[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Who dies, /b/?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random

Thread replies: 109
Thread images: 8
File: who dies here (1).png (203 KB, 512x279) Image search: [Google]
who dies here (1).png
203 KB, 512x279
Who dies, /b/?
>>
>>677274881
E,D and C
>>
>>677274996
Lol, why E?
>>
File: TANK with legs.png (69 KB, 1907x862) Image search: [Google]
TANK with legs.png
69 KB, 1907x862
All of them coz dis huppenz
>>
>>677274881
B and C
>>
>>677274881
my will to live after this fucking repost for the billionth time

fuck off cunt
>>
>>677274881
D probably, C shouldnt die because first stone doesnt have enough weight
>>
they will all die from old age.
>>
>>677275195
>implying you had a will to live
>>
Hopefully /b/ dies
>>
>>677275195
>will to live
>on /b/
>>
>>677274881

D is the only one that might die if his head was not lucky enough to have that hole in E's barrel over his head.

Not C cos hole in E's barrel makes it lighter than C's barrel on the seesaw and also E's barrel will just simply roll onto the Seesaw instead of drop onto it, therefore the seesaw will not crush C.

B is safe cos barrel wont roll onto him due to wall.

A is safe.
>>
>>677275452
Solved
>>
>>677275452
The rolling ball accelerates, which means it will push the seesaw with more force than just F=mg.
>>
>>677275452
implying E is strong enough to get that bolder going.
>>
>>677274881
E would die by hanging for the attempted murder of 4 individuals.
>>
>>677275708

Rolling fast is not dropping fask and also note the flat surface between c and d meaning the barrel will travel flat and then just roll onthe the seesaw as the right side of the seesaw is at the same height as the flat surface between c and d
>>
>>677275862
can you prove that it was his intent and that he didnt forsee nobody dying? innocent untill proven guilty.
lawfaggot here
>>
>>677275452 D can duck
>>
>>677274881
>who dies
Everybody dies, early or late.
>>
>>677276075
>>>677275245
too late faggot
>>
>>677276067

>>677276067

Yes he can duck, just ssuming if no one can move and then who lives?
>>
>>677276045
>death by hanging
obviously i'm not in touch with the law enough to be in support of archaic punishments, but who throws a boulder anyway? you could get a felony tossing rocks onto a highway or garbage out a skyscraper window. you think rolling a boulder down a hill doesn't get you harsh punishment in any society?
>>
>>677274881
None of them.
>>
>>677274881
no one.
>E pushes stone with hole, survives.
>Stone pushes D down the hole. the gap is to large for him to be smashed.
>stone with no hole is heavier than stone with hole. not enough force to push spikes down. C survives.
>stone with hole does not have enough speed to jump to kill A or B
>>
>>677274881
none of them, there is no proof that E pushes the ball down the ramp
>>
>>677276315
nope it doesnt unless you destroyed something or someone there is no law against it.
>>
>>677276425
if you look closely on E's rock, you will see that the hole is lightly at the left. this means that gravity will eventually make the ball roll by it's own
>>
>>677276627
*slightly
>>
>>677276627
if the absence of mass is to the left, it would roll to the right
>>
>>677274881
D, B & C
>D because head will be crushed as hollow will be at top approximately
>C because momentum from E combine with lighter weight will throw second ball into air, killing C
>B because ball in air will land on top of him
>>
>>677276767
how is that even logical?
>>
>>677276898

It means if one side is heavier than the other, then that heavier side will go down and the lighter side will go up. Just think like a seesaw.
>>
>>677276898
im assuming hes going with "it weighs more on the right so it will go there"
>>
>>677275452
Just because it has a hole doesn't make it lighter.
>>
>>677276898

Forget about higher education and think of learning a trade as you apparently are not very bright.
>>
>>677274881
D, the hole isn't at the right position so he gets crushed.
The ball would have so much momentum, it wouldn't stop on the lip above c, at most it would slightly crush C, but it would roll into the middle
>>
>>677277025
>>677277045
yeah, I was thinking along these lines
>>
>>677274996
Well,he is about to kill a few of his own,obviously the guilt and the blame for taking those lifes is going to get to him eventually .. slowly he will drift away from the idea that he did something that had to be done,and realize that he had more choices ..
>>
>>677277231
Sorry it was meant for
>>677275074
>>
>>677277114

Yes it does, balance a ball on the ground and remove 1/4 of top right and see what happens. You do not understand how centre of gravity works do you?
>>
nobody dies.
the boulder that doesnt have a hole must be extremely light.
just look at it.
it hasnt even rolled to the edge of the seesaw.
we have to assume that it is extremely light and probably sticky.
or
nobody dies because the image is static.
the boulder at the top will remain in place until E decides to push it. then it will depend on how hard he pushed it.
>>
>>677277303
The one with the hole could be 10 times heavier if the material is denser.
>>
>>677277303
i think what he meant was it could have the same mass as the boulder/barrel on the seesaw depending on what it was made of, how it was made, etc.
>>
>>677275118
>>>/out/
>>
File: Z56jUTH[1].gif (1 MB, 320x180) Image search: [Google]
Z56jUTH[1].gif
1 MB, 320x180
>>677274881
>>
>>677277303
yeah but there is not proof that the material is homogenous, the ball could be weighted to account for the hole, and return the center of gravity to the center of the envelope
>>
>>677277527
kek
>>
>>677276627

Nope, was talking about barrel next to E, nothinga bout barrel on the seesaw, look at link above this sentence.

>>677277426
>>677277454
>>
>>677277539

Scraping at the bottom of the barrel aren't ya?
>>
File: who dies here (1).jpg (107 KB, 512x279) Image search: [Google]
who dies here (1).jpg
107 KB, 512x279
>>677274881
I'll tell you who dies
> pic related
>>
>>677277539

The onus is on the op to provide additional info if needed, said nothing about diffrent materials etc so will have to assume you are just trying to be cute ;/
>>
>>677277757
not really, we're being asked a physics problem in which there is no where near enough information to solve it. The majority of objects in our observable universe are no of homogeneous construction, therefore if we were forced to make an assumption, the smarter money is on the ball not being homogeneous
>>
Answer is here.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LKLzv8INA3E
>>
>>677277958
no, the onus is on the op to provide all of the info required. Such info has not been supplied. We were not directed on which assumptions to make, therefore the problem is not solvable
>>
>>677274881
C.

E's stone rolls downhill, the interior space passes over the head of D, the inertia carries it past its effective flat spot from its interior space, loses speed, simply drops off the ledge at its low enough height, and with less mass than the full round boulder at the other end, that its force only pushes the teeter totter about halfway down, *maybe* just far enough to kill C if you're lucky, and then the teeter totter returns to its present position, full boulder still in place, everything at a halt.

Bu since your question was "who dies", and not "does someone die and whom", this implies that someone dies, so it must be C.

It's really C's fault anyway. What the fuck is he doing laying under a teeter totter full of spikes at the bottom of a long smooth hill with a boulder on top?
>>
>>677276767
That is assuming the ball is to heavy to be pushed
>>
>>677278442
Considering that E is in a pushing motion, we can assume that he is capable of pushing it. Unless he is some beta who doesn't even lift, My monies on E surviving
>>
>>677278442
no, that is not a necessary assumption to to make when concluding that a weighted ball will roll a certain direction.
>>
>>677276345
>stone with no hole is heavier than stone with hole. not enough force to push spikes down.
Nigger do you even momentum?
>>
>>677274881
the reason it gives is a grid is so we can do the math. I just woke up though so im not gonna write it down
D dies
>>
>>677277527

Told you so
>>677276783
>>
>>677278664
Yes, and it will slide some getting it going, and by the time he crosses the edge, the recess will align to pass over D's head.
>>
>>677278347
incorrect faggot
>>
>>677278872
Wrong! D Dies
>>
>>677274881
if we just wait long enough everyone will die
>depressed_face.wav
>>
File: FascinatingCatMeme.jpg (121 KB, 500x375) Image search: [Google]
FascinatingCatMeme.jpg
121 KB, 500x375
>>677274881
They're all niggers, so they'll probably kill each other. They all die.
>>
Clearly there is not enough information about the velocity, density, whether each of the bolders are the same material, i.e its bait
>>
File: image.jpg (29 KB, 384x384) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
29 KB, 384x384
>>677279206
>>
>>677278347
Plausible, dpending on the mass of the stone & full Boulder, which are unknowns.

Also critical unknowns, the width of the gap in the rolling stone causing an uneven roll and energy lost to bouncing over its own corners as it rolls, surface friction of all materials, and whether OP has sucked his own dick today or not, & has enough strength & flexibility left to get the ball rolling.
>>
>>677279274
I totally agree, These guys could consist of such a high density that the ball would simply bounce off of them
>autism
>>
>>677278143
Yep. This guy gets it
>>
>>677274881
D and C most likely, not sure if bolder will make it over the ledge to crush B though.
>>
>>677274881
D died, B died and C almost did
>>
>>677279105
That cant even be calculated without fluid dynamics software faggot.
>>
>>677279583
>life saving surgery was performed
>>
>>677279667
lololol
>>
File: 12874.gif (3 MB, 382x282) Image search: [Google]
12874.gif
3 MB, 382x282
>>677277527
kek
>>
>>677279630
There's not even any fluids in this game.
>>
>>677274881
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKLzv8INA3E
>>
>>677274881
Need more information. Many possible scenarios whose likelihoods depend on respective contingencies
>>
>>677279630
It is a ball dumb ass. As it rolls its circumference spans the ground
>1 Full rotation until it reaches D
>basic mathematics
>>
>>677279866
>implying fluid dynamics = studying the ocean
>implying
>implying implications implicitly
>the imp lied
wutwutwutwutwut
>>
File: wheelies.jpg (118 KB, 900x900) Image search: [Google]
wheelies.jpg
118 KB, 900x900
>>677279166
kek
>>
>>677279866
lol wut
>>
>>677280110
>Rolling a O down a hill is the same as rolling a D down a hill.
>basic mathlemagics
lol I can tell that's all you've had
>>
>>677279630
>fluid dynamics affect distance
>autism
>>
>hey
>>
Just D
>>
>heyy
>>
>>677280394
You've gotta be baitin me, no ones this stupid
>>
>>677274881
cd
>>
>>677280717
not B?
>>
>>677278779
yeah but the stone rolles over to fast. it dosn't stay on the seesaws spiky side long enough for it to kill C
>>
>>677280414
Well, they could, considering every critical environmental variable that'd have an effect here is an unknown quantity. so yeah, I guess
>>
>>677274881
Everybody dies - it just takes longer for some.
>>
>>677280790
The only way this statement is possible would be if airflow was strong enough to either force the ball backwards, killing E, or was strong enough to force the ball into the air temporarily as it rotated and by some fucking miracle the ball landed with the hollow on top of D.
If airflow was strong enough to do this then either the ball would not weigh enough to kill anyone or everyone would be killed by the ensuing hurricane.
>>
>>677280649
Take a nice circular shape, roll it down an incline.
Now take a file and shave off 1/6 of its circumference to a flat, and roll it down the incline.

They both go the same speed and distance, don't they?

I want to live in your world where physics works however you want.
>>
>>677275708
the direction of acceleration is perpendicular to the direction of weight so it doesn't affect it
>>
>>677281313
What the fuck is this. Never did I mention the ball had a flat edge.
>fucking retard
>>
>>677281264
Don't forget plastic deformation along the tines of that opening as they impact the ground every time around.

...assuming this is a hard granite stone rolling down a hard granite surface, and if not, then you have all the variables of the interaction between the rolling body and the ground to consider as well.
>>
>>677275363
more than your gay sex life at least
>>
>>677281675
The ball will complete one rotation before reaching the seesaw.
>Deformation along tines is an insignificant factor
>>
>>677281589
Perhaps you should wait until you get to 7th grade geometry class, and realize that taking a big chunk out of the circumference of a circle creates a line. That hole at best is a flat spot across its rolling surface. At worst, you're rolling it down a grassy muddy hill, and the shape of those pointy edges digs in to the soil every time it comes around in addition to the jarring bouncing wobble you get instead if a smooth unrealistic oversimplified roll you're imagining.
>>
>>677282158
Yes but an insignificant flat spot. A perfect sphere would result in the hollow being at the highest point at D. Considering the minor flat (not a fucking D) the hollow will be slightly before the top
>D still dies
>>
>>677282158
See, this is why mathematicians sit on the other side of the restaurant from physicists.
>>
>>677277527
>physics engine is flawed.
>Didn't use Unreal engine.
>>
>>677282619
The incline is not steep enough and that gap is not small enough for it to be insignificant. Especially not in E's effort to get it started.
>>
>>677282842
>mass is known
>gravitational pull is known
>environmental conditions are known

Given what is known that gifs the best representation
Thread replies: 109
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.