File: 1449719501615.png (408 KB, 700x1010) Image search: [Google]

408 KB, 700x1010

anyone?

File: FBI-fail_o_16431.jpg (48 KB, 640x505) Image search: [Google]

48 KB, 640x505

well well

>>674172660
That's not loli, it's hardly even pettanko.

File: loli9.jpg (222 KB, 1454x1000) Image search: [Google]

222 KB, 1454x1000

>>674172841

ok

File: loli99.jpg (1 MB, 1500x1500) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1500x1500

just gonna let it die now since there is no interest

File: 1458009955130.jpg (259 KB, 900x1131) Image search: [Google]

259 KB, 900x1131

>>674173262
I'll contribute for a bit

File: 1457950540878.gif (4 MB, 570x460) Image search: [Google]

4 MB, 570x460

>>674173449

File: 1457950174928.gif (1 MB, 320x320) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 320x320

>>674173511

File: prolapse.webm (1 MB, 1050x1050) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1050x1050

>>674173624

File: dehydrating.gif (4 MB, 1000x576) Image search: [Google]

4 MB, 1000x576

>>674173802

File: stretching.webm (695 KB, 640x360) Image search: [Google]

695 KB, 640x360

>>674173942
Anyone still out there?

File: real-fantasy-for-some-girls.jpg (203 KB, 599x999) Image search: [Google]

203 KB, 599x999

>>674174165

Ye

File: she-thinks-this-is-love.jpg (160 KB, 700x1000) Image search: [Google]

160 KB, 700x1000

>>674174487

>>674172873
oh god yes

File: bad-touch.gif (2 MB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 500x500

>>674174734

File: this-happens-all-the-time-in-thailand.jpg (168 KB, 710x1000) Image search: [Google]

168 KB, 710x1000

>>674174968

File: forced-orgasm.jpg (677 KB, 1103x903) Image search: [Google]

677 KB, 1103x903

>>674175153

>>674175863

good stuff

File: human-fleshlight.jpg (213 KB, 1200x1190) Image search: [Google]

213 KB, 1200x1190

>>674175554

newfags still dont know about 8ch

>>674175325
Don't desert my dick
Fucking kek

Serious question
Does anyone know if this stuff is illegal in the UK?

>>674178453
As of 6/4/2010, lolicon and shotacon is banned in England and Wales under the "Consultation on the Possession of Non-Photographic Visual Depictions of Child Sexual Abuse".
People have been jailed/fined for it before.

>>674178453
In the UK? Sure, everything is illegal there. Except if you are an aristocrat, then you can do what the fuck you want, and the police will actually protect you.

>>674172323
Anyone have more like this with realistic bodies

File: 08.jpg (523 KB, 840x1200) Image search: [Google]

523 KB, 840x1200

Aight i'm out guys

>>674178746
Well fuck. Looks like I have a lot of deleting to do

>>674178746
not uk here so i'm just asking out of curiosity, does that cover saving and possession, or also online viewing?

>>674173802
The ending what the fuck

>>674179688
Both. Since the 1994 revision of the Protection of Children Act, deliberately viewing such images online can land you with up to 5 years prison time.

File: comicsfromhell_org_012.jpg (81 KB, 772x1000) Image search: [Google]

81 KB, 772x1000

>>674179442

File: ccd.jpg (60 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

60 KB, 1024x768

>>674179606
>>674178746
>>674178453
Does it matter? Tor + Ccleaner + add everything to encrypted rar file (with at least 26 char password that uses numbers, uppercase, lowercase, symbols, and no dictionary words)

>I totally know that for unrelated reasons... i swear
>the things we do for love

>>674179606
dont bother. Take the steps above if you want to stay safe, because deleting (the "normal" way) is not going to protect you anyways... more in a sec, im tryna get this up to save your stash

File: comicsfromhell_org_001.jpg (92 KB, 772x1000) Image search: [Google]

92 KB, 772x1000

>>674180739
https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/?tags=toufu_%28tofusan%29

>>674180480
ouch, I'm assuming its one of the crimes that isn't sought out but rather tacked on after something else got them looked into in the first place? also do you know how other countries handle it/is there a resource that runs down this stuff?

Like is this common for all 1st world countries, or just a UK thing? How does the EU handle it? The US?

File: realistic17.jpg (391 KB, 1024x1325) Image search: [Google]

391 KB, 1024x1325

>>674179442

yes

File: realistic13.jpg (202 KB, 1024x1326) Image search: [Google]

202 KB, 1024x1326

>>674181222

>>674175863
Wish I could find a real translation for this.
Olddog's rewrites suck!

File: realistic20.jpg (396 KB, 1024x1325) Image search: [Google]

396 KB, 1024x1325

>>674181318

>>674180831
>cont
In a nutshell, most file systems keep track of used data with inodes (or equivalent) which is like a table that the operating system looks at and says "oh, there is data located at XYZ, I cant write anything there". When you "delete" a file, most file systems just delete that entry in the table... and thus, the OS can say "oh, well XYZ is free to write to now", even though the actual data is still there. If you are asking if the FBI/federal law enforcement can get at that data, the answer would be yes, considering the fact that you can with freeware. The only way to "truly" delete that data would be to write over it (possible, but not reliable) or to get a program that can "shred" data (AVG includes this now with their free version... GET IT)

Likewise, even viewing can be tricky, for similar reasons, specifically for the reason that pretty much every web browser caches thumbnails locally (on YOUR computer) and so even when this thread 404s, your laptop will still have a shitton of loli on it.

>cont again, below, bump for more info

File: realistic6.png (815 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

815 KB, 1024x768

>>674181385

File: feeding-her-daddy-everynight.jpg (96 KB, 707x1000) Image search: [Google]

96 KB, 707x1000

>>674176739

File: realistic2.jpg (1 MB, 1280x960) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1280x960

>>674181607

File: realistic16.jpg (268 KB, 1024x1325) Image search: [Google]

268 KB, 1024x1325

>>674181691

File: obsessed-with-being-his.jpg (123 KB, 707x1000) Image search: [Google]

123 KB, 707x1000

>>674181642

File: realistic5.png (1 MB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 1024x768

>>674181752

File: ritual-massage-since-birth.jpg (60 KB, 600x600) Image search: [Google]

60 KB, 600x600

>>674181897

File: losing-bladder-control-during-orgasm.jpg (505 KB, 1000x707) Image search: [Google]

505 KB, 1000x707

>>674182077

File: 1457759815557.jpg (50 KB, 677x736) Image search: [Google]

50 KB, 677x736

Hello anon. Young and old.

Id like to say that I know I speak for many, whether here now or not. Many of us who live a secret shelled life find so much true joy from these threads, first page, on B. We have been here for years. Myself, at least 7. Thank you. Without loli, there would be no B. Thank you, all of you.

Can we get some more forced breeding, please. :)

File: visiting-uncle.jpg (168 KB, 708x1000) Image search: [Google]

168 KB, 708x1000

>>674182270

Loli is the only reason I come to /b/

Why are little girl pussies so damn pretty?

File: they-will-all-love-it-eventually.jpg (237 KB, 1400x924) Image search: [Google]

237 KB, 1400x924

>>674182406

File: image.jpg (210 KB, 850x1070) Image search: [Google]

210 KB, 850x1070

No spidey or banana fags either...

>>674181126
Most first world nations' domestic intelligence agencies (such as the Bundesnachrichtendienst) have cyber crime divisions who are responsible for investigating illegal online materials distributors/consumers.
As I understand it however, many infractions are too minor/ambiguous to warrant investigation. That's why you more frequently hear about police finding cp stashed in (already arrested) criminals' homes.
Thanks to Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, loli and shota is legal in the United States due to the current law (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) not being constitutionally able to enforce any prohibition without violating the First Amendment.
>USA USA USA

>>674181126
>>674181572
>cont
CCleaner will take are of those nasty browser thumbs, though im admittedly unsure of whether or not it "shreds" them (though I would actually argue for unlikely). Is this a problem though? Well, it depends...

For starters, it helps to know how your local law enforcement operates. For example, in the US, there ARE cases of people being prosecuted for loli, but these were usually OBSCENITY charges and not for CP. HOWEVER the charges were brought up because the perpetrators already had REAL cp on their machines. There is AT LEAST one documented case of someone being charged exclusively for loli, though my memory is shady on who and how, but this is not setting the precedent for the country for a few reasons.

For one, obscenity laws are dying, and even law makers despise them (almost as much as judges and artists), and how they are filed varies widely from state to state (US, obviously). Likewise, the probability of someone getting in trouble for loli exclusively is slim to none. Contrary to popular belief, FBI does not just perch on loli sites looking for prey. They instead try to find child pornographers and cp distributors, and typically direct their attentions there. If you look at the case history of most loli prosecutions in the US, the perpetrators were indeed almost always suspected of having real CP or were at least reported by someone who actually spotted the loli on their machines. In short, dont let your friends, family, or dog see your loli. It freaks people out and there is a really good chance they will report you.

Still, most of the cp offenders are found because the FBI DOES perch on cp sites when they are seized, and has been known to actually HACK cp sites to get IPs before taking down their suspects. The prosecutions have often then been carried out with only browser thumbnails (yes, people have been imprisoned for thumbnail evidence)
>cont below

File: You rang.jpg (35 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]

35 KB, 250x250

>>674182777

File: ritual-massage-before-school.jpg (169 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]

169 KB, 1000x1000

>>674182729

>>674181572
that's why cryptography was created
HIDE PORN!

>>674182313
a true gentleman

>>674183032
is anyone reading this/giving a shit? I can continue, I wasnt quite done yet. Ive only established lemmas, with no cohesive thesis.

File: trying-not-to-enjoy-it.jpg (175 KB, 824x1200) Image search: [Google]

175 KB, 824x1200

>>674183149

>>674183448
moar?

>>674183297
It's kind of interesting, but I'd really rather just see more naked little girls

>>674183639
daaaymn... alright... I was about to reach my thesis, but fair enough. I appreciate your honesty, sir

>>674183297
>>674183857

Continue, but do it faster, image limit is coming

>>674183857
This knowledge is getting me harder than the lolis.

>>674183297
I figured it was just spam since there was no loli attached. Still not going to read it though.

>>674184299
Wizard detected.

>>674184046
Ill continue in next thread if need be. There will certainly be a next thread... always is

>>674183032
This of course all applies to the US. As for the UK, I am actually uncertain what agency enforces this kind of thing, but some things to take into account would be that, for starters, they too will probably be more dedicated to cracking down on real cp, especially with Russia being a prime producer for like 30 years now.

>However, we cant rule out danger because they may* not be as dedicated to finding you.

We can however try to establish what resources they may or may not have. They can probably rummage your digital trash as easily as the FBI or a normal person with any brains, but what other capabilities do they have? For the sake of argument, lets assume they are at least as equipped as the FBI in almost every regard. There is only one resource we can reasonably rule out the European agencies having, and that is the NSA.

The FBI cant actually track you through a Tor browser (also contrary to popular belief), but the NSA CAN. The NSA can also share this information with the FBI, which they do. HOWEVER, it is unlikely that the rate of information sharing between the NSA and european agencies (or FBI and Euro agencies) reaches a frequency or composition similar to NSA -> FBI. In short, it is super unlikely that you will be found if you are using a Tor browser.

Of course, in the highly unlikely event your laptop DOES get searched, you should still lean on the tools I mentioned before as an extra line of defense. The password you use to get into your laptop is meaningless, but a password for rar encryption will probably help, if you choose a good password. If your password has a dictionary word in it however, consider the password useless as well.

>>674183448
Image limit reached, I should find more forced/breeding loli. Until next time. Some of the softcore loli pics should be in a separate thread.

>>674185237
>it is super unlikely that you will be found if you are using a Tor browser
in the UK, i forgot to reiterate that

Likewise, if you are too lazy to use a lengthy rar password, a laptop password WILL protect you IF AND ONLY IF you use drive encryption AND you stick to the password rules I mentioned above.

As for the abbreviated NTKs of this whole mess

FOR US
>Download loli at will, but if you ever even think* of touching real cp, you should expect a knock at your door at 3 in the morning with a search warrant
>Tor will not save you from the FBI, but the FBI doesnt care about loli
>You CAN get in trouble for loli however, and cops CAN get a search warrant if they get a tip. This tip will have to come from someone who catches you though. Dont buy hardcopies of loli (which will go through customs) and dont have a toddlercon wallpaper

FOR UK
>Tor will most likely insulate you from any agencies out to get you
>According to legend, loli is illegal, so be extra careful and really lean on Tor

FOR BOTH
>use drive encryption or rar encryption with a good password to stay safe
>use Ccleaner, and frequently
>SHRED documents with something like AVG shreader
>if you have the space and time, try a freeware program to check your deleted files... you may be surprised what you find
>Come up with a solid password. Try using the first letter of every word from a passage from a book or a song lyric. Include punctuation and end with a number (chapter, or track listing)
>Spread your knowledge on how to stay safe with others!

>>674173288
Sauce please

>>674187105
Look at the filename.

>>674173802
My dick thanks you

>>674187315
Oh right kek
Thanks anyway

Welcome, I'll get better material next time

>>674186779
What about those of us on mobile operating systems (apple and android)?

>>674182778
>many infractions are too minor/ambiguous to warrant investigation. That's why you more frequently hear about police finding cp stashed in (already arrested) criminals' homes

ok, thats basically what I thought was the case, that real CP took priority (obvi) and loli prosecution was more of an incidental thing

>>674182778
also thanks for response

>>674183032
got it, thanks for the comprehensive response, seems pretty in line with what I was assuming, that most of what they actively go after is real cp and so loli is more incidental charges, though it seems less of a grey area than I thought it'd be, so thanks for the response

>>674183297
I was and appreciated it, just alt-tabbed and got distracted before coming back and saying thanks

>>674186779
solid info, thanks, knocking out now

and prob forgetting most lol :(

>>674188982
In the US you are covered by either one, especially right now with the whole Apple vs FBI thing going on (multiple reasons, I kept forgetting to add that bit, Dammit dammit)

But I would watch that thing very carefully. Watch this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsjZ2r9Ygzw

Basically, the hardware/software is safe, SO LONG AS APPLE DOESNT CAVE. Beware though, Big Brother will always be looking for more power.

>>674190081
>>674189685
>>674189554
No prob! Im making a jpg now for easy distribution if any of you wants to help fellow loli fans. almost done, just adding the last post here:
>>674190480

>>674186779
Wait so how do you permanently delete images? avg shredder? And how do u view files that weren't really deleted?