If WWE got rid of PG, would they suffer for it financially?
Plenty of kids watched when it wasn't PG because most parents generally don't give a shit when they hear the word wrestling.
I gather they would lose out on some of their sponsors but I think they could easily make up for it with the benefits of non-PG television.
Maybe just have Smackdown remain PG even.
>>1306992
>the benefits of non-PG television.
Explain what you think these are.
>>1306992
it's not because parents didn't give a shit, wrestling was public enemy #1 back then for parents.
the best way to get a kid to do something is to convince them they aren't supposed to.
>>1306992
If the ratings went up enough for them to get equally high paying sponsors they'd be fine.
The problem is they can't put on a good enough TV show to do that, PG or non-PG.