Have we yet reached the point where we can change the term "X-Pac Heat" to Roman Reigns Heat"?
It's a slightly different thing. Even the guys who absolutely loathe Roman want him to stick around long enough to get (in their view) rightfully buried by better talent.
XPac's reaction was just "why did you make us pay to see this shit again? He wears a leotard and does a bronco buster, and not one of his feuds has ever developed meaningfully or ever gone anywhere".
>>1360709
Yeah only cause you're underage and don't actually know what x-pac heat is.
Just call it the sound of fat butthurt smarks
>>1360709
Has X-Pac tragically died yet? That's how the last got out.
>>1362605
This
It depends on how long WWE continues to book him like this. Part of the reason X-Pac heat became a thing is just how long he kept showing up, winning with the same shit, being the same character, and not being involved in interesting feuds. It's been maybe two years for Reigns. Still too long for a guy being pushed so hard with such little success getting over, but not quite X-Pac level yet.
>>1360718
X-pac had a decent feud with D-lo for the European championship.
