what will it be /v/?
Battlefield 3.whogivesashit
>>336663365
Calling it now it's vampires with guns!!
>>336663495
nice figurines
Everything from 1944 over Korea and Vietnam, spies at the cold war, Desert Storm, 9/11 and Modern Warfare upto robots.
>>336663495
>March 2017
Why the fuck do publishers announce their games so early. Just do it 2-3 months before.
>>336663709
Yeah nah. Alternate History WW1 with secret/supernatural/extraterrestrial tech? Sure, may work. Realistic WW1 setting after BF4? It will flop harder than the Hardline, no pun intended. You don't need extra insight ability to see that happening.
Granted after Battlefront EA may have given some liberties to Dice. But the game must have been in development for longer than half a year.
>>336663709
1944 isn't WWI you fucking idiot
>>336663709
1944 isn't WW1.
>>336663964
Because its fake. BF will probably battle with CoD release during autumn. There's absolutely no reason to release a game this big in March.
>>336663365
>>336663495
I swear to fuck, if the next Battlefield is some old war bullshit, I'm so done. Nobody wants to use old shitty guns and vehicles. Why would you release a new game with nicer graphics, but all the equipment is just shit versions of the previous game's gear?
>>336663495
Confirmed fake
>>336664220
I'm glad to hear that.
So what do you guys see?!
>>336664113
t. middle schooler
>>336663495
you can literally see the outline of the monitor
Whatever it is, /v/ will shit all over it. Screencap this post.
>>336663495
>It's "Anon taking pic of his monitor" episode
WW2 but in an alternate history where technology was much further advanced. He is seeing a Zeppelin that is bound for space.
>>336665069
>>336664781
>muh bolt action rifles
>muh mustang planes
Tip harder faggot
>>336665302
But if the Zeppelin goes to Space it'd just keep floating up until infinity.
>>336665062
True that. You people have hawk eyes, or you actually sit there and analyze the photo. Either way, nice catch.
Battlefield /v/ poll:
http://www.strawpoll.me/10140882
http://www.strawpoll.me/10140882
http://www.strawpoll.me/10140882
>>336663495
>>336664113
m8.
Old weapons and vehicles n shit is the best
Better than futuristic shit that has never existed and probably will never exist either.
Even BF 1942 with new graphics will be awesome as shit
>tfw no one plays best BF anymore
>>336663495
This is a whole new level beyond tilted photos
Battlefield 5- Garbage Returns
>>336663365
>people still play Battlefield in 2016
LMAO
I hope it isn't another BF3 skin and I hope the rumors of it being a WW2 game are true, would be a nice change of pace in the midst of all the modern and futuristic shooters.
>>336663365
nvidia ad campaign
>>336666164
i think you mean
>still playing this shit
LMAO
>>336666164
BF4 is good
>>336666165
Yes, fighter battles suck with modern jets. I'll miss helicopters though.
>>336663365
>what will it be /v/?
WW1 with a twist
>>336666640
that guy has like 100 paintings like that
It's going to be Battlefield 1952, I tells ya. WWII with more jet fighters and helicopters and snarky medics.
>>336666372
It's really not.
>>336666640
Do post more
>>336666640
whats this painting from i like it
Hey guys how's BF4 nowadays?
As long as Premium exists I don't care too much.
>>336667372
Bretty good, easily one of the best shooters on the market right now.
>>336667128
>>336667234
>>336667529
>>336666640
>>336667529
these are sick
finally i find good images on an imageboard
>tfw no retro futuristic fps game
>>336663365
>what will it be /v/?
Shit
>>336666640
FUCK SAKE STOP POSTING "WW1 WITH A TWIST"
IT WAS SOME FUCKING RANDOM FANMADE TWITTER PAGE THAT SAID IT, NOT
CONFIRMED AT ALL, SHUT THE FUCK UPbut i do bet it's normal WW2 though
>>336667926
I can confirm however that there is a bordgame which art design is made by the guy who made these dieselpunk ww2 pictures.
>>336665312
jokes on you, you can't associate this fake post of mine with a battlefield speculation thread
>>336663495
I'll admit that is pretty clever you might be able to trick a few people
>>336668080
still looks too new, i'm talking that real look of how people in the 80s assumed the future would be.
Imagine a game in a setting like this
>>336663365
i'd love space colonies vs earth forces like in gundam but without gundams
>>336663365
Battlefield Vietnam 2
>>336668327
How about Korea?
>>336668327
Quickest way to kill the company imo.
Nobody wants more Vietnam shit.
Guys, guys, guys...
i just realised i've been hyped as fuck for this all week then saw pic related ...
are we not even going to get gameplay reveal ? will it just be fucking cgi "game engine" footage ?
say it aint so ! i've been thinking about gameplay or them showing of technology all week, surely they are doing this much hype just for a fucking setting reveal ?
>>336663365
>>336663460
>>336663495
it's going to be based on the Rhodesian Bush war
>>336668423
fuck, this was pic related btw
>>336668449
Including short shorts DLC with day 1 early access
>>336668402
Speak for yourself.
>>336663365
As long as i get to kill Muslims i don't really care what the fuck it is
>>336668402
Vietnam 2368
>people being hostile to the idea of a futuristic shooter
I may have put more hours into BF2142 Than I did BF2
>>336668423
Battlefront looks amazing, what makes you think they cant achieve that level of graphics with the new battlefield?
>>336668554
he did, notice the imo
>>336668423
pretty sure DICE put that on all their videos
It will probably be a mix of both their trailer and some gameplay thrown in.
>>336668625
i dont think they can't achieve it, but look at their own teaser disclaimer
>>336668618
welcome to the minority.
>>336668618
>ITS NOT LIKE IN REAL LIFE ITS FANTASY SHIT
and so on, who the heck knows how couch warriors think like
>>336668727
All that says is that the teaser shown is just a cutscene using their ingame engine rather than gameplay.
We're hours away, they're not dumb enough to not show gameplay when they're planning this whole thing for months.
>>336665646
>BF3, BF4 and BC2 the most played
I knew you faggots never played the older ones because you always shit on them saying the newer ones are the best.
>>336668645
>Nobody wants more Vietnam shit.
What about this?
>>336668782
>minority
the futuristic CODs were the best selling CODs
>>336668884
DICE Sweden did with their Battlefront trailer during the Star Wars celebration.
>>336669013
I still don't get why it has so many dislikes. On the first day it only had about 30k dislikes, after the 2nd day it jumped to 100k+
I know it's "cool" to hate CoD, but jesus christ the people are autistic in the comments section. Saying they've "matured" and are only playing cool games like BF now.
>>336669174
Those are some big Germans
>>336669159
Only thing I can think of is that people are angry it's so far in the future. I don't think it's a fad to hate COD anymore
>>336669273
für Sie
>>336669159
People are this pissed because you need to buy the most expensive version of the new game to play MW remastered, AKA what cod players really wanted.
>>336668161
Literally fallout.
>>336669013
No?
Literally only one "futuristic" cod sold well, and it doesn't even have jumpjets or other overtly future-y shit. Bo2 is still pretty grounded in reality.
So you have 1 maybe-somewhat-kinda future CoD selling well.
Why do you just say whatever bullshit pops into your head first? Wait I already know why, because you're an idiot.
>>336670108
Literally no
>>336670259
Blops 3 sold more than Ghosts and Advanced Warfare. So it's more than 17mil+ by this point.
>>336670259
this chart has to be wrong, blops 3 sold way more than 4.5mil
>>336670346
Still didn't surpass the Modern Warfare series or even BO2. People do not want futuristic stuff in CoD and the numbers show that.
>join us on may 7th
fuck me i thought it was may 6th
>>336670485
The announcement is today
>>336670526
OP is a lying faggot then
http://www.battlefield.com/event
>>336670549
Nah he's an Aussie, that's why it's 7 for him
>>336670549
Check the time faggot
>>336670615
>people actually live in australia
>australia is a thing that really exists
wtf
>>336670739
There are like 24 million of us you know
>>336663365
Guys, listen
Guys
what if
It's not WW1, WW2, modern or futureBut all of the above, in one game
>>336664504
$100 season pass
>>336671071
Cor, I don't remember dumping that many convicts.
>>336671950
is such a thing even possible
>>336672096
kek
>>336671071
Haha okay
>believing in Australia
>being this new
Please be WW2
Please be WW2
Please be WW2
Please be WW2
Modern warfare cucks will finally kill themselves.
>>336672137
Battlefield: War through the ages
Doo you think they will drop a BETA as a surprise like they did with Hardline?
EA Access' Twitter account accidentally revealed "Battlefield 5": http://archive.is/t79au
>>336673601
During E3 yeah.
>>336673601
They'll certainly drop a beta but it won't be a surprise. Probably have to order some crappy EA game.
>>336666640
>>336669159
>>336663365
>what will it be /v/?
shit
and he said why.
BFBC 1 was flirting with disaster. BFBC 2 was putting the toes across the line.
Every since BF has been a popular vote series.
It used to be fucking awesome and the developers had to strive to make a great game to get sales. Now they just strive to get the doritos demographic and the gameplay itself is shit (but with spectacular visuals).
BF4 is still buggy, its still badly balanced and the maps are still shit.
Kiss my dick DICE.
>>336663365
It sure as hell won't be Bad Company 3;w;
>>336666164
>people still play neptunia, pokemon, Mario, sonic, cod
>B-BUT THEY ARE GUUUD GAYMES
>mfw
Battlefield takes a huge shit on your favorite games, fags. Accept it.
>tfw BFG will be alive again
>ww2 with nowadays leaps in visuals and effects
Yes please. Only problem will be keeping all the cancerous perks and shit out of it. But maybe DICE will take a step in revolutionising the scene and remove all the bloated shit?
>>336673971
I guess battlefield is eventually good after two years of patching it to work.
>>336663365
some sort of clusterfuck time travel game so they can shoehorn as many factions, weapons and vehicles behind paywalls.
Just watch, it will start as a WW1/2 trench battle, then 'It aint me' vietnam helicopters will fly over, they will be followed by modern day jets fighters. Then some futuristic 'not halo' soldiers will drop from the sky and finally the camera will pan all they way back to show the initial trench battle is just a tiny part of a fuck huge battle with a titan or some shit in the sky above everything before cutting out with the games tagline.
People will eat it up and when the game launches all the good shit will be locked behind premium.
>>336674151
DICE has never locked content behind premium. Other than a one week early access to new map dlcs.
>>336674069
> But maybe DICE will take a step in revolutionising the scene and remove all the bloated shit?
They have the money and the target market to do so. Now, if they're willing to try is a whole different matter.I wouldn't mind it tbqh
>>336664113
I like to play Rising Storm sometimes just to hear dat PING
>>336666164
I'm still playing bf 1942 and bf 2
what now, bitch?
>>336674142
Honestly, I only remember Bf4 being bad at launch, can't remember if the other titles were as disastrous.
>>336674219
>DICE has never locked content behind premium
Have you played BF4? about 80% of the gametypes are locked behind paywalls.
>>336674389
>gametypes locked behind premium
What? I put like 300 hours into BF4. Are you talking about the premium only servers?
>>336667595
>Wojtek
cute
>WW1 with a twist.
One can only hope that some day it will be pic related. Imagine struggling with your regiment against endless, much more powerful horrors.
>>336669461
google translator fail
![large[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/bDrwD3S.jpg "large[1].jpg")
>>336663365
alt history ww1 or 2
possibly a followup or spiritual sequel to codename eagle.
Tweet is a DICE dev
>>336663365
>ww1 if hitler won
Why not the grim First Chechen War
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQ2XZ8W2t-o
>>336675052
I'm sorry?
Battlefield: Warhammer 40K
since we all agree that WW2 is overdone, WW1 is shit, the future is shit, etc etc
why not Cold War? including Korea and Vietnam, as well as maybe Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (tfw getting to finally kill mudslimes)
>>336675053
We got enough slavshit infesting our other games.
>>336675280
I would not be even surprised anon
>>336663964
under a year is early
>>336675331
>We got
>our other games
USA USA USA USA USA!!!
BUILD THAT WALL!!!
>>336663365
it better be 2142
>>336675089
An alternate history where Germany wins WW2 at the cost of ruined the planet. The Manhattan project in this timeline is used to research time travel to allow the future axis forces to travel back to WW1 to prevent Germany losing the first world war.
>>336675280
I would buy it. but then forget that i dont like online and there would be no single player component.
like battlefront
>>336675315
Black Ops did it.
Battlefield 5: Army Dog
>>336675053
Id love to remove some virtual kebap. The triggered sjw's would be a nice bonus
>>336675052
You are joking, right?
>>336675423
The western world dumbshit. The educated class, the people who actually speaks english.
It hurts to see poor slavshits write cyrillic alien language in our games instead of getting an education or working in the field. I feel bad for them, they need to wake up and stop their escapism.
it's obviously 2143 you mongs
the entire console fps genre is all about sanic fast futuristic shooters, there's no way cucks like dice are going back to world war themes. their last bf4 dlc was future shit, and their last game was also star wars future shit
>hardline is before 4 on the twitch stream
what did they mean by this?
twitch tv/battlefield
Stream is about to start.
Battlefield-Red October.
You get to remove the Czar and embrace the revolution. Years later it all falls apart and there's a cutscene of your character's hand patting your wife's son on the back after he comes home from voting for Bernie Sander's with his muslim boyfriend.
>>336675734
If they aren't doing yet another me-too futuristic shooter then I applaud them.
I think the brand is well known enough that an unusual and fresh setting won't put people off.
>>336675734
keep telling that to yourself faggot while I'll enjoy shooting down some big ass zeppelins.
So, what has better streaming quality YouTube or Twitch?
>>336668727
>no weapon, vehicle or gear manufacturer is affiliated or has sponsored this game
Is this a hint that it wont be futuristic?
>>336665416
WW2 was the last interesting war in history. Everything after it is either rats in tunnels like Korea and Vietnam or absolute technological curb stomps like the first and Second Gulf Wars.
And the "modern/future warfare" schtick is getting old.
>twitch says 6 minutes
>official website says 6 hours
Judging by the teaser Im gonna say its back to WW2, just because the uniform the guy seems to be wearing is flat khaki, not camo like modern combat uniforms.
>2142 not shown
W-what the fuck, where is it... WHERE
>>336675998
It's not canon.
Fully expect a WW1 game. HOWEVER
>EA notices ww1 weapons are not fun to play with, and tanks/ biplanes weren't too great
Time 'travel' plot where a variety of 20th and 21st century weapons/vehicles are Timedropped in to help the Kaiser win the Great War. Gameplay wise, mix of WW1 weapons and a broad smattering of weapons from different time periods.
>>336675998
Its not shown because its gonna end with2143
>>336675998
>hardshit gets a spot
>but not Vietnam or 2142
REEEE
WHERE IS IT
>>336675998
Holy fuck. What if its being saved for last. What if the new Battlefield is a...a REMASTER OF 2142 IN THE NEXT GEN FROSTBYTE ENGINE?!
>>336675998
They started the stream with the 2142 theme song, so what gives?
>>336676098
Cancer
>>336674324
game name and favorite server? I will literally boot up 1942 RIGHT NOW and play with you.
>>336675998
it's over. you will never harass gunships and make them do loops again
Part of me wants WW2 because its such an iconic cool era with tons of awesome history, but part of me really hopes its not because ill miss holo sights/acogs/flirs. Iron sights are horrible.
So conflicted.
What's happening at stream?
Every game is shown during each hour?
>>336676224
>not posting the pilum
pls leave
>this music
I don't recognize it from any of the other games?
>>336676054
That sounds like 100% shit
You can't get the WW1 feeling down right without WW1 guns. Whilst Verdun had a lot of problems this was something that it did very well, you were genuinely scared of turning a corner because it most likely meant death, IMO you can't get that same feel with non-WW1 gun
>>336676246
I would guess so.
>>336676140
I'm being Ironic.
And now they're playing Pirates of the Caribbean music.
>>336676242
When was the last AAA WW2 shooter? World at War?
RO2 doesn't count.
>>336676136
HYPE
So maybe I will end up 60 bucks poorer by the end of the day.
Is the time setting for Hardline actually between those? Didn't think it actually mattered
>>336675662
>hitler doesn't get shot in the balls
>singlehandedly overruns the british and french trenches
>proclaims himself emperor of france
>>336676242
I think Cold War would be amazing
Either Alternate History WW3 or setting the game in the different conflicts of the Cold War (Korea, Afghanistan, Rhodesia?)
Cut, cut.
Okay, again without all the awkward.
>>336676267
but how does the pilum make gunships do loops?
When is the presentation? Who are these faggots?
>>336676054
How will they handle the balance if its WW1 though. Trench warfare was very very one sided, hence why so many men died in WW1. Going over the top of the trenches and getting mown down by machine guns or blown up by arty shells over and over again doesnt seem like it'd hold peoples attention for very long.
NAME IS CONFIRMED TO BE BATTLEFIELD 1.
http://ea.com/battlefield-1
REDIRECTS TO THE EVENT PAGE
ALTERNATIVE HISTORY WW1 CONFIRMED. HYPED AS FUCK.
>>336676450
typical swedes
>>336676424
You shoot them ded and watch the wreckage tumble.
>>336676450
Ear gauge, sleeve tats.
FUG
>>336676339
Wolfenstein 2009 and Enemy Front were the only WWII games I can think of after WaW and I wouldn't call either of them AAA.
2143 CONFIRMED
>jackfags
Oh you have to be fucking kidding me.
>jackfrags
So COD went with the far future and BF with the opposite?
>>336664113
>i dont like it!!!!!
>that means no one likes it!!!!!
Dude shut the hell up. I would love this to be real.
Also i think they are going older now because of the small demand and they can go modern again with better graphics in the future
>>336676502
>oh no he isn't a fat neckbeard wearing a oversized hoodie like me
>>336676339
Wolfenstein: The new order
>no other game had this scale and shit
Oh you little child...
>>336676585
More like Jackshills, I unsubed from that obvious shill ages ago
>dooooood that brings me straight back
DUDE THAT TAKES ME BACK
>>336676607
Implying he actually played the original wake like he just stated.
>>336676565
>>336676585
where's that chav shill?
>manlet on the right quiet as a mouse
lol will they ever learn
>>336676669
I hope you are just pretending to be retarded
I hate these pretentious, tatooed, pierced faggots.
Why do these degenerates populate the video game industry.
>>336676481
>BF1
>Dev tweets a link to their first game, code name eagle which is set during alternate timeline WW1.
Its going to happen!
LINK ME TO WHAT'S GOING ON, MATES
I JUST GOT HERE
>within 5 seconds of turning on the stream i see a fag in a parachute shoot his teammate
fucking kek
>>336676815
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDqkEvKwI6M
>>336676815
we won't get 2142
>neeeeew level of realism
This guy, honestly.
I think the most likely scenario is another modern day main game, but with a remastered BF1942 thrown in. Like what COD has done with their upcoming release.
Games companies always copy each other these days.
>literally no recoil
>people complain how modern shooters have no recoil
Is this nostalgia?
>>336673913
>tfw we'll never get a similar BF game to pre-BC
I understand that BC was a spin-off, but it was the 1st step in the wrong direction by pandering to the console crowd even though I have nothing against consoles. Then came BF3 the contender of CoD which had bigger maps, vehicles and required almost no teamwork like CoD.
>>336676747
It came before the first BF yet had tenfold more content, detail, realism and scale.
BF looks like a dumbed down consolegame in comparison, sorry you had to grow up with an inferior game.
i had a normal yob before this.
>1942 is a "precursor" to the battlefield series
>>336677016
:DDDD
It will be shit just like 3 and 4.
>>336676994
>yet had tenfold more content, detail, realism and scale.
Why are you lying?
6 hour preroll lmao
eternal anglo on stream
>>336677050
Those games were good you contrarian faggot.
>>336668402
LOOK AT THIS FAG
>>336677050
BF3 was the best of the series.
My pipe dream is that they go some sort of Battlefield Generations garbage that lets you play across multiple time periods.
My nevergonnahappen dream is that they just go back to their routes, release some maps with none of this scripted shit, release a mapmaker, allow support for mods, and just let the already large community go wild they way they did with 1942 and 2. But long gone are the days of mods and mapmaking.
But hey, that custom El Alamein CTF server is still up and running on bf1942.
>>336677141
>2016
>Playing vanilla Battlefield X
http://www.realitymod.com/
>>336677141
>>336677183
>good
Let me guess you've never played BF before BC2 came out like that poll shows. It's because of faggots like you this series became shit since it got infested with CoD community after they got bored of it.
>people think this is better than the modern day fps
How is that nostalgia?
I'm glad they are showing how the games have evolved to shut you nostalgia fags up.
battlefield MOBA
buy more and more modern weapons from the item shop till you destroy your opponents tree
>tfw when it's ww1
>>336677168
can't believe this didn't come on pc after all that dick sucking they did back then
>>336677283
I started with BF2 and played 2142. BF3 is the best in the series. Eat shit.
>>336677283
Actually no i was wrong BF2 was the best of the series but 3 was definitely not a bad game.
One thing I hope they change this time is jet physics, would be awesome if they go back to how they handled in BF2, where buying a stick and rudder was actually worthwhile. Jets in the newest 2 games handle like kites, no sensation of speed at all.
>>336677356
Already pretty much confirmed to be.
>name is confirmed to be Battlefield one
>Tweets about their first alternate timeline WW1 game
pls be WWII with battleships, subs, aircraft carriers, bomber planes and stationary artillery
>>336671950
This could be nice.
Leaked information so far:
Source on BF5 graphics quality: based on Battlefront and taken up a notch.
2: BF5 uses the same texture tech used in Battlefront.
3: BF5 has full DX12 feature set,
4: BF5 has better destruction as well, with way more details and elements compared to BF4.
Part 1: game has much better facial animation tech, at least twice as much detail as BF4
2: BF5 has increased focus on graphics realism, from environments to effects, uses Physical Based Rendering, which Battlefront also had.
3: More immersion with improved weather and lighting effects, more character details etc.
4: A "4K mode" was mentioned, a PC setting tailored for 4K resolution with better quality textures to take full advantage of 4K (QHD)
5: Map info: maps will be roughly same size as BF4 (some bigger), but will be much more detailed with better destruction etc.
If you're into a particular historical setting, you will not be disappointed.
God damn it got banned
>>336675915
None of them do, publishers buy a license
What's your favourite map /v/?
http://www.strawpoll.me/10142232
http://www.strawpoll.me/10142232
>>336677525
source?
>>336669159
>"cool" to hate
When will codfags accept that people just don't like eating shit year after year?
If they weren't milking the same awful engine it wouldn't be half as bad but they don't even care because their brain dead player base can't even understand why people would hate their favowite game. .
>>336677429
You're the 1st person I've seen in years who played the previous games and says BF3 is better than 2 or 2142. Anytime I read some forums or comments on other websites most people who have played previous games shit on BF3 and 4, not even gonna talk about Hardline, The only ones I see praising it are those who hate CoD nowadays or those who got introduced to BF when BC2 came out.
>>336677525
As long as they keep using Frostbite. It sounds retarded because I critique other developers for that like Valve and Bethesda, but Frostbite always looks nice, consistent, and clean and runs nice. I can't trust an EA developer to successfully make another engine from the ground up that won't run at 10 FPS on a triple SLI TitanX
>>336677586
>>336677648
Maybe I've exaggerated a bit too much. It's not that they constantly shit on it, but they say that they're worse than the previous games.
>>336677283
BF3 was the saddest piece of shit in the series.
Vietnam plz
>>336677698
>As long as they keep using Frostbite
>>336677698
The vehicle collision is 7 ways till sunday fucked up though
>>336677751
you must have joined this website when we were memeing the beta, its okay to have bad opinons on things
>>336677567
>People voting for meme island
You people are disgusting
>'Future of Battlefield' as slogan
>All games in chronological order shown except 2142
C'mon guys, it's obvious at this point.
>>336677648
I've played 1942, Vietnam, 2, BC2, 3, and 4 and I think BF4 is pretty acceptable as a BF game. I've given up on expecting a BF with as much content as 1942.
CURRENT ONLINE PLAYERS
Battlefront: 4,500
Hardline: 1,800
4: 23,800
3:4,900
