Indie Manga thread.
You can only in this thread if you know several obscure manga that are just as good if not better than mainstream Shounen manga
VALIENTE FLY
VALIENTE VENCERA!
LET'S KEEP PUSHING FORWARD!!!!
UUOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>139317257
Why do you want to trigger people so badly?
>>139317111
Dai no Daibouken was one of the most successful Jump manga back in the day, and yet now they pretend that this never existed.
Square Enix doesn't own it either, does it? Dai no Daibouken is in an eternal limbo.
>>139317111
Do you even know what indie means? Wait, no, you fucking don't, because you're a retarded newfag who thinks this is a good way to start a thread. Have fun as it fills with other retards like >>139317195
>>139317257
>>139317281
>>139317304
This is better.
No one knew about this until FT came out
>>139317486
Do you not hear the singing of agony from humans and yelling of Shin? If that is not music, I don't know what is.
>>139317503
>No one knew about this until FT came out
Fairy Tail came out ten years ago.
>>139317486
Also indie literature is another way of saying outside of mainstream literature so it also means independent.
>>139317622
Yes, exactly. Independent of big corporate/publishing entities. That would be doujinshi and some smaller publishers. It certainly wouldn't be an official manga adaptation of Square Enix's Dragon Quest, published in Shueisha's fucking WSJ, with almost 50 million volumes sold.
>>139317622
I just wanted to know some good lesser known manga...
>>139317111
I know that. Read it when I was a kid.
Now beat this
>>139317671
Fuck off to /wsr/, you idiot, rec threads aren't allowed here.
>>139317195
>>139317257
>>139317503
These are mainstream guys, too popular and liked by audiences.
>>139317486
Stop being triggered like a retard and understand that indie manga is referring to the idea that some manga is not widely distributed and mainstream, dumbass. Understand indie literature.
>>139317669
Helck is urusunday and definitely a smaller branch of publishing that is not entirely mainstream. It is not even in the top selling manga.
>>139317725
See >>139317669
I'm not saying "indie manga" doesn't make sense as a thing, I'm saying that OP's does not qualify in any way.
>>139317782
Not him, but Ura Sunday isn't their own publisher, they belong to Shogakukan.
>>139317111
I don't know what kind of thread you wanted exactly, because Dai no Daibouken was both mainstream and shounen.
>>139317399
Well Dai no Daibouken did incorporate the Dragon Quest into its official title so maybe there are some copyright issues involved.
>>139317787
Did not recognize that as dragon quest. Though seriously, Helck was one of those categories for Indie manga. That wasn't retarded.
>>139317840
It is still a smaller branch but their own name if anything. They have a few stuff that is not widely known still.
>>139317707
It's not a rec thread, it's a "lesser known manga thread"
:^)
>>139317787
Yeah but Dai no Daibouken is old-school and retro that only the most adept manga readers would know about.
>>139318058
> mangareader
>>139317846
That's what I was thinking.
I was hoping that it would show up in Dragon Quest Heroes at least.
Fuck, I'd kill for a Dai RPG
Get on my level, bro.
Do you even KNOW manga like I do?
>>139318194
Dai needs to be in smash
Jump doesn't have any licensing problems with Square Enix
If they do, they wouldn't have 2 DQ manga running in V-Jump
>>139318058
>>139318207
Yes, I also looked up Kishimoto's brother when I was fourteen.
>>139317486
I'm in agreeance. These people are dumbasses.
>>139317894
Just kill yourself.
>>139318463
>>139318463
Can't you guys have a sense of humor for once?
Did Jump Just used Dai no Daibouken to promote the new oneshot by its writer? then they used it again to promote return of Beet the vandel buster?
they're not pretending it doesn't exist
>>139318588
*didn't
>>139318588
Used how?
"A NEW SPECIAL CHRISTMAS ONE!! CREMATORS FROM THE CREATOR OF DRAGON DQ: DAI NO BOUKEN!!"
or something like that
You guys simply aren't well versed into retro indie manga like me
>>139318860
That isn't big deal, they only mentioned the name.
Shonen Magazine for example reminded that Okubo was the creator of Soul Eater, even though they don't even own Soul Eater.
I would be satisfied with Dai appearing in those Jump All Stars posters. Not having him in Jump Ultimate Stars pretty much confirmed that Jump can't do shit with this series anymore.
>>139319068
But he does, isn't?
>post obscure manga,i'll start.
>Still posts battleshounen garbage as is /a/ tradition it seems.
Are there /a/nons who actually read manga?
>>139319988
Anons who read manga don't make shitty rec threads.
>>139318194
Dai no Daibouken took a few ideas from DQ III, but you should play DQ I before that. DQ II is skippable to be honest.
>>139318058
Interesting on how it immediately struck me as a Naruto-clone, and then I read the filename.
Makes me want to know on how far they developed together as Mangaka.
