50%

>>677846751
are u mentally disabled?

>>677846669
40

2/3

File: image.jpg (50 KB, 700x544) Image search: [Google]

50 KB, 700x544

>>677846828
He's right you moron

>>677846828
fine, what's the answer?

>>677846958
2/3

I think an eighth or sixteenth for some reason.
It's probably some permutation or factorial idk

>>677846669
50%

>>677846669
12/35th
ez mode

>>677846669
If you don't put the ball back, 50%
If you do put the ball back, 75%

File: 1449022835590.png (405 KB, 772x482) Image search: [Google]

405 KB, 772x482

>>677846751
>>677846950
It's ok Tyrone, you tried.

>>677846669
Its not box on rite.
Is box in middle or left. U dunno witch.
If left yellow, if middle Grey. 50%

pretty sure this actually just is 50%, you already picked a gold.

"probability next ball is gold", silver/silver is completely out of the question here that box is worth nothing.

>>677846994
Why not just say 66.66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666desu66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666%?

The final answer is 50%

File: image.png (38 KB, 1016x932) Image search: [Google]

38 KB, 1016x932

>>677847237
"same box also will be gold" retard can't even read

Possibility 1: You pick one gold ball from first bag, the next ball WILL be gold

Possibility 2: You pick the other gold ball from bag one, next ball WILL be gold.

Possibility 3: You pick the gold ball that's with the grey ball, it will NOT be gold.

2 out of the 3 possibilities end in you picking a second gold ball. The third bag isn't part of the probability because it's impossible when you assume the first ball you pick is gold.

2/3 chance is the answer.

>>677846669
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand%27s_box_paradox

>>677847288
right but there's only a 1/3 chance you picked the gold ball from box #2, but a 2/3 chance you picked a gold ball from box #1. Therefore, you have a 1/3 chance of not drawing a gold ball (box #2), but a 2/3 chance of drawing the other gold ball from box #1.

2/5 final answer

3/6 + 3/6
2/5 + 3/5

>>677846828
>>677846751

No. S/He's not. Each draw is a different roll. We know that the first ball was gold, that eliminates the two silver box. So the real question is, what are the chances you have the box with two gold balls of the two possible choices. The chance of that is 50%. Suck my dick, any statistics or math fags. These are facts with simple math, simple always trumps abstract.

>>677846950
But what if he pulled it from the one with two silvers? Then it's 0% chance.

>>677847453
wrong

>>677847453
It's a box pick and not a ball pick so ball 1&2 from box 1 counts only as 1 pick

You have 3 boxes, in the first stage you have 1/3 chance for any of the boxes.
Once you remove your first ball, and you see it is gold, you know for sure your next ball is going to be either silver, or gold.
Since the first ball is already a known fact, you only have to calculate what your chance is on finding the NEXT gold ball: 50%

TL;DR: I'm a math-fag and i just explained why it is 50%

>>677847746
Good explanation you cuck

>>677847453
50%chance that the box you randomly picked is the one with 2 gols balls - no matter which one of them.

50% chance you picked the box with 1 gold and 1 silver - next ball will be silver.

Godfuckingdammit its not that hard stop trying to make up shit.

>>677846669
gr8 b8. Made me reply. The odds are 1/3. Bc you're picking 2 balls out of the same box your choosing a box not balls. There is only one box with 2 gold balls.

Not surprised OP makes a post about handling balls.

File: 1452367041379.jpg (37 KB, 396x382) Image search: [Google]

37 KB, 396x382

Didn't we do this earlier today?

It is 2/3 and a way to demonstrate elementary probability,

>>677847453
Possibility 1 and 2 are the exact same thing. It doesn't matter which one you pick, the other will automatically be the 2nd one. You either picked from box 1 or box 2, so it's 50/50

>>677847828
Fucking thank you!!!!

>>677847651
Yes. He is. Same box. So you fed didn't pick up the all silver box. Which means the next ball you pick is one of two outcomes. 50/50 shot

>>677847672
It says that he starts with a gold ball so box 3 is irrelevant at the beginning

>>677847746
>>677847826
>>677847828
>>677847867
>>677847930
>>677847976

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand%27s_box_paradox

you're all fucking stupid

File: disgusting.jpg (25 KB, 680x383) Image search: [Google]

25 KB, 680x383

>>677847555
Those trips are wasted on the likes of you

>>677848044
Omfg this!!!

>>677847928
>>677847887

No, because one possibility is precluded in the proposition of the problem. There for two choices. 50/50.

>>677847521
He's right
>>677847347
>>677847651
>>677847828
>>677847867

>>677847453
Probability of B given A. A is a given we already have a golden ball. Either we are in box 1 or in box 2 dumbass.

File: Brandsites_oranjeboom_Slides_auto_auto_c900_c450_q_Strong_Beers.png (233 KB, 900x450) Image search: [Google]

233 KB, 900x450

33% My greasy nigger friend.

>>677846994
the question is about the probability that the next ball you take from THE SAME box will be also gold.

so you picked a box with a gold ball, it leaves one out

and it can be either a box with 2 gold ores or a box with silver and gold ore. 50:50

>>677848113
Finally, someone else isn't as ass about this
>>677847521 (You)

God you guys are dumb. It's 2/5. Just count the balls and make a fraction.

If you said anything other than 50/50 then you have poor reading and comprehension skills

>>677847828
Hand back your degree immediately, if you have one.

>>677847928
I asked for more pics like this so its not my fault that all the guys take the riddle

>>677847555
[Gold, Gold] [Gold (picked), Silver] = next ball is silver
[Gold (Picked), Gold] [Gold, Silver]= next ball is gold
These are the only two possibilities which means it is 50%

>>677848343
They're all just going to stick with it being a box picking problem when it's actually a ball picking problem. They're so focused on the boxes that they aren't noticing that there are THREE gold balls. Picking one gold ball over the other in box one ARE two different outcomes.

File: bait0.png (35 KB, 625x626) Image search: [Google]

35 KB, 625x626

>>677848142
The probability that GG would produce a gold coin is 1.

The probability that SS would produce a gold coin is 0.

The probability that GS would produce a gold coin is 1⁄2


Originally, all six coins were equally likely to be chosen.

The chosen coin cannot be from drawer S of box GS, or from either drawer of box SS.

So it must come from the G drawer of box GS, or either drawer of box GG.

The three remaining possibilities are equally likely, so the probability that the drawer is from box GG is 2⁄3.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand%27s_box_paradox

>>677846669
1/2 probability, the question is of the probability AFTER already finding 1 gold ball, cutting off the box with the silvers, meaning all you have is the probability of 1 box vs 1 box

2/3 chance to pick a box with gold in it and 1/3 chance to pick the box with two golds in it

So if middle box is picked first it will be 1/3 chance to get first box.
Answer equals 1/3

If first box is chosen first it will be a 2/3 chance to get a box with a gold ball in it but a 1/2 chance to choose gold on the second box.

1/2 * 2/3 = 1/3

Final answer is 1/3

>>677848589
Probability Estimation = Abstract math.

3 boxes, only one meets the criteria, therefore 1/3

>>677848545
Yeah, it's painful how intransigent some people on /b/ are. But, these threads tend to die down once you post an appropriate link, and the passionate morons go away to rage in quiet, without actually learning anything.

/rant

>>677846669
The other ball is radioactive and the cat was already dead

Its called a paradox for a reason. Try this out and it Will be 50/50, but in the minds of eggheads its 2/3

>>677846669
50% in the case in the OP, 2/3 in Bertrand's paradox where the other ball can be from another box

>>677846669

50/50. By picking a gold ball, then you know that your next ball will either be from the first or second box which will be a 50/50 chance.

>>677848494
Idk if I can find a pic so I'll type one out.
You have a boat tied up at the dock
There is a ladder on the boat going into the water.
The ladder has six rungs 1 ft apart.
3 rings under water and 3 above water.
The tide rises at one ft per hour.
If the tide comes in for 3 hours how many ladder rings are under water?

>>677848786
/thread

>>677848632
That was deliberate...

>>677847568
Ya tried a bit too hard there
Wrong
Pretty obviously 50%

>>677847555
yes but it doesn't matter. the question states YOU HAVE A GOLD BALL and what are the chances you PICK A GOLD BALL FROM THE SAME BOX?

its 50%

>>677848977
Still three because the boat will rise with the tide

>>677849083
i see your reading comprehension is as bad as your math.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand%27s_box_paradox

"A box is chosen at random, a random drawer is opened, and a gold coin is found inside it. What is the chance of the coin on the other side being gold?"

>>677848692
Omg you already picked the fucking box and drew a gold ball!!!! You don't get to pick another box and the last ball in your prechosen box can only be one of two things

>>677848692
the question already says you have a gold ball, having 1/3 or 2/3 chance to pick a ball with gold in it from the initial statements is invalid

there's 3 gold balls and one silver.

Eliminate one gold and you're left with 2:1 gold to silver. That's a probability if 67% you'll draw another gold ball now. Just because you pick a box doesn't matter. The balls could be in the same box and the odds remain the same.

>>677849187
Good reader.

>>677848786
the actual question states you know for a fact you have a gold ball, you are only trying to find the probability of the next ball in YOUR gold box.

there could be 1 million Silver Silver ball boxes before the question, the answer is still 50%

>>677849451
That would be true if you also hadn't picked a gold ball as well

Here's the one true answer:
Before picking up one ball there is a 1/3 chance, because only one box has 2 gold balls.
After picking up a gold ball there is 1/2 chance because one of the two boxes that has a gold ball has 2 gold balls.

This thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjYSR8oOToI

>>677847316
oh you're right, I'm an idiot

>>677848589
No, if you consider the theory Schroedinger's cat (Which I am basing it loosely and don't know the actual theory so fuck you if I get it wrong) you would not know which gold ball from GG has been picked and it is equally likely of it being both so we can imagine it as a state the they have both been picked and regardless of what happens, from GG there will always be another gold to pick.

Gold privilege is giving the first box TWO chances

>>677848848
You're ignoring the wording of the OP.

The odds that the second ball you pull will be gold, as the first ball is removed from the equation entirely. Since the first ball only seeks to determine that you have chosen either box one or two, it's irrelevant, so treat the boxes as though they contain one ball, gold, or silver. One, or the other. 50:50, if you will.

>>677849739
Cause he's wrong

>>677848977
none because a ladder has rungs and not rings.

>>677849451
you're only looking for the probability of your box not both, friend.

>>677846669
50%, easy

W

>>677849345
>>677849309
>>677849046
Well i now know this a childrens word problem and basic odds

People like me solve math without reading enough
People like you read and do what your told

File: 1459418241439.jpg (66 KB, 533x523) Image search: [Google]

66 KB, 533x523

The cats already dead!

>>677849814
This is my last attempt to educate you:
http://blog.zymergi.com/2013/06/bertrands-box-paradox.html

>>677849913
Lol. Missed that last rung.

>>677849685
this. the wording is intentionally vague to cause conflict

>>677848977
how long is the rope on which the boat is tied to the dock ?

>>677850111
For the sake of the riddle it's 21.75 meters and a half foot

>>677850065
Yet again you ignore the wording. The question does not add any detail, it simply applies to the material. Basically, this Paradox is asinine.

>>677850324
which foot there are various lenghts of each foot for each nation which used it in the past ... unlike meter ... metric system :<

It's quite simple actually.
You have already picked the gold ball... that means that you got the box number one or two, that being said it, pretty much dismisses the box with 2 silvers.
You have to look at it from the perspective of the boxes, not balls, you already know, that you picked one of the first two, so there are only 2 possible outcomes
There is actually a term in mathematics for something like that... but I am not a native english speaker, so I don't know it... instead of dividing the number of desired outcomes by the number of all possible outcomes, u divide it by the number of outcomes that match the given condition (getting one gold ball first)
calculating probability like that goes like this
P(getting gold after already getting gold - desired outcome on the condition that we already got a box with gold)=P(picking the box with 2 gold - desired outcome)/P(picking the box with at least one gold - condition)=(1/3)/(2/3)=1/2=50%

>>677846669
the way I see it:
we know first draw is a gold ball so we either drew from box one or box two
let's assume the balls aren't put back into the boxes after the draw, that means we either have 100% chance to draw another gold ball from box one or 0% chance to draw another gold ball from box two, which means we have 50% chance total to draw another gold ball

if we assume the balls are put back however, we have 100% chance to get another gold ball from box one and 50% chance to get another one from box two, which makes it 75% this time

Literally the only way this could be different from 50% is if you are putting the ball back in the box. That increases the odds to 75%.

>>677850677
there are two possible outcomes, but not equally likely. if you picked a gold ball, then you know you either have box #1 or box #2. but not with a 50/50 chance. you have a 2/3 chance that you have box #1, and only a 1/3 chance of having box #2.

File: 1446695637450.jpg (219 KB, 1224x1445) Image search: [Google]

219 KB, 1224x1445

>>677849754
>if you consider the theory of Schroedinger's cat
>I don't know the actual theory

>>677850855
They're not asking the odds you have the box. They're asking the odds that the next ball will be Gold. Y'all need to learn some reading comprehension.

2/3
(if you calculate with formula and don't guess)

>>677851151
those two odds are related, though. you've already excluded box #3, therefore you yourself are taking into account which box you have. apologies if you're too stubborn to admit you're wrong, or too stupid to read a wikipedia article that's in fairly basic english. but you're wrong.

OKAY FUCKTARDS LISTEN UP. IMAGINE THAT THERE IS TWO BOXES THAT HAVE TWO BALLS IN EACH. THEY ARE CONNECTED BY A STRING AND ONE STRING HAS TWO GOLD, THE OTHER ONE GOLD AND A SILVER. NOW IMAGINE THAT THESE BOXES ARE ONLY SHOWING YOU ONE GOLD AND THE OTHER BALL IS HIDDEN UNDERNEATH BUT STILL CONNETED VIA THE STRING. YOU CAN PICK UP ONE OF THE BALLS ON SHOW. WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY THAT THE BALL UNDERNEATH IS GOLD.
Well. The balls underneath are either a gold or a silver so that means.... Guess what? 50% NOW SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET ON WITH YOUR LJVES

>>677847828
You are a pretty dumb math fag.
Btw,im also a math fag,not as dumb tho

>>677849309

The problem in your wikipedia article and the problem in this pic are worded differently. You need reading comprehension on the pic in this thread.

>>677850598
American

>>677850993
I don't know the actual wording of the theory but I know the key principles.
>A cat in a box with poison
Clearly kept captive by the average /b/tard due to a roll thread
>We can't tell if the cat is dead or alive so we create a new state where it is both
Similar to tumblrinas and genders

File: 1329528414321.jpg (58 KB, 500x199) Image search: [Google]

58 KB, 500x199

>>677848848
that is not always the case. i was introduced to the monty hall problem ~9 years ago on /b/

i raged, then i read the wiki article, then i felt like a jackass and became smarter

since you got a gold ball, you're in one of the two left boxes.
1/3 chance of being in the mixed box, 2/3 the double gold box. Aka. 1/3 of the time it's 0% that the other ball is gold, and 2/3 the chance is 100%. Multiply probabilities ==> answer is 2/3.

>>677846669
GG
GS
SS

You picked a gold ball. Your box therefore is either:

GG
GS

What is the probability the other ball - in the same box you just picked from - is gold as well?

50%.

G[G]
OR
G[S]

We know SS is impossible, therefore we must draw our probability from this new matrix of boxes.

Anyone who disagrees is either trolling or just plain dumb.

File: 1334534624105.jpg (57 KB, 458x319) Image search: [Google]

57 KB, 458x319

>>677852399
read the wiki you fucking imbecile, just read it

>>677852399
wrong, you will be in GG more often than GS. See my post >677852395 for the correct answer.

>>677846669
It depends if you are as wise as you are bold. Young in limbs, and in judgment old.

>>677852575
>>677852399
I am an imbecile. I rushed to a conclusion.

It's 2/3 lol.

File: 1334544369939.jpg (37 KB, 544x463) Image search: [Google]

37 KB, 544x463

>>677852799
believe me, we have all been there. this shit is unintuitive. you have proven that you are able to learn and that is the most important thing. so, respect to you

>>677852399
I don't think they're trolling, they are bringing links of a problem of a similar callibre and saying that is the answer. Similar to if we had the problem of solving who did a murder and we knew that a case similar to this was done by a guy called Tyrion, it is similar so it must be him since he shot someone with a crossbow and so did this murderer. HOW COULD THIS BE WRONG?!

>>677851715
Read the entire article ya dingus
Or are the words being drawer instead of box too complex for you?

anyone who said it's 50% is retarded and never studied probability. The fact that you pick the first gold ball from the gold bag is different from the fact that you pick the second one. Even if they both are gold they're two different objects and correspond to two different situations you morons then it's 2/3

>>677853134
They may be two different objects but what it is trying to find out is if the next ball is gold. If we replace that with 1s and 0s
11 10
Does 1 not equal 1 and therefore they are the same thing?
Or this
>>677851648

>>677853134
You take box 1 or 2 and not ball 1,2 or box 2... Murican education everyone

>>677853081
Except the wiki link clearly describes the same exact conditions save balls being coins instead.

Maybe this way of thinking will help you:

If you pick a gold ball from a box you have 2 gold balls and one silver ball existing.

GG
GS

As you can see if you remove the G from one of those.

Think of this as well, you can pick a gold balls from GG in two different outcomes, and GS once.

If you pick from GG, the probability of the next ball being G is 1. If you pick from GS, then the probability is 0. This is what may lead you to think it's 1/2. But you are forgetting one thing, you can pick a gold ball from GG in TWO different outcomes.

GG
GG
GS

When you pick a ball, one of those outcomes becomes reality.

You are twice as likely to pick the box with two gold balls then you are to pick GS given this scenario.

>>677853557
you don't take a box, you're picking a ball in a box, then taking ball 1 and taking ball 2 in the gold bag are two different situations. fucking study probability

>>677853557
>insults murican education
>is completely wrong
This is why you live in a shithole and blame whitey.

WE WUZ KANGS

>>677853779
see
>>677849754
You can consider them as the same fucking ball. Also It is asking about boxes not balls. There is two boxes that can be picked
[G]
or
[S]
If you pick G, you will get G as the second ball
If you pick S, you will get S as the silver ball.

>>677846669
It's very simple.
It appears to be as if you're picking from box 1 or 2, but you're not.
It's stated that you pick a golden ball, so you have to look at the probability of picking a box where you pick a golden ball which would produce another golden ball.

3 golden balls, 2 of them will produce another golden ball if you pick it.

Answer is 2/3. Don't dismiss the probability of you picking a silver ball if you first stick your hand in box number two.

>>677854492
This has nothing to do with quantum mechanics you idiot.

>>677853531
there are 3 possibilities :

1) you picked the 1st gold ball of the gold bag and will then pick the 2nd gold ball in it
2) you picked the 2nd gold ball of the gold bag and will then pick the 1st gold ball in it (different situations, get it?)
3) you picked the gold ball from the other box and will then pick a silver ball next

there are 2/3 favorable ways for getting a gold ball again then the probability is 2/3 now gtfo

File: 1458261932773.gif (355 KB, 500x376) Image search: [Google]

355 KB, 500x376

>>677846669
when you first put your hand in to grab it would be 50/50 but since 'devine intervention' steps in you get a gold ball.

so now the odds are no longer 3:3 gold ball but 2:3 that you'll get another gold ball. RIGHT?

WRONG NIGGA

Because the boxes with gold balls either have 1 gold ball or 2 gold balls. so the box with 2 silver balls is disqualified INSTANTLY. RED MAGIKARP!

Okay, so it's either silver, or gold. but the chances you grab a box with a gold ball in it is 2 times more likely to be 2 gold balls box, then 1 gold ball box. since it's "RANDOM".

So, with that in mind, if you did it randomly 3 times with every possible outcome, you'd have 2 gold ball box, 2 gold ball box, 1 gold ball box.
So the answer is still the same as the start.

2:3=2/3=66.6/100 it's another gold ball.

>>677854726
>>677854492
Further elaborating, you can pick GG twice and GS once. Your flaw in thinking is that there is only one GG outcome when there is two.

>>677854838
either of the 2 gold balls in GG box. plus the GS, 3 outcomes, 2 with another gold, 1 with SILVER LOSER BALL FOR FAGGOTS I FUCKING HATE SILVER.

I think it depends if you are asking what would be the probability, starting from the point where you are picking the box, or what is the probability from after you already drew the gold ball.

For example, I flipped a coin and got heads twice in a row. What are the odds the next flip will be heads? Well if you giving the odds of getting 3 heads in a row, the answer is 12.5%. But the way the question is worded, it's asking about the next flip, which of course would be 50%.

File: redden-eq09_076.jpg (69 KB, 1500x1277) Image search: [Google]

69 KB, 1500x1277

fuck your balls

>>677855125
it actually plays with multiple sets of probability, and even one set of non-probability (certainty?) and then a box of 2 silver balls for no reason.

File: 1328528198270.jpg (17 KB, 211x211) Image search: [Google]

17 KB, 211x211

>>677855161
what's all that shit

you are just making random signs up

>>677846669
75%

File: 1326615454361.jpg (24 KB, 269x308) Image search: [Google]

24 KB, 269x308

>>677855304

>>677853099

see
>>677855125

>>677855304
CLOSE

>>677855304
I could understand where the 50% fags are coming from but this stupidity just blows my mind.

This is African level stupidity.

>>677855161
"Hey, let's put random numbers in this equation that I don't know what it means!!" :pPppPPPppp

>>677855295
That's the quadratic formula and I don't unserstand why it is being used...

>>677855125
It's clearly asking the probability at the current point famalam

>>677855407
it's ment to be tricky, so I don't agree, I think a lot of people would be stumped by this. probability is quantum level ideas. in all reality probability is highly valued idea. to say africans are REALLY good at probability is to say all black people are as intelligent as Data from star trek.

File: 1448703217625.jpg (22 KB, 320x320) Image search: [Google]

22 KB, 320x320

>>677855523
the same reason i used this picture.

>>677855612
stop posting
never procreate
kill yourself

File: 1457897498061.jpg (67 KB, 670x503) Image search: [Google]

67 KB, 670x503

>>677855696

File: 1349363196193.jpg (13 KB, 334x400) Image search: [Google]

13 KB, 334x400

>>677855612

37.5%

>>677855799
My thoughts exactly on you. Do you know the that with statistics and probability you can predict anything in the world, and thus predict the future, to the point of even changing future outcomes and even causing people to commit suicide.

complex probability is why people think you can't predict the future, even though WE CAN. This is a simple example of that, but do you know the answer? is it 50/50 or 2/3? hint: it's the same as what you would guess in the start!

File: download (1).jpg (9 KB, 256x197) Image search: [Google]

9 KB, 256x197

>>677856182

>>677855295
i hate you you fuckinggfag chineseblack small poki txuni , fuck you and your mom

File: 1446666514594.jpg (55 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]

55 KB, 400x400

>>677856305

I was thinking that the fact that you chose a gold ball might affect th probability so it's not 50%, but if you chose a silver ball first, the odds of picking a gold ball would still be the same in this scenario.

File: 1327512810821.jpg (20 KB, 400x295) Image search: [Google]

20 KB, 400x295

>>677856182

>>677846669
If you're not a moron, 100% or 0%

Gold and silver are different densities. The three boxes will weigh different amounts. And you can easily pick the heaviest and lightest boxes.

File: 1349816783918.jpg (50 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]

50 KB, 250x250

>>677856408

File: Tyrone.jpg (30 KB, 449x600) Image search: [Google]

30 KB, 449x600

>>677855161
Were you trying to plug random numbers into an equation nobody understands to look smart, but your idea of super smart equation is the quadratic equation?

>>677855799
I ASK, DO YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? NIGGA?

File: 1376433422576.jpg (46 KB, 600x393) Image search: [Google]

46 KB, 600x393

>>677856728
yfw

File: 1447762919755.jpg (11 KB, 225x225) Image search: [Google]

11 KB, 225x225

>>677856182

>>677856581
you're given that you choose a box containing a gold ball (50% chance)

multiply that by the chance of picking another gold ball (2/3 or 66%)

50% x 66% = 33% or 1/3

2/3s Call me stupid all you want, this is how it is.
two boxes have a chance of you picking gold, there are three boxes. And the retards saying one thirds, fucking kill yourself. 50% people. I can understand where you're coming from.

>>677857068
right answer, WRONG REASON, it's actually because there are 3 gold balls and 1 silver ball, and you have one of the gold balls.

File: Mfw.jpg (31 KB, 600x595) Image search: [Google]

31 KB, 600x595

>>677856728
>mfw you assume the balls. Are the same size
>mfw you assume all the balls are solid and not hollow
>mfw you assume 100% metal purity and not allow
>mfw you assume the balls are made of gold and silver, and not just balls the color of gold and silver

>>677857046
not given the choice of choice, you get a box with a gold ball in it to start.

File: mimetex-cgi.gif (14 KB, 776x319) Image search: [Google]

14 KB, 776x319

>>677856748
you think im kitting??im gonna fuck your mom later

>>677857068
You're saying the completely right answer for the completely wrong reason.
Back to school..

File: 1259816135378.jpg (32 KB, 324x400) Image search: [Google]

32 KB, 324x400

>>677856933
i haven't saved a new reaction face for over a year, this one made the cut, so grats

also, checked

>>677857335
Oh shit floor functions

File: 1307766601970s.jpg (26 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]

26 KB, 480x360

>>677857293
*alloy

>>677846669
2/5

File: Boxes.png (453 KB, 1278x1128) Image search: [Google]

453 KB, 1278x1128

It's 50% newfags. Anyone saying 66% is an autist.

Pic related.