There was a point when this shit needed to stop and we have clearly passed it.
>>120007074
>There's too many beautiful girls in my anime
Being a faggot must be hard on you.
It will never stop. Eventually there will be a Fate/Saber, in which every character is Saber. Considering how the mobage looks, such a time should come any moment now.
Nothing inherently wrong with genderbending. Sometimes it's even a drastic improvement.
For a second I thought Nyarlathotep became an official servant. That would actually be cool.
>>120007074
But Nyarlathotep actually makes fucking sense. The Crawling Chaos can pretty much be whatever the fuck it wants.
I'd let Nyarlathotep drain my soul if you know what I mean.
No brakes.
>implying there was ever a point
>>120007074
You want to know why Nero, Arthur, Rippee are genderbent because the creators was homolusting and infatuated with them and didn't want to be perceive as queer so they mask their sexuality by genderbending them.
Just wait a few months and then you'll see George Washington as a slutty schoolgirl begging for Nipponese cock.
>>120007380
>Washington
>relevant to the Japanese
Matt Perry and MacArthur on the other hand
>>120007427
MacArthur x Hirohito yuri FUCKING WHEN Anons?
>>120007427
>MacArthur
Already happened.
>>120007074but lets keep going and see what happens
Girls are much cuter than boys so there is nothing bad with making historical figures cute girls.
>>120007074
Are you some kind of faggot?
You write what sells. This is their target audience.
>>120007074
The only one there that is 100% wrong is Nero.
King Arthur isn't a historically credited figure (although I can concede that in fiction he was decidedly male and in the contest of his epic it would make very little sense for him to be female).
Jack the ripper was never caught so we don't know shit about his identity. Of course it is unlikely that it was a woman, since female serial killers rarely use direct methods of killing.
Nyarlathotep is again a mythical creature and in the fiction itself he can assume whatever form it wishes (although it always assumed male forms according to the official myths).
What is less believable, anyway, it's not much the fact that those characters were females but that they were so cute and moe.
>>120007737
>King Arthur isn't a historically credited figure
Wrong. There definitely was a historical Arthur. Though he probably didn't have a magic sword given to him by lake-nymphs.
>>120007074
But let's keep going and see what happens
>>120007935
>Wrong. There definitely was a historical Arthur.
Oh? When?
>>120007987
At least post a real female Nobunaga, that's just a Japanese student.
Historical gender bending!
>>120008010
But the first one was cuter
>>120008064
Still the most historically accurate Nobunaga. (Why they keep depicting them as hairy old men is beyond me.)
>>120008010
Happy?
>>120007935
Amerifat please the most we have is a speculation that "king Arthur" was based on some other British king or noble at the time.
>>120008139
>>120008147
>Happy?
Very.
>>120008139
That's not Nobunaga in the quote you are referencing. It's clearly Date Masamune.
>>120008242
I know, but same series. Context, anon-kun.
>>120008155
He was the former Roman Governor of Britain, you complete fucking retard.
You could find this much out with fifteen minutes of research.
And while we're on the topic.
>>120007583
Miracle of the universe
