Which one is superior?
New would be perfect if it didn't have that ugly faux-scratch
>>884586
>outraw wrestring
YOOOOOOO
>>884607
BRRRRRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVMMMMMMMM
>>884581
Old.
>>884607
/thread
I like the new one. They should have dropped logo the scratch with the F.
>>884719
Best.
>>884607
>>884581
Old>>>>>
>>884586
/thread
>>884581
Old.
New would be fine if it weren't for that ugly ass silver gradient
New one, It's about time we got rid of the circumcised attitude era logo.
>>884581
New one is way better
old one
>haha le edgy >:D
>bring back le attitude era - in my wresslin i want stone cold whipping ass n drinkin beers (btw i was boring in 2001)
>fuck pg xD
>cena is le worst wrestler ever he buried david otunga >:O
>>884581
Old one by far. It ahd some character and grit to it. The new one is safe, clean and sterile, just like their product. I guess it fits, at least.
>>884581
The new one. The old one looked like something a 12-year-old would draw to try to look edgy. The new one is a modern version of the classic logo.
>>891639
> classic logo
18+
>>891735
Get the F out.
>>891283
You're such cancer
>>891787
Well that is the classic one but i cant see how the new one is the modern version of it
>>897656
Shiny and solid with a W on top of another W.
>>897663
Exactly.
>>884581
I prefer old, but I would never want them to change it back.
It doesn't fit with the current wwe.
>>897663
But it is just a sleeker and more refined version of the scratch logo
>>897675
That was his point. At first glance it looks just like the scratch logo but it subtly borrows from the classic logo too.
>>884581
one has more attitude
>>891283
go back to reddit please
this is the 2008 version of the scratch logo
