>Lucasfags will defend this
It's poetry, you wouldn't understand.
ikr, and like did you know yoda was a fucking puppet in ep5??? smdh these fake ass movies
>c3po the queenbot
>chewbacca the giant sasquatch
>kermit the yoda frog
>Jabba the mafia rapeslug
ALL STAR WARS HAS ALWAYS BEEN RETARDED.
Hayden is such a cool guy.
god dammit i love ewan mcgregor. every time you hear him talk about star wars you can tell he loved it, and here he's the only who seems enthusiastic about it
sure, these fuckers get paid millions, but when I do this in the park they call the cops on me.
The fuck was samwell jackson even doing?
>>64339082
he's been telling the world he's a badass mother fucker for so long that we actually believe he is one.
but he actually fights like a pussy.
Experimental film making
People praise A New Hope for the experimental film making because they liked the film, but deride the prequels for the same shit
baka desu senpai
>reddit filename
>tiny gif converted into webm
>shitposting
>another star wars thread
you really should leave
>>64338890
Don't speak evil of Mac Windu
>>64338963
>>64338920
>comparing practical effects to a bunch of grown men swinging at the air
>>64339176
Being experimental only gains you praise if the result turned out good
>>64338890
Its called technology you luddite. Every sane man will defend this. Now get back to touching yourself listening to Plinkett's heavy breathing.
>>64338909
>it's faggotry
>you wouldn't understand
I sure don't
>>64339176
There wasn't anything experimental about the prequels.
TPM had a big mix of practicals and CGI and it holds up very well still.
Lucas did all CGI sets on the sequels not to save money but to reduce the shoot time. They hold up like shit, all the CGI sets look god awful. They looked awful back then too.
The only thing he experimented with was digital film, and you know what, I'm glad he did. It kicked that industry in the ass to get moving to producing better digital cameras for movies. However, the all CGI sets set the effects industry years back. He basically made it ok for big budget movies to want more and more CGI.
>>64339536
Don't ever fucking reply to me. again.
>>64339603
>They looked awful back then too.
Fucking no?
They only look awful due to the better shit that people are now seeing.
Its like gaming console graphics when people think the current generation's graphics is hot shit only to be trumped by the next one.
>>64338890
i dont even like natalie, but dat midriff
>>64339622
or what
>>64339671
oh you did it now, you replied
>>64339308
...you cant read or...?
>>64338909
>>64339536
>>64339622
>>64339671
>>64339710
>>64339657
>They only look awful due to the better shit that people are now seeing.
>Its like gaming console graphics when people think the current generation's graphics is hot shit only to be trumped by the next one.
No, they looked fucking awful back then. People complained about the digital backdrops, they felt it was uncanny valley in many ways. I remember talking to one of my co-workers about how you could see the actors sliding around when the camera would pan in certain angles.
I was working at the time for a small 3D shop and I had been experimenting with virtual sets in 3DS Max. It was amateur shit, I didn't have camera tracking software. It was far too expensive for our studio and there was no free or open source alternatives back then.
Anyway I remember my co-worker laughing and telling me "holy shit and I thought your shitty comps were bad."
Yes they looked like shit back then, they still do now. I am specifically taking about the virtual set pieces, not talking about all of the CGI in general. I think the chase scene is still well done and that has lasted well, but those virtual sets. Fuck no.
>>64339738
>me too
>>64339812
>No, they looked fucking awful back then
No, they didn't.
>>64339622
You can't even meme correctly.
>WHAT KIND OF BATTLE U WANT PHAM
>just stand in a group and swish your weapons aimlessly in mid air
>SIT BACK AND RELAX WE GOT THIS
>>64339905
I'm guessing you were too young to have been around the internet back then, or too young to remember seeing it when it first came out. Yes people did bitch about those fake backdrops. Just because you were 2 and don't remember shit doesn't mean it didn't happen.
>>64339999
Holy shit, we got a ben quadinaros over here.
>>64339999
FUCK
>>64339999
>>64339999
>>64339999
>>64339999
sup reddit
>>64339999
What have you done!?
>>64339999
HELLO DARKNESS MY OLD QUADS
>>64339999
AYY
>>64339999
THE CONTRACT IS SEALED.
"THE WAY YOU GET ACTORS TO PERFORM AT THEIR BEST IS TO PUT THEM IN FRONT OF A BLUE SCREEN WITH NOTHING TO ACT AGAINST!" - George Lucas
MEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEME
Phantom menace has aged well, technically anyway compared to the others as it was shot on film. Whereas. Attack and revenge were shot on an early digital HD camera
>>64339999
>>64339999
DELET THIS
>>64339999
>>64339603
>There wasn't anything experimental about the prequels.
Jar Jar Binks is literally the first CG character (as opposed to creature) integrated into a live action film.
>>64339999
