>>16607729
You don't. The payee and your endorsement won't match up. That could only possibly work if the check was made out to "cash" or something.

Do the right thing and get it where it should be.

>>16607829
well that's no fun

>>16607837
Well fine, since you don't seem to have a conscious, you could try using the check for the thing it's written for, for yourself. If it's written to a specific person, this won't work since your signature to endorse the check won't match records of the true recipient's.

>>16607858
>browses 4chan
>having a conscious

obviously not.
i know you can sign over a check to someone else other than the person it was made out to. the issue is obviously not having this shit traced back to me.
used to have a guy that could steal checks by replicating them but he's been outta the picture for sometime and i never learned how he pulled that shit off

>>16607927
Even on 4chan, some people would still argue against stealing.