>>16576356
>Is it wrong if I start a religion
Yes

What makes you think you can?

>>16576356
We already have enough of those stupid beliefs since the Stone Age. People who believe in elephant-headed superhumans, talking bushes, resurrecting vulture food...

We don't need yet another one.

>>16576356
yes, because you can only start a sect. Only after it got approved by the government it becomes a religion.

But... But... I get to rob money for things that doesn't exist. I mean... We've seen that before, right?

>>16576393
Like... Scientology?

>>16576382
I can manipulate people...

>>16576356
Starting a religion in itself isn't wrong. The morality is what you do with it.
As long as you're not putting people into isolationist work horse cults or forming suicide pacts, I don't really care.

What would it be about? What's your spiel? How would you convince people?

I miss religion being a big thing since it was nice having a place where people gather weekly to eat food, make music, discuss philosophy, and organize volunteer work.

>>16576441
>
I miss religion being a big thing since it was nice having a place where people gather weekly to eat food, make music, discuss philosophy, and organize volunteer work.

What are you from the 1200s or some shit?

>>16576441
Are you immortal?