>>44454295
*tg

it all blends into one place after a while guys

>>44454295
> tactical
> minis

Pick two OP. Positioning is the bases of tactical combat. You can't theatre of the mind that stuff.

>>44454295
what's cqb?

>non-mini
....so nobody ever moves?

>>44454295
OP I struggle to understand how you expect to have any in-depth tactical combat at all without any sort of table top visual aid. Descriptive narrative will only get you so far. Any game would consist of basically cross-examining court room hearings.

>>44454680
Close quarters battle?

>>44454295
Phoenix Command, which you can find in /hwg/.

Also, Skirmish Sangin for whenever you man the fuck up play a minis game.

>>44458068
>the only thing more convoluted than gurps

>>44454680
what >>44455248 said

as in, nodal combat or outright automated. To simply the paperwork when the emphasis is strategic campaign play involving target selection and force composition

>>44458068
looks interesting, appreciated

>>44459575
Using "zones" would still require tokens of some sort, is what im saying. Anything that reqyires distinction between positions kinda needs a mini

>>44459791
miniatures wargaming is associated with mechanics you know damn well are not associated with "zones"

>>44459915
So are you allowing tokens?

>>44459999
(^:

what I want to avoid are point-based, ruler or hex or grid movement wargames that function primarily in an open environment using squads of miniatures that fight as a unit. Tedious and repetitive

>>44460015
Well there's a lot of options. Too many to give an answer. So with the assumption that you narrowed it down further than that, It just seemed to me that you were disallowing physical representatives of any kind, which would explain your general lack of replies.