>Go to job interview
>Reviewers are two millennials
>Answer their questions pretty well, with details relating to the job applying for
>They only ask three before asking if I had any
>I ask a few - and it quickly becomes casual conversation, like workplace banter I wouldn't expect until a month or so in - to the point of them partially admitting that the job is pretty lame desu but whatever
>I try not to let it get out of hand, I turn conversation back to my qualifications at opportunity and remain upbeat about the possibility of being hired
So I can't really tell - were they casual because they weren't taking me seriously as a candidate, or because they liked me and were comfortable with me?
Pls help a poor lost assburger.
Probably the second. I think your chances are good. Best of luck, OP, I'm trying to get out of my dead end job, too.
>>16900551
Sounds good to me, OP...hell, better than good. Make sure to send a thank you note and follow-up on your application status a week later.
Only a trained professional can diagnose you with Asperger's. Don't self-diagnose and don't use a diagnosis as an excuse, should you get examined.
Good luck with the job.
>>16900551
Wouldn't you want to hire someone you can talk to comfortably rather than someone who's quiet and difficult to converse with?
>>16900551
>So I can't really tell - were they casual because they weren't taking me seriously as a candidate, or because they liked me and were comfortable with me?
Option 3: you passed the qualifications, and so they moved on to testing you for "fit". These are millennials, after all: "fit" is big for them.
That said, it sounds like you didn't spill the spaghetti during that test. I'd call that a very positive sign.
