>>17348450
no, it doesn't.
Can someone post the screenshot of that guy from r9k that paid a prostitute to fuck him in the ass?

>Nopes
This is correct

>Yeps
In that case I lost my virginity when I was 5.

>>17348450
no but you are on the right track. Penis in vagina is what you are shooting for

No. But the question, why did you not proceed on and actually lose your virginity? Banging a girl is the most natural thing to do after you have eaten her out.

I'm going to say pretty much yes. Men don't have hymens, I see no reason to restrict classification to penis in vagina.

As a man, losing your virginity is more a social rite of passage than a technical physical act. Anyone who says otherwise probably "lost their virginity" by paying an escort.

>>17349544
I agree with this and think that in general it makes no sense to restrict losing your virginity to PiV rather than looking at how impactful the whole experience was.

If you have a steamy affair where you perform mutual oral, 69, get to know every scent and space of each other's body and grow comfortable with being naked around someone, does it make sense at all to say that you're a virgin? To me it doesn't.

Having said that I think any set standard is off. If you bury your face in a woman's pussy and lap up her juices, she wraps her thighs around your head, and you feel her pulse and climax right up against your face, that's a whole lot more intense than giving a vulva a few drunken licks as a dare.
To me it's more about whether you now have experienced what sex is like than about what act you performed.