https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXVzK9svve8
J U S T
Where did it all go so wrong
smark status = worked
>>1374853
Oh yes killing ratings is a work. Bravo Roman great job
>>1374853
>Roman is such a good face/heel that he makes people switch TV channels and the ratings even more shit
Based dog working the smarks
At this point I'm certain they're embracing the smarks and trying to make us boo the guy as much as possible. There's no possible way "good, bad, just" is one of the best catchphrases of the last decade, let alone the best. It's just a catchphrase. A shitty one.
Chris Jericho's STUPID IDIOT should be number one.
>>1374894
Nah, on their main product they're still desperately trying to get him over.
At the least, you could gift them the acknowledgement that they understand fans don't particularly like him, and thus ricochet off of that to make his opponents less generic Heels, and almost the babyfaces of the situation sometimes (the AJ feud, the Seth doc showing on Raw).
But they still try to get him over.
The Youtube channel is just a Youtube channel. They're openly baiting there.
>>1374900
But the thing is that the main product have started to suffer because of this relentless push. Roman Reigns the character is permanently damaged because of an aggressive push that he wasn't ready for nor deserved to be perfectly honest. He's never going to get truly over.
You can't poke smarks with a stick like this. It doesn't matter if it's a youtube channel.
Poor Roman Reigns. This wasn't how it was supposed to happen.
But it's pretty based seeing Sashafag smarks get worked.
rofl
once again WWE desperately trying to show ''he's relevant guys plzzzzzzzzzzz''
>>1374849
"Booty-O's" is a catchphrase?
>>1375064
Yes. New Day. Somehow they made it a catchphrase.
