>>1152529
but the dude in the middle always loses

>>1152529
Lol no. They never will be.

Edge, Randy and John total for about close to 30 World Titles, there's only 4 between those 3

Seth is Edge and Roman is Cena, but Dean is just a jobber the the stars. He will never win a feud with anyone credible.

>>1152529
randy orton and edge had charisma

Daniel Bryan = Bret Hart
Roman Reigns = Diesel
Seth Rollins = Shawn Michaels
Dean Ambrose = Razor Ramon

Seth Rollins could be Edge but rest doesn't fit

More like Reigns is Nash, Seth is Scott Hall and Deanetty is X-pac

>>1152574
It was well over 30, probably somewhere around the early 40 plus mark.

>>1153220
this is more accurate, dean is a solid worker like xpac was, wont be on par with roman and seth but he will have a decent career.

Seth is Orton
Dean is Dibase Jr.
Roman is Manu

>>1152529
I do think that Reigns and Rollins are gonna be the Orton and Cena of this generation, not sure about ambrose

>>1152529
No those guys were actually over and draws.

Shieldettys are shit.

>>1153309
Ambrose is Punk

Just without the 400+ day reign.

>>1152574
That will not stay like that for 1O years, dumbass

>>1153375
yeah that makes sense

>>1153375
yeah i agree
reigns will be a less charismatic cena
rollins a possibly better orton
dean will be this gen punk in that fans love him, hes great overall but wwe will shit in his mouth till he leaves.

>>1152529
>Rollins is a vanilla as fuck naturally talented wrestler
>Roman is a forced babyface
>Ambrose is a based storyteller, easily the most charismatic and naturally better as Heel