Playboy no longer features naked women.

>>17334611
What's is purpose then?

Playboy is almost softporn
Mayfair/Penthouse is harder glamour
Escort/Razzle is Slags and houswives

You can buy british mags online from Newsstand co uk
Delivery isn't much ontop of cover price and they come in plastic covering that you cant see through.

I went through a phase of ordering Mayfair for that old school nostalgia feel.

but it's weird having porno mags lying around your room in this day and age.

>>17334620

It's for advertising Cappucino machines and luxury sportscars that most of the readers couldn't afford anyways

>>17334562
Haven't bought a porno mag in about twenty years, forgot the bloody things existed. I remember there was a big fuss about magazines in general being "family friendly" in the early 00's, even ones like FHM had to be in opaque packaging so you couldn't see what was on the cover, and a lot of places stopped carrying them all together.

Supermarkets certainly never carried them, and I'm pretty sure they don't now (although I've not looked, it's probably been twenty years since I bought any other type of magazine too). Smiths used to sell them I think, although they've probably stopped. The best place to get them is - or at least was - seedy little paki shops. The ones that still have the original fittings from 1965, prices are three times more than it would anywhere else, everything is either out of date or says "PART OF MULTIPACK NOT FOR INDIVIDUAL SALE" on it and the punjab behind the counter won't talk to or even look at you, only holding his hand out to take your money? Those ones. That's the place to get them.

>>17334611

I did once read an interesting article in there by Hunter Thompson and Ralph Steadman