One of the following will happen:
>Ambrose will beat HHH for the WHC at Fast Lane, leading to an Ambrose/HHH/Reigns triple threat at Mania
>Reigns will lose to HHH at Fast Lane, leading to an Ambrose vs. HHH match at Mania
There is zero chance of Reigns vs. HHH being the main event of Mania.
>>911724
They'll just have Seth run in at the last minute at Mania. It'll be better this time.
>>911724
>There is zero chance of Reigns vs. HHH being the main event of Mania.
You're betting against an insanely bad Vince idea?
>literally anyone going over Vince's pet project
>>911724
Stage One: Denial
OP stop being delusional. They are not putting Ambrose in a WWE title match at WM this year. And he damn sure isn't winning the title at any point when he's doing a good job keeping the IC belt hot.
Why do I feel like they're having Triple H do the "annoying boss who screws everyone over to get the title" angle in an ill-fated attempt to get Roman crowd sympathy and cheers over by Mania time?
For fuck's sake....the crowd cheered Triple H when he entered. They booed Roman and hated him so much that they cheered for Triple H because at least he was one more threat to stop the guy that they hated.
And they're actually gonna take this garbage all the way to WM....
If they're smart then it'll be the second-to-last match with a bigger match as the main event. They don't have Seth or MITB to save them this time....
