I'm a master mechanical engineer and I failed.
>>675268245
40?
>>675268245
16.
Fuck you.
OP is a faggot.
>>675268530
I got 36
39
36 is my answer
>>675268505
>>675268530
>>675268535
Autism detected.
32 BTW.
>>675268245
I see 24
40
>>675268632
Wait... The periods are squares, too. My answer changes to 38
>>675268245
Engineers are just people who do the same job with worse education and act like they're better than everyone else because muh engineer.
This only applies to X-engineer (ie. Network-engineer, Software-engineer)
16
Also dubs
27
40
>>675268245
41?
>>675268245
At least 35
39
16 you inbreds
30
40
34
>>675268245
We have..
8 tiny squares in the middle
4x4 + 2 = 18 squares with 1 brick width
9 squares with 2 brick width
4 squares with 3 brick width
1 square with 4 brick width
which gives us 40 squares total.
Did I miss any?
28/.
32
>>675268245
Techically would it be 1?
>picture is square
>put squares within squares to fool the uneducated
>like asking home much water is within the water
Pretty good trick question tho, might use on my students.
40
>>675269120
Nope
>>675268245
33. Also, check em
3.14159265358979
>>675268245
Fuck all y'all!
>>675269130
This guy.
>>675269130
Ultimate bait
you all suck, its clearly 38
>>675269130
It's not the same question as squares in the image are finite and thus countable.
Water is not countable as it is not split into discrete units. Hence the question really does not make any sense for water.
>>675269261
Exactly it's 40
>>675268900
This. If you include the word square as a square
I counted 35.
I got 38
>>675268245
I got 29
I don't where you got 40 tbh.
>>675268505
>>675268709
Yeah it's 40
(1^2+2^2+3^2+4^2)+2+8=40
No one is allowing for the pixelations in their monitor. These is indeed a major consideration.
>>675270099
> water isn't in discrete units
Dude have you even heard of atoms?
This is legit what avogadro's number us for
>>675271016
Now I see.
I only finished my secondary education.
>>675268245
Too fucking many.
>>675268245
There is also the huge white square that makes up the image, that makes 41, as well as the word "square" also. Totaling 42
37 with the edges of the picture
45
>>675271774
The picture is rectangular
Do the line breaks stop a square from being square? I need to know the rules here
>>675272258
Not if one looks at it with a 5 by 5 aspect ratio. shit, that makes another 2. 44 in total now.
>>675272397
Thank you. Fantastic point.
>>675268245
if i had to guess id say its either 2
or more than i could even bare to count
>>675268245
i got 40
>>675268535
I got 17 counting the whole thing.. remember guis - the center column of 8 are not squares anymore when the little ones chop them up.
>>675270099
Youre not gonna fool me
guys its 80440
>>675272967
I agree with this, people are ignoring the fact that lines are through what they perceive as squares. Regardless for all we know they could be diamonds on their sides. I am out of this bullhshit.
>>675268245
80,440 if you count the pixels to make up the image.
16
Check out the definition of square if you disagree
>>675268245
0 because none of those shapes have perfectly equal edges B)
42
56
>>675268245
80,400 if pixels are square
>>675273682
well your technically not wrong
>>675273851
And technically not wrong is the best kind of not wrong.
31, didnt think too much did it in 1 min
>>675273995
well your way off. I got 40
Only 10, rest isn't squares!!