Is the WWE Network worth getting, despite the fact I haven't watched WWE since Wrestlemania 23 (Cena vs HBK), just to watch ECW and WCW? I'd watch the shit out of either.
You answered your own question. If you'd watch it, it's worth it.
>>1421756
For 9.99 its worth it, just cancel when your done watching.
>>1421756
All the ECW entrance themes are dubbed over and it's fucking hilarious. RVD walks out to stock music and it is the greatest thing I've ever seen.
The real question I'm asking is, is there enough content on there for me to be satisfied? I don't watch WWE.
The old stuff is worth it if you can make it past what >>1421809 said.
>>1421854
There is tons of old shit on there. You could probably find a lot of the individual matches and even full PPVs if you Googled hard enough, but that's annoying and quality is worse. Really just depends if you can afford it or not.
Absolutely not. I have it and I have to force myself to watch ppvs live. Stone cold podcasts are cool once every 3 months if you don't work in the morning
>>1421953
Like I said, I wouldn't be watching it for current WWE. I'd be watching it for anything pre-2001.
>>1421993
i think it's worth it if you just want to check the archives out. i mean you can always cancel when done. i had it for a while but after this last WM i cancelled it after that shitty main event. i just watch everything online anyway.
>>1421993
>Implying there isn't some good stuff 2002-now
Get over yourself and your whiny fanboy hatred
>>1422031
I watched until 2007, the current WWE just doesn't interest me. Call me a hipster, call me a fanboy, but whatever the case, I just don't like it.
>>1421756
It's cool for a year or so. I watched WCW only growing up and I had the network for 2 years and watched all the WCW shows. ECW is mostly awful, and I never did like WWF/E. I watched all the current PPVs as they were happening and a few of the guys are decent but if you are interested only in pre 2001 stuff there is way more than 30 days of it for $9.99
