Twice edition.
>>834042
;____;
She probably was saved from a poisoning attack though
>>833713
>and I'm Tzuyu
That doesn't make sense if you didn't watch Sixteen.
>>833859
another webm ruined by the pig
No sound sorry. Probably my favorite choreography in all of K-pop.
>>835214
>gaypop
>no sound
>>/mu/
>>834845
sauce please
>>835214
they have better
>>833829
I'm in love
>>835214
I prefer Shinee for it's more subtle movements but the BTS choreo liked best was Danger since it had a lot more attitude to it.
for me i'd say
Shinee=>oldEXO=>BTS
not really a big EXO fan but i'll be damned if i didn't think their choreo was fantastic and creative.
voice of an angel
>>836211
the most underrated beauty of our time.
>>836360
hnngggg
we like wendy here
>>836217
Who?
>>836478
Who is is this???
>>836265
Based Lizzy getting right in there
it's it's CL from 2NE1
>>836519
word
Some more EXID
Too bad the new song is shit
This thread suffers from a lack of Crayon Pop
>>836971
I'm OK with this
nice spam
>>837008
you better be
>>836816
song name?
>>837059
thanks ;)
thread needs some Sally
>>837104
And some Mijoo too
>>837120
btw this is 151119 Behind The Show Lovelyz 러블리즈 & Oh My Girl 오마이걸, forgot to add the metadata
>>837082
shame about 4chan's limitations, could make this even grander.
>>837145
But it's shit
>>835716
Hani IS love.
<3<3<3
>>836525
woohee from dal shabet
>>836222
Is that......Ailee?
>>837235
That's Jacky.
>>836494
Hey - have you actually SEEN candid pix of Wendy and her abs and thighs in rehearsals?
She.
is.
BUFF and HARD.
If that's "fat", give me MORE.
>>836806
The famous "Hani vs. a bee" clip.
<3<3<3
>>837072
【TVPP】Solji(EXID) - Maria, 솔지(이엑스아이디) - 초대 복면가왕 솔지의 ‘마리아’ @ King of Masked Singer (HD)
>>837236
Ah - thanks!
>>837104
More tzuyu plz
>>837324
You probably know it, but here it is
>>835214
I don't watch homopop
>>836474
CL what the fuck are you doing.
>>837341
>background chaengy
I have, it's good thanks
>>837236
that chest should be insured.
>>837353
is this choa approved? because my penis approves.
>>837506
>>837104
fuckpuppy~
>>837629
you are a poop
Daily reminder that Gooks are inferior to grorious Japan
Fuck off with your kpop shit back to ledit
>>836353
Who is she?
Sauce please!
>>837791
nana aka The butt slut of After School
>>837642
your mother is a fuckpuppy
I'll never know why they were laughing so much...
>>838480
>you will never hi 5 Dasom...
>>834048
more likely just semen
>>838500
that average kqt at the end tho
>>838549
I noticed her too. She's pretty enough to be an idol.
>>838552
yeah, or my gf.
>>833829
>i wana be white nose job
>>838709
sana <3
>>837341
source plsss
>>838743
it's on the metadata
151020 트와이스(TWICE) 쇼케이스 - OOH-AHH하게 포인트안무 모모 직캠
>>838579
she hasn't had surgeries
We need some Hyosung in here guys. For serious and true.
I don't have any webms tho, so...
>>838061
Song name?
>>838907
Sounds like a Big Bang song.
>>838918
Yes it does....but i can't find it.
>>838933
Thanks.
based leader jun hyosung
>>838934
those outfits were a pitbro's dream
>>837785
youngjizzwhore
a god
>>839656
nm u?
>>838480
the fanchants
if the thread kill?
why is the thread kill
>>839750
it was something else, everyone was looking at someone
>>835348
Phoenix - 1901
>>840007
Word, I like my /wsg/ slow but with new content.
I've been experimenting with making webm 60 fps interpolated. Any thoughts?
>>840462
Why? It just looks weird.
>>840470
Care to explain why it looks weird?
And to answer your question, I just enjoy 60 frame videos.
>>840462
Looks nice, can you do a Kara webm like this?
>>840481
Sure. Any specific video? If so, a specific time frame would be good too.
I'd like to warn that scenes where the camera changes a bunch looks kind of weird.
>>840474
interpolated videos have a uncanny valley feel to them. the movements are very strange and sudden. kind of robotic and real.
>>840462
a video that small doesn't need a high bitrate
>>840485
I'll think about something when i get home.
>>840491
I see. Thank you for explaining why you felt it was weird. I can see what you mean with this webm attached, but not so much with the previous one.
>>840493
What do you recommend?
Last one. I won't botch your guys' thread any more.
>>840504
I wouldn't use more than 1800 on a small video like that.
>>840462
What do you use for the interpolation?
>>840504
Look at the hair and facial expressions they make in your previous webm. It's stiff but they move suddenly but with a delay. It's very strange.
>>840512
I use MeGUI and an AviSynth script
>>840462
1. it has been done before, look at KPOP Dance 60fps channel on Youtube
2. It looks like shit (fast movements cause artifacts)
3. The webms look like shit when under 4mb. Maybe if we had bigger limit
4. We already have 60fps fancams, MVs don't need to be 60fps.
5. Your webms don't have sound
So stop doing those
>>840524
>The webms look like shit when under 4mb
Increasing the bitrate isn't going to make it look any better. The bitrate he's using is probably already higher than the source. If he's going to make low resolution webm he should use a lower bitrate.
place holder comment
>>840524
1. I'm aware of the channel
2. I can overlook it with better frame rates hurting my eyes less
3. I agree, but I feel like using a lower bit rate as suggested by another anon would help. I need to find a good size and bitrate that work together.
4. I disagree, and think some clips from MVs look nice in 60 frames.
5. I took the sound out because this isn't the only place I posted them for advice on the quality.
Anyway, I thank everyone for the advice, and it wasn't my intention to cause a stir in the thread. I apologize if it bothered anyone.
>>840530
Glad to hear you like 'em. I'll use sound if I ever post any more.
>>840526
I meant that if we normally have barely good looking 24fps webms, making them 60 and then trying to get them under the same 4Mb limit is definitely shitting the quality.
But you're right, 5 sec webms with that rate is too much
>>840530
Whatever, no one stops anyone from posting. It's just regular MV webms are boring as well and I don't see what you see in 5 second no-sound clips with artifacts. If you want 60fps then just look at the true 60fps footage
>>840534
>1. I'm aware of the channel
Then why are you doing those? If you want to see interpolated MVs you can check them on Youtube or link them to kpop threads.
>2. I can overlook it with better frame rates hurting my eyes less
>3. I agree, but I feel like using a lower bit rate as suggested by another anon would help.
Nah. Webms mostly look like shit because of the 4Mb limit. So they only look good if you do like 5-15 second clips or turn the resolution down a lot. There's no negative effects on too high framerate, although we hope not to see 4Mb 2 second webms everywhere.
>>840535
No, wait, that's interpolated too. Here's true 60fps and look how shitty the quality is
>>840541
I think you're misunderstanding. I'm doing it because I want to. I'm not going to be the first person, and I definitely won't be the last. They're only 5 seconds because they're test webm to get a feel for how people liked them here.
Not everyone has the same taste, and a few have expressed interest in seeing more, so obviously not everyone feels the same way that you do.
It really wasn't my intention to make the thread about me though. I just wanted to share what I had done and get some feedback. Which is what happened. Like it or not, I do appreciate your thoughts on it.
>>840535
Interpolating a video to 60 fps barely increases it's size. He doesn't need to use a bitrate over 4000 for a 704x396 video. Using a high bitrate higher than the source is pointless. It only makes it harder for people on mobile to see. Half the users of 4chan browse from their phone. You're making it hard for people to see your webms if you don't use the bitrate efficiently. You should use a high bitrate if your webm is high resolution, but something small like 704x396 doesn't need anything over 1800.
>>840552
>Interpolating a video to 60 fps barely increases it's size.
It does. It doesn't make it twice as big, but it definitely affects the quality when encoding.
>Half the users of 4chan browse from their phone
[citation needed]
Also browsing 4chan in public is stupid as fuck
I don't think about mobile users when making webms. I'm not making them 2x the original bitrate, but I try to get them to look as good as possible even if they go near or over the original bitrate (converting to VP8 doesn't mean exactly the same quality even if the bitrates are the same)
>>840559
catchy
>>840561
Moot said half the users of 4chan browse on their phone.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCzaqOjCxPAwyQ0X1gxZ65w/videos
I'm not sure which video he said it in. It might have even been taken down.
Moot might have said it in this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8eKUzPnW5s
I remember that channel having more videos on it. The video he said it in might have been removed, but he has said half of 4chan browses on mobile in several videos.
>>840596
its probably ban evaders
>>840717
if sunny did this it'd be the greatest instashit video ever.
>>840717
who?
>>840723
Kim Ah-young
>>840726
that awkward noona in the background
>>840552
>Interpolating a video to 60 fps barely increases
I'm not familiar with interpolating videos, but native 60fps videos are almost double the size than their 30fps counterparts. I'm not sure if it's the same for converted videos, but logic tell us that double the frames, double the size.
>tfw we're always fighting in here
Never change, /wsg/
>>840788
An actual 60 fps video will almost be twice the size of a 30 fps video.
http://i.imgur.com/MJCi9AJ.jpg
A interpolated video will be slightly larger than the original.
>>840798
Interesting, didn't know that
>>840798
>A interpolated video will be slightly larger than the original.
Wrong. In theory it's exactly the same as true 60fps video, it inserts full new frames between the old ones so it should be over twice as big. But because it re-encodes everything there's no exact size or lossless interpolated videos.
>>836228
who are theses screaming qts?
fixed volume
>>841153
I don't know what you're using, but when I messed around with it the file size would be around 10% larger than the original.
>>841415
You can't just add frames and keep the video and its quality unchanged. You need to re-encode it and the output file size is the result of the setting you use. Of course you can make it even lower than the original file if you use low quality settings, or make it 10x the size by using high quality settings
>>841780
never fucking learns
>>841236
Orange Caramel.
Overalls is best girl. This is scientific fact.
>>837573
So does mine.
All my <3
>>841789
>American flag jacket
Uh that's cultural appropriation and I won't stand for it.
>>842019
More twice especially tzuyu
>>842018
Yale would like a word with them
>>842027
You're right I should have left the original resolution for short webms, somehow though the settings decided to stick around. Initially I was preparing webms with a lengthy duration and for those I usually lower the resolution to fit the filesize limit, but the mwave uploads are so blocky looking I might as well make them in the original resolution hoping no one would notice the decrease in bitrate, this webm for instance was made with 870kb while the other two were in the range of 1500-1800kb
>>842039
>>842056
okey dokey I'm on it
placeholder comment
i thought about cutting this shorter but momo eating pizza caught my eye
>>842174
I thought about make a webm of that winking scene too, but the video quality was bad so I decided against it.
![150817 [KA-Live] Kara Youngji's Horror Stories {Eng Sub} (V App) sound.webm](https://i.imgur.com/VScLKNK.jpg "150817 [KA-Live] Kara Youngji's Horror Stories {Eng Sub} (V App) sound.webm")
>>842197
Are the stories good?
>>842200
they are super adorable.
>>842202
I'll check it out.
kissu~
>>842175
I know what you mean but then again m&g has never really been known for the most amazing picture quality with the choices being either 480p at 1MB bitrate or 720p 2MB. Looking at the youtube rip with mediainfo reveals the bitrate is approximately 1600kb so maybe the source directly from Mwave looks a bit sharper but I haven't downloaded it yet to check because for some reason it takes longer to process than youtube which was available only a short while after
Actually I just took a look while I was making this webm and it's up now brb downloading
http://mwave.interest.me/meetgreet/view/229
>>842210
I forgot to tell you that you should have waited, usually mnet uploads small clips of the m&gs with higher quality and in 60fps
>>842209
> "ah.. so.. uh... like... kissing... what's it like? is it nice?"
cute
One of Chaeyoung's music recs from twicetagram
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kXIWj4-W6Q
>>842213
Thanks for the reminder
I did notice the youtube livestream was in 60fps, usually I watch from the mwave website but the youtube stream was slightly ahead this time
>>842013
>>842019
>>842027
>>842082
>>842210
These look like shit, lower the resolution please. Why do people think the higher the better? I'm fine with 640x360 webms and I think 1280x720 is top limit if the quality is good. But unfortunately the 4chan limit limits these so I'd rather watch small resolution but good quality than big reso and shit quality.
> the mwave uploads are so blocky looking I might as well make them in the original resolution hoping no one would notice the decrease in bitrate
What? If the originals look shit then of course you lower the resolution, not keep it at the original one.
>>842305
I was planning to make another batch, but after twice on v app which starts soon
>>842614
:3
>mina's cute defeat
sorry girls chaeng loves to win
>>841942
i second
Hey Seunghee has shot my heart~
I love Arin's reaction to the voice filter, she was like "DO YOU REALLY SOUND LIKE THAT??"
>>843063
and this one is prior to debuting, when nobody was paying attention to them
Instagram quality though
