>mfw the "new era of WWE" is just the era of Reigns.
You are currently reading a thread in /asp/ - Alternative Sports & Wrestling
We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.
>mfw the "new era of WWE" is just the era of Reigns.
>>1255552
But he's still champ you fucking dingus.
Also, this "new era" crap is total bullshit. A new era isn't just when Vince says so, it's a total change of attitude, booking style, or the way the product is presented to us.
Having said that, there hasn't been a real era change since PG. It's the same nonsensical booking and storylines it has always been
>>1255833
I thought the same thing but think about when Vince announced the Ruthless Aggression era and that was sorta a thing. Plus none of these new era storylines are going to elevate until SS.
>>1255833
Post 2010 we have a lot more indie guys, guys from Japan, etc. There's definitely a change. The weekly show wrestling quality has never been this good as a result maybe matched by Ruthless Aggression/Smackdown Six era Smackdown
Does anyone else feel that there is potential for another boom period but know it won't happen cause Vince hates money not made his retarded way?
>>1255833
I don't think Vince gives a shit about anything else except that Roman must remain champion in this "era"
The era of stealing talent from other promotions
>>1256935
>offering better pay/exposure is stealing
Stay mad japcuck
