I'm trying to amass a collection of easy to print out tokens for my assorted tabletop games.
Please post any good tokens you have found/made.
Preferably the tokens should print out at 30mm.
All genres are welcome.
The creatures in my tokens are Zombies, Ghouls, and Shoggoths, for Call of Cthulhu. (Tokens are mine but not the art)
almost forgot, this is not limited to monsters, player tokens and other humanoids are more than welcome.
>>47177630
Something people might find useful; a way to make tokens:
http://download.rptools.net/zip/tokentool-1.0.b28.zip
Simply drop an image into TokenTool, Choose a border and size, then save the new image (or drag the preview in the corner into the document of your choice). Most frames are 256x256 (acceptable for home printing).
>>47178141
how does one open the program, I may be retarded but all those files are .jars
>>47178519
It's a Java archive. You double click it. Do you not have Java on your machine for some reason?
>>47178141
But why not just use GIMP?
>>47180910
Because many people here are not actually that interested in computers and find programs with complex tools difficult to use. Gimp isn't very user-friendly to use if you have zero experience with it. I use it daily but I understand that 'civilians' have difficulty using powerful programs with hundreds of tools. Same goes for everything from programs to power tools.
>>47180962
and those are the people you want to install vulnerability-ridden java?
>>47180978
To be fair, executing a .jar and enabling the java plugin in your browser are not nearly the same.
>>47181041
yeah but there's still malicious .jars and those kinds of people aren't going to know good from bad
>>47181041
Of the two, the executable is by far the more dangerous.
>>47181111
>>47181158
Well it all depends on whether or not you can trust the source. And on Windows that goes for anything.
>>47180978
I want to believe that people are intelligent enough to know which sources to trust and which programs and scripts to run. I want to. I don't. Yeah, some web-based alternatie would be better but I don't know any which woukd be similary efficient to use.
>>47181341
I might actually make this when I get time,
>>47177630
>>47182980
