

>>678041234
Nice straight

>>678025618
It's like being the first to climb Everest. Edmund Hilary did it and it was amazing Now tons of people have done it and it's not special any more. It's actually gotten easier.
It's a bragging thing. You can't really brag about something everyone has done.

>>678025618
although it is true that you can't "uneat" the cheerios, you could have made better life decisions and avoided eating cheerios. you would do so if you think that it has sentimental value to a loved one or a prospective loved one to be "special" and your "cheerio".

it's just what you want the other person to feel like. if i called everyone my best friend because i love making best friends, it is not wrong for my best friend to think, "wow he has a lot of best friends; i'm really not the best/closest/etc" because i went about and made a shitton of best friends that "hurdur i can't unmake".

>>678041390
But Anon I don't wanna think like the Nigger.

>>678041390
While we are at it we can starve ourselves and sell ourselves into slavery

File: Screen-Shot-2014-06-22-at-9.23.22-AM.png (405 KB, 639x535) Image search: [Google]

405 KB, 639x535

>>678025618

Guys don't like it because it makes them uncomfortable when they realize if shes been with a bunch of dudes before them, they are probably not going to be the last one shes with, and that basically shes going to be looking for her next fling sooner or later.

Statistics show guys initiate breakups more, but women initiate divorces more. This suggests men want to break it off before it becomes serious, but women will let it become serious and legally binding and then break it off, probably due to the assets she can take while she moves onto another guy.

Guys don't like the idea of being compared to previous partners a lot more than a women do. Especially when it comes to dick size and how good they are at using it.

There's also the saying easy come, easy go. It looks like they don't put much time or effort or emotional attachment in because they bounce from relationship to relationship.

Its much easier for a woman to put herself out there and find a guy, compared to the ease men have.

The only kind of guy who would be ok with that would be a guy who's only interested in the sex, which basically makes him just as bad.

Which shows more dominance to you, penetrating someone else or being penetrated? Guys don't like the idea of their woman being dominated by a list of guys, as it suggests shes easily dominated and the list will get longer, possibly while they're together, thereby increasing the chance of him being a cuck. No self respecting man wants to be a cuck.

Its entirely the guys decision if he wants to be with a woman with a lot of mileage, though. If hes willing to have some standards, that is.

>>678041335
Win. Also I think it plays into male insecurities. May be irrational but still valid.

This is why my pets have their own food bowls.

>>678041518
Then try not spelling like one.
>>678041608
That's why I think it's interesting. They have such little value and are generally ignorant, it's incredible that they got something correct. And what country is that in S. America?

>>678025618
OP I deliberately do not know the number of people I slept with. If I were to estimate, I would say around 10. I have slept with 18yo and 53yo and the older woman was much better.

It isn't as though I couldn't count, but I place so little value in that knowledge that I won't count. My wife and I had both had long term intimate relationships before we met. Did it make our relationship better, that we already had experience? Of course.

>>678040764
Men who call women sluts are usually just bitter because they can't get laid. Otherwise they usually don't.

>>678041335
Kek, you think statistical evidence is fact. Bless your heart.

>>678041335
This doesn't refute the point just something to consider.
Correlation != causation
Depressed and insecure girls become sluts.
I think most people would rather avoid mental illness and insecurity is never attractive

>>678042040
>>678041335
And it's even self reported surveys...and on topics people are likely to lie about. Lol

>>678025618
please, your analogies are terrible.

>spoon
that has been cleaned and is made typically of microbial-resistant materials like steel
>vagina
it's meant to breed life, you fuckwit. ever hear of STD's? yeah that's a helluva lot worse than cooties.

and yes, the lock does track the argument.
it matters how many locks a key can open because we know it can access whatever goods is behind the lock. it also matters how terribly easy it is to open a lock based on the number of keys that can open it, so we know our goods would be safe or unsafe using that lock.

i will want the carrier of my children, the heiress to my possessions and the sharer of my life to be someone i can trust. if it takes the slight bang of a palm to open a lock, i wouldn't put it on my safe.

my wife would see in a primitive way, not unlike mine, that i am a hunter that can access many goods; thus i am desirable.

>>678042040
It's the figure contribution to your fact.

What derivative is to a function except purely implicit. Go away.

>>678041335
Idiot

It is summer already

>>678025618
Oh it's okay, anyone can do this, but no man wants to date a fucking slut and no women wants to be with a player.

>>678034264
this

>>678037045
>Humans didn't evolve to have[...]barbs to scoop out opposing male cum
Yeah, about that... It's pretty much the function of the head and foreskin.

File: EagleLion.gif (2 MB, 2509x1673) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 2509x1673

>>678040255
Dubs speak truth.

>>678034264
Took the words right out of my mouth

File: 1441729092089.gif (246 KB, 500x368) Image search: [Google]

246 KB, 500x368

>>678041059

>>678034431
Well he didn't say people are going to die from overpopulation, he was just saying that we are already very well populated and people don't really care about it anymore.

>>678032243
>calling that dude a white knight
Nigga you retarded?

>>678042488
No it doesn't, why would you think that?

>>678025618

>>678025618

I said that key analogy in a sociology class in college, about 90% of the class lost their shit laughing while about 3 feminists got pissed and tried to get me in trouble. Luckily the dean is a old white straight guy who didnt give a shit about the feminazi regime.

>>678034431
Our resources are also in decline. Water is running out in many western countries for agriculture and that's not even the most dire problem. Just because we haven't hit the wall yet doesn't mean we're sustainable.

>>678025618
Really the thing that I see wrong with this is that people just have sex casually. Well what's wrong with that? It's simple, women are supposed to be more emotional and the ones who care to be in a relationship but now all they want is sex. This is fucking ridicilious people have no self control. You shouldn't just have sex with random people or people you just met yet that seems to be happening more and more. Sex is a deep, physical connection it should not be done casually. OP you're just trying to justify you being a whore... the reason why tumblr and john green agree is because tumblr is literally the youth and john green appeals to the youth.

>>678026839
/thread

>>678040255
Dafuq you smoking faggot?

>>678025618
I used to like this beta male, but fuck this nonsense. Crash course is oversimplified drivel interlaced with his worldview too, so it should surprise me he said this bullshit.

>>678025618
>pretending you don't care that tons of guys plowed your girl
Ay lmao
You're trying to convince people they should adopt your sexual/social preferences ? Good luck. Would you mind letting me know who gave you that authority? I give my guy friends credit for fucking a lot of whores, and I don't want my girlfriend or wife to have 10 feet different cock on her resume. Deal with it.

>>678025618
This faggot is just rationalizing why he is a beta cuck