griddlegirders on pooicide watch
previous thread: >>71962077
>>71976020
i dont understand, metacritic and rt top critics agree that the new ghostbusters is bad, so doesnt everybody lose?
Premier is in 12 hours (for many states/theaters)
Post your local theaters
>>71976070
Just get a bunch of hacks to write positive reviews to show those stinky misoginnists and feminism wins XD
It's the perfect plan because Sony is a bastion of integrity and it's not like they've been caught doing the same exact thing in the past XD
![girls-laughing[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/K67jHNh.jpg "girls-laughing[1].jpg")
>>71976100
>F11 going to the cinema by himself
Is ironically pretending to be a Sony marketer the hottest new meem?
>still caring about """"""critics""""""
how do we fix /tv/, /tv/?
>>71976166
I FOUND A PIC OF F11
>GURLPOWER!!
The only people gong to see this are fat SJW females and F11 men
>>71976205
Hey /tv/, name something receding faster than his hairline
what is reason for holywood make reprodce movie Ghostbusted? Original movie Ghostbusted too much better.
Dr. Robert William great actor, make Ghostbusted too much fun. Dr. Robert William dead and new Ghostbusted make shame to the sacrifice
holywood not care??
>>71976249
Sony's investment into marketing Ghostbusters
Writer here (not a screenwriter, I write articles for publications)
Look at some of the reviews.
These are either paid reviews or these people are deluding themselves by writing very shallow-sounding reviews.
It reads like one of those $5 comedy DVDs that have the stupid "fun for the whole family!" tagline
>>71976249
His father's respect for him
>>71976249
My boner.
>>71976309
>That rarest of big-studio offerings - a summer flick
What?
>>71976249
His chances of losing his virginity
>>71976249
myown hairline.;_;
>>71976249
the odds any of those women will see him in a sexual or romantic light
>>71976309
Those reviews seem to claim it's just a throwaway, completely forgettable movie.
POST PICS OF F11 MEN
Paul Fieg was on Sway in the Morning yesterday, and DB said he thought it was "alright"
Even in front of the director himself, he couldn't muster any more fake praise
>>71976309
It's not about whether the product is actually good or not, it's about how it fits with the reviewers political opinions.
There are no standards for reviews, which is why half of these fucking dipshits have been defending the movie for months without knowing its actual quality. It's not a film, it's a weapon to be used against people with different opinions.
>>71976647
The tides are turning
http://www.polygon.com/2016/7/13/12173660/ghostbusters-criticism-anger
The movie's not even out yet and Polygon's already jumped shipped to save face
>mfw China denied permission to show Ghostbusters over there
>mfw this will be the biggest bomb since Fant4stic
>>71976750
>These are the critics who might have viewed their position on this controversial movie as picking a side in that battle. Meanwhile, the critics who reviewed Ghostbusters less favorably seemed to be older, well-established film reviewers
Holy shit
>>71976647
>It's not a film, it's a weapon to be used against people with different opinions
Just like so many other 'products' that's been coming out the past decade?
In 2016 people's primary way of expressing their political views (beyond just preaching to the choir on the internet) has become spending money on things they think support their views, or actively avoiding things they think oppose them.
Either way, you're all being played by the corporate executives. They absolutely LOVE this new bout of political commercialism.
>>71976750
>But I've been afraid to state any opinion about this movie up until now, when I have reviews from critics like Edelstein and Roeper to hide behind, because I have been afraid that speaking negatively about Ghostbusters would result in me being falsely associated with an activist movement that I disagree with and disapprove of.
>Actual discussion of the film feels impossible, which is a bit depressing. Films with middling scores and a talented cast and crew can sometimes be the most interesting movies to pick apart. We've lost that interesting and fun conversation for this take on Ghostbusters, and it may be gone forever.
Kek
Will China be able to save them this time?
>>71976750
Must be bad when when fucking Polygon has more integrity than you
>>71976855
the latter part is true, now I don't know if the movie is as extremely bad and revolting as people here say or if its just your typical bad remake or if the humor is actually so gross and out of place or if it actually includes "all white men being evil" etc
Daily reminder that Paul Feig is a Jews wet dream.
>>71976070
And the critics on rt either open with "in your face haters", which kinda spoils their critics,
or they criticise it but give it a "this cast" or "its funny" bonus to shift the rating in a fresh tomato.
>>71977076
Daily reminder Paul Feig was photographed having an orgasm with the cast of Ghostbusters dominating him
>>71976750
>How internet hate crushed useful discussion of an upcoming film
Literally the first sentence after the title completely invalidates any chance of this article being anything less than pants-on-head-retarded like all the rest.
Noone hated this movie any more than they did the Robocop reboot or any of the other garbage Hollywood remakes that get shit out for a cheap buck nowadays and it would have flopped and been forgotten about just like the rest had a bunch of twats not turned it into a political weapon to use against people on the internet they've never met who have different opinions than them because its the only joy they get out of their pathetic lives.
Noone's seriously claiming this fucking garbage remake is raping their childhood because that's fucking retarded and noone's seriously claiming that womyn can't be Ghostbusters because we've already had a fucking cartoon that proved otherwise.
The movie will bomb and it will bomb hard because it doesn't have the Chinese market to save it and then a wave of articles will be shat out crying about those evil Patriarchal misogynerds using their penises to defeat the movie that was going to save feminism and then everyone will forget about it and eventually another movie studio will reboot a classic film with an all gender and/or race-swapped cast and the cycle will begin anew.
>>71976384
Summer flick is the new language way of saying it's a forgettable and mediocre film. A pump and dump.
>Sony makes another flop
Do they have any other successful IPs besides Bond? And even then there's murmurs of making Bond a black guy.
>>71976100
Dont know if this indicates something.
How does it on other blockbusters. And dont many buy it on impulse?
But i read on twitter that some cinemas in the uk already decreased their airing time.
>>71977168
I'd pump and dump a roll of this film before I'd ever touch any of the gross fucking women in this film.
>>71977129
By internet hate he means from both the youtube faggots ant twitter SJWs
he's just being intentionally vague because it's polygonand he doesn't want the class 5 full roaming vapor formed from Zoe Quinn's vaginal discharge to assault him
THERE'S SOMETHIN STRANGE
IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
WHO YOU GONNA CALL?
>>71977219
the theatre for a refund
>>71977209
I stopped reading after >MANY COMPLAINTS ABOUT GHOSTBUSTERS ARE UNQUESTIONABLY MISOGYNIST
>>71977185
Jump Street has been successful both critically and commercially enough for it to get a MIB crossover as well as a rumored female Jump Street
>>71976563
Isnt he just trying to look under her skirt?
>>71977193
>How does it on other blockbusters
Same theater was sold two weeks in advance for Age of Ultron (all screenings that night), a month in advance for Force Awakens (all screenings that weekend), and a few days in advance for Dory (first showing only, second showing very full)
Obviously Ghostbusters isn't anywhere on the same level as those movies but the Palisades mall is pretty big and draws a lot of consumers. 3 people for opening night seems very bad
>>71976100
Madman
>>71976309
>a lot of enjoyable, disposable fun
that's possibly the most negative way there is to be positive
>>71977303
What the fuck? Why would you do that?
>>71977303
JUST FUCK MY MOVIE EXPERIENCE UP
>>71977245
Further in the article he starts actually criticizing the groups that deserve it.
Remember this is polygon, if it didn't seem 100% feminist approved they wouldn't have published it
>>71976249
Masaka, It's even faster than Star Platinum!
>>71976996
>China bans moviess that has depictions of ghosts, living dead, moving skeletons, etc
>plus quotas of foreign movies to be allowed in theaters
>Ghostbusters won't be in chinese theaters
Nope.
that plus the fact that the franchise was never that big in most of Europe means it will be a disaster in foreign markets.
>>71977332
It was already fucked up anon
>>71977303
These are making me laugh more than they should
>>71976100
>>71977209
>class 5 full roaming vapor
>>71977355
IMAGINE BEING A SANE NON-KUCKED MALE UNDER A TYRANNICAL HYSTERICAL GYONOCRACY
IT ALMOST FEELS LIKE A HILLARY CLINTON PRESIDENCY
BETTER WATCH WHAT YOU SAY SHITLORD!
>>71977129
>raping your childhood
Isnt this just a internet meme regarding rule 34 and the fan porn?
I think the ones hating are just too exxagerated. Just like the others using this to hate back.
Both sides should grown some thicker skin.
>>71977398
>couple seat
What?
tbqh, the AVGN got BTFO'd
>>71977460
i guess its a loveseat.
>>71976020
>tfw Ghostbuster got destroyed by Pokemon Go
>>71977355
case and point, when talking about Rolfe
>The content of the video wasn't hateful, overtly misogynist or particularly unreasonable.
>overtly misogynistic
>implying it was even slightly misogynistic
Also those comments are a hilarious dumpster fire
>>71977300
>age of ultron
>tfa
Dont think they are anywhere near to compare them with gb16.
But dory i think is. Thats not a good sign for gb16.
Than the reservations are very poor.
>>71977514
>People so caught up with a shitty app game that they forget about Ghostbusters
dohohohoho
>>71977514
>clever move to destroy nintendos competitor sony
I dont think pokemon go have anything to do with it, you still can do both. But i will not say it isnt possible.
>>71977584
>student loan
Whoa looks like he is the only into it.
>bills
Like he really acts
>rest
Its our job to do.
Why is this so depressing? Even most of the guys look like as if they had too much girls and now its just doing duty.
And sure i know know it just pornbiz.
I have one free ticket to my local cinema.
Should I go see this?
>>71977584
>not including alimony
Come on bruh
>>71977816
Alimony isn't really a thing for a proper anon
>>71977803
No, it'll still count towards their box office
You could pirate it to try and show Sony how big of an audience they lost letting Feig and McCarthy reboot a franchise into their toilet humor lineup
>>71977816
In what world would a kissless permavirgin anon get to pay alimony?
I don't have any stake in this and am just not interested in seeing another shitty modern comedy, but it's just pathetic when I see reviews like this.I actually don't mind McKinnon though
I guarantee if they just put the original Ghostbusters into theaters they would have gotten more money. It would have required almost no work too
LMAO
Brianna Wu joins the party: https://archive.is/VmJL4
I am sure China will save this one.
>>71977933
>magazine that outright standard citizens rapists
>never bothered to publish an apology when the woman making the claims admitted it was fake and they were freed of all charges
>not being a biased feminist mouthpiecethat woman actually wound up in jail for murder
>>71977957
dat face
>>71977981
'Ghostbusters' Denied Release in China
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ghostbusters-denied-release-china-910563
>>71977778
BLACKED.COM = SLAVERY 2016 EDITION
>>71977999
dat(((hair)))
what did they mean by this?
My sister said she's going to see it and not once have I seen her even act interested in this movie. From what I've gathered she thinks it's IMPORTANT. I can't believe she fell for this shit.
Meanwhile she says she refuses to see meme masterpiece Suicide Squad.
>>71977999
Did Richard Simmons start doing meth?
>>71977778
Fun fact, porn actors are mostly gay.
>>71978068
TELL UR SISTER SHE'S A DUM BINT
WAIT TILL SHE DYES HER HAIR PURPLE
>>71978068
AY
*smacks lips*
HOL UP
>>71977460
>his kino house doesn't have couple seats
get with the times
>>71978068
>My sister said she's going to see it and not once have I seen her even act interested in this movie. From what I've gathered she thinks it's IMPORTANT. I can't believe she fell for this shit.
Ah so she's F11? Or is she dragging her poor boyfriend along?
>>71977933
"We need some positive critical reception to slap on a movie!"
"Quick, call Peter Travers!"
>>71978051
>brobabiez
wow, thats actually a new variant, good on her. Out of all the highschool level bullies that these "journalists" are, she the bulliest and the high schooliest, well done well done
>>71978068
You should fuck her.
>>71978051
>Kristen Wiig Ghostbuster says 'Say hello my little friend!'
this is definitely a parody.
Paul Feig. More like Paul Fag am I right?
>>71976249
Venezuela's GDP.
>every positive review is just critics screaming "take that man babies!!" and uses vague buzzwords
>>71978405
I think that's how it's pronounced anyway.
>>71978405
Be careful, an 8 year old said that to him once and he's still seething over it
Comes out in 10 days in Sweden and theres no marketing at all.
>>71978518
WELCOME TO 2016
PROBLEM? SHITLORD!
>>71977978
Must be hard for it to stay relevant these days.
>>71978567
Cinema overall is a dying business in Sweden
>>71976249
Will Smith's credibility and/or Brendan Fraser's life expectancy
>>71977978
John Walker Flynt will do anything to try making himself relevant again, doesn't he?
>>71978567
>comes out in a month in France
>will be released while Suicide Squad will be in its second week
>in the middle of august
>while the theaters will be screening some classic summer comedies as well
This is going to tank pretty hard here.
>>71977331
Maybe he's blind in his left eye
>>71978856
maybe he's blind
>>71976100
The empty theaters mean we could be getting decent camrip really soon.
On the other hand I don't think any group will bother ripping it.
Most the positive reviews come from the social justice rags you'd expect and seem to written by cucks. Wait for user reviews to surface.
>>71978856
But the extreme left?
>>71978947
The only people who would bother reserving seats for this would be the extreme left
>>71978928
>implying it won't be a flock of tumblrites writing equally dumb and empty praise about their patriarchy-smacking pet-flick
Nobody else is going to see it, there won't be anyone to say anything negative about it.
>>71976020
> 54%
AHAHAHA
>>71978518
like only 30 % of them
>>71978974
>>71978051
>girl power and ghoul power
Kill me
Say what you want about r9k and supreme gentlemen, but holy shit, these people that get on their soapboxes and go, "Fuck these manbabies! Eat shit, loser virgins," are ten times worse, namely because their behavior is encouraged more.
>>71978975
Just like they all flocked to like the trailer?
>>71979083
More like because their behavior is encouraged whatsoever. No one looks up to /r9k/ including themselves, but the progressive circle is mostly just jerking their own opinions off.
>sjw shills keep just going full retard with their reviews
>banned in china
>some pets movie is already raking in box office money
>just need to wait for it to release
>just need to wait and see the box office numbers
>its already going to flop because it was determined via pre-screening it was a flop
>all the premier seatings just plain empty
>people honestly believe this is going to be a blockbuster and be a "BIG WIN" for feminism
the original ghost busters had more empowering female characters than this one does and wasnt such a cancerous festering pustule of filth needing to justify its own existence to the world
its a sad day when you need to rally behind such trash like this, and pretend its good, just because you are so delusional towards a social agenda you are trying to push
>>71979107
You don't pay to see a trailer so everyone can say what they want.
Chances are a lot of people won't want to pay for something they know isn't going to please them.
I dont care what they try and spin, this shit is getting poor box office numbers
>>71977978
>Revolution 60 release date: October 2014
bravo woo
r
a
v
o
It doesn't matter what the angry manbaby virgins believe, this movie will be a huge hit in China.
>>71980135
China banned it for having ghosts
>>71980135
China already won't let the movie in because of quotas of foreign movies and ban on representations of ghosts and living deads.
>>71979312
I like how the orginal was pretty balanced as far as gender is considered, but in this reboot all the men are dumb as posts
>>71980567
Not to mention that the every man is played by a black guy.
>>71980664
Based Dick.
>>71976020
Sony Damage Control Coming Through!
>>71980664
what a based review
>>71976020
>150 million dollar production budget
>144 million dollar marketing campaign
>Almost 300 million dollars in the hole
>mfw they have at least double that, without China, to break even.
>>71980851
yeah, there's no way in hell this is getting a sequel
>>71980969
4 obese body positive feminist landwhales
>>71980969
does that really mean fat people
or does it just mean like, a wheel chair or something idk
please tell me thats not massive obese fat fucks
>>71980994
There's mostly sluts than tumblr landwhales in my cities
>>71980994
Rather four Tumblrinas along with their pitiful beta orbiters who just couldn't talk their galpals out of it.
>>71976100
>>71980969
There's shockingly more people in the 7pm than 10pm maybe it's just parents with their kids
>>71976100
Woooow, this is going to bomb so hard.
>>71981143
>tfw the tickets start to be sold by the buckets as it get closer to the opening.
>>71977129
>no one hates this movie anymore than the Robocop remake
Stopped reading right there because you'd have to be a retard to seriously believe it.
The Robocop remake was a reboot of a semi-obscure movie that only niche genre fans adore. Meanwhile, Ghostbusters is a movie that even the normiest of normies know about. This was why no one really protested the Robocop remake outside of die hard movie/sci fi groups. The reaction from the two could not have been more different.
The response to Ghostbusters has been overwhelmingly vitriolic since the cast was announced and those first publicity stills were shown. I say this as someone who was in those first shitposting threads: no one was saying "let's give this movie the benefit of the doubt". People were complaining that this was a shameless cash grab, but the majority of the criticism was always directed at the cast first and foremost.
I'm not going to see this piece of shit because I don't want to support a bad product, but damn. Don't try to rewrite history when you get called out for your autism. At least stand by your beliefs.
>>71981151
Is this normal for first nights? I don't know much about box office revenue
>>71981167
Sure, suddenly cinemas will be swamped with of scores of people who have nothing better to do than to watch this particular movie ASAP.
Without China, what are the chances that this movie will make a positive return?
Given the budget and marketing costs, this needs to make 450-500 million to make a decent return.
http://www.strawpoll.me/10745540/
>>71981221
I know, right?
Dude. I really hope when this shit get here in latin amurica, we dont fuck things up and end up giving more money than every other continent combined.
>>71981253
Why that much? It should be twice the budged to start giving revenue IMO.
>>71978974
severely underrated
>>71980851
You have a source for the two budgets?
>>71978974
>>71981219
Dunno. Usually for big things with reserved seating, they sell out very early and very fast. Star Wars was booked for ages. Only other movie is Life of Pets right now, and it's been out long enough to not matter in terms of reserved seats. I've been checking Ghostbuster's times tomorrow and it's all pretty similar. Two people here, six people there. No one wants to see this thing.
>>71979083
So in other words it's the same behaviour, but you're just more booty blasted because they've actually achieved mass approval whereas you haven't.
>>71981197
>robocop
>semi-obscure
>>71980664
Did Kermode bothered to review this shit? I liked his Neon Demon review
>>71980851
Marketing campaing is not already on the production budget?
Holy hell, I dindt knew that lol
>>71979312
It may or may not be a win for Feig's bank account, but regardless of the success of the movie it's already been a PR success for feminism as the reaction has been another boogeyman for them to claim legitimacy.
>>71981341
I can't find a source for the marketing budget, but I found a year-old breakdown of their film budget:
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Female-Ghostbusters-Movie-Has-Giant-Budget-71005.html
Feig got paid 10 million fuckin dollars personally to make this trash.
>>71981382
>mass approval
You mean media approval.
The average person is more right wing leaning than ever and society is steadily moving to the right.
Liberals are a very very loud minority.
Without immigrants(very conservative most of them) they wouldn't even have a significant electoral representation.
>>71981253
Really not good. The sort of comedy it seems to be going for might not work that well in the asian market overall, nor in Europe where the name recognition isn't as big as it is in the US.
Not to mention that it will open at different dates in some places, at points making it close to Suicide Squad's opening, which is not good at all.
It will probably break even but not enough to be decently called a success.
>>71981280
Yes, and the total budget for the movie and its marketing is 300 million.
>>71981551
>You mean media approval.
And Ameritards' opinions are guided by...?
Will Twittertards be happy enough to disregard financial flop for the sake of "muh positive ratings", or are they going to rage about how 'mysoginist dudebro manbabies' sabotaged the most important movie of the decade by refusing to watch it?
GOOBERGATE
IS
DEAD
>>71981529
No it's not, BvS production budget was 250 million, with marketing and adding toys and cereal adds up to 800 million
>>71981551
>increasingly liberalized notion of ''''''''conservatism''''''''' each generation
>claiming it's meaningful to say many people are still conservative
>>71981547
Except if the movie fails hard, it might also show that this sort of bullying marketing techniques alienate the audience and that there really is such thing as negative press. Not to mention it could show that basing your movie's appeal entirely on "gurl power" may not be enough to guarantee a mainstream success
>>71981613
>800 millions
>for a movie
God Almighty.
Also, BvS?
>>71976275
lol
>>71981621
Alienate what audience? What fraction of the people seeing/would have seen this movie give a flying fuck about Feig taunting neckbeards? What fraction of the people angry at his approach would have actually spent money on tickets to see this movie?
Do you actually think that's what hurt them, rather than just the mediocrity of the movie and people generally not giving a fuck about Ghostbusters?
>>71981621
What's sad is how seemingly simple it would have been to make an entertaining and amazing movie. Ghostbusters has such a broad set of options, but Feig basically farted this one out without trying anything new. From the emails, we learned that he wanted to take the original Ghostbusters and redo it, but stretched across three films. In the first they would establish their weapons and form a relationship with the city. In the second, they would fight Zuul, and in the third they would fight Gozer.
Feig is the most uncreative piece of shit, like good god.
>>71981595
This comic should not make me as mad as it does.
Also
>implying they won't do both and blame the patriarchy puppets in the audience that can't undertand the intellectual progressive critics, etc
I loved it personally but each to their own I suppose.
>>71976249
The amount of real /tv/ users on /tv/
>>71981574
The Internet.
TV is dying, ratings with each passing year are lower.
>>71977999
Sam Roberts?
>>71981621
I really don't want Sony to be rewarded for this harrass viewers into watching our movies by insulting them style of advertising
If Ghostbusters does manage to be a success you can bet your ass they WILL do it again
>>71981651
Star Wars had to make 4 billion or something to break even cause of the marketing which they did, they only made 900 million in the box office
>>71981702
Why do redditors hate Feig so much? He made their favorite reddit show "FREAKS AND GEEKS"
>>71981755
Wait they hate Feig?
>>71981755
I think of it like director rot. Same sort of thing that happened to M. Night. They get full of themselves, and next thing you know they're making movies like After Earth and Last Airbender
>>71981775
Haven't you seen the posts heres? A prime example of a crossie >>71981702
>>71981744
Look, Im not a /tv/ guy so I dont have the same knowledge that you anons have it. I just came here to see the Ghosbusters meltdown that is about to happen.
Still, knowing a bit about bussiness, I cant agree with this info you just gave me.
Who in they right mind would have done amovie that has the goal of a 4 billion for break even when barely any movies reach 2 billion?
This math is not well done or there is something more on these numbers that are not showing up.
>>71981696
Alienate the potential audience or the customers. Maybe I didn't phrae it well. By trying to make anyone who doesn't like the movie or even who doesn't want to go see it look bad, you may lose your audience who will not like that sort of agressive message. By making some people angry at Feig and the blogger's antics, they lose them as an audience. And judging by the reception of the trailers, it proves that it's not just about niche audiences that spend too much time on the internet. Even your "normie" guy has seen some needlessly agressive buzzfeed articles telling him about how horrible it is to not be super excited about the movie.
>>71976100
who are all these people?
>>71976100
Don't most people just go a regular theater and not reserved seating? Like I can't even check my theater because there are none within 50 miles with reserved seating.
Hollywood execs know exactly how to play the brain dead liberal SJW crowd and get them all worked up.
wasn't it just a decade ago these SJWs and Feminists were fighting AGAINST corporate greed and hollywood CEOs?
Now liberals are being used by Hollywood to shill their shitty movies... and the liberals have no self awareness that they're being used.
>>71977209
Best post
>>71982124
Liberals ten years ago are nothing like the current tumblrites and SJWs (who are everything but liberal deep down).
Actual liberalism mght want to take a stand against corporatism but today's SJWs are all gender studies majors obsessed with pop culture. that's what happens when you start to legitimize mainstream/pop art as subject for academic criticism and observation and let it take over established corpuses.
>sociology in charge of not ruining everything it touches
>>71981956
Austinites. A scummy people, whose terrible attributes are not to be discussed in polite company
>>71976100
>>71978974
Did you mean "liberals"?
>>71980664
S A V A G E
FUCKING ROEPER, UNASSUMINGLY SITTING THERE WITH EBERT DOING THEIR MILQUETOAST TV SHOW
WHO KNEW HE WAS SUCH A BASED MOTHERFUCKER
DOUBLING DOWN AND GOING HARD WHEN THE SJW BULLSHIT TOOK OFF IN 2016
LEGEND
>>71981728
And the same owners of tv channels own most online newspaper shit, so...
>>71977460
Wife and wife's boyfriend.
It's rather interesting job modern progressive leftists have gone so far to the left they've come out the other side and behave exactly like the Religious Fundamentalists of the 50s and 60s. Basically, if you don't think like them you are clearly the enemy and full of hate.
>>71981738
Come on man, don't be cruel.
You guys are so mad
>>71977978
Why is Gamergate being blamed?
I was unsure if it still existed but this isn't fucking vidya. Is anyone SJWS don't like goobergeiger?
>>71977303
Someone with free tickets trying to troll /tv/ on purpoise
>>71981491
Just because you can recite Robocop's script and all the funny memes by heart doesn't mean half of the people around you can, anon.
Go ask someone you talk to today who is a casual moviegoer what Robocop is about and see if they know, or if they'll just regurgitate the remake's plot to you.
>>71982498
You realize that's not the same Roeper from the show right? The original's been dead for years.
>>71982716
That might just be the horseshoe theory where the assholes on the political spectrum meet
75% is "fresh"?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PO5RGX5CeT4
Today I will remind them
>>71982879
It's a buzzword that they love to throw around.
>>71982879
Gamergate is now the SJW equivalent of "I BET THE JEWS DID THIS"
>>71977602
One takes time from the other.
You got a new game and you either spend $12 and wish you were playing it or play it during and risk getting kicked out.
Bad weekend to premiere.
What the fuck, it would have never done great anyways.
This cinema is ALWAYS packed out, and this is PEAK TIME on a Friday evening where it's usually hard to get tickets and yet here we are.
>>71977219
Social Justice!
>>71977909
No don't even pirate.
Don't give them another excuse for failure.
>>71976020
HOLD ON
>Scratches Neckbeard
I REPEAT, HOLD ON
>Unsheaths Katana
THAT YOU'RE SAYING
>Reddits Furiously
YOU'RE SERIOUSLY SAYING
>mountain dew hastily
THIS NEW GHOSTBUSTERS
>Tips fedora
THIS NEW GHOSTBUSTERS
>M'lady's internally
IS ACTUALLY OK?!?!?!
>Links Dorito powder off venison sausage reminiscent fingers
>>71983159
The later showing in the bigger cinema (which costs more and is in 3D) is even worse kek.
>>71983213
>Whitecorrecting and appropriating the Kangz culture
Muthafugga.
>>71982124
decade?
i thought theyre still fighting 'the man'
>>71979002
Flip those stats anon.
At most there are these three types:
>great because women and fuck everyone
>funnier that the original, it surpasses the classic, it is superior and modern
>it's funny on its own, no need to compare it to the original
The third is the only one I take seriously, and even then, they seem hesitant about praising it too much.
>>71978731
Underrated as fuck.
>>71976205
Isn't that just a theater reserved seat?
>>71976205
>that shirt
Jesus, it doesn't get much worse than that. Even some of the names I could understand from an ideological stance, but all of them together is a ball of mental disorders
>>71983159
i live around here, this doesn't surprise me. most of the females around here aren't the militant feminist type lol. if you catch my drift.
>>71977219
WEIGHT WATCHERS!
>>71981510
He's always doing reviews on friday. Or at least uploading them.
>>71983159
>They took the front row so they could cheer on the actresses.
![Lm8xL7a[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/6JRLUSI.jpg "Lm8xL7a[1].jpg")
>>71982879
Screaming gamergate is the go to pejorative in the same way SJW is bandied about when people disagree with right wing opinions.
>>71983601
>#RAPECULTURE #PATREON
>ghostbusters will be a critical flop
75%
>b-but it's going to be a commercial flop
I wouldn't be surprised if it makes >$300m.
>>71983742
>75%
>Average score is 6/10
They've done a terrible marketing job and that's what puts butts in seats. Knowing it's only average when there's that cute pet movie to check out instead is not going to sell tickets.
>>71983159
>That single person in K7
Great spot
>>71983011
>75% is "fresh"?
Actually it has somehow been given the higher rank of 'certified fresh', wtf ?
Also it's at 74% at the moment.
>>71983742
You can buy critics but you can't buy bums in seats my mane
>>71982879
Wu is legally insane.
I just arrived from work to see this and the previous thread. damage control at maximum levels top kek
>>71976205
>calling them by their first name
oh wow sexist pig
>>71983742
Breaking even is a success to you?
>>71983882
No, but you're all hoping it's going to fail drastically at the box office for some reason.
It's over, Ghostbuster won
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbgSvkC331c
the only critic that matter
Even if it falls below 70%, I bet they'll keep it.
>>71982879
It's a boogeyman.
>>71978292
Pretty much. The entire movie looks to be nothing but references to other things. It might as well be Scary Movie: Ghostbusters Edition.
>>71983934
>for some reason
you have to go back faggot
>>71982124
>wasn't it just a decade ago these SJWs and Feminists were fighting AGAINST corporate greed and hollywood CEOs?
>Now liberals are being used by Hollywood to shill their shitty movies... and the liberals have no self awareness that they're being used.
Pretty sure my mom would shit her birkenstocks and bellbottoms if she learned what corporate tools feminists have become in 2016
>>71983945
Sounds like they both hated it.
>>71983945
They don't seem that impressed. "Rent it" isn't glowing praise. I'll rent any shitty movie if I'm that curious.
>>71983945
Did you watch the first few minutes when they said it was "ehh... okay... meh," and skip the rest?
They have a long list of shitty jokes they didn't like in the middle and they call out the film for being "GIRL POWER GIRL POWER" and the marketing/press for "demonizing" James Rolfe and anyone who didn't want to see the movie.
>>71977129
You're exactly what's wrong with shit.
"I DON'T HAVE TO READ THIS ARTICLE TO WRITE AN ARTICLE IN RESPONSE!"
Yes, you faggot, you really do. Fuck you you stupid asshole.
>>71983945
>HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM?
>>71976100
should be a record breaking night honestly
>>71982995
Are you retarded? That is him. You're thinking of Gene Siskel
>>71976100
7pm tonight in Kalamazoo. No one wants to see this shit.
>>71984587
More than half of those seats are sold anon.
>>71981197
>The internet is only 4chan
>I know this, because I posted on 4chan about this movie once
>Robocop is obscure and unknown to most
Feel free to end it all, soon.
>>71976020
This film is a great critic filter. Now you know who takes their job seriously and rate it correctly, seeing it as another uninspired hackneyed remake and who supports a film just to make gurll power stance. Thanks, Paul Feig!
>>71980548
It's funny because in every other TCG (Yugioh, Vanguard, etc...) It's america the ones censoring shit (Usually lewd stuff or religion)
