Where you at
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
- Home
- Board: /b/ - Random
- Reading: Where you at
Where you at
Op here
Btw it's politicalcompass.org/test
I think I would be a gutless wimp on that scale. I have things I like from each extreme, and they kinda balance out.
>>670414444
Checked
I'm a sensible dude
>>670413838
Somewhere between sensible people and unelectable candidates.
Stoners, but I consider myself to be an honest intellectual, as stated by my peers and family.
>>670415817
Though you have not proven yourself to be one by merely speaking in higher vocabulary. Do something with your life Anon.
American monarchist. Trump for Emperor.
This has become a Trump thread.
>>670413838
enjoyo, boyo.
First church of free market. I am really not into politics,though...
>>670413838
Looks like I'm an unelectable candidate bordering on the intellectual wasteland.
Dead center of 90% of the Proud Intellectually Superior Conservative American Politicians
>>670413838
I guess i'm fairly sensible. I never expected that.
>>670413838
Keep your liberal circlejerking to reddit,faggot.
>>670416339
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxJ863Zlbh0
Sounds spot on.
On the border of unelectable people, gutless wimps, and sensible peolle
>>670419853
> national socialism
> actually left-aligned
nigga the nazis had some serious private enterprise game going on
Looks like I'm in the wasteland of potsmokers
I guess I'm a gutless wimp
>>670420544
there's a difference between theory and execution. that's probably why national socialism is on one-side and fascism is on the other.
>>670421443
100% made-up
>mfw people are putting progressive/ liberals on the center or right
>>670421581
lay off the weed brah
>>670421480
have a personality you fuck
>>670421647
the rest of the upper left is marxism in action, not theory, quit your bullshit
>>670421734
I just pulled it from the site. It may be true, and it may be false. Either way, just because it doesn't reflect your predictions doesn't mean it is completely false
>>670420732
Enjoy your stay, Brother
>>670421856
tbh I am a rather bland person when I speak. But my actions lead others to think otherwise... no Idea why
>>670413838
Did somebody say Emperor
>>670421924
please, tell me when marxism was executed perfectly. because if it had been, it really would've been fucking useful to society.
>>670422073
>Clinton is in the right
> Bernie is barely left
You're fucking retarded
>>670422233
you haven't found a direction to run in. I seriously worry about people like you. I don't understand. do you need a role-model? I'd rather have another enemy than someone who doesn't care about anything.
>>670422586
My main issue, being in the "gutless wimp" category, is a fear of picking the wrong position out of ignorance, and making decisions based on that viewpoint that would hurt other people.
>>670422228
Damn. Thats actually not the most recent, but its not much different, Slightly more Left and Libertarian.
>>670422073
i don't know where you're getting "predictions" from. clinton is objectively left. I don't think you understand the shit you post.
>>670422586
I care about a lot of stuff, and my role models are the silent type who get shit done.
>>670422915
Predictions as in: what you thought the candidates would score compared to what they are marked. Also, I did not make the graph, and I don't quite care about the graph. some things just aren't meant to be placed on a two axis scale.
I'm Gandhi
>>670422798
the fear of picking the wrong position is exactly what makes you a gutless wimp. it's better to make a mistake 100mph than to hesitate and be fucking deer in headlights.
i get it, that's extremism. the point is, being 100% neutral is never useful. you eventually will have to pick a side, or you're just a sandbar being washed away by the tides.
>>670422421
it never was. the point is you are a fucking retard trying to claim the national socialism is in the right place on the chart when by the same metric all the marxism around it should be be flipped about the x-axis.
and I'm a retard because pic related
This wasn't exactly the most comprehensive test, but it's not too far. I think if the questions were more diversified, I'd probably be a bit further right and down, but c'est la vie.
>>670423585
Or, you just don't go a hundred miles per hour. There's nothing wrong with examining social and economic positions until you find one that makes sense, rather than jumping into whichever one "feels right", or "sounds logical".
I'm think I might be one of the farthest-right leaning people on this thread.
This is What I got I'd consider myself basically as left as you can get so this fits
>>670423301
kek. that's what people complained about the left vs right. mentality.
what we really need is a tesseract graph depicting the depths and wishes of every possible angle. then we could accurately assess someone's world view.
Well, went as i expected
>>670424118
The Sphere of Absolute Truth! *only exists past the 7th dimension*
Hmmm...
>>670424086
I'm not too far from ya. Only one point the left.
>>670425075
square up marxist pig
