>Kiritsugu did nothing wrong
Other than killing the few to save the many, how could you save the world, /a/nons?
Make the holocaust real.
The whole Shirou > Kiritsugu meme is a joke.
Imagine if they were in a room with a terrorist in possession of a nuclear weapon.
>Kiritsugu would shoot him
>Shirou would try to save the terrorist
>>134087579
Summon king Arthur s(he) knows what is up. Also Communism is a only true answer.
>>134087579sage
>how could you save the world
Not watching Type Moon shit would be a good start.
>>134087892
I'm sorry, what?
>>134087579
>Kerry wanted to save everyone with the grail
>even the kikes and mudslimes
He already did plenty wrong.
>>134087771
As someone who studies literature at the graduate level academically, it always surprises me when people who dislike Urobuchi start criticizing his writing. The fact of the matter is that, from a technical point of view, he is a very skilled writer. It's rare in anime that someone is so good at both writing compelling plots and making believable, interesting characters. All of Urobuchi's stories have both of these, as well as extremely well-written, interesting dialogue.
There are parts of Fate/Zero that actually remind me of Shakespeare. Of course I don't mean this in a qualitative way, but just in a structural sense of the way that he creates characters and writes them.
The only really shitty thing about Urobuchi is that he's very lazy. He needs to stop letting other people finish the stories that he starts. Aldnoah.Zero and Psycho-pass, arguably even Madoka Magica, are all incomplete and he's putting his faith in people who lack his sophistication and skill to realize the rest of his original vision.
Aside from this though, considering writing quality is typically the worst thing about anime, it's surprising that /a/ is so eager to denounce the few examples of competent writers that there are. Urobuchi, Nisio and Okada are good examples of writers that are frequently slandered on /a/ by people who are trying to seem smart by having hard, contrary opinions, but who just end up sounding like idiots, at least to me, and I'm sure to anyone else who actually knows a thing or two about "good writing."
>A drama or literary work in which the main character is brought to ruin or suffers extreme sorrow, especially as a consequence of a tragic flaw, moral weakness, or inability to cope with unfavorable circumstances.
>>134088658
I don't claim that his work is perfect, but I'm still a fan.
I choose wu wei
>>134089114
>replying to pasta