File: klim002.jpg (22 KB, 460x300) Image search: [Google]

22 KB, 460x300

>>554782314
>Whups! Sorry, OP
>I Rolf Harris'd

Bum...p

File: 4.jpg (186 KB, 700x700) Image search: [Google]

186 KB, 700x700

>>554782647

File: cross-the-line.jpg (115 KB, 1064x493) Image search: [Google]

115 KB, 1064x493

Warning you

These babes are so cute. Keep 'em coming, guys. :)

File: vicky .jpg (18 KB, 320x240) Image search: [Google]

18 KB, 320x240

what is going on in here?

>>554784429
this is some shitty "art" op. i want some real quality art

File: 16.jpg (557 KB, 1800x2412) Image search: [Google]

557 KB, 1800x2412

>>554785018
dont like 4play I take it?

lol art? you make me sick. the police will backtrace you all.

would add some of Jock Sturges stuff but the mods would 404 the thread.
even though its been ruled by the supreme court that its considered art

>>554785409
g8 b8 m8

>>554785519
I prefer David Hamilton.

D: my heart!

Come little children, now follow me home,
Not a one of you need worry.
Come little children, the time's come to roam,
Come follow me now please hurry.

Come little children, there's magic to see,
Here in my garden of mystery.
Come little children, in to my abode,
Tomorrow you all will be history.

>>554785409
>consequences will never be the same

>>554785409
as long as its not sexual in nature its legal and considered photo-graphical art.
if you don't like it... too bad

>>554785820
I wish more people would understand this

>>554785662
he's good too

>>554782314
Gay. think about it.

File: 1E.jpg (22 KB, 627x486) Image search: [Google]

22 KB, 627x486

Edited.

>>554786832
oh I like that

File: rico.jpg (59 KB, 472x316) Image search: [Google]

59 KB, 472x316

>>554787429

File: 31.jpg (47 KB, 398x426) Image search: [Google]

47 KB, 398x426

>>554788194
wut m8

>>554787847
ayy lmao

>>554785547
i'm sick of people saying "g8" its gr8 you dumb nigger

File: 068 jst.jpg (911 KB, 1886x2567) Image search: [Google]

911 KB, 1886x2567

dont have any more that wouldn't make the uneducated cry

>>554789367
attempt at being polite...

>>554789367
go ahead, try to make us cry sweetheart

File: 019 jst.jpg (603 KB, 2210x1798) Image search: [Google]

603 KB, 2210x1798

>>554789484
it's all art

File: 41.jpg (183 KB, 992x1000) Image search: [Google]

183 KB, 992x1000

>>554789718
yes sir,

>>554789718
suuuuuure it is. just keep telling yourself that.

>>554789718
is it just me or does she look like emma watson

god damn pedos... and maybe rape is just when the woman is in a bad mood?

>>554790289
I could see that

>>554790079
look up his work it is
>>554790365
here come the tards

>>554790365
You might be surprised.

>>554790479
shut up, i am the internet, anonynymus we stand, the feds will get you, you sick pedosss

>>554790365
idk, I do see more as art, but then again, I'm not a pedo, so ....

>>554790289
the pic is from 1984

File: brb.jpg (227 KB, 536x800) Image search: [Google]

227 KB, 536x800

damn anons I got a little busy at work here for a second, but I need a few minutes if you don't see me posting it is, because of that dawgies.

>>1sec

and im not some beta fag, i just fucking hate to see you pedos, the feds will track you down one day

>>554790684
that's a nice pussy
cat

File: 1402096544713.gif (498 KB, 405x228) Image search: [Google]

498 KB, 405x228

>>554790765

>>554790765
for what? art?
ok cool

http://www.damplips.com/?p=14113

Enjoy

File: anonymous.jpg (52 KB, 635x360) Image search: [Google]

52 KB, 635x360

Potential soon-to-be child pornograhpy thread reported.

As a proud member of Anonymous working with other members in Anonymous with #OPInnocence #OPPedoHunt I report all threads that depict / and or otherwise sexualize children or show questionable content.

These threads and its content can be but are are not limited to 'Too Young For Those Tits (TYFTT), Too Young For That Ass (TYFTA), Pre-Teen & Teen (JB), Young Girls, Cute Little Girls, Young Candid, and this also includes such threads 'Bad Parenting, Creep shot, You Love You Loose, Guess Her Age, Nudism' as these can often be places where such violations are performed with pictures of underage girls and boys being posted.

We must also mention that threads/images that sexualize underage girls that are drawn, sketched, animated or crafted, (Known as Lolicon) are just as bad as the real thing and is also in violation of rules of not just 4chan but the Adam Walsh Act and the laws of the United States Of America (18+ Required Law) and Human Rights Act.

We in Legion thank the Janitors & Moderators of 4chan who listen to our reports and work with us along with the interception and help from the FBI, LEA, Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), New York Police Department, Google & Microsoft in working together to help stop child exploitation and abuse.

Remember, we must protect the children as they are our future - the future of Legion!

Never stop fighting the vile scum of this Earth such as pedophiles and child molestors!

We shutdown Freedom Hosting, OPVA, CPHeaven and many more deep web sites we can do even more!

If you help, support, produce, assist or in any other way endorse child sexual abuse we will find you.

We Are Anonymous
We Do Not Forgive Child Molestors
We Do Not Forget The Children That Have Suffered

Expect Us.

>>554790365
>back to tumblr

>>554790479
i couldn't give a shit if his "work" is "art"
it's still pre-pubescent girls with their vaginas open to the air and the lens. which is wrong.

however, if you want to just admit that you fap to it, and get it over with, we all might be a little more forgiving. It's pretentious pricks like you who look at images of naked kids, and say it's "art" that make me sick.

if you're gonna jack off to a kid, own it, don't try to pass it off as some kind of "hurr nurr nurr, the play of light on the peach fuzz adorning her vaginal lips is a perfect example of post-modernist contrasts, especially when held in conjunction with what the dildo up her ass says about the communists" pretence.

File: 1395642865597.jpg (14 KB, 216x265) Image search: [Google]

14 KB, 216x265

>>554791045
it never gets old

>>554790909
kek

>>554791213
>wrong

File: 057 jst.jpg (860 KB, 1993x2549) Image search: [Google]

860 KB, 1993x2549

>>554791045
nice down syndrome you have there

how did guys not realise it was a bad b8 thing

>>554791247
and how is it wrong? elaborate.

>>554791213
But you agree that if the pictures do not cause arousal then it is art?

File: willsmith.jpg (24 KB, 309x225) Image search: [Google]

24 KB, 309x225

>>554791213
fucking this

>>554791045
Whatever....

#1 it's copy pasta

#2 the material here IS art. If you're that brainwashed and can't see the forest through the tree's, then you're just fucked in the head beyond repair.

Pro Tip .... How about thinking for yourself for a change? I know... scary thought for you, isn't it.

File: 063 jst.jpg (1 MB, 2000x2556) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 2000x2556

>>554791213
it doesn't matter what you think or how you feel
its legal
so go away

File: erection_laughing.jpg (10 KB, 327x388) Image search: [Google]

10 KB, 327x388

>>554791605
>a pedophile calling someone else fucked in the head beyond repair

oh the ironee

>>554791494
I don't get off on elitepain, or scat porn, but that does not change the fact that they are pornographic images.

I wouldn't call 2 girls 1 cup art, and that doesn't arouse me.

>>554791765
How is he a paedophile ?

>>554791619
well here's the thing faggot, I'm well aware that my feelings don't matter.

you're the one trying to make themselves feel better by posting on an _anonymous_ board, and trying to convince us that you've never pulled your pecker to any of these pictures.

like I said, own it, stop being a fag, and we'll all get along fine.

File: BackSeat_AnthonyGoicolea.jpg (256 KB, 1600x1000) Image search: [Google]

256 KB, 1600x1000

Back-Seat by Anthony Goicolea, 2010

>>554791213
Their vaginas aren't visible you biological failure.
You can see their slit sure. But it isn't being shown in a sexual way, nor are there any images here of them being molested, nor masturbating nor taking a cock real or artificial. They are simply naked children.
Is nudity that taboo for you? That you vilify everyone for being naked in public or in art?
Get a hold of your hormones before you go and rape someone just for seeing them naked.

>>554791905
that's a fair point. so is all nudity porn, then?

>>554783627
white knight faggot

File: 42.jpg (131 KB, 1100x733) Image search: [Google]

131 KB, 1100x733

>>554792150
ohhhh I like that

>>554792094
English, faggot. Assumption is the mother of all fuckups don'tchaknow.

how's about stop getting butthurt about something that I was kind of hoping would turn into a decent debate.

I should have known all of you 'art'fags would just start trying to get personal. HAH.

>>554792150
that is the single gayest picture ever posted on b

wht is wrong with you pervert?

File: 46.gif (1000 KB, 377x198) Image search: [Google]

1000 KB, 377x198

>>554791045
wtf that even mean I am anonymous and so is everyone here? you are gonna war on yourself?

File: 0001 - Last day of Summer (cover).jpg (805 KB, 1871x3112) Image search: [Google]

805 KB, 1871x3112

>>554792137
im not faping to it

all the pics im posting are from this book
which is all legal
so hush

>>554785409
>>554790365
>>554790596
>>554790765
>>554791213
>>554791765
Aside from the fact there is nothing wrong with this thread, and taking into account that you might be serious (if not, this is sucha bad trolling everytime), I always wonder, what did you expect when you first entered /b/? A world filled with fun, rainbows and ponies (the latter might be true tho)? What made you move to visit this board? Was it the movie Smiley (or something like that), or those news articles about "anonymous" and "how they change the world"? Because you being here bitches how we all are pedo's won't make a difference. The feds tracking us? Not everyone of us live in the UN of 'Mrica you know. You probably watched too many movies about the FBI busting peoples homes. Go back to Facebook, 9Gag or Tumblr or whatever shithole you came from, 'cus this ain't a place for you faggots.

File: 1401287272393.jpg (45 KB, 640x435) Image search: [Google]

45 KB, 640x435

>>554792094
how the fuck do we find it sexual, we are disgusted you are just casually posting naked underage girls like its nothing, and dont give me some bullshit excuse that your just enjoying the art. we all know what you pedoshits are up to The only reason they post "softcore" pictures is because they can't get away with posting the hardcore stuff they have stored on their hard drives.

>>554792368
nobody cares dude

>>554792154
here's the thing... I simply don't care, the guy is posting pictures of young girls, where 'you can see their slits, sure'. on... dun dun dun... /b/
a haven for paedophiles, and people who are just plain wrong in the head (no offence guys, I love you just the same)

what do you, Mr Smarty Pants, think this guy was hoping to acheive?

File: 1400381966034.jpg (16 KB, 208x236) Image search: [Google]

16 KB, 208x236

>>554792641
son you do realize cp is illegal, even on 4chan. wtf do you think the mods are here for

File: JPP-BA18.jpg (43 KB, 642x768) Image search: [Google]

43 KB, 642x768

>>554792531
what's wrong with your shit taste

File: 061 jst.jpg (756 KB, 1967x2276) Image search: [Google]

756 KB, 1967x2276

>>554792641
i love you lol

>>554792898
peedo, you cant say that and expect to be taken seriously

File: dat line.jpg (220 KB, 1000x994) Image search: [Google]

220 KB, 1000x994

>>554792903
really like that.. would love the source

>>554793078
fag

>>554792705
just about every image posted here can be google image searched only to be found at a legal credible site somewhere else.

Just because YOU don't like it doesn't make you the sheriff of 4chan.

Thank's Barney Fife

>>554793223
retarded trolling

>>554792641
hahaha, you imbecile, I'm just loving every minute of this.

At what point did I suggest that I was shocked by anything in here? every one of my statements has held fast to the ideal that, yes, nudity in images is something that should not be pre-pubescent, but I believe if you read back I mentioned that I wasn't going to hold it against anyone if they just came out and owned what they were doing.

>>554793183
Jock Sturges - Last Day of Summer

>>554793284
going on vacation to a place that is close to the place where this was shot

>>554792891
You probably dropped out of school or something, 'cus there ain't no kind of so-called pornography in this thread. This is called art (not my kind of taste tho), and you seem to never be educated on what art can be. There is nothing like spread vags, penis in vag or other sexual activities going on in the picture, and the picture is made solely for art reasons. I guess you must be retarted, or 12 years old since you don't seem to understand the difference between art and pornography. Even some kind of pornography is considered art, bus I think that's a step too high for a pleb like you.

vipergirls.to/threads/634395-CandyDoll-tv-Laura-B-12-Sets-amp-Videos

File: 1404229026645.jpg (74 KB, 720x556) Image search: [Google]

74 KB, 720x556

7 warnings before publishing pictures of your children on the social network

1. Never upload pictures showing your children modelling on anonymous sites as it can be used for arousal and shared sullying your childs identity naked. While taking pictures of babies when they are taking a bath is cute, or even if they are running with their diaper on, we should never do it. There are people with horrible intentions that dedicate their time to collecting pictures of infants with little or no clothing to satisfy their vile intentions. Pornography effects are terrible.

2. Avoid uploading daily images of your young ones. This is dangerous because it makes you vulnerable. You are exposing your family’s safety.

3. If you upload pictures taken in your home to a site on the net, try to avoid taking it in a place where you show expensive items, TV, computers, even the car. The image can be seen by your friend’s contacts (people you haven’t met) and you don’t know if any of them will be interested in your property.

4. When you share family pictures in public places, avoid any place that reveals where you live, such as the street name or the home’s entry.

5. Pay attention to the way you name the pictures. This is the point where you share valuable information. For example, “Here I am getting out of the school ______, I always do it at 2 p.m.”

6. Erase your album pictures after a few days.

7. Do not upload pictures of your babies or children in compromising situations, or with silly poses. It may be common to turn into a shared joke a million times during Internet memes.

We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.
We are coming for you pedophiles.

>>554792715
That's a nice beach. All the beaches here suck. It's always crowded and super rocky. I just want a nice desolate beach with soft white sands and calm blue waves. Fuck that shit. I'm going to Tahiti as soon as I can.

>>554793535
thx m80
keep up the "good" name for anonymous.
the people will never know ;)

File: 030 jst.jpg (897 KB, 1930x2578) Image search: [Google]

897 KB, 1930x2578

lol here's a "dirty" pic

>>554793535
yawn...

>>554791045

http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/124/1/22/
"Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and than men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported."


Us oppressed pedophiles need to oust these bigoted, anti-pedophile scumbags. Their bigotry is not supported by science and results in enormous suffering for adults and children alike.

Please do your best to disseminate this study.

>>554792154
Its sad that people have been coached by the media and masses to believe that if a child is seen naked the the seer is a paedophile. Should mom's and dad's be locked up for taking a picture of their kids in the bath? There is a massive difference between cp and what is posted here. Some of these pictures are beautiful. I personally don't know how anyone could get aroused to any of it, but then again I am not a pervert, if it was cp, i could understand the outcry by the idiots on this board but it isn't. You people need to grow up start thinking for yourself s.

>>554793750
Agreed

File: art m8.jpg (13 KB, 300x378) Image search: [Google]

13 KB, 300x378

>>554782314
here /b/ruh

>>554793738
TL;DR

>>554793750
This