>>47459416

Give him a boost early on and he'd be the best martial combatant in the group. Some of those later-level feats are pretty gnarly.

Once you get into high levels though it won't make much of a difference. He can have every single archery-related feat in the CRB but it'll do jack dick for him if he opts to just use a two handed sword all the time. The best it'll do is give him more options.

>>47459416
All fighter feats as in core ones or just all throughout all supplements?

For the first one still shit. They're mostly +1-4's that apply to different things

For supplements you're kind of an insane killing machine that can't be stopped my illusions or any sort of magical protection

>>47459416
I would instead give them the ability to make feats that have a specific weapon choose (Weapon focus/spec) be generalized to weapons they have prof with. So weapon focus beco n es a blank +1 with a fighter versus only long bow for a ranger.

This way if a weapon is randomly rolled is great, but doesn't match the 5 feats he's already spent it's not a faaaaark situation.

Nerf wizards, give them an at will eldrich blast type spell and some other at wills then scale down the SoDs.

A banlist for 3.5 spells honestly helps a lot.

>>47459700
I understood the idea of someone mastering one weapon in particular, but I like the idea of a versatile fighter who mixes up his weapons depending on the situation. Lance things till it breaks then switch to a sword and also be able to grapple with a knife

>>47459416
What did you think about females having
-1 strength
+1 constitution

Was it sexist? Is D&D part of the patriarchy?

>>47459768
Just play 5e if that's what you want. That's basically what you're describing anyway

>>47459824
lol, that is sexist?
Realtalk:

#Men
+1 Constgitution
+1 Intelligence
+1 Strength

#Women
+1 Charisma
+1 Intuition
+ Something to Manipulate People

>>47459700
What the fuck did you just say?

>>47459416


>still be behind a druid
>he has Improved Critical
>he picks a Scimitar as his starting weapon
>he now has the ability to score a crit with a 1d6 weapon if he rolls an 16-20 for x2 damage

>implying he's not completely broken now

>>47459416
Just play 4th ed fighter, and you are gold.

>>47461741

>Broken
>Still has to get within melee range
>LaughingWizardGirls.jpg

>>47461164
>childbirth
>lower constitution
ok

>>47463551
>implying women live through all births unassisted.

>>47463591

He didn't imply that, you just inferred it.

>>47459790
That's what I meant instead of being singular, your fighter just picks and chooses freely expending only one feat versus the 100 you would need. Making them versital asf