I don't understand why fucking another man's wife or gf is a big deal. Or rather, I do understand why it's a big deal that your significant other WOULD fuck somebody else, but I don't get why it's bad to be the person that they fuck around with.
If someone is inclined to be unfaithful then they're going to be unfaithful, and if they don't put themselves into those situations and are not so inclined then they won't. Cheaters cheat, and if you didn't figure out that someone who you are intimate with is such a person then you're blind or in denial. To be quite frank with you I feel like I'm almost doing you a favor if I prove that your girlfriend is going to fuck around on you, but finding that out the hard way sucks so I feel like it's negated by the suck.
Am I operating on blue and orange morality here, or is there something to this?
>>16649174
Because you didn't do nothing wrong. If the significant other cheating is shitty for their partner, you are the other half. It took two to cheat, not one.
You are the cancer killing western society. The proper thing to do is decline, then inform the SO of the person so that they can get their shitbag partner out of their life. If everyone did this, whores would not exist.
You're right and I completely agree all I would add to that is that you should tell the cheating persons partner afterwards
something to what? your belief in everyone having an unalterable fate to cheat or not? no.
>>16649174
If you're aware that their in a relationship they you are being a dick by sleeping with them. What if it was you that was getting cheated on? The whole act is immoral. If you found out the day after sleeping with the person then you're absolved of guilt but you're being a "homewrecker" if you consciously do it.
Also blue and orange? You been snorting those blue stop signs?
>>16649183
Nothing stops such a person from going out without their wedding ring and cheating with someone oblivious.
>>16649185
You're quite wrong. There are already consequences for being a cheater socially and always have been. It hasn't stopped people.
>>16649190
Naturally.
>>16649191
People's behaviors are a consequence of their inclinations. Someone who doesn't respect other people's property is likely to be a thief. A narcissist is likely to throw others under the bus in order to benefit themselves. The same is true of cheaters.
>>16649197
I'd know that I was better off because i wasn't with a cheater anymore. It would hurt, but I value knowing that my partner is a cheater so that I can avoid further entanglement with them and save myself future pain.
>blue and orange
As opposed to black and white morality. Blue and orange denotes that I'm aware of the possibility that I'm operating along a different moral axis.
>>16649174
holy shit, you're enabling someone to cheat instead of saying gee sally, break up with him first. you're being a fucking scum bag, forget the notion that you weren't the cheater. this shit is why the world is terrible. grow up anon, please, for your own and everyone else's sake
>>16649218
I don't know I see him as more of a renegade vigilante except with his dick instead of a sword.
Cumming deep inside slutty girlfriends and telling the boyfriends. Leaving a cumstain smiley face on the sheets.
>>16649216
>nothing stops such a person from going out without their wedding ring
That's absolutely true, and it makes them a victim too. But that's a different situation than the one you described. In the OP post you talk about doing someone a favor by demonstrating the partner's infidelity.
You're giving the cheater what they want, even if it's for a moment. You're enabling them.
Instead, the best thing to do is to deny them, shame them, and out them. Complete and total shutdown. If more people operated this way, society would be better off.
Plus, it's pretty gross on your part that you'd involve yourself at all with a cheater.
>>16649174
>I don't get why it's bad to be the person that they fuck around with.
Because you're the accomplice. Just because they might have found another enabler if you hadn't ahowed up doesn't absolve you of your wrongdoing in taking up that role for yourself.
Nobody is immune to seduction and temptation OP.
Your logic is that everyone should be exposed to temptation and seduction, so they can be truly tested if they are faithful or not. This is flawed logic, because part of being faithful is avoiding putting yourself in a compromising situation.
Deep down, everyone is potentially a cheater if they fall deep enough into the trap, the trick is to avoiding the pitfalls of temptation. You are the enabler, you are encouraging people to cheat because you are playing on seduction.
So TLDR, you are a piece of shit.
