>better character designs
>actual gradients
>film grain adding texture
>slight imperfections in lines
>darker color palette
>proper shading
>actual blacks
Will new anime ever reach the same level as before?
Why would it regress?
nice repost, but we still dont care.
>>115026567
Are you just going to make the same thread every day and shitpost about le old anime was better?
>>115026625
Pay no heed to him. He's just a nostalgia fag. I can't watch anything pre-2000. It all looks like shit. Anime post 2008 is better than it ever has been.
>>115026625
"If the first one didn't work, I'm sure they'll take my bait the second time!"
-every two-bit troll on 4chan
![[Takara] Treasure Island 17 v2.mkv_snapshot_22.29_[2014.08.01_03.46.23].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/1RtsA81.jpg "[Takara] Treasure Island 17 v2.mkv_snapshot_22.29_[2014.08.01_03.46.23].jpg")
>>115026567
Most of the visionaries are either dead or retired. I wouldn't expect much more from the generation that took anime and manga to its heights.
>>115026703
The worst taste.
>>115026567
Shame Yasuhiko didn't direct more. Giant Gorg and Venus Wars are fantastic.
muh grains
>>115027440
I still need to watch Arion.
>>115027529
>Not knowing anything out OP's post.
>>115026567
I hate these kinds of posts, even when it's copypasta. It's the worst kind of cherry picking.
No old anime could possibly match Monogatari, Madoka or No Game No Life in looks
>>115026567
>Slight imperfection in lines
This has been bothering me a lot recently. I know they use computer assists for most animation nowadays, but things like every character having a literally triangular chin (UFOTABLE I'M LOOKING AT YOU) and perfectly oval eyes is beginning to get annoying.
Old and new anime are better and worse in different ways.
Oops. Logic.
>>115027611
>NGNL
It might have been ok if you only talk about the visuals , but I must still ask you to throw yourself off a fucking cliff for mentioning it alongside actual decent anime.
>>115027611
Which monogatari?
The shaft stuff?
Or the traveling pharmacist?
>>115027611
While your point is true, your examples are shitty as fuck and only work against you by showing your newness
>>115027824
>While your point is true
Not really. Art wise, modern series are behind. Visionary character designers like Akio Sugino, Yoshikazu Yasuhiko, and Norio Shioyama are few in number today.
>>115028050
>>115027611
0083 still looks better than 90% of anime that's airing today.
>>115026567
Op, if you're gonna troll, don't bring based Venus Wars into it.
>>115027440
He's directing the Gundam: The Origin anime.
>>115032696
Finally
watching old animes is stupid.
why watch bad shows when we've improved so much in the past century?
>>115028005
Are they having a stroke?
>>115032696
Oh, I wasn't aware of that. Great news.
>>115026703
>I can't watch anything pre-2000. It all looks like shit.
>>115035942
That's just b8, m8.
>>115035737
Yeah, it really has gone up in quality, didn't it?Truth be told, I'm with the notion that both types of animu are goat and shit in their own ways.
>>115036808
90% of everything is shit.
People are who say things are/used to be better have only been exposed to that good 10%.
>>115036977
>90% of everything is shit.
99% of anime is shit. Most of it is so cheap and lazy and they just pump it out. Anime has a "quantity over quality" mentality.
>>115037015
What's the 1% that's good in your opinion?
>Anime has a "quantity over quality" mentality.
Pretty much like almostverything else?
>>115036147
Keep thinking it's bait. I don't watch any pre-2005 shows.
>>115028333
If it looks so good why's there no BD release yet?
Checkmate gundamfags.
>>115037241
are you 12 or something? even though everyone here hates nostalgia fagging, no one can deny having watched at least one of the following back then:
>lupin
>dragonball
>golden boy
>escaflowne>cowboy bebop
if you did miss these, i seriously pitty you.
>>115037509
None of those are worth watching, and they have shit tier animation to boot.
>>115037537
>and they have shit tier animation to boot.
How is modern anime better in that aspect?
>>115037537
Before doing anything wrong here, please inform me about which kind of animation seems to be in your favour.
>>115026703
Tioga060 is that you?
It won't ever be the norm, every successful industry eventually starts cutting corners, and if the sales keep coming, they'll keep doing it until they find out how much shit they can get away with.
It's too late, you'll find some gems here and there though.
>>115026567
oh look it's this thread
again
>>115035737
M8 I'm having a hard-on with 3/4 of the right pics but I can't recognize any of them.
>paper master race
I want to get into anime and these pics are amazing. Any name?
>>115037509
Nice lies, kid.
>>115035737
Where is top right from?
>>115037509
>All those series
Fucking kids these days, where's my City Hunter? Where's Daitarn 3? Where's Cat's Eyes? Where's Ranma 1/2?
Fucking newfags ruining muh /a/.
>>115039018
>hurr I'm so cool I know obscure garbage no one has ever seen.
>>115039018
Ranma is not that old anon.
It ran alongside with Dragon Ball
>>115039049
>any of those
>obscure
Don't you have middle school to get to?
>>115027739
That would be Mononoke m8
>>115039018
>he said he has not watched pre 2005, so lets better mention the least known ones, that seems logical
faggot.
all of these except the hot cat's eyes are shit. why havent you mentioned inuyasha tho, then you shit list would be perfect.
>>115039157
Daitarn 3 bombed in Japan.
So yes, it would be considered obscure today.
>>115027440
Picked the fuck up.
>>115039303
But Ranma is really good though.
>>115039303
>all of these except the hot cat's eyes are shit.
>City Hunter
>Shit
>>115037537
Please fuck off.
>>115039367
Manga != anime.
>>115039551
If you're going that way then all anime is shit.
Not much to discuss then.
>>115039367
genderbender was and will always be shit, havent read the manga tho
>>115039390
calling this one shit might have been a bit overboard in the heat of the moment, but it seriously was not to my liking.
>>115026567
Go to bed Otaking
Honestly, you retards who barely watch anything made before 2006 are no worse than nostalgiafags
>>115039633
There are anime that are better than their respective manga, and there are anime that aren't.
Ranma definitely belongs into the second category. Just the art style change rubs me the wrong way already.
>>115039742
>There are anime that are better than their respective manga
>>115039903
Gintama for one.
>>115039726
I think you meant no better. Anyway some of us aren't interested in become anime aficionados and just watch casually.
>>115039994
>>115040153
>and just watch casually.
Then go to MAL
>>115040341
Nope.
