RIP grooblegrumplers
for real though
HOW will pissing babby babymen recover?
>>71962101
Don't know, don't care. Man's time is over, it's our time now. Fuck men.
>6.5 average rating among all critics
>6.1 average rating among top critics
>17 fresh
>16 rotten
>>71962077
There's only one critic who matters.
>this movie would have just been another sony bomb if men didn't get mad at women
>>71962142
What a ringing endorsement, this movie must be awesome!!! Can't wait to stick it to the adolescent man babies!!!
>>71962142
>52%
AVERAGE
WANNABE MEN BTFO
My wife and her son have been insisting that I go see this with them. I think I'll go now.
Holy shit
Well they never stop being BTFO
>>71962077
>itll be 90+ likes fiegs other shit lmao
>hahaha its 75% tv btfo
I love it
Can't wait to see all the 500+ mil predicitons become "hahah 200mil we win!"
>i validate my opinions by looking at the numbers posted on a website by random strangers.
>>71962237
>RT IS GONNA RIP IT A NEW ONE 2 HOURS LEFT BOYS
>NEW THREAD HERE
I love this revisionist act, /v/edditor
scary movie 3 has a 36% on rotten tomatoes
robin hood men in tights has a 48% on rotten tomatoes
both of those are classics
pretty much
since this movie has a 75% rating that means it must be really fucking good.
The best part is that not all reviews have been counted/submitted yet. It's only going to strengthen and possibly go up a little more within the next week or so. Any critic with their head on straight knows that the only way this movie is as bad as people claim is if they go into it with grumblegrappler state of mind ("aka HURR DURR MUH 80S MOVIE MUH MALE PROTAGONISTS"), and since they aren't virgin shut-ins living with their moms they can be unbiased and make a fair judgment.
>>71962320
>I love this revisionist act, /v/edditor
muh gamergate boogyman already
tons of idiots claimed it'd score 90+ like spy and bridesmaids. now a fucking 75% is called a victory
if this doesn't beat warcraft it's a failure
F
>>71962168
I somewhat agree. I don't think it's a matter of men bashing women. People should've shut the fuck up about the movie, and just let it fail. Too many people felt like that has to put in their 2 cents, and that's why there was controversy in the first place.
>>71963111
>it only succeeded cause everyone kept voicing their opinions and thumbs down'ing youtube trailers
Yeah everyone should've done the reverse. Given it a thumbs up and said they were going to see it. Good strategy faggot.
So what's more important to /tv/ now? The "fresh", imdb, meta rating or is it the amount of dollars brought in by the box office?
>>71963342
whichever works for me currently haha
>>71962320
Yes because every person on this site has the same opinions and predictions.
>>71962805
Well this movie was denied a release in China so a bomb is possible. The ad costs for this movie must've been huge, because I saw nonstop ads for this.
>>71963312
or just fucking say nothing and don't go watch it
>>71963358
which is why 75% is a victory hahaha
showed those gamergaters amirite lmao
Reminder that anyone that hates this movie is automatically a fat basement dweller.
But stop generalizing women!
>>71963439
did u check the top critics 40% lad
SJW BTFO
w-wait its up to 50% now... uhhh PRESALE TICKETS AREN'T SELLING OUT LMAOO
>>71962077
How young and fucking thick do you have to be to attribute any meaning to something as fucking arbitrary as Rotten Tomatoes? It's film scoring for simpletons. It's either "this film is fresh" or "this film is rotten" - no room for shades of grey because the fucking mongtards who use that piece of shit websites have an absolute inability to understand absolutes.
All the "this film is OK reviews" - and even the SJW shill reviews are reserved in their praise,- are included as positive. Why? Something being OK isn't a positive - it's indifference which is worse than something being bad. The film is so average that it can't illicite a concrete response from those who want to like it. The politics around it are the only thing people care about. That hack Feig (who wrote an article that men aren't funny because dick jokes and then makes a film which is just fanny jokes because he's a clueless, weak hack) has blown it big time. I hope his regressive left, camp, self hating, whiny shit bag career dies on its arse.
TL;DR - anyone who takes RT seriously needs to fucking remove themselves from the gene pool because they are too stupid to live.
>>71963528
>50% top critics
WEW babbymen totally got btfo
suck it shitlords it 2016 womyn can make jokes now
>>71962077
doesn't matter if it got 10000% if no one goes to see it.
>>71963546
>its a pleb that has no taste in film pretending he has taste in film episode
>>71963312
I was getting at the fact that if people were so vocal about it, they wouldn't have been called out for being sexist. Most people posting criticitally beforehand were grouped into that category even though they had valid points. This turned into free publicity for the movie. I was indicating that we should've ignored, and it would've flopped like most of the movies this summer minus the controversy.
how long until 4chan dies? The userbase as is has to be small, and most conservatives stick to facebook to post their opinions. 4chan has been on the wrong side of history since goobagate.
>>71963411
>or just fucking say nothing
Likely to happen.
>>71963411
>and don't go watch it
I doubt most people here will.
>>71962133
>Don't know, don't care
>Don't know, don't care
>Don't know, don't care
That's the real problem. To want to be head honcho but having no understanding of what to do, or how to do, let alone doing better.
it has a 4.0 on IMDB with every user review giving it 3 stars or less
>SJWs going full retard with their "reviews"
>banned in china
>sony paid shill marketers
>isnt even out yet
>confirmed will flop already
>marketers still trying this hard to affirm its a success when we all know its already a failure and all executives knew it would be a failure thats why it was in PR nightmare limbo for 3 fucking years
>shitters now just trying to shitpost and spam about it
>just need to wait for it to come out and see box office results
>everyone knows it will flop
>theres already a animated film raking in the box office money and its already released and hasnt been a PR nightmare trainwreck needing sony shills and retarded SJW shills going full retard to shill a turd for it to sell because its legitimately a good movie
>>71962213
Make sure you go three or four times, Anon, for feminism
>>71962133
Well, that's awfully sexist of you.
>>71963739
yea but like misogyny and stuff
>pissy babby babymen
>babymen
>brobabies
Oh I get, feminists call us babies because they know they'll never have one
>>71963669
>This turned into free publicity for the movie
All the articles about how all the sexist mysogynerd gamergate trump supporters were giving the trailer a thumbs down on youtube only bolstered its popularity amongst feminists that were only going to say positive things about the movie regardless.
Normies don't know what gamergate is, they aren't involved in online feminism crusades, etc. They read articles like that and the only thing they take from it is that people didn't like the trailer. They aren't following this internet drama week in and week out like SJW tumblr and /tv/. It's only more "relevant" in neckbeard and tumblrina circles.
im glad it's doing well tbqh it's fun to see the butthurt fedora tears
>waahh there's a woman in my movie!!!
grow the fuck up
>>71963901
>SJW tumblr
meant to say SJW twitter
>>71963880
Don't be rude, anon. Their cats are their babies.
>>71963776
>nobody will buy the ghostbusters themed twinkies
>no one will play the ghostbusters board game
>it's over sony
>>71963880
>>pissy babby babymen
this one is my favorite
its so silly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxoXN0EaOtU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVoQkYsUxhE
BASED ROCCO!
>>71963971
>it's been confirmed ghostbusters maypoles are in low demand
>i haven't seen a single ghostbusters basketball hoop
>no one in the real world wearing ghostbusters scarves
top kek sony
>>71963914
How is it doing well? It's not even out yet.
>>71963971
they won't if the movie bombs
>>71963971
http://www.ecto.cool/
Sony wins again.
>>71964077
>no ghostbusters canned stew
why is sony even bothering to release this movie again?
>no ghostbusters flutes
>no ghostbusters cellos
>no ghostbusters harpsicords
why do people pretend this movie will do well?
Empirical evidence that this movie is good, can you fucking wealking virgins stop with the woman hate now?
>women have been starring in movies for a century
>including movies men and nerds love like Alien(s) and Resident Evil plus tons of horror
>the narrative evolves into Hollywood is a sexist boys' club
>gender swap popular franchise in order to deliberately annoy the fanbase
>make it as over the top zany and grrrl-power as possible to rub their faces in it
>literally zero male characters who aren't either evil or retarded
>throw in some actual nutshots and anti-men dialog for good measure
>internet hate machine reacts just as planned
>call them all misogynist virgins
>they get madder and louder, drawing more attention
>collect moneys
>>71962077
This is one of the popular theaters in my area(near Toronto/SJW ville). The grayed out seats of the 2 showings tomorrow are reserved.
>Falseflagging
>>>/v/
>>71964370
GRUMPYGRUES ON SUICIDE WATCH
Alright somehow top critic score is around 50 and still they slapped a certified fresh sticker on that shit. Disgraceful
>>71963528
>they're doing it in this thread now
fucking guacamolegate plebs i swear
>>71962168
It's still going to bomb. Secret Life of Pets will take the weekend and Star trek 3 will take it next weekend.
>>71962133
It's looking that way, fifty genders, calling a bitch a bitch is a hate crime
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-36775398
the tans are after getting a new cunted prime minister and youse yanks are getting a female president, so yeah, up shit creek
>>71964370
In the last thread someone posted a pic of a Manhattan theater seating chart and a little under half of the seats were empty. I checked one of my local theaters and well over half of the seats were empty. I don't think anyone has found a soldout screening which means the pre-sales are abysmal. It's gonna flop HARD.
>>71962077
>consensus just 2 hours after the embargo was over
>certified fresh with just a 100 reviews
all this damage control after China told them to fuck off
>>71962142
>Neither godawful or great
BOTH SIDES BTFO
>>71964071
been out for 3 days in the UK and Ireland
SJWs can take comfort in their pawns praising the movie but that won't save Paul Feig and Sony. This pile of shit needs to make at least 400 million worldwide at the box office and that isn't gonna happen. The pre-sales have been absolutely abysmal, China won't play it and there's fierce competition this week and next week. Calling it, it'll make around 200 million worldwide and feminists who don't know anything about marketing budgets will scream "LOOK, IT MADE A PROFIT! IT HAD A BUDGET OF 150 MILLION SO IT MADE A PROFIT! SONY IS GONNA GREENLIGHT GHOSTBUSTERS 2! MANBABIES BTFO!"
>>71964609
Did SONY really forget about China's policy on ghosts or was this just a dumb move all around?
A mediocre movie. That sure showed 'em. The funniest thing about this movie is the collective hopes and dreams piled upon it like the film itself is a political movement and it turns out to be meh. Nothing more than an overlong SNL bit.
Does anybody know of a movie with a lower average rating or lower Top Critics percent that's Certified Fresh?
Hell, what about a Certified Fresh movie with under a 5 on IMDb?
>>71962077
>Average Rating: 6.5/10
>a D average is good
>>71964758
>pascal
>dumb
pick both
>>71964758
Can't really have Ghostbusters without ghosts dumb ass
>>71964766
>mediocre
Its metakino/antifilm
You're just too pleb to get it mate. Stick to trash like Dredd and Guardians of the Galaxy
>Go on "SJW forum" like Gamerghazi
>"Ghostbusters looks shit", "Why do people even care about this movie", "Why can't Hollywood write good comedy anymore?", "Lame reboot is lame", "Why does hollywood even greenlight this shit?"
>Go on 4chan
>SJW CONSPIRACY TO MAKE THIS MOVIE GO GOOD, LOL WHEN THIS GETS ROTTEN THEY WILL BE BTFO'ED, SJWS ON SUICIDE WATCH
Every time.
>>71964460
Dies mensch ist richtig
>>71964877
>Can't really have Ghostbusters without ghosts dumb ass
Actually, if they called them beings from another dimension it would be fine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tC27RDtosM
Ghostbusters >Ghostbusters II>Ghostbusters New
Who gives a shit about reviews? We all know they're bought. All that matters is the Box Office.
>>71965011
This is the objective ranking.
>>71964766
And just like politics, it will take a year or two before the people who voted for Ghostbusters to realize in hindsight that it's just like all the other shitty summer remakes. Until then, everyone is going to be proudly displaying their Ghostbusters bumperstickers and feeling important.
RT is a website that is designed for shilling. 6.5/10 is FRESH!
>>71964877
No shit and way to miss my point. China is a good source of box office revenue (look at how Ant Man did there) and this movie is getting mediocre at best audience response that isnt going to earn their budget back. When you cut a big portion of your market out you better damn well make sure your movie is going to do well domestically
Upsetting manchildren alone makes the movie worth it.
Too bad it couldn't be, yknow, good.
angry nerds btfo
>>71965011
Ghostbusters > Ghostbusters: The Video Game > Ghostbusters II > The Real Ghostbusters > Extreme Ghostbusters > Ghostbusters (2016)
Girl power and ghoul power - it's a winning combination.
>>71962077
>Sony convinced reviewers that if they don't support their shit movie they're against women
>>71962077
ITT thread: /v/ trying to damage control super hard after officially being btfo.
>>71965142
Actually its kind of iffy with The Real Ghostbusters considering the second half of the series fucking tanks thanks to ABC meddling. Havent watched Extreme but I hear it gets really dark with Cenobites and shit.
I don't get it even in Metacritic most of the reviews is positive from different outlets, what the fuck is going on?
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/ghostbusters-2016
>Hey guys we're putting a BLACK FEMALE in our cast? Crazy right? Look how progressive we are
>Lets have her be a sassy black woman for the ENTIRE FUCKING FILM
Winston wasnt a fucking nigger the entire film, why would they waste an entire character to a fucking stereotype when they're trying to act progressive?
All he did was ask "What exactly do you mean by this?" or "That sounds pretty bad" and smoke some ciggies.
>>71964460
Literally no chance gb doesn't take this weekend 2bh. Star Trek 3 will take the following weekend. Is anything big coming out after that? Secret Life of Pets might go back to the top in two weeks.
Are there porn parodies and Asylum mockbuster versions yet?
>>71965260
Winston was arguably the most likable guy on the team, and hell its even canon that he earned his doctorate
>Average rating: 6.5/10
>CERTIFIED FRESH!
This has only made me realise how broken RottenTomatoes is. Not a helpful site at all.
>>71965313
Theres a new porn parody already in the works, I think it has a trailer too
>it's a shitposters pretend to be SJWs thread
>>71965246
>what the fuck is going on?
Huge backlash on twitter and other media outlets claiming anyone who didn't like the trailer or said they wouldn't go see the new movie were misogynists.
So you've got a bunch of people giving it a "passable" score so they dont get attacked like James Rolfe did. Even people who dislike it end up spending a good portion of their review preemptively defending themselves from these accusations
I understand it's just how the site works, but it's so fucking dumb for the movie to be certified fresh when the average rating is 6.5. I'm sure critics who felt lukewarm about it increased their rating just enough for it to show as fresh on RT.
>>71965234
Pretty much.
Go on Gamerghazi, they fucking hate the film and they're the biggest "SJWs" of all.
>>71965260
>>71965342
Winston was the audience self insert.
He was a total skeptic and was just looking for a job.
>>71965436
Sounds like a version of Emperors New Clothes.
>>71965106
Fucking piece of shit only gives it a 63% anyway, God I hate critics.
>>71964961
what a fucking misogynist
she's clearly a virgin crybaby living in her dad's basement.
Where the fuck is the Armond White review?
You know it's going to be saucy.
>>71965011
Ghostbusters > Ghostbusters II > genitals dipped in boiling acid > nU gHoStBuStErS
>>71965827
Duckontherun knows his shit
they may have gone a bit off the rails with this one
>>71965827
Did you see the second to last comment talking about creative integrity
>>71965741
>genitals dipped in boiling acid
hey, that sounds interesting.
>>71965690
>Implying that bitch isn't just trying to pander while her Chad bf rakes the big autistbucks from her cuckfanbase.
>>71965949
>that face
>>71965949
Oh my god no one said girls couldnt be Ghostbusters for fuck sake, Extreme had one and a disabled guy. Does every fucking writer act like a 5th grader?
>>71965492
They shot themselves in the foot.
Obviously the manifesto waving redpillers were always going to hate it.
Then they pissed off the super fans of the original ghostbusters with all the "muh soggy knees" attack articles on Rolfe
They pissed off the SJWs with the black caricature for Jones, and then when she defended her character they slammed Feig and Dippold for "appropriating black culture"
They were doomed from the start.
>>71962142
>52
>average
>>71965949
Seriously did anyone say girls can't be Ghostbusters?
Wasn't the biggest complain that the original cast weren't reprising their roles in any capacity?
>>71966160
To be fair their top critics rating is rotten.
def not a shill
>>71965302
The Secret Life of Pets is an audience pleasing smash hit whereas Ghostbusters has alienated their core demographic with all of the "EVERYONE WHO DOESN'T WANT TO SEE THIS MOVIE IS A MISOGYNIST" shit. I would bet money that The Secret Life of Pets will stay at number 1.
Sony's trying way too hard now.
It's almost embarrassing
https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=%23Ghostbusters%20with%20%23MySquad
>>71966195
I think the bigger issue was people calling out the cashgrab for a movie series reboot nobody wanted and SONY turned it into something it wasnt to justify it.
Implying no girls like Ghostbusters in the 80s. By that logic, wouldn't boys not feel included with this one? I fail to see the difference.
>>71966244
>2.5 out of 4
>Fresh
What the fuck?
This movie is outing cucks like crazy. So many people I can add to a list so I never take them seriously again.
>>71966406
No I mean Man O' Steel was rotten.
Ghostbusters just squeaked out over the Rotten line for Top Critics putting both ratings in the NonRotten.
Superman had one in the Rot.
>>71966381
Because girls cant relate to male protagonists, fuck off with that corporate statistic bullshit
>>71966406
That carries over from the all shill/agenda critics.
Those are obvious photoshops and no I won't go and check the actual site, it got a score of 0% and nothing you say will convince me otherwise. BTFO? I dont think so buddy :^)
>>71966470
They must think women are incredibly simpleminded
>>71966466
Early today it was 'Certified fresh' with a rotten Top critics score.
The top critics dont factor into what becomes 'Certified fresh'
>>71966406
>>71966466
>>71966480
Somethings fucky.
Maybe it was the controversy
maybe it was sony buying reviews
but something's fucky.
fucking btfo
>>71966056
She looks like she would be offended by everything.
>>71966319
Well Sony Pictures wanted to re-establish franchise merchandise, that's the only real reason this movie happen. New kids buying the new toys in association to.
I truly never cared that it was an female cast. Would have been better having both, but we can't be equal anymore so I just wanted it to be connected to the original cast somehow.
>>71963914
You're so fucking stupid, I genuinely wonder that you understand how to breathe.
>>71966497
I just get tired of the "Well I can only like a character thats the same race/gender as me!" shit. Because its borderline narcissist if you actually have that mindset
AW HELL NAW
>>71966388
It literally means nothing, they can just give a fresh whenever they want.
>>71965660
James BTFO! When do you think he will commit suicide?
>>71966532
Yeah, too many big, experienced names are calling this out on its SJW bullshit and labeling it a fucking mess, which it is.
I doubt it'll turn a profit. We don't even have the rest of the reviews in, its toys aren't selling for shit, its video game tie in got blasted, and China isn't touching it.
>>71966648
This is laughable
>>71965660
>2.5/4
>fresh
Good Christ this is awful. Supergirl all over again.
>>71965375
>Theres a new porn parody already in the works, I think it has a trailer too
And even after internet piracy it will still turn a profit
>McWeeny
>>71966835
>this beautiful on a visual level
It's official. Top critics should be the only critics. This bullshit has gone long enough.
>>71965411
I hope you're right, anon. This is the only website I can go to without being bombarded.
>>71965949
>2016 journalism
Someone tell me why we need these people again? The internet has long since made film critics obsolete.
Has anyone actually been able to find the pre-sale numbers. Don't most movies announce that shit.
>>71966648
>same wit as the original men
No statement has ever been more false
>>71966914
>The internet has long since made film critics obsolete.
I miss that fictional movie critic Spy magazine had who wrote gushing reviews of every piece of trash that came out, usually punctuated with "I smell Oscar!"
>>71966931
Yes most movies do.
Pretty telling that this one hasn't
Do you think people will freak out if this film grosses 78 cents for every dollar the original grossed?
>>71967240
mom definitely will
>>71967240
>>71967240
Kek at Thor's name being first
>>71966532
>maybe it was sony buying reviews
Bingo, also SJWs.
There is an image people have been posting documenting almost all the internet reviewers on RT that gave the movie a fresh rating having posted in the past declaring it a huge success before it even released.
>>71962077
Kek life is a joke I give up
>>71962077
>average: 6.5
It's fresh in that everyone agrees it's mediocre.
>>71966375
I can't take this guy seriously, 4 out of fucking 4? What kind of retarded arbitrary scale... fuck.
>Can see? - Check
>Can Hear? - Check
>Has Actors? - Check
>Has Credits? - Check
Fucking "Critics" my ass.
>>71967289
Jesus what the fuck. Also Swiss Army Man was fantastic, cant believe he gave them the same score
>>71964483
Wew.... what a slippery slope that will be.
>>71967343
Fuck I meant this guy
>>71966381
>>71962168
Anon, you know the controversy was created. The studio third an all female cast as a gimmick so that they could use the feminist angle in marketing and use the misogynist argument to shut down critics.
>>71967360
Slippery slope is only a fallacy if you have no evidence. It often represents reality perfectly well.
>>71967461
That's what I mean though. I can see this shit getting out of hand. Two people get into a heated argument in their own home, and one of them calls the police out of vengeance, claiming that their spouse was committing a "hate crime".
It's not that I want people calling each other names, but I can see how this law would be abused by those who would want to just get back at a person.
>>71967461
I'm locking my door and throwing away the key. I hope rand was right and a group of morons with negligible education can't pull off filling the world after getting rid of everyone else
>>71967586
It has already been happening likely since before you where born man, every divorce ever is because the man hit her at some point, mos retarded cucks will claim that at least 80% of men do hit thier spouses
>>71966648
>>71962133
>Man's time is over, it's our time now
Feminists should be called Pork-Hai
>>71967679
fukken saved m8
>>71967289
>trusting critics
>ever
do you really think they'd trash such a controversial "feminist" movie and risk losing their jobs?
>>71967586
>and one of them calls the police out of vengeance, claiming that their spouse was committing a "hate crime".
It's worse than that right now
>man and woman fight
>man is being beaten with a pan/bottle/whatever
>calls the cops because he's done dealing with this shit
>they show up
>he's bleeding she isn't
>"sir you're going to have to come with us"
>he tries to explain but they dont listen
>she trashes his apartment/belongings
>renter's insurance refuses to cover the damages
>your only options are small claims court or convince a jury a 5'4" woman assaulted you
>>71967320
You know what the worst part is? The obvious bought out shill reviewers are all claiming they hated the trailer from the start but the movie turned out good when they went full on baby men hate mode from moment one.
I can't way for someone to invent a robot so I can dress it like me and make it go outside and eat all this bullshit while I get to stay inside and be free
>>71967744
Jesus, this makes me not want to get married. Not that a neckbeard like me has anything to fear, but still.
>>71967809
>married
Man if only it were as simple as avoiding that
>date a girl
>she gets pregnant
>it's not yours
>you break up with her
>she lists you as the father on the birth certificate
>have to settle this shit in court
>a paternity test proves you're not the father
>you have to pay child support anyway
>"the interests of the child come first!"
>the checks are made out to her, not her rosy cheeked excrement
>>71967884
Shit looks grim. This is not the future I dreamed about.
>>71966543
>because only men dislike Goobergrubblers 3
>>71967289
It has to do with the movies themselves being certified fresh, not the reviewer's personal fresh or rotten score.
>>71965660
>rolling stone
>>71968389
No. That indicates whether the review was counted as fresh or rotten. I imagine they look for certain buzzwords words to determine whether a 2.5/4 is fresh or rotten, but that's where it gets subjective and fishy.
>>71968457
I think it's just straight bullshit, see:
>>71966694
>>71967947
Never forget, all women are bitches and whores. That's not hate, that's just the facts of life.
>>71968821
You know /tv/, you guys are pretty cool.
>>71966406
>marvelously cast
>>71962077
how do you equate gamergate a hash tag with the hate for this shitty movie
>>71968821
I'd never call women bitches or whores because they already do that to themselves better than men do.
>>71962077
its has nothing to do with games at all.
>>71969034
Pretty much. These days they call each other "bitches" all the time. Mom just says it's degrading and doesn't use the word though. She thinks it's pretty fucking stupid to use it if it's so bad for others to use it.
>all these stupid cunts on both sides getting tricked by the obvious marketing gimmick
You fucking neckbeards are to blame. This was another piece of shit Sandler-tier awful comedy that was supposed to come and go without any fuzz. But you casted the first stone and all the terrible SJW articles and the retarded rants about how it's WRONG to reboot a franchise that's 30 years old because you say so made sure that Sony won. Now enjoy! Why the fuck would any sane person feel so possessive about a largely irrelevant old movie to the extent of actively trying to make another movie that's related to it fail?
>go to metacritic homepage
>PokemonGo: 65 (Yellow- mixed)
>Ghostbusters: 61 (Green- positive)
They arent even trying to be subtle are they?
>>71969006
Because Gamergate was about hating shitty games and the shitty reviewers that propped them up because smoking guns were discovered that showed that Video game reviewers had undisclosed relationships with certain developers.
But they forced meme'd it enough to make it mean it was just people being sexist. So, it's now a meme feminists and SJWs use agianst any group they don't like or they want to raise money from suckers.
Also, the bitch who is the producer who helped create this trainwreck because she fired the original ghostbuster's producer and brought in Fiag? She bought the right's to make the movie off a book being written by one of the people caught sleeping with game reviewers to get positive press for her 'game'. Of course I doubt she'll mention those.
>>71969091
oh god there's going to be 4 sequels now
>>71969067
You have to look out for moms, though. They may not use the word in front of other men, but when they're with other women talking about other women catching their man's attention, or their son's attention some moms have been known to use those words.
>>71969091
SJW Shill detected, we have the leaked e-mails and scripts from the sony leaks showing that they were going to go forward with the men hate Ballbusters even if there wasn't a backlash.
Enjoy the 10 cents for your shilling.
>>71969150
unlikely, see >>71966143
Lots of people are praising it to avoid feminist hate but a ton of SJW sites are shitting on it for being racist
they played with fire and got burned
so much for honest criticism
You know it's a piece of shit but PC liberals can't criticize this film for what it is lest they be called misogynists
>>71962077
Leftist propaganda always gets above 90% scores.
The fact that they didn't make it to 80% and that it's played in mostly empty theaters, it's a sign of a massive failure.
>>71969144
Anon please. It was always /v/ celebrity drama about some fucking nobody who slept around and cheated on her equally shitty boyfriend because she was just a bitch. You only managed to trick yourselves and reddit into thinking you actually gave a shit about the integrity of an industry that was always about advertising games.
>>71969091
Yeah, us neckbeards all got together and planned to make the trailer the most hated on YouTube. We then enlisted Rolfe to say he's not going to review it. You got us.
And it's got nothing to do with a really forced marketing strategy. Nope. It was all us neckbeards.
>>71969266
Shill please, you can't bury the truth, or the amount of damage done and people who's power has been marginalized.
>>71969330
m8 I was in the threads where it started. It's time to let it go.
>>71969233
>Leftist propaganda
>>71969229
>PC liberals
Uh oh, the neo-cons are here to make the issue into their binary two dimensional talking points conversation. What a surprise?
If ever you'd learn to understand the world in more than only two sided debates you might be worth discussing actual facts.
>>71969349
Sure you were, and I got moot's autograph 10 years ago.
>>71966244
>It's bad but you should still see it. Thumbs up.
>>71969214
kek you're right
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/08/ghostbusters-remake-not-feminist-black-women
>Three white women play ‘brilliant’ scientists; the black actor is a sassy transport worker. Go figure
>The 2016 reboot has been hailed as a new, feminist Ghostbusters. But praising white women’s access to roles that challenge patriarchy yet simultaneously harm black women through perpetuating racist tropes can only be feminist if the word has no meaning.
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/04/the_new_ghostbusters_and_race_why_it_matters_that_leslie_jones_isnt_playing_one_of_the_scientists/
>Paul Feig's "Ghostbusters" trailer suggests that even in progressive films, toxic Hollywood patterns can endure
>The glimpses of Patty we see in the trailer are reminiscent of decades of tokenization in cinema, which reduces people of color—and specifically black women—to being portrayed as mammies, “Magical Negroes,” and token black friends.
http://www.hypable.com/ghostbusters-reboot-trailer-backlash-leslie-jones/
>“Women aren’t funny!” Nope. “This is pandering to feminazis!” Try again. “It’s a little bit…racist?” Yeah, you might be on to something there.
>there is one big reason to be unhappy with the Ghostbusters trailer: It’s kind of really, incredibly racist.
>>71963739
I rated it a one. Might change after I see it tomorrow.
>>71962147
richard roeper? he's on point without the neoconservative philosophy
>>71969514
Why give them your money?
You know it'll be online by friday morning.
>>71967884
Feminists claim they want equality but what they really want is for men to be their slaves.
>>71969490
Why is anyone still surprised? Feig is a known racist that only cares about white culture
Are the people on this thread being sarcastic or are we being raided?To be fair it's hard to tell on the internet
Regardless of what any critic says, this thing will be forgotten about in a month.
>>71962744
you think 16 of the top critics only wrote negative reviews because they're mysogynists gamergaters? how delusional can you be?
>>71969535
Because me and my gf wanna go make fun of it and I'm genuinely curious to see if there's a large crowd and how they react.
>Inb4 anon has no gf
>>71969490
So stereotyping blacks is okay as long as you're trumpeting up women. What the fuck sort of backwards ass mindset is that?
>>71969394
>Fact: the film's trailers were unappealing due to their crass and frankly unfunny content
Is that unbiased and sophisticated enough for discussion, you fucking intellectual?
>>71963901
that's his point you fucking dipshit. neckbeards whining about women and doing shit like spamming the youtube dislike button gave sony ammo to frame it as a sexist conspiracy. are you retarded?
>>71966694
>a man steals the film completely
whoopsie didn't see that one coming
>>71969541
I think feminists want equalitythough I dont argue some want supremacybut at the same time they have no idea what to do with that equality.
So they sort of keep moving the goalposts
>this summer comedy of a major IP stars all women?
>everyone who dislikes it is a misogynist! Oh.. and uh.. It's racist too!
They've been playing the victim card for so long they wont know what to do without it.
I wouldn't be surprised if in 8 or 9 years we see mass protests in the same vein as BLM but for women.
>Black president elected
>How progressive! Things will really change now!
>Midterm election
>Republican House/Senate
>Things dont change
>Tipping point reached
>Mass protests
>Women president elected
>How progressive! Things will really change now!
>Midterm election
>Republican House/Senate
>Things dont change
>Tipping point reached
>Hmmm.....
>>71969594
If it's making fun of the new ghostbusters and happy it's going to fail. It's people from here.
If it's someone who is saying anything positive about the movie or it's getting press because people are attacking it, then it's either a paid shill from sony or a faggot from Reddit.
>>71969541
Aw Hell Naw, they just be wantin to feel appreechee-8ted, and chit, yo.
Man be all like, dis my world, and fukin it all up, and we wimin b like, hey, geeb me'z a chanze to fix dah shit and acts like I kno wut I dun did wit out yo white honky azz ...sshshshsit...I fahgots what I mean...fuk it.
WIMEN RULE!
>>71963111
That's what Sony wanted. I bet that Sony advertisers went on sited posing as men bashing women in order to make it a success.
>>71969594
We're being raided by redditors upset about their manchild flick having gurls and an ape
>>71954886
>>71969689
>>71969594
Let's not deny the obvious fact that a lot of /v/irgins are on a meme vacation and are baiting hard as fuck
>>71969615
But the people who claim that all the positive reviews are paid for by Sony or are part of a liberal conspiracy are completely sane, right?
You don't need to be right-leaning to have the sense to criticize Feig or his shitty movies. I'm not a conservative either but I understand how fucking ridiculous it is for someone to say "men aren't funny, women are superior in every way possible".
Any sensible person, liberal or conservative, can see this.
>>71969675
I expect he'll be justly crucified once the dust has settled.
>>71969636
You must has selected the wrong anon.
>Brexit
>Nutbusters flops hard
>Trump presidency confirmed
What a lovely year!
>>71965660
>the movie is shut
>but all the girl rule I swear please don't call me a manbaby!
>>71969731
>people who claim that all the positive reviews are paid for by Sony or are part of a liberal conspiracy
Stop strawmaning no one's saying that.
But there's a very real bias from a lot of the positive reviews. It's a simple fact based on how they all wrote articles defending GB'16 or attacking people who dissed it.
http://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/4s6of5/ghostbusters_2016_review_megathread/d573ypg?context=3
>hurrdurr reddit
Yeah they're a bunch of memeing fucks but I'm not copying all that shit here
just pay my reviewers off senpai
>>71969724
Huh, how does Wheaton manage to stick his foot in his mouth every time?
>>71969860
Go back to reddot
You're not welcome on this art board no matter how garbage this movie is
>>71966040
jesus christ why are people praising that mugging for the camera lolsorandum dyke?
>>71969921
And if you'll look to your left you'll see a meme tourist from /v/!
Everyone wave to the /v/irgin!
They try their best to blend into the thread but you can easily tell them apart by their cheeky hook shaped tails used to catch unaware anons.
They survive off of (You)s but if they eat to many they'll get a tummy ache! So let's just give him this one and move on with the tour.
>>71966543
these are more embarrassing than anything. they literally think like children and unironically call others babies
>>71969995
Did you not read the fucking post you piece of pleb shit? I said go home
>>71969688
I think feminists have warped perception of what equality is. They say women should be equal to men, but men are not equal among themselves. Equality shouldn't mean a woman must be allowed to any top man she chooses no matter how little she's qualified.
>>71970063
This is the main problem with the gender pay gap debate.
When they get their "79%" figure that they like to throw around they're averaging all the salaries for all workers.
So naturally it will look like men get paid drastically more than women when you're comparing freelance software developers with kindergarten teachers.
http://www.payscale.com/gender-lifetime-earnings-gap
This infographic breaks it down by profession and shows it's a mostly bogus claim and outlines the reasoning for why there's a difference in the median earnings for men and women
>>71969091
This. It is amazing 4chan never learnt to don't feed the trolls
>>71970288
>implying we don't have another 70 days of summer
>>71970264
Oh boy, those comments are fun.
>teaching is a very stressful job, much stressful than programing, that's why I quit teaching and work as a software developer now
>>71962168
It was men and women getting mad it wasn't a sequel, Sony and retarded women on the Internet screamed mysoginy.
>all these ass blasted grinklegutters
Manbaby is like the SJW equalvalent of cuck.
