[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>Officially confirmed worse performance than GTX970 >B
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 102
File: Worse Than GTX970.jpg (29 KB, 678x429) Image search: [Google]
Worse Than GTX970.jpg
29 KB, 678x429
>Officially confirmed worse performance than GTX970
>Barely keeps up with a R9 390
>Can barely OC without massive temperature increases and system crashing
>https://www.pccasegear.com/products/35881/xfx-radeon-rx-480-black-oc-8gb

Really disappointing. I've got an OC 3Gb R9 280 @1100/1300 which cost me $70 less than if I bought the cheaper 4Gb 480.

Guessing I'm saving my shekels and waiting for Vega, and if that's no good, then I'm switching back to Nvidia.
>>
>>343172651
Video review with benchmarks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CJBaZ9V2Eo
>>
File: 1462977310927.png (42 KB, 653x726) Image search: [Google]
1462977310927.png
42 KB, 653x726
DELETE THIS
>>
>>343172651

My R9 270 shit itself last night, only had it for a little under 2 years. Hopefully my R9 380 will last longer but it's getting to the point where there's really no cost benefit for me in going with AMD shit. It used to be they were the cheap alternative but their modern cards are fucking expensive, perform worse and die easily.
>>
N-no..
>>
>>343172651
What if you have a shitty GPU, is it a good buy?
>>
>>343172962
I know that feeling. My first card was an ASUS GTX465 ref. Never had a single issue with it and ran 75% of games on ultra for the first 2 years. Had it for a total of 4 years until its 1GB vram and limited power meant I had to upgrade. Got an R9 280 and it's been great, until the warranty expired and now it's about to die.
>>
>>343173086
>If you have a GTX 960 or below it's a slight upgrade.
>If you have a R9 370/270 or below it's a slight upgrade
>In DX12 it might actually do alright, but it's going to be at least another 12 months before DX12 becomes more mainstream
>>
>>343172651
I'm still getting the 8gb version for emulation. I'll hop back onto Nvidia again later. My 560 ti is still going strong, but emulation needs more than 1gb vram.
>>
>>343172651
meh i have a garbage gtx 960 and i wanted to upgrade but fuck this
>>
>>343172651
>290x/390 performance for price of $200
>Stock coolers
>reference
Still a great deal if you're a poorfag, but the aftermarket 480's will undoubtedly have better coolers and higher clock speeds.

Guess I'll hold onto my sapphire 290 for a while longer and wait for the non-reference 490's and if those turn out mediocre I'll get a 1070.
>>
If you have the money for 1440 monitors, why in the world would you buy an AMD card?
>>
File: DELETE.jpg (66 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
DELETE.jpg
66 KB, 500x500
>Below the 970
>Below the 390
>Below the 290

JUST.

THIS AMD CARD WAS MEANT TO BE THE SAVIOR. WHAT HAPPENED AMD FANS?

WHAT THE FUCK
>>
>>343172651
so they're hoping for a late release of 1060?
thats the only way it can sell
>>
File: laughing frog.png (121 KB, 258x245) Image search: [Google]
laughing frog.png
121 KB, 258x245
/v/ literally BTFO
>>
File: 1467188044509.png (329 KB, 355x668) Image search: [Google]
1467188044509.png
329 KB, 355x668
FUCKING KEK

THIS IS WHAT YOU GET FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES AND CARING ABOUT THIS POINTLESS SHIT
>>
>>343172807
>Almost all nvidiot gimpworks titles.
Yeah nice benchmarks.
>>
>>343173979
poorfags in general
>>
>all those little amd shitters that were making nonstop shitposts
glad i bought a 980, going to get a 1080 soon, when the third parties start creating OC versions of them

just buy nvidia, amd always has issues
>>
I don't care. It's still the perfect upgrade to my shitty 270X.
>>
>>343173631

yes and at least $260 outside US i would go for a fucking 380 and wait for the 1060 or whatever vega shit
>>
>>343174160
You could put a paper clip in there and it'd be an upgrade
>>
>constant nvidiot fud before the cards even in consumer hands

so it must have a great price/performance ratio
>>
>>343174146
If you can afford a 700+$ card why did you even considered a 200$ one?
>>
>>343174035
So you are saying that most of the games are plagued with gameworks? What's the point of buying AMD then
>>
>>343174146
Anon if you have the cash to always buy the newest high end card then this really doesn't concern you
>>
File: 1465847691054.png (46 KB, 194x181) Image search: [Google]
1465847691054.png
46 KB, 194x181
>mfw 1060 will destroy 480
>>
File: images.jpg (3 KB, 147x147) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
3 KB, 147x147
remember 80% of steam users are poorfags, this is what they need, they can't even run games on medium/60 fps. Anyone who disagrees is a nvidrone.
>>
ROFLMAO
>>
>>343174492
You are saying this like Nvidia doesn't have mid-range GPUs
>>
>>343174270
I'm starting to think the same thing, but I kind of wanted to support a company that develops open source tech, and competitive markets are good for consumers. Competition drives innovation. Innovation creates exciting new products. In the end the consumer wins. If there's only Nvidia, then they can do whatever the fuck they want and nobody can do shit about it. They could release a new GPU line every 10 years if they wanted to, financially it would be the smart choice.
>>343174312
I can afford a 1070, but see above for my reasons
>>
>>343174578
name the counterpart, dont say $250 970 zozzle
>>
>>343174492
>80% of gamers have shit rigs
>games have to run on their shit rigs so they have shit graphics
>literally no point to buy a high end Nvidia card
>>
>>343172651
Still getting one. Running a 560ti right now so its still a major upgrade
>>
File: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (99 KB, 600x800) Image search: [Google]
flat,800x800,075,f.jpg
99 KB, 600x800
>Be not poor
>Get 980ti
>Still serving me well from last year


Feels nice being able to earn more than most of /v/
>>
what did people expect for a budget card at 199? It does well for its price

Still waiting on the 490 as always
>>
>>343174620
1060 is out in like a few weeks, we will see then
>>
>>343174620
1070 is midrange Nvidia, but only costs $500 because that's how much people should be paying for premium designed in Israel brands
>>
>>343174675
You mean the 590.
>>
>>343172651
It's also $200 and only needs 150W.
>cost me $70 less than if I bought the cheaper 4Gb 480
So you bought your GPU on a sale? Don't see how this is relevant to a new gen at release.

If you want an upgrade that 290 this year you'll have to wait it out until the RX 490.
>>
>>343174694
$300 lmao
>>
>>343174709
>500$
You wish.

It costs ~675$ here in Israel
>>
>>343174872
We don't even have the specs though judging by pricing strategies for this generation it's more than possible
>>
File: 73412485634523.jpg (117 KB, 1280x800) Image search: [Google]
73412485634523.jpg
117 KB, 1280x800
>>343172651
Alright /v/, tell me without bullshit what should I buy, if I currently have 660gtx, oldish i5 and a 900p screen?

What's the best card for poorfag budget if said poorfag wants to play new games on decent settings?
>>
>>343174974
RX 480
>>
>>343174974
Non reference 480, maybe then it will overclock and not shit itself
Otherwise 970/390 of a flea market
>>
>>343174270
So that companies stop doing it and because it's cheaper.
>>
File: mikeross.png (253 KB, 411x443) Image search: [Google]
mikeross.png
253 KB, 411x443
>>343174973
doesn't matter about the specs, we're talking about budge gpus for poorfags, they're not gonna through another $100, I said gimme an equivalent to $200 and your dumbass linked me a $300 gpu
>>
>>343172651

>trusting poo in loo to make a decent gpu
>>
>>343174854
>So you bought your GPU on a sale?
Nope. Bought it close to release date, and still worked out cheaper than the 480. Here the cheapest 480 is AUD#319, whereas I paid AUD$250 for the 280. AMD has always been cheaper in Australia when compared to nvidia.
>>
>>343174974
rx 480, its a good poorfag card
>>
File: 1465813140010.jpg (8 KB, 320x196) Image search: [Google]
1465813140010.jpg
8 KB, 320x196
>>343175119
>your dumbass linked me a $300 gpu
We don't even have the specs. They haven't announced 1060. If we don't have the specs and don't have the announcement we don't have the price, you dumb fucking retard. Check your shitty clickbait sources, fucking cretin.
>>
>>343175165
That's odd
>>
File: 1335234234234.png (96 KB, 340x361) Image search: [Google]
1335234234234.png
96 KB, 340x361
>amd
>ever
>>
>>343175218
Give me a reason why would they price the 1060 under 300$.
>>
>>343174252
i never considered it
you plebs were shitposting nonstop claiming that piece of shit was going to be better than a 980 and cost 200 bucks, im just commenting because i own a 980 and saw all your bullshit claims

enjoy your like 5+ years of driver issues , AMD has a monopoly of the entire console hardware business and literally no excuse for having shit drivers anymore, they have no one to blame but yourselves
>>343174312
>this doesnt concern you! stop shitting on the card we shilled for months on end and claimed was going to be the next coming of christ!
kill yourself
>>
>tfw never ever bought an AMD in my life

so good, AMD is pure pootech, only dumb and poor buy that expecting to get garbage tier performance
>>
>>343175298
I've just said that they are more than likely to price it like that, but we are not sure
Goddamn, you are a fucking dumb faggot, why am I even replying to your stupid ass posts
>>
>>343175298
They wouldn't need to. Keep it at $300 and they would still beat AMD sales based on the sole fact the nvidia brand is a proven performer.
>>
>>343175386
>>this doesnt concern you! stop shitting on the card we shilled for months on end and claimed was going to be the next coming of christ!
>kill yourself
Do you ever do anything but argue against strawman
Doesn't talking to yourself get boring
>>
>>343175237
this
only poorfags resort to amd because they have no choice, then they sit on 4chan all month long spamming shitposts about nvidia to justify their poorfag bullshit

if you play games 24/7 like a real gamer, you buy the good shit, and never experience issues, literally no excuses , ever.
>>
File: 1466033028783.png (296 KB, 649x649) Image search: [Google]
1466033028783.png
296 KB, 649x649
>>343175218
retard still fighting about specs when it's about budget
>>
File: 1462845997335.jpg (65 KB, 441x464) Image search: [Google]
1462845997335.jpg
65 KB, 441x464
>it's an AMD card

Whatever helps the poor animefags I guess
>>
if you bought a console, you bought an amd, if you dont have a console, what are you doing on v
>>
>>343175469
You could at least try to make this not sound like astroturfing.
>>
>>343175504
THERE IS NO FUCKING PRICE FOR GTX TEN SIXTY. NO PRICE
NO
PRICE
WHAT IS THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND
>>
>nvidicucks on turbo shitposting
>meanwhile the 1080 has thermal issues, OC issues, and the custom ones are higher priced than promised
Enjoy the last day of your shitposting, greencucks.
>>
>>343175580
If making shit up helps you then power to you man
>>
File: oh oh wow.gif (2 MB, 228x180) Image search: [Google]
oh oh wow.gif
2 MB, 228x180
>I must run absolutely every new AAA title at 200fps 6000p quality with vr goggles on

you autistic performance whores are honestly hilarious. All you fucking do is buy the latest meme jewery and then make billions of complaint threads then repeat as if nothing had to be learned.
>>
>>343175657
poor faggot ahoy
>>
>bought 970 used for 210 bucks
>480 soon revealed after
>feel like I made a bad decision
>all of this
The biggest shit is the OC. What the hell AMD? I could Overclock my HD 7850 just fine.
>>
>>343175642
>nvidia,card is out so we have real info
>amd card is not out yet so we have no real info
Okay I made it all up. ;^)
>>
File: Picture of me 2.png (283 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]
Picture of me 2.png
283 KB, 480x480
mite b cool to crossfire if support for that wasn't shit
>>
>>343173979
>feels good man
>>
>>343175706
>970 for 210
You did good. Wish I got mine for that price. My 970 is starting to show its "age" at 1440p.
Goddamn 3.5. Is the 1070 better suited for 1440p?
>>
>>343175695
>you must be poor if you don't buy overpriced shit with programmed obsolescence every year then cry about it


Good goy
>>
File: 1465077535019.jpg (47 KB, 852x854) Image search: [Google]
1465077535019.jpg
47 KB, 852x854
>mfw my 1070 comes in on Friday
>>
File: 5637557.jpg (63 KB, 420x505) Image search: [Google]
5637557.jpg
63 KB, 420x505
cool
>>
>>343175871
Keep posting poorfaggot!
>>
>>343175959
>pc gaming is not expensive, what, you paid more than 1000$ for your rig are you stupid
>can't afford a 700$ video card every year, what are you poor
>>
>>343172651

>$399
>$399
>$399
>$399
>>
>>343175871
>NVIDIA cards
>overpriced shit

Yeah, keep telling this to yourself.
Buy an XBone. At least it has decent graphics. Well better than 200 Dollaroos AMD shit.
>>
File: 1454996344703.jpg (113 KB, 864x960) Image search: [Google]
1454996344703.jpg
113 KB, 864x960
>>343175871
Planned obsolescence is a meme. Nvidia doesn't need to continue providing support for older cards because nobody uses them. The 970 is the most popular card on steam right now, and within 6 months, the 1070 or maybe even the 1060 will become the new most popular kid in school. Only retards use old tech, and that's all AMD are good at creating.

AMD users will forever be stuck with
>but muh driver maturity
>but nvidiot gimpworks
>but planned obsolescence
>>
>>343172651
>320 Australian dollars

Guess I'll just get the R9-380 instead
>>
>>343176079
Yeah but I dont spend $700 a year.
My 970 cost me £199
2 years on I bought a 1080 for £524.
sold my 970 for £125

stay poor.
>>
File: Pepe-The-Frog-Happy-20.jpg (34 KB, 680x734) Image search: [Google]
Pepe-The-Frog-Happy-20.jpg
34 KB, 680x734
>>343176079
>pc gaming not expensive
>spent $650 last year
>I play some different games, but I just went back to LoL and WoW
>I shoulda kept that money to buy more gay skins and Wow time,
>pc gaming is expensive
>>
>>343175706

>3.5 gb

you did. and with time the 480 will easily shit on your gpu with dx12/vulkan
>>
>>343176306
And how many years do I have to wait for that to happen Anon-kun?
>>
>>343176306
By the time DX12 even becomes relevant, the 480 wont be.
>>
>>343176229
>bought 200$ card
Were you poor?
>>
>>343175959
>I am autistic and can only call people who disagree with me poorfags

keep it going

>>343176151
yes it overpriced stupid goy, their presence on the market and the weak competition allows them to get away with bullshit prices. Numbers you see are not worth the the product.

>>343176169
yes buy a new one every year goyim, we're planning on making a weekly release in the future. hope you'll subscribe


Anyway have fun playing shit games like doom of duty then complaining about how vidya is dead.
>>
File: 1458179317767.jpg (10 KB, 192x245) Image search: [Google]
1458179317767.jpg
10 KB, 192x245
Is it possible for the GTX 1060 to be $250?

I-is it possible that the drivers for the 480 will make it on par with the 970 in dx11 games?
>>
>>343176471
200$ did not always equal £200 anon. You don't have to rub it in.
>>
>>343176572
Sorry, 150$?
>>
If only AMDfags stopped hyping up mediocre cards and started looking for jobs so they could afford decent rigs
>>
>>343176471
no I was waiting for the 989ti to come out, it did then I just didnt bother getting it
>>
>>343172651
So I'm better off getting a used 970?
>>
>>343176504
>yes buy a new one every year goyim
Hey, at least nvidia will be around in 10 years time, unlike AMD, which is hemorrhaging money. AMD will be bankrupt, and nvidia will still be alive and kicking.
>>
>>343176504
Good fucking lord. Stop your stupd goy shit.
It's not like eveyone bought a 980 last year and buys a 1080 this year. If you don't use 4K, even a 970 will hold up.
AMD, they lost a good chunk of their costumers years ago and NVIDIA picked them up. They just work perfectly, you know? AMDs dying, simple as that. No gamer buys an AMD CPU or an AMD card. It's like Nokia. Give it another year and they're gone.
>>
>>343172651
Might aswell pay 50 more bucks for the 1070 and get a better performance then a 980.
>>
>>343176169
How can you be so pathetic as to apologise for planned obsolescence?
>>
>>343176758
Well the Nvidia gameworks thing and tessellation where it makes no sense is kind of bullshit though.
But it is not nearly as scummy as what Intel did since devs/publisher decide to use gameworks or not.
>>
>>343176306
>>343176306
yeah thats why ithe 480 gets beat by the 970 is Ashes.....
http://i.4cdn.org/v/1467199000044.jpg
>>
File: 567742166.png (21 KB, 348x423) Image search: [Google]
567742166.png
21 KB, 348x423
>AMD will soon go bankrupt and there will be nobody to save us from the Intel/Nvidia monopoly
>>
>>343176610
$150 is £111 stupid.
>>
>>343176894
The whole Gameworks and tessellation argument has been debunked so many times now it's starting to sound like a broken record
>>
File: 1444740631752.png (71 KB, 592x492) Image search: [Google]
1444740631752.png
71 KB, 592x492
>You now remember all those threads claiming the 480 will beat a 980
>>
>>343177063
What about paid benchmarks?
>>
>>343172651
>this gens AMD cards are POO
>still trusting AMD to make a comeback with Vega
if they fucked up horribly this gen then you're better off switching to NVidia now and saving yourself the wait
>>
>>343177312
Paid benchmarks are a crime, and the only ones committing crime are AMD with this joke of a graphic card.

1070 and 480 are both mid range cards, yet one is vastly superior, and the other is only just good enough to be used as a paperweight.
>>
POO IN THE GPU
>>
Dude, it's 200$ while being only 5% slower than 970(which has memory issues).
Though if would probably be smarter to buy a used 290 instead.
AMD is doing a wonderful job of bringing the gaming hardware to poor fucks like me. I hope their next card of the same class will be even cheaper.
>>
>>343175948
>the grid on the core clock is clearly shopped

kek
>>
File: 1410904873888.gif (217 KB, 320x268) Image search: [Google]
1410904873888.gif
217 KB, 320x268
>>343175912
Me too, Anon. I'm not ready. It's gonna blow my fucking mind.
>>
File: 1457720654363.jpg (25 KB, 300x300) Image search: [Google]
1457720654363.jpg
25 KB, 300x300
>According to the review, 5% overclocking causes severe artifacts in 3DMark, while 7% overclock causes system to freeze
>>
>>343177487
AMD vs NVIDIA is more about budget, or rather about "dollar per unit of perf".
>>
>>343172651
>https://www.pccasegear.com/products/35881/xfx-radeon-rx-480-black-oc-8gb

MY NEW PS4 NEO IS SUPPOSED TO GET A R9 480 AND ARE YOU TELLING ME IS NOT iN PAIR WITH MID RANGE CARD???!!!
DELETE THIS RIGHT NOW!!!
AND STOP THE #ps4shaming.
#freethepsn #pcforps4
>>
>>343177548
>Though if would probably be smarter to buy a used 290 instead

Why would it be smarter to get a used 290?
>>
What's a good processor to go along with this? I'm telling my brother to just get this because all he plays is league and overwatch but he will need to upgrade his cpu
>>
File: drrakelbling.png (193 KB, 393x371) Image search: [Google]
drrakelbling.png
193 KB, 393x371
I run most games 720-900p at medium thus my shit is worse than an xbox one. I can't wait for this
>>
>>343172962
A heatgun can restore your dead card, check the internet.
My father runs the heatgun over the bare gpu chip for like 2 minutes, lets it cool and reassemble and it runs again like new.

Well, for another 4-6 months, then it breaks again so redo from start.
>>
>>343177771
post your build on pcpartpicker, they'll tell you everything
>>
>>343177651
And yet the 1070 is far superior in terms of $/perf, it's even a 6 pin card, so it's $/watt is better too, and not to mention perf/watt.

In fact, everything is better.
>>
>>343177771
I7 6700k
>>
>>343177565
Oh man stop doing this shit to yourself
>>
>>343177487
You mean you don't remember when Nvidia literally paid the benchmark company to write two versions of 3DMark to make ati cards get worse results? Oh wait, you probably were not even born yet.
>>
>>343177912
tthats overboard, pcpartpicker might say i5 6500
>>
>>343177996
AMD fan here. Now you're just making stuff up.

Stop it.
>>
Are AMDfags trying to be worse than Sonyniggers?
>>
>>343172651
who seriously fucking cares? it's $200, it's not supposed to be a fucking titan you retard, this is for cheap bastards who want to be able to play modern AAA games at medium-high graphics

enjoy spending $700 extra on a rig that can play games one setting increment higher than an AMD machine, your jewish overlords will thank you greatly
>>
POOJEET ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>
>>343177905
>In fact, everything is better.
600 (six zero zero) dollaridoos.
>>
>>343178128
You first. It was during the 6000 series.
>>
>>343178208
>who seriously fucking cares? it's $200
No. The 4GB model is $200, and won't go on sale until later in July. That model is the $250 8GB version, which has slightly better performance than the 4GB version, but still worse performance than the 970/390.
>>
File: 1451577769988.jpg (73 KB, 655x485) Image search: [Google]
1451577769988.jpg
73 KB, 655x485
>>343176278
Wow, a frogposter is a fucking retard, what a surprise.
>>
>>343178594
who seriously fucking cares? it's $250, it's not supposed to be a fucking titan you retard, this is for cheap bastards who want to be able to play modern AAA games at medium-high graphics

enjoy spending $650 extra on a rig that can play games one setting increment higher than an AMD machine, your jewish overlords will thank you greatly
>>
File: download.jpg (10 KB, 225x225) Image search: [Google]
download.jpg
10 KB, 225x225
>In 3 weeks the RX 480 has gone from 980ti tier to 980 to 970 and now finally slightly BELOW 970 level
>>
>3 displayports
>1 hdmi
>no dvi or vga

Disgusting.

This card is such a disappointment, especially with all the rumors that it'll be stronger than the 980ti and 2 would be stronger than the 1080.

It sounded great before it came out.
>>
File: 1457767087691.jpg (129 KB, 600x900) Image search: [Google]
1457767087691.jpg
129 KB, 600x900
>>343178679
>a card that costs $70 less has lower performance
>>
File: 1460127390950.png (30 KB, 657x527) Image search: [Google]
1460127390950.png
30 KB, 657x527
>RX 480 is announced
>two of them easily beat a GTX 1080 with only 51% GPU usage, and with better efficiency too
>beg my grandma for some money from her pension, but she doesn't give me any because I asked her for money for some mlp figurines a month ago
>steal some of her meds and sell them to get $200
>take a loan for $600 so I can buy two extra and sell them for $300 after release
>more benchmarks come out which show RX 480 having Fury level performance
>it can also OC to 1600 MHz and beat GTX 1070
>feel as if I've made the best investment in my life
>new benchmarks come out and claim it can't even beat a 980
>this can't be true
>the review samples can't oc for more than 5%
>this is all lies
>polish benchmarks say it loses to a 970
>no, no, this is all wrong, this can't be happening
What am I going to do guys? I already preordered the cards and I can't cancel it. The loan has a 20% interest rate, and if I can't sell the two extra cards for $300, I can't pay off the loan.
>>
>>343178780
>vga
Thank fuck. Why would you need that anyway. Hdmi is what you need.
>>
>>343178846
Sell your ass
>>
>>343178965
Hdmi yes,
but what if I have 2 hdmi screens and no displayport screens because I'm not a retard or macfag?
>>
>>343178965
Fuck that, sound trought monitor? Are you 12?
>>
>>343174640
kys
>>
>>343178663
holy shit, so much coping in only one post
>>
>>343178829
The main problem isn't its performence, its that people have been shilling this thing as way better than it is. Its not only just here, AMD was trying to claim to 2 480s in crossfire could beat a 1080 and that isn't even close to true.
>>
>>343178965
>not playing at 144hz

>>343178846
you're disgusting. an hero maybe.
>>
>>343179158
Nvidia did the same. Also wait until the cards are out.
>>
File: 1460196272028.jpg (183 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
1460196272028.jpg
183 KB, 1280x720
>250$ for 970 performance
>it's the best value AMD won
>everyone forgets 970 is 2 years old already

It's absolutely irrelevant to anyone besides people who are generations behind in video cards, and even then it's better to buy a 1070 or a 1080 to extend the time until you need to upgrade again. A 960 is on par with 680, a card that cost 600$ at some point, but is outclassed heavily now.
It's the same with the 480.
Even if I'll consider upgrading from my 770 I would not get a 480 because then I'll have to upgrade again in 2 years instead of say 4-5.
>>
>>343173413
is it the best card you can get for 230$ us?
>>
File: 1461206001349.jpg (13 KB, 369x262) Image search: [Google]
1461206001349.jpg
13 KB, 369x262
>>343172651
>I was indecisive on AMD or Nvidia
>Own 280x and needed an upgrade
>AMD BTFO
>mfw saving money
What Nvidia card should I buy? Or should I wait for AMD to make a driver update?
>>
>>343179348

also 770 here.

These cards suck both AMD and Nvidia. be smart and wait for HBM memory.
>>
>>343175657

exactly this, this card is perfect for those who haven't upgraded in years, and those benchmarks are pretty good for 200+ dollars, any sane person is not going to pump up the graphics to the max and expect perfect performance, just tweak a few settings and you're good to go.
>>
File: ohno.png (6 KB, 874x95) Image search: [Google]
ohno.png
6 KB, 874x95
>>343179158
I feel sorry for schmucks that sold their 980's for this card thinking it was a magical overclocker
>>
File: 14196783687.jpg (47 KB, 371x348) Image search: [Google]
14196783687.jpg
47 KB, 371x348
Are graphics stagnating?
I see no point in wasting all this money on the newest and hottest gpu when even my 750ti can hold up at non-meme resolutions.
>>
>>343179307
NDA drops in 8 more minutes. Reviews are primed and ready to go.
>>
>>343179456
Hey 2 more 770 users! It's still a totally good card, although I get random stutters in overwatch, any suggestions? The game runs smoothly, then every now and then it'll have like a few milliseconds of lag
>>
>>343179418
I was going to get the 480, but I think now I'll get an AIB 1070.
>>
>>343179558
No it can't, unless you consider 60fps a meme
>>
>>343179558
Yes and it's because of those meme resolutions.

Jumping to 4K is hugely taxing and now you have spergs becoming obsessed with 120+FPS.

Just means graphics will stay the same while people pay out the ass for resolution and framerate.
>>
>TFW GTX 970 user here
>bought it even cheaper than RX 480 price
>>
>>343174896

Is that in USD or Shekels you fucking jew?
>>
>>343172651
student poorfag in a third world country here
i can afford either GTX 960 or R9 380, they have literally the same price here
which one should i go for?
>>
>>343174270
As much as you guys hate consoles, they're going to be the reason why developers optimize for AMD hardware.
>>
>>343179558
750ti bro here too, and i run 1080p res. Witcher 3 can only handle that at like 39 fps.
970 would be tempting but i'm not a cuck.
980's still fuck expensive and might be obsolete tomorrow.
1070 seems to be the only right choice.
>>
File: 1465455837548.jpg (38 KB, 657x527) Image search: [Google]
1465455837548.jpg
38 KB, 657x527
For anyone that's interested. The 970 that's being used in the tests has the same clock speed as the 480 (1266Mhz), but slower memclock speeds (1750Mhz vs 2000Mhz).

So the 970 is technically an inferior card in terms of hardware capabilities, but it clearly has superior performance.
>>
>>343179856
380 benches better.
>>
>>343179776
Not to mention, game textures will still be low resolution. This was very noticeable when playing at 1600p from 1080p.
>>
File: 1467033684457.gif (474 KB, 200x150) Image search: [Google]
1467033684457.gif
474 KB, 200x150
>>343173525
>card is barely 1 year old
>garbage

what games do you even play thats so demanding
>>
>2 480 can outperform a 1080
Well that went nowhere.
>>
>>343179791
USD.
About 2600 NIS. Can go as high as 2900.
1080 is 3900-4200 which is 1010$.

But those are new cards and most aren't even in stock yet so they are jewing it up.
>>
>>343180058
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/b3052/galax-gtx-970-exoc
And even with the vastly inferior 3.5Gb vram and 6/8 cache, it still outperforms the rx480.

AMD need to do better than this.
>>
File: 1467199365131.png (609 KB, 854x640) Image search: [Google]
1467199365131.png
609 KB, 854x640
>>343180058
gimpworks games, nvidia based titles
better optimized drivers.

rx 480 has no drivers at the moment and its a fucking reference card and ofcourse its fucking AMD.
>>
So if I was thinking about getting the R9 380 should I just get the RX 480 instead?
>>
File: 1467022277119.png (370 KB, 798x333) Image search: [Google]
1467022277119.png
370 KB, 798x333
I fucking told you fags. If this card was good they would have had the NDA drop before release so hype could build up, but they didn't because they have a turd.
>>
I am hoping that the 970 goes down in price a little bit more so I can buy one that's not used for around 250€.

It's not much of a difference between that and a 280x but still I had my issues with AMD cards that, after finding out, always seem to be solved by using an nvidia GPU instead. It's been pissing me off.
>>
It's a mid-tier card with no drivers, so this is a bit of an overreaction.
For $200 to get performance on par with the 390 that's pretty nice, and I'm usually an Nvidiafag.
>>
>>343180354
Yes.
>>
>sub $200 stock reference rx480 does 3-5fps worse than custom 3rd party OC cards that cost $100-$200 more on nvidia gimpwerkz titles

oy vey amd is shit! buy more nvidia goy!
>>
>>343180518
>no drivers
They seriously sent this shit out to be reviewed without drivers for it? That is beyond retarded. Does anyone at AMD have a brain?
>>
>>343180636
>Nvidia's new midrange is better than their last gen flagship
>AMD new midrange is worse than Nvidia OLD midrange

kek
>>
>>343172651
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRDgiWBfs5I

>"AMD reps went to his office and told him the card is aimed at 960 price line but with 970 performance"

Confirmed
>480 performs lower than the 970 and 390

Not worth it.
>>
File: 82397.png (28 KB, 650x450) Image search: [Google]
82397.png
28 KB, 650x450
JUST
>>
>wait for benchmarks
>wait for tests
>wait for new drivers
>wait for amd to release something that isn't total shit

when will amdummies stop this shit?
>>
Is Ashes of Singulaity a good game or its just made for gpu wanking?
>>
>>343175706
He was using a 430watt to overclock. Anyone with a brain would know it's not gonna work. These nvidia shills are just trying to spin it into amd's fault. Reviewer is also a nvidia shill since nvidia only features like gameworks and hbao+ were activated to gimp amd cards.
>>
>>343172651
im glad i got disappointed on life more times than a man should, still feel it a little, but i already got resistance to this feel.
>>
>>343180690
>AMD
>Drivers
That's one of the constants of this universe that will never be broken.
>>
>>343180690
If they did that I've lost all respect for AMD. They've blacklisted reviewers before because they were supposedly biased against AMD and then they go out and send cards to be reviewed that are handicapped because of lack of drivers, which distorts the reality worse than any bias could be.
>>
>>343176983
The last thing intel or nvidia wants is for amd to go bankrupt and the government to come in and break up their companies to force competition. The status quo is better because it means intel and nvidia can do whatever they want because amd provides "competition."

The problem is neither of them can help the fact that amd is basically suicidal at this point.
>>
Very disappointed, but considering it's still cheaper than the 970... it's not so wrong of a deal. Just nothing really worth selling your shit and upgrading to. If Nvidia were to step in and lower the prices a little bit more, AMD would just fuck itself.

With the announcement of the 480, I had this little hope for AMD after losing it frequently, after having bought AMD after AMD, next time I will finally switch to Nvidia. It's stupid.
>>
Its either a 480 for 200 dollars or a 1070 for $600
>>
>>343179417
Probably
>>
great gpu for price. but it indicated that they can't compete with nvidia on flagship.
>>
>mfw I cancelled my evga 1070 pre order to wait for this
I guess at least I didn't buy it, now I just wait even longer
>>
File: 82406.png (31 KB, 650x450) Image search: [Google]
82406.png
31 KB, 650x450
2X SLOWER THAN THE 970. YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP
>>
>>343181075
I paid 420 for my 1070.

Why are you so poor?
>>
>>343180806
just gpu wanking, but even then it's literally garbage
>>
>>343181124
>all these shit games with huge monitors and all the graphics you would never turn up

When's Arma.
>>
Will amd ever stop being >AMD?
Every announcement is like the start of the Sonic Cycle for them.
>>
>>343181124
POO
>>
Why everywhere in youtube is everyone saying this is the best value card? AMD don't have money to pay everyone.
>>
>>343180304
Uwot m8?

The RX 480 comes with the driver. It's a fucking CD in every box. All the benchmarks were done with the correct driver.

Once again AMD fanboys saying "wait a bit more", the same as every year with a failed release.
>>
>>343181124
What's up with the 1070 performance? I thought it went much higher than that.
>>
File: 1436623166902.png (43 KB, 500x1170) Image search: [Google]
1436623166902.png
43 KB, 500x1170
Poorfags rejoice.

We did it!
>>
I mean, it's ok if it's dirt cheap.
>>
>>343179864
>developers
>optimize
never gonna happen, that's why we all should stick with nVidia graphics cards and their top notch drivers
>>
>>343181106
>amd announced a half year ago that they DON'T WANT to compete with Nvidia in flagship tier
Nvidicucks, everyone.
>>
File: untitled-16.png (58 KB, 683x968) Image search: [Google]
untitled-16.png
58 KB, 683x968
GG Nvidia
>>
>>343181224

for the price it is. it's marketed as a 1080p card @ 60fps. it does that well. obviously if you want higher res, you'll go with a more expensive card.
>>
File: 1459418122260.jpg (329 KB, 1600x1200) Image search: [Google]
1459418122260.jpg
329 KB, 1600x1200
>>343181286
>At least we won something, r-right guys?
>>
>>343181224
Because these are people with a clue and not retarded /v/ermin?
>>
Is the 1070 overkill for 1080p? I just want to max out pretty much everything. Afraid if I get a 1440p monitor I won't be able to use all the meme settings you see in new games.
>>
File: lmao wtf.jpg (20 KB, 512x523) Image search: [Google]
lmao wtf.jpg
20 KB, 512x523
>>343172651
Win the fuck is the 1070 going to go down from that Founder's edition shit?
>>
>>343181451
1070 is ideal for 1440p gaming.
>>
>>343181451
yes it's overkill, the devs will never include more taxing effects and bigger textures for 1080p gaming anymore and the 1070 will be overkill for that resolution.
>>
>>343181503
Literally all I've been wanting this entire fucking time. I don't want to spend close to $100 more just because I'm an impatient cunt, but I'm one step closer to the edge AND IMMABOUTTA
>>
>>343181240
AMD always gets better benchmarks over time though, it has been like this for almost every R9 2xx and R9 3xx card.
>>
I have a gtx 680 that is on its way out (occasional artefacting, lots of microstutter) would the rx480 be a worthwhile investment once board partners come out with coolers, despite the card not living up to the hype?
>>
>>343181503
>down
Why would it go down? Custom coolers cost more so they will ask for more money for non-founders cards.
>>
If the rumors of the 1060 being at 980 performance and $250 are true...
>>
>>343181647
Founder's edition always costs more you nigger.
>>
>>343181598
It's not going to happen.

Aftermarket realized that they could get away with 420-430 ALL DAY.
>>
>>343181641
Fuck no.

Buy a discounted 970/980.
>>
>>343177862

Oh well I've already got the new card. It's got twice the RAM anyway my current one wasn't keeping up with some of the more demanding games. I'll keep your suggestion in mind for when the new one kicks the bucket. Does the same technique work for CPUs? My Phenom II x6 has been an absolute beast, it's been going since like 2011 with no issues but since it is old I will probably have issues soon and want to know if I can put off replacing it when it happens
>>
From what I'm seeing, this card runs newer games better than the 980. But games from 2013 and back runs worse than 970.
>>
>>343181451
Currently 1070 can keep 1440 above 60.
>>
I HAVE BEEN KIDDED FOR THE LAST TIME!

I WILL NOT BUY THIS SHIT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
>>343181856
On med/low settings.
>>
>>343181885
I will, because >>343181286
>>
>>343181915
You mean using AA that isn't overkill.
>>
>>343181915
The vast majority of games aren't as demanding as TW3.
>>
>>343181708
>he fell for the founders meme
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GdfDCq86Gk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y6Ky_pCawQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRDgiWBfs5I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBwvFAlEKEY
>>
Do I need a 1080 to play Worms Armageddon?
>>
>>343181824
OP benchmark is on a heavily overclocked GTX 970, a binned one at that that cost really high new.
Ref vs Ref RX 480 beats it almost all the time except.
>>
>>343172651
>worse than 970
>barely keeps up with 390

Are you retard, 390 is better than 970, so this is obvious.
>>
File: perfdollar_2560_1440.png (43 KB, 500x1170) Image search: [Google]
perfdollar_2560_1440.png
43 KB, 500x1170
Performance
Per
Dollar
>>
>>343182021
1080 SLI and you still can't use AA.
>>
File: 82404.png (31 KB, 650x450) Image search: [Google]
82404.png
31 KB, 650x450
>>343181258
>>343181124
>99th percentile
Still good to know though. Kind of sad it drops lower than some of AMD's last lineup.
>>
I really wanted to try out AMD with my next upgrade cycle, I guess I'll have to wait for the flagship cards and how Nvidia will deal with DX12 in the future.
>>
>>343182021
Yes
>>
File: 1450669678861.png (104 KB, 277x280) Image search: [Google]
1450669678861.png
104 KB, 277x280
>buy nVidia once
>keep on using it until you feel like you need to upgrade
>buy AMD
>resort to using your warranty every 2 months until you get sick of this shit and buy nVidia once the warranty is no longer valid

Switching to nVidia back in the beginning of 2000's was one of the best decisions I've ever made.

>mfw all of my old nVidia cards still work
>>
>>343182054

Dirty
Chinky-eyed
CEO
>>
File: 1466701465012.jpg (365 KB, 1162x850) Image search: [Google]
1466701465012.jpg
365 KB, 1162x850
i play everything maxed on TW3 2560X1080p on my 290x at 50 - 60fps, just limit the tesselation to 8x and stop being a bunch of faggots, you don't even see past 8x tesselation anyways. FUCK.
>>
Welp this is awful, 1060 is going to shit on this.
>>
>>343182021
Only if you're planning to play it on 1080p screen
>>
File: 1442966798865.jpg (298 KB, 1462x1462) Image search: [Google]
1442966798865.jpg
298 KB, 1462x1462
>>343182135
LOL
>>
>>343182084
>a 1070 is literally twice the performance

And people expected this fucking thing to beat a 1080 in Xfire?
>>
File: 1466675154724.png (765 KB, 1001x1001) Image search: [Google]
1466675154724.png
765 KB, 1001x1001
>>343182136
NO ONE needs 64x Tesselation. nvidia are such assholes.
>>
>>343181810
Currently 970 and 980 are about 450 and 600 AUD respectively (both took a hit after 1000 series cards came out with no stock) while the RX 480 4gb is ~$320

Second hand isn't much better.
>>
>>343182136
/v/ is retarded, more news at 11 etc.
>>
>>343181824
The 970 in OP's benchmark has the same clock specs as the 480.

see >>343180058
>>
File: top_gun.jpg (11 KB, 176x187) Image search: [Google]
top_gun.jpg
11 KB, 176x187
>>343182136
Just like you don't see past 24 fps, right?
>>
File: 1449649873448.jpg (52 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]
1449649873448.jpg
52 KB, 480x480
>mfw I buy monitors even cheaper than my GPU so I can't tell the difference between high and ultra settings and it's like I'm not missing out by being a poorfag
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 102

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.