why does everyone say someone is buried when they lose a match?
obviously one person is gonna lose and one person is gonna win. so every time a person loses they are buried?
doesnt that mean in every event half the stars get buried? are you guys retarded?
Smarks using words they don't understand but heard in a shoot interview online.
Because new stars need big wins,
theres nothing wrong with losing a feud, but when the person is brand new, and fucking john cena kills them while they're hot, is a burial.
>>1170508
Lesser smarks belittling smarks because they aren't as tuned in to the product
Why do people still take shitposting seriously?
>>1170495
When did Haitch get back with Chyna?
>>1170514
So Kurt angle buried cena?
>>1170924
Not at all, that match is the exact opposite of a burial.
Wrestling fans attracts the most retarded people
I mean if it's someone like bray wyatt, yes he's buried for life
>>1170508
Pretty much this.
A burial is when an over talent is forced to lose again and again in squash matches and is put in to angles that are expressly made to degrade and lower their status in the eyes of fans.
Zack Ryder was legitimately buried after he got over with Z! True Long Island Story and Vince took exception.
Dean Ambrose losing to Brock at WrestleMania is not a burial. (poor match but nowhere near a burial.)
Smarks are just using terms they don't really understand in a bid to seem smarter than they actually are. Nothing new.
>>1170974
It made Ambrose look pretty chump-ish, you could argue that it's somewhat of a burial.
>>1170978
>It made Ambrose look pretty chump-ish, you could argue that it's somewhat of a burial
... sure. Because it took 13 german suplexes - the last one on top of a pie of chairs - and random mayhem to put Ambrose down over the course of 12 minutes. And with him scoring two near-falls on Lesnar, who's booked to be this unstoppable force of nature.
Burial? Pf.
He got in more offense against Lesnar than Cena did in *his* "Extreme street fight" match and that one was about half an hour.
>>1170495
You have to consider it this way. Think of EVERY wrestler as a threat. Let's start them at one.
For every win, give them a point
For every lose subtract a point
For every PPV win give them 2
For every PPV lose subtract 2 points.
If they are against an old man/comedy character/jobber divide the winning score by 2 and if they lose multiply the subtracted points by 2
If it's at Wresltemania do the above once again.
Now if you're say...AJ Styles and you're losing to a man in his late 40s early 50s at wrestlemania you're buried to shit, and considered not a threat and we all know that AJ is going to lose to Roman.
Also the Wyatts are looking at a threat level of Negative 100.
>>1172190
>I JUST KEEP COMING BACK!
One F5. Done.
>>1170974
>Dean Ambrose losing to Brock at WrestleMania is not a burial. (poor match but nowhere near a burial.)
Nah it was a burial.
Dean was gong to lose, no doubt. But he should have wounded the beast. Like all of Raw I wondered
>Why isn't Brock coming out, and Paul going 'Hey Roman that belongs to us, as you know since it was stolen at WM31.' and then just beats up Roman until they fight at Payback
>>1170924
dont remember that match, but they probably made cena look strong as fuck
if they make them look strong and they lose, its not as bad
>>1172190
Bork used his face as a doormat, beat the shit out of him, kick out of his finisher after getting punched in the balls and hit with multiple chairshots. Oh and only time dean got an upperhand was after romans walk in. And the "match" was only 12 minutes. As much as the league of urination gets with bork on a house show.
>>1172245
>romans walk in
>>1172254
Brock was beating the shit out of Dean on some RAW. Roman showed up, distracted Brock and Dean punched him in the balls. #littlebrother
>>1170495
Holy shit haitch would be a hideous woman
>>1172272
Good thing he doesnt have any daughters...oh
>>1170508
>this
>>1172283
Kek
>>1170924
No because that was a damn good match
