[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Why is it the older Playboy models are more attractive than the
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random

Thread replies: 241
Thread images: 90
File: 1969.06.01 - Helena Antonaccio.jpg (166 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1969.06.01 - Helena Antonaccio.jpg
166 KB, 792x1728
Why is it the older Playboy models are more attractive than the newer ones?
>>
nostalgia
>>
The pics weren't airbrushed to the point the girls look plastic.
>>
>>585013285
they're not GMO's
>>
File: 1957.10.01 - Colleen Farrington.jpg (139 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1957.10.01 - Colleen Farrington.jpg
139 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585013483
This
>>
>>585013285
they actually smiled instead of doing duckfaces
>>
More natural boobs, women that had pubic hair. Looked classy, not slutty.
>>
Why isn't that ice cream melting!
>>
>>585014290
because its vegetable shortening
>>
File: 1964.06.01 - Lori Winston.jpg (168 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1964.06.01 - Lori Winston.jpg
168 KB, 792x1728
>>
Back then mostly white girls.
>>
The women don't look like realdolls
>>
File: 1964.08.01 - China Lee.jpg (122 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1964.08.01 - China Lee.jpg
122 KB, 792x1728
>>
i would post some playboy models. but most of them are under 18 years and 4chan considers them child pornography. so i won't
>>
File: P09.jpg (278 KB, 2048x1624) Image search: [Google]
P09.jpg
278 KB, 2048x1624
>>
File: 1959.10.01 - Elaine Reynolds.jpg (152 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1959.10.01 - Elaine Reynolds.jpg
152 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585016014
Those should be under nipples in the dicktionary, perfect.
>>
No photoshop, no plastic surgeries, no stupid modifications (tattoos, botox, etc)
>>
Because back then "the girl next door" was in
Now it's "the whore next door"
>>
They were real and not made of silicone and Botox.
>>
Does Playboy never show pussies or sex? They are the worst porn type
>>
Playboy 1998. God tier year.
>>
>>
File: P41.jpg (421 KB, 2048x948) Image search: [Google]
P41.jpg
421 KB, 2048x948
>>
File: 1961.07.01 - Sheralee Conners.jpg (139 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1961.07.01 - Sheralee Conners.jpg
139 KB, 1728x792
>>
>>585016640
Neither
>>
>>585013285
Because they look like real women instead of silicone fun dolls.
>>
File: hjCIvFL.jpg (145 KB, 750x1330) Image search: [Google]
hjCIvFL.jpg
145 KB, 750x1330
>>
File: 1954.09.01 - Jackie Rainbow.jpg (130 KB, 792x1224) Image search: [Google]
1954.09.01 - Jackie Rainbow.jpg
130 KB, 792x1224
>>
>>585016430
Oh my lawd those titties.
>>
File: 2cMLGsK.jpg (152 KB, 783x991) Image search: [Google]
2cMLGsK.jpg
152 KB, 783x991
>>
File: K94sB16.jpg (135 KB, 783x960) Image search: [Google]
K94sB16.jpg
135 KB, 783x960
>>
>>585017714
I don't get how people find that attractive
>>
File: 1413824051908.jpg (316 KB, 1600x1067) Image search: [Google]
1413824051908.jpg
316 KB, 1600x1067
so what OP, you don't like this kind of stuff?
>>
File: kqBk12y.jpg (337 KB, 1000x1600) Image search: [Google]
kqBk12y.jpg
337 KB, 1000x1600
Dem legs
>>
They're real, not photoshopped bitches.
>>
File: 1414095914640.jpg (63 KB, 719x800) Image search: [Google]
1414095914640.jpg
63 KB, 719x800
>>585017922
Got a dump, should I dump?
>>
File: 1966.09.01 - Dianne Chandler.jpg (164 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1966.09.01 - Dianne Chandler.jpg
164 KB, 1728x792
>>
>>585013285
Look more like real people?
>>
File: 600full-elaine-reynolds.jpg (49 KB, 570x640) Image search: [Google]
600full-elaine-reynolds.jpg
49 KB, 570x640
>>585017895
You're telling me you wouldn't tap her?
>>
>>585018289
Yes, please.
>>
File: 1410916063160.jpg (127 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
1410916063160.jpg
127 KB, 1024x768
>>
>>585018289
Yeah
>>
>>585013285
Her tits got some googly eye problems.
>>
>>585013285
that's some sexy ice cream. it's the ice cream that makes this sexy
>>
>>585013285

Good choice OP. She is my altime favorite.
>>
>>585013285
Too many fak-ass tits.
>>
File: 1412169133967.jpg (203 KB, 616x1344) Image search: [Google]
1412169133967.jpg
203 KB, 616x1344
Glorious 90s
>>
>>585013285
I really wish I could buy a physical copy of this centerfold and frame it on my wall.
>>
File: 1414082598608.jpg (883 KB, 1627x2400) Image search: [Google]
1414082598608.jpg
883 KB, 1627x2400
>>585018338
>not having a vintage wifu
>>
File: 1961.05.01 - Susan Kelly.jpg (247 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1961.05.01 - Susan Kelly.jpg
247 KB, 1728x792
>>
File: 197312_Christine_Maddox_09.jpg (60 KB, 432x640) Image search: [Google]
197312_Christine_Maddox_09.jpg
60 KB, 432x640
>>585018928
1973 mo'fucka
>>
File: 1414098531189.jpg (141 KB, 1024x681) Image search: [Google]
1414098531189.jpg
141 KB, 1024x681
>>
Anyone who wants more/find the best and post them, this site has them all by decade.

http://komodo.pw/Ultimate_Playboy_Collection/Ultimate-Playboy-Collection-1/Playmates/Sets
>>
>>585013483
Yeah. I remember seeing Jenny McCarthy in one and I didn't recognize her at all. That was the point when I realized it was all photoshopped shit.
>>
File: 1414082545198.jpg (820 KB, 1600x2400) Image search: [Google]
1414082545198.jpg
820 KB, 1600x2400
>>
>>585013285
Becasue we always want what's different.
>>
File: YL8dNU9.jpg (963 KB, 2455x5037) Image search: [Google]
YL8dNU9.jpg
963 KB, 2455x5037
>>585013854
Different version.
>>
Everyone here is a fucking retard. It has nothing to do with photoshop or airbrushing. Playboy used to be a cultural icon and would attract the best talent. Playboy hasn't been relevant for years and as such the quality is not the same.
>>
>>585013285

they are real, girl next door types. Not that bullshit barbie doll fake tit shit,
>>
File: 1413699007430.jpg (356 KB, 900x675) Image search: [Google]
1413699007430.jpg
356 KB, 900x675
>>585019168
But yours is bad and you know it's bad
>>
mafia ii fuck yeah
>>
>>585017714
I don't get how people find that attractive
>>
>>585020182

Everyone : Every Person

Your referencing every person in this thread, including yourself
you shouldn't be so hard on yourself
you didn't choose retard, retard chose you
>>
File: 1413824534376.jpg (155 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1413824534376.jpg
155 KB, 792x1728
>>585020235
>>
File: 1413733778885.jpg (349 KB, 1600x1067) Image search: [Google]
1413733778885.jpg
349 KB, 1600x1067
>>585020223
But what's wrong with barbie doll fake tit shit if it's done correctly?
>>
File: 1960.04.01 - Linda Gamble.jpg (196 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1960.04.01 - Linda Gamble.jpg
196 KB, 792x1728
>>
File: 1413824453809.jpg (182 KB, 823x1728) Image search: [Google]
1413824453809.jpg
182 KB, 823x1728
>>585020754
an oldie
>>
>>585020235
Yeah, no, she's hot.
>>
File: 1962.08.01 - Jan Roberts.jpg (172 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1962.08.01 - Jan Roberts.jpg
172 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585017895
Wow, you're obviously a massive pedo
>>
File: e0xDJD3.jpg (88 KB, 469x700) Image search: [Google]
e0xDJD3.jpg
88 KB, 469x700
lruking
>>
File: 1967.03.01 - Fran Gerard.jpg (141 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1967.03.01 - Fran Gerard.jpg
141 KB, 792x1728
>>
File: 1413877091160.jpg (570 KB, 1600x1067) Image search: [Google]
1413877091160.jpg
570 KB, 1600x1067
>>585021191
>dry flat eyes
>small pouted mouth
>left side tit looks horrible

idk, I got nothing on her but her head size and mouth shape.
>>
>>585020507
>browsing /b/
>not being a fucking retard
choose one faggot
>>
File: 1413698806854.jpg (168 KB, 1600x1067) Image search: [Google]
1413698806854.jpg
168 KB, 1600x1067
>>585021835
>>
>>585016640
Liar. I've got magazines to prove otherwise
>>
>>585021835
She looks the kind of chick who'd wander round naked at Woodstock offering everyone a spliff, that's hot to me.
>>
File: 1413827523311.jpg (544 KB, 1281x1920) Image search: [Google]
1413827523311.jpg
544 KB, 1281x1920
>>585022128
That's your taste anon, mine is more conservative maybe, i dont know
>>
>>585021486
AckAck Ack Ack-Ack
>>
>>585021792
Was gravity not a thing in the 60s?
>>
Is there a good place to find high res vintage playboy images?
>>
>>585016560
Troo
>>
Heels
Heels
More heels
>>
File: 1954.10.01 - Madeline Castle.jpg (116 KB, 792x1224) Image search: [Google]
1954.10.01 - Madeline Castle.jpg
116 KB, 792x1224
>>
File: Playboy-USA-November-1993_01.jpg (215 KB, 440x600) Image search: [Google]
Playboy-USA-November-1993_01.jpg
215 KB, 440x600
All I know is that my birthday was a good year.
>>
>>585017410

Mah dick
>>
>>585013285
Torpedo titties is why.
>>
>>585023211
>>
File: 1401106852301.jpg (138 KB, 853x1280) Image search: [Google]
1401106852301.jpg
138 KB, 853x1280
>>585022642
It's something that has to do with fit girls and extremely large tits
>>
>>585022988
this guy gets it
>>
>>585022642

It was the space age.
>>
File: 1964.07.01 - Melba Ogle.jpg (213 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1964.07.01 - Melba Ogle.jpg
213 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585023732
>implying there is no gravity in space
>>
>>585022988
>>585023679
Plz
>>
Is it possible because women were more "oppressed" playboy had more to chose from? Femenisms fault??
>>
>>585021716
>Those hips and thighs
Oh my
>>
If half of these girls posted tits on /b/ today, there would be a barrage of comments bashing her for droopy tits and weird nipples. That's why Playboy uses the silicon look. BECAUSE OF YOUR FEEDBACK.
>>
>>585023649

Nah, some tits are just shaped like that.
>>
>>585024316
Damn /b/ has a lot of influence.
>>
>>585024550

/b/ = guys talking about boobs in general
I used /b/ as an example.
>>
>>
>>
>>585024663
Together we will shape the breasts of the future.
>>
File: 4465bb.jpg (175 KB, 800x1067) Image search: [Google]
4465bb.jpg
175 KB, 800x1067
>>585013285
>>585024316

Same woman. Your move.
>>
>>
>>
>>585024827

We won't shape the breasts exactly. We'll shape the plastic surgeries.
>>
File: 1401391644911.jpg (223 KB, 700x800) Image search: [Google]
1401391644911.jpg
223 KB, 700x800
>>585024517
Not many girls have them naturally tho, and it needs just a little work
>>
>>
Terri Welles, from the mid-eighties, was my favourite. Ex-Air hostess. Imagine how many fliers fantasised over seeing this chick in the buff. Beautiful.
>>
File: playmate_70_41.jpg (76 KB, 450x982) Image search: [Google]
playmate_70_41.jpg
76 KB, 450x982
Probably the only real blonde ever to be in Playboy.
>>
>>585013285
instead of a customer base of all men, they really only have a base of extremely old men who don't know how to get pornography properly on the internet

old perves tastes are shit, and so is their eyesight

bet most men who look at softcore use metart etc which is comparable to old playboy with much more/better content
>>
File: 1398807875025.jpg (61 KB, 486x720) Image search: [Google]
1398807875025.jpg
61 KB, 486x720
>>585025033
Talking from experience btw, lesb femanon
>>
What is it about rocket tits that are so hot?
I just can't understand why I like them so much
>>
File: nicetryanon.jpg (67 KB, 626x601) Image search: [Google]
nicetryanon.jpg
67 KB, 626x601
>>585024846

No.
>>
>>585023592

I was in love with her for so many years, pretty much got me into the mega titties fetish.
>>
>>
>>585025403

They don't exist anymore, we always love what's gone.
>>
>>585025471
What do you mean "No?"
>>
>>585025628 A great loss for humanity
>>
File: 1413699178986.jpg (469 KB, 2560x1440) Image search: [Google]
1413699178986.jpg
469 KB, 2560x1440
>>585025252
Real blonde?
>>
>>585022128
me too :-)
>>
>>585025845

Oops. Thought you meant a femanon was OP and me in both posts. My bad.
>>
There was a playboy in the 70s...where a maid was looking through a key hole and watched a cpl have sex....does anyone have an idea what playboy it was?
>>
File: janet-lupo-playboy-playmate-07.jpg (103 KB, 486x720) Image search: [Google]
janet-lupo-playboy-playmate-07.jpg
103 KB, 486x720
>>585013285
Old playboy's main focus was big natural boobs, even if the girl's face wasn't anything special. Now they have girls with pretty faces but fake looking artificial tits. Old playboy was more natural girls less fake.
>>
File: 1400023076820.jpg (577 KB, 1072x1600) Image search: [Google]
1400023076820.jpg
577 KB, 1072x1600
>>585025628
They are usually on ugly girls/small tits to even show that they're rocket/pornstars that you wouldn't fuck even if u were paid.
>>
>>585022642
Gravity is a relatively new invention.
>>
File: 1963.01.01 - Judi Monterey.jpg (194 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1963.01.01 - Judi Monterey.jpg
194 KB, 792x1728
>>
File: 1386887886942.gif (2 MB, 249x212) Image search: [Google]
1386887886942.gif
2 MB, 249x212
We can use gravity to go back in time to save mankind and bring back rocki-titties. I saw the intergalactic documentary so it works.
>>
OP IS FAGGIT
>>
>>585025252
dem hips..... nnnnngggggg!
>>
as a femanon with tits that look like old Playboy not today's Playboy, this thread gives me a shred of hope
>>
>>585020754
they don't have the gravitas that real tits have, the heft and the subtle curve
>>
Now I wanna watch that one movie again about this woman who's husband got a subscription to playboy and she was like "MUH FEMINISM!" and he was like "pfff u old with kids" and she was like "I SHALL POSE NAKED TOO THEN!" and he was like "NO I DON'T WANT OTHERS TO JACK IT TO YOU!"
but she did.

to google!
>>
>>585028045
We'll be the judge of that. You know the rules
>>
look at her fucking foot dude that's disgusting also she looks either really fucking dumb or actually mentally retarded

>buying porn mags
>>
>>585013368
lol fuck no.

women back int he old days of playboy were made up and styled perfectly, underneath it all they had actual beauty. They werent just plastic dolls with bad lighting. They were natural, glowing and appeared happy to be taking nude photos.
>>
>>585016640
duude, look at this 12 year old.
>>
>>585024265
Pic is shooped.
>>
File: CIvgv.jpg (39 KB, 442x330) Image search: [Google]
CIvgv.jpg
39 KB, 442x330
>>585016640
>>
>>585028576

too late, i already gtfo
>>
>>585016714

Not really, the fake plastic look started around 1996/97.
by 98 I stopped buying Playboy because there were no beautiful women in it anymore, just plastic dolls.
>>
File: 1966.05.01 - Dolly Read.jpg (159 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1966.05.01 - Dolly Read.jpg
159 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585013285
Analogue photography + Not so whorish girls
>>
>>585024846
Still very sexy for a now 65 year old.
>>
>>585026497
goodness fucking gracious
>>
File: 1960.02.01 - Susie Scott.jpg (188 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1960.02.01 - Susie Scott.jpg
188 KB, 792x1728
>>
All these girls were very whorish for their time.
>>
>>585026497
but with the right hairstyle, her face wouldnt be so bad.

But i guess it IS all about the tits, right?
>>
>>585023649
OHHHH.

thats a heeb bro
>>
File: 4chan-Heaven-cat.jpg (28 KB, 269x300) Image search: [Google]
4chan-Heaven-cat.jpg
28 KB, 269x300
>>585025936

Who is this glorious fuck meat?
>>
File: 1963.05.01 - Sharon Cintron.jpg (201 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1963.05.01 - Sharon Cintron.jpg
201 KB, 792x1728
>>
File: 1964.09.01 - Astrid Schulz.jpg (243 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1964.09.01 - Astrid Schulz.jpg
243 KB, 1728x792
>>
>>585016271

Yes. Playboy was a child pornography magazine in the 90's.

Are you retarded?
>>
File: 1968.12.01 - Cynthia Myers.jpg (182 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1968.12.01 - Cynthia Myers.jpg
182 KB, 792x1728
>>
File: tumblr_mpvip2QIIE1rydpjxo1_1280.jpg (183 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
tumblr_mpvip2QIIE1rydpjxo1_1280.jpg
183 KB, 792x1728
I win
>>
>>585013483
Also, most of them aren't doing that blank stare duckface/glazed mouthbreather look that most pornstars do. Some of these models actually smile like real people.
>>
>>585033795
Then prove him wrong, idiot.
>>
>>585034234

First prize: Hairiest Stomach Award
>>
>>585035140
virgin detected.
>>
File: 1970.11.01 - Avis Miller.jpg (158 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1970.11.01 - Avis Miller.jpg
158 KB, 1728x792
>>
>>585034234
Looks like Morticia Addams.
>>
>>
We need more vintage models.
>>
File: lolthisdude.jpg (91 KB, 1099x708) Image search: [Google]
lolthisdude.jpg
91 KB, 1099x708
>>585013285
They remind you of your mother op. By any chance do you happen to have mommy issues?
>>
File: 1968.08.01 - Gale Olson.jpg (153 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1968.08.01 - Gale Olson.jpg
153 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585013285
Standards of attractiveness are shifting back toward what they were in the '40s-'60s.
>>
File: 1968.09.01 - Dru Hart.jpg (215 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1968.09.01 - Dru Hart.jpg
215 KB, 792x1728
>>
File: 1969.03.01 - Kathy MacDonald.jpg (246 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1969.03.01 - Kathy MacDonald.jpg
246 KB, 792x1728
>>
File: i like.jpg (6 KB, 124x139) Image search: [Google]
i like.jpg
6 KB, 124x139
>>585035391

kik
>>
>>585037133
>>585037514

Everything was better on the Sixties.
>>
File: 1965.05.01 - Maria McBane.jpg (171 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1965.05.01 - Maria McBane.jpg
171 KB, 792x1728
>>
File: 1965.04.01 - Sue Williams.jpg (180 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1965.04.01 - Sue Williams.jpg
180 KB, 1728x792
>>
>>585034809

Hugh Hefner isn't in jail.
>>
>>585038925
So since Dick Cheney isn't in jail either, he did nothing wrong? Okay.
>>
File: 1966.04.01 - Karla Conway.jpg (137 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1966.04.01 - Karla Conway.jpg
137 KB, 1728x792
>>
Those poses are very sexy. Love prone bone.
>>
File: 1966.08.01 - Susan Denberg.jpg (217 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1966.08.01 - Susan Denberg.jpg
217 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585039233

Haha. You really showed me. You trolled me into looking foolish! Wow, your superior mind sure is no match for my lesser intellect! Be proud Anon... Be proud.
>>
File: Lena.jpg (558 KB, 1084x2318) Image search: [Google]
Lena.jpg
558 KB, 1084x2318
>>585013285
I'm studying CS, image processing, so Lena is my favorite
>>
>>585018013
damn she is insanely sexy. Dat face, dat rack, dat DAT 'ERRYTHING
>>
>>585018013
Name?
>>
>>585013285
Holy shit I had to check the name twice to see if this was indeed an older model or a new girl


Fucking hot as hell, perfection in a picture right there


have to agree OP, I love older playboy models, the ones from today all look the same, cheap and plastic


I guess it's like toys, in the past kids got quality goods, nowadays it's all the same garbage
>>
>>585040669
Kids in the past got lead paint flakes and cadmium to chew on. This is why we had Jeffery Dahmer.
>>
>>585040552

Google told me in 0.49 seconds it's Angela Dorian from 1967.

That was a hint.
>>
File: 1313192089468.jpg (14 KB, 320x320) Image search: [Google]
1313192089468.jpg
14 KB, 320x320
>>585041143

Seems legit.
>>
>>585020754
What's wrong with men preferring the real stuff?

Gtfo please, there are plenty of threads that focus on nudes in general, you're free to express your preferences for silicone barbie crap in them

We don't have to explain shit to you, I don't want a barbie, you should be glad, you have em all to yourself as far as I'm concerned
>>
>>585013285
they arent
/thread
protip: sara underwood
>>
>>585013285

They havent been under the fucking knife 50times before they are shot to the magazine. Nor taken 20 galons of botox.
>>
>>585042006
i think the barbies are sexy in the sense that they're hounding for cock so hard they become cyborgs and undergo major surgery to be more cock accomodating
>they just tend ot be airheaded and full of themselves for the bodies they bought

natural girls give it that homegrown "girl next door" type of feeling that trumps a "10/10 cumdumpster"
though you cant help but feeling that you are DEFINtely not the first customer
plz these bitches had these tits since they were 16
>>
>>585042426
Let me get this right. It costs nothing?
>>
>>585042426
Feds trying to catch people with pics that are 8 yrs old
>>
>>585042989
But man, it's free.
And LIVE!
>>
>>585042989
I'm more confused as to how they got tumblr in on their shit.
>>
>>
>>585042989
>implying incest at 18 is illegal
>>
>>585043882

incest is a crime? but i love my sister!
>>
File: 141260258045.jpg (51 KB, 480x640) Image search: [Google]
141260258045.jpg
51 KB, 480x640
U MUST visit this page for moaaar hot teen pics !

••••••••••••••••••••••


http://go1,in/647667 (change the comma to dot)


••••••••••••••••••••••

CHECK !!!!
>>
>>585044108
I love my twelve year old sister on a regular basis, iycmd
>>
>>585044034

It is in most states... The ones where there are very few people names Jethro and Elly-May, anyway.
>>
>>585044274
More, fbi, we find them funny
>>
>>585044420

aww mine is 26, i'm not a good /b/ro
>>
>>585013285
because cameras were shitty back then even pepe could of passed as a model back then
>>
>>585013285
less Ps
>>
>>585044900
According to UK rules, everything is CP.
>>
>>585044754

Yes... $2,000 SLR cameras were shitty in the 80's and 90's. Digital ushered in the best of everything... Music, photos, movies...

Go be 12 somewhere else faggot.
>>
>>585044900

What the actual Fuck are you talking about?
>>
>>585045053
Nah, we just now think that everything but consensual missionary position is illegal.
>>
>>585045053

No... Anyone over 18 is fine in UK. Just as long as they're not face sitting, or pissing. Then you go to jail.
>>
File: 1974.06.01 - Sandy Johnson.jpg (177 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1974.06.01 - Sandy Johnson.jpg
177 KB, 792x1728
>>
This thread is so awesome
>>
>>585045721

And, you just know that the second they made those things illegal in Britain, google searches went up 3000% for those key words.
>>
God damn most of these girls just look so much more genuine. I love it
>>
File: 1961.08.01 - Karen Thompson.jpg (198 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1961.08.01 - Karen Thompson.jpg
198 KB, 1728x792
>>
>>585044481
Engaging in it is

please explain how clicking a link that mentions incest can get anyone in trouble, I'm looking forward to that

>inb4 you can't
>on the internet, clicking a link is not a crime
>FBI baiting the mentally disturbed for the fun of it
>>
File: 1967.02.01 - Kim Farber.jpg (252 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1967.02.01 - Kim Farber.jpg
252 KB, 1728x792
>>
>>585013285

Back in the day, you had 3 main players... Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler.

If you wanted attractive, mostly natural women that didn't look like strippers and didn't have their labia stretched over their heads, you went Playboy.

If you wanted something slightly raunchier, like to be able to see some labia, you bought penthouse.

If you wanted to see a plastic, dead in the eyes whore getting railed by a hairless mass of man muscle, you bought Hustler.

Ah, those were simpler times
>>
>>585047582
perfectly fit for simpler minds


just messin anon
>>
>>585018013
moar
>>
>>585047344

Well, i highly doubt that... But assuming she is, any civilized country wouldn't get their panties in a waste about it anyway. It literally shows nothing.
>>
>>585047344

Nope, 18.
>>
Because the older ones contain real.
>>
>>585013285
>they didn't all look like the same Barbie doll with fake boobs
>natural lighting
>>
>>585042006
shut the fuck up you cunt whistle i can say whatever the hell i want in whatever thread i want, because this is 4chan bitch land of the free
>>
>>585047778

I think it made men appreciate women more. The first time you saw a irl girl naked back then was fucking amazing. Like, you thought your heart would explode out of your chest. Now, even lifelong virgins have seen 8 inches up 1000's of women's rectums, so they've become desensitized to it. It's kind of sad actually. Lots of kids today won't have that same "Christmas morning" feeling when a girl undresses in front of them.
>>
>>585048838

12 year old detected.
>>
>>585026497
yikes thats not sexy
>>
File: 1966.10.01 - Linda Moon.jpg (320 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1966.10.01 - Linda Moon.jpg
320 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585022642
>>585023649
>>585023732
>>585026870
Do anyone have the answer for that? You never see rocket tits like that anymore! or at least it is really rare! What have caused this??
>>585021792
>>
>>585049780
If I had to guess it would be the cone shaped bras.
>>
File: 1970.12.01 - Carol Imhof.jpg (144 KB, 1728x792) Image search: [Google]
1970.12.01 - Carol Imhof.jpg
144 KB, 1728x792
>>
>>585049698

Good lord. I'm beginning to think you are mentally challenged, and not trolling. This girl wasn't in playboy. She was from some European magazine in a country where there was no agage rules as far as nudity went. There were quite a few countries like that up until recently. Japan, for example only put an age limit on nude photgraphy about 10 years ago.

Out of the 65 years of playboy, one or 2 might have such through with fake ID, but it certainly wasn't the norm.
>>
>>585049698

Oh wow, she was also in the cover of Penthouse too.
>>
>>585047344

Yesss, delete that picture of the 18 year old girl.
>>
File: 1972.06.01 - Debbie Davis.jpg (181 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1972.06.01 - Debbie Davis.jpg
181 KB, 792x1728
>>
>>585050020
Yeah! That seems like the only plausible explanation!
>>
>>585045053
>>585045574
Dude, A guy just got arrested for having non nude non suggestive pictures of children on his laptop,the law said the pictures were indicative of a pedophile. Better yet, he was an art major, not only had children, but people of all ages
England is fucking bust now
>>
i like the triangle pubic hair we need more of it
>>
File: 1970.01.01 - Jill Taylor.jpg (139 KB, 792x1728) Image search: [Google]
1970.01.01 - Jill Taylor.jpg
139 KB, 792x1728
Thread replies: 241
Thread images: 90

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.