So, his ability just shits on Hangarback, right?
>nontoken
well, duh
>>44176675
I'm pretty sure Hangarback Walker is a nontoken creature when it tries to go to the graveyard.
Nm, Hangarback's 'shit out tokens' clause activates at death
>>44176891
Dies requires the creature to hit a graveyard. Kalitas tosses it out halfway there, so they don't get any tokens
>>44176941
And then he turns it into a zombie robot?
>>44176638
Seems like good sideboard tech for the Rally mirror.
>>44176638
>put a zombie on the battlefield
Under who's control?
Shouldn't the card specify that?
>>44177374
No, because the rules specify that whoever puts a token into play is the owner and the controller of said token.
Yes, old cards were worded differently. It changed a couple of years ago.
>>44177374
It's under card controllers control unless specified otherwise.
>>44177374
this shitposter needs to stop
http://deckstats.net/deck-8573676-af46ac997f902845af9aac73b10d31e3.html
What do you guys think about my standard deck?
Was thinking about moving it more towards post-rotation in future.
It has had pretty good match history this far, too bad the sideboard is a piece of shit.
>>44176941
Aww shiggy diggy
>>44176638
Not just hangarback but the Memetuko Rally the Meme deck
it shits on Rally so hard that they HAVE to kill it or lose.
its an aggressive "Anafenza the foremost" in that regard.
even if you simply Languish and kill your board and your opponents the triggers will go on the stack and you'll get a buttload of 2/2's after everything resolves.
VERY powerful Mythic, it pumping itself is just a mana sink afterthought, the real power is "kill spells give me 2/2's!'
a wincondition in a Can, really, just one activation makes him a 5/6 lifelinker that MUST die.
with Innistrad coming this card is going to be worth a lot of fucking money.
also it is a warrior, giving this thing doublestrike is insane.
oh look, his best fucking friend.
Executioner too! also Drana.
hell you can just play B/W warriors with 4 of everything I just said and the usual package and call it day.
every Fleshbag "sac a bloodsoaked" is brutal for your opponent.
So does he stop enemy scions from generating mana too?
>>44184009
those are tokens.
>>44184009
even if his ability worked it wouldnt, you get the mana for the sacrifice itself, it doesn't matter where it would go.
>>44184092
So he doesn't prevent sacrifice abilities but does prevent death triggers.
Is that correct?
>>44184130
yes, its exactly like Anafenza the Foremost and cards like it.
the card never hits the graveyard and never "dies" so you can't get triggers like Zulaport Cutthroat.
it hoses that deck entirely, and is a fairly powerful wincondition.
>>44184184
radical
>>44184184
Neat. There are so much ally shitters at my LGS
>>44183631
Eh, I'd prefer to run his better cousin.
>>44176638
Is mono black a thing again?
>22 Swamp
>2 Blighted Fen
>4 Transgress the Mind
>4 Duress
>4 Ruinous Path
>4 Languish/Crux of Fate
>4 Mardu Strike Leader
>8 Fleshbags
>3 Palace Siege
>3 Kalitas
>2 Ob Nixilis
Seems like a great control deck with two pushed token-makers.
>>44185920
>8 fleshbags
>>44188454
2 balls per ballsack marauder?
>>44188454
Merciless Executioner is just "Fleshbag 5-8"
>>44177374
I am not sure why this one has confused people so much. I have seen people who have played for years look at this card and ask the exact same question. You get the token unless otherwise specifies. It has always been this way, every single token producer is worded in the exact same way.
It helps if you whisper the token mantra to yourself:
You get the token, you always get the token, you have always gotten the token, you will always get the token.
>>44185650
Only one of those is in standard, though.
>>44190005
Pretty sure it's just a recurrent shitposter at this point.
>>44176638
I can't wait to put this guy in my black White warriors deck :^)
>>44193002
Mah warrior bro. What gets taken out though?
>>44193002
B/W warriors is tier 1, it is top 16'ing alot and got 2nd at a GP in Japan.
its just not run because people would rather sleeve up Abzan because its more consistant and cruise controls to victory without a thought.
>>44193372
>>44193002
also I responded because I know you were being a facitious little shit.
>>44193343
it becomes a whole new deck, pretty much.
28 Creatures
2x Mardu Woe Reaper
4x Bloodsoaked Champions
4x Chief of the Edge
3x Wasteland Strangler
3x Arrashin Cleric
4x Fleshbag Maruader
4x Merciless Executioner
4x Kalitas Traitor of Ghet
4x Silk Wrap
3x Stasis Snare
2x Valorous stance
23 Lands
>>44193430
also Risen Executioner fits in there too.
>>44176638
so.. with 1 pump and then a languish I can get an army of 2/2's
>>44193653
Yes, This goy is totes value.
So is return to Innistrad confirmed?I want a new plane after Battle for Rehash ;_;
>>44195121
Yes
>>44195121
Can wait for them to ruin Innistrad like they have every other revisit.
>>44195121
Yea the next set after oath is gonna return is innastrad
>>44195255
Has WOTC ever pulled off a good revisit yet?
>>44195751
RTR
>>44195751
well I enjoyed New Phyrexia...
>>44195810
Gotta agree with this.
>>44195751
Time Spiral
>>44195806
Sincerely hope that's a joke.
>>44195751
Pretty much every block on Dominaria
>>44198835
half of them were shit and added stuff to the game that boggles the mind like Tinker and Yawgmoth's Will.
