Richt at Miami
Sabans bitch at Georgia
>>63961257
wait whose at UGA?
also I hope mario cristobal gets a head coaching job somewhere. he was good
>>63961257
What? Ohio state is not your rival. Fuck off you clingy child. We are only rivals with Michigan, and vice versa.
You shouldn't have beat Michigan. We destroyed Michigan. We played a historically bad game and poor playcalling allowed you to have a fluke win and beat us on a field goal.
Other examples of HOW FUCKING LUCKY sparty has been all year? Rutgers spiking on fourth? Almost losing to fucking purdue? Indiana keeping it close?
Ohio State is objectively a better team and you know it shitposters. Academically, we're superior too.
Have fun getting btfo by Iowa and tOSU sneaking into that fourth spot.
>people actually think Michigan State has a chance against Iowa
>>63961270
Kirby Smart
*****THREADLY REMINDERS****
>There is literally nothing wrong with Taylor Martinez
>Gayker Gayfield is a Kliff Babby.
>Vincent Testeverde is a Kliff Babby
Bama. (11-1)
2. Oklahoma (11-1)
3. Iowa (12-0)
4. Clempson (Very insecure about their school and their ranking btw) (12-0)
5. Northwest Missouri St. (12-0)
6. Jacksonville State Gamecocks (10-1)
7. Harvard (9-1)
8. Slippery Rock (12-1)
9. Houston (11-1)
10. aOSU (11-1)
>>63961297
shitpost desu
Top Four Dec 7th edition:
1) Oklahoma
2) Michigan State
3) tOSU
4) UNC
repost:
We keep talking about doomsday scenios
Bama losing, Clemson losing. For either Clemson or Michigan State to lose wouldn't surprise me in the least, but what would Florida need to do to even beat Bama? Florida's defense is actually pretty good IMO, so could its offense run on some successful/lucky meme plays? (trick plays, shots down the field, hail marys)?
>>63961297
>8. Slippery Rock (12-1)
>>63951991
>miami
>clemson,florida(fuck bama), michigan state
>i only browse /sp/
>>63961310
Repost too then:
Stop Derrick Henry and no turnover in offense.
desu I don't see Florida winning that game in any scenario.
>tfw 5-7 teams will be in bowls this year
>>63961310
>so could its offense run on some successful/lucky meme plays?
Cowherd was talking about this yesterday. He admitted Alabama's front 7 is incredible, but that their efficiency numbers are likely highly inflated by the fact that almost every SEC team has a shit offense. Assuming UF doesn't run the ball 20 times because their run game is shit (>but muh kelvin taylor preseason heisman darkhorse) they could sneak in a couple big-gain plays in their passing game. Yes, their pass offense is shit also, but I'm willing to be McElwain takes a lot of risks on offense this game.
>>63961308
Maybe, but muh rankings are a meme.
I throw teams in at the bottom with the eye test, and teams can only move up by someone in front of them losing ("The whole point of the selection committee was to replace the simplistic horse-race nature of Top 25 polls — where teams only move up if someone above them loses" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_Playoff#Voting_procedure)
But of course, there is a "Game of the week flex" where I can put any team two spots behind another and call it "the game of the week"(Like the CFP with LSU and Bama)
I have mastered the best aspects of polls for my poll, and thus created the only true poll.
Reminder that UCF won 0 (zero) games this season
>>63961327
repost2: >no turnover on offense
Even then Florida would really have to meme hard to even score, they might as well through interceptions and get the game overwith cause they are going 3 and out every drive
>>63961393
Actually they cant "won 0" since it's a past tense of win and they'd have to do that first.
HOLY FUCK I JUST HEARD
WHY WOULD YOU HIRE HIM, MIAMI
WHAT WENT WRONG
WHAT THE FUCK WENT WRONG
Reminder that UCF lost 12 (twelve) games this season which is equal to the amount of games they played
>yfw your mascot will never be this comfy
how mad would aOSU fans be if the loser of the big10CCG gets the Rose Bowl bid?
>>63961468
damn,
/comfyasfuck/
You have been visited by the comfy pupper of blue blood football programs, National Championships and Good Recruits will come to your team but only if you say, "stay comfy Smokey".
>>63961573
>implying i'd relegate myself to the 2nd tier of historic schools
lel tennessee fans this delusional
>>63961365
Florida is gonna need to score 30 to beat bama. It's not happening.
>>63961393
Absolutely depressing year, but finally #FireOLeary and lots of experience for young players. UCF should be a 9-10 win team again by Frost's 2nd year.
>>63961594
>Looks like someone is not going to get Nattys or good recruits.
>>63961573
stay comfy Smokey
>>63961573
stay comfy Smokey
Smokey better bring me some heismans; fuck nattys.
Shits is for Ivys.
>>63961573
>Tennessee blue blood
>>63961675
>seriously do you people not want your Natty's and recruits
Will Wisconsin ever win a national championship? Not necessarily within our lifetime, but at some point within say the next 1000 years, assuming humanity survives and Bernie doesn't ban concussionball.
>>63961573
>Tennessee
>blue blood
pick one
>>63961714
they can win fcs championship if they take the gamble
>>63961723
>looks like someone is not getting those Natties and Recruits.
baka desu senpai
>>63961714
Will Alabama have figured out how to clone Saban?
>>63961714
Will a team that's half white guys ever be good enough to win a title?
>>63961742
But then everyone will just clone Kliff?
>>63961747
Depends on what position the white guys are playing. Offensive line. Tight end. Slot. QB. D-line. Linebacker. Safety.
Corners and wideouts is about all the niggers really have claim to.
>>63961573
>Tennessee
>blueblood
>>63961768
i would be ok with a an army of Kliff clones
>>63961773
>Corners and wideouts is about all the niggers really have claim to
don't forget RBs
>>63961747
They almost won it in basketball last year with a bunch of white guys so who knows.
>>63961781
>Michigan
>blue blood
>>63961786
>Implying Christian McCaffery isn't the great white hope
>>63961781
It's a meme, don't worry. Tennessee fans know they aren't bluebloods.
>>63961797
>implying we aren't blooestblood
>>63961784
Imagine how many Nicolas Sparks movies they would film with them in the offseason....................................
>>63961714
If Joel Stave isn't an incompetent cunt, and they beat Iowa and Northwestern (Like they should have,) they're playing for a playoff spot this weekend.
This shit coach is making $3.1 million a year and basically you're fucking stupid
>>63961805
>last national championship was 1948
>blue blood
kek
>>63961813
Thats funny because its the same amount your mother made this year sucking dick.
>>63961573
>25 in the nation
>8 Wins and 4 Losses
But muh quality losses
>>63961805
Im sorry, you seem to have mi-staked Mishitgan for Princeton
>>63961813
Well who the fuck else is gonna beat Saban?
Les gets 5+ mil to lose to Saban every year
>>63961813
don't forget he is probably getting more pussy than half the team
>>63961820
Hey man if my mom was making $3.1 million a year sucking dick I think I'd be out there sucking right along side her man, that's good money
>>63961817
>1973
>1997
>>63961825
She only charges 5 dollars.
>>63961822
Has Kliff beat Bama?
>>63961830
He was OC and playcaller at A&M when they beat them in.... 2012.
It's why he gets 3 mil a year.
>>63961297
Slippery Rock Alum reporting in.
Thanks for the lofty ranking, Giggs, but you have to realize SRU is doomed to be mediocre forever. We'll lose in the Elite Division II Football Eight for sure.
>tfw I don't care that I'm quoting a post from all the way at the top of the thread, my tiny, stupid named school got a mention
>>63961573
stay comfy Smokey
>>63961812
Two plays away from being in the Big Ten title. We'd be btfo'd by any team in the playoff though desu senpai.
>>63961827
>>1973
>implying that Nebraska weren't the true national champs in 97
>>63961842
hello slippery rock.
>>63961828
So 620,000 dicks
Now when I've sucked a dick, the guy usually cums in under 1 minute. Let's say the average suck lasts 45 seconds or so. 45*620,000 = 27,900,000 seconds, which is equal to 465,000 minutes which is equal to 7750 hours which is equal to about 322 days worth of sucking dick. Now I either need to get guys to cum a lot faster or maybe suck more than one at once.
>>63961842
I'm sorry but yeah.
Northwest Missouri is going to Murder everyone in D2. Except maybe CSU Pueblo.
They're FCS tier.
>>63961856
I-is Slippery Rock a troo blooblod now?
>>63961827
Weren't there like 5 undefeated teams in 1973? Didn't Nebraska have the better resume in 1997?
>>63961827
>1973
Bama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, and Penn State all have more of a claim to 1973 than Michigan
Tennessee... More like Whenessee your mom I'm gonna give her my Smokey.
>>63961849
I feel like their defense could keep them in any game, but Stave and a bunch of young RBs coupled with health issues on the O-Line means we wouldn't be able to score much.
>>63961857
>maybe suck more than one at once.
you'd have to ask his mom
Clemsoning isn't a real thing
Will Texas Tech ever succeed with the Air Raid offense?
>>63961863
>tfw I had a prof who went to Northwest Missouri for his undergrad
Dude will be hype if it's SRU/NWMSU
But yeah, we're pretty much fucked. Shepard has blown >us out within the last few years.
>>63961898
Until they blow it and the rest of the country hates Clemson for letting OSU back into the playoff.
>>63961905
This is the Rocks year.....
To lose in the Final 4
>>63961891
We're always just a few steps away from really breaking into the next echelon. The three very close Rose Bowl losses, the two hail marys the season we had Russel, the meme ass endings to ASU and Northwestern. Always feels like luck just doesn't away towards Wisconsin like it did in the 90's. The key components are there: fantastic defense, young offense with some room for growth, a new head coach. Seems like we'll just continue to be stuck in an 8 or 9 win range. I've come to accept this, and can sleep well at night knowing that Wisconsin is consistently bowl eligible and competing for the Big Ten West despite a storm of coaching changes in the last few years. I wish we could reach for more, but I'm content with the state of the program. It's odd how schools like Georgia and Nebraska absolutely hate being just good.
>>63961922
Thanks for the confidence :^)
>>63961902
They already did.
Leach invented the white manlet slot receiver position that the Patriots use to win superb-owls.
>>63961915
if Clemson loses UNC would get in
>>63961403
Their Qb sucks (don't remember his name) and their running game is meh.
As you said I thune we gonna see a lot of 3 and out
>>63961932
I feel ya. It's nice being able to pencil in the Badgers in for a good bowl and at least a 5-6 seed in the tournament every year. Most schools don't get that.
>>63961869
1973 had 4 undefeated teams: Notre Dame, Ohio State, Michigan, and Oklahoma. Oklahoma tied a 2-loss USC and didn't play any other elite teams that year so they're out. Ohio State and Michigan played to a tie, but the general consensus was that Michigan would go to the Rose Bowl because they largely outplayed aOSU but missed two chipshot FGs and arguably fielded the greatest defense ever at the time. And for people who will say I'm only claiming that because I'm a Michigan homer - I guess Woody Hayes was a Michigan homer as well. MSU voting for aOSU to go to the Rose Bowl because they were coupled with the fact that the "No Repeat Rule" was conveniently lifted the season prior led to aOSU being chosen instead.
As for 1997, just no. Nebraska played 4 ranked teams, Michigan played 7. Michigan also dominated Nebraska in terms of common opponents (+59 point differential opposed to +31). Let's not ignore the fact that Nebraska also played 2-9 Akron and 5-6 UCF that year while Michigan played only P5 teams. So no, Nebraska absolutely did not have the better resume. All of that being said, I'm still fine with Cornhuskers unironically claiming a shared title for 97 because the fact is they were undefeated - it's just non-Cornhuskers trying to meme Michigan out of a championship despite the fact they objectively had a much better resume any way you look at it.
>>63961936
That doesn't help Tech.
No matter how crazy this weekend is, there is literally NO WAY that Ohio State gets into the playoff. The winner of Iowa/MSU gets in. Oklahoma is a lock. If Alabama and Clemson were to lose, Stanford and UNC would take their places in the top 4. Period, end of story. Ohio State has looked good for 1 (one) game this ENTIRE season, and completely dropped the hall the second they played a competent team in Michigan State.
Roll tide.
>>63961976
I think we have different definitions of success.
>>63961939
Haha. You think they're putting in the Tar Holes over a blueblood? I wish.
>mfw Alabama wins out and wins its 4th national title in 7 years
>>63961877
Notre Dame maybe. I'm not unironically claiming 1973, mostly just doing it to shiver anons timbers. In a serious conversation I'd never say Michigan got a title in '73, but I do think they rightfully deserve it more than any other team besides possibly ND.
>>63961994
Roll tide.
>>63961989
1 loss ACC champ > 1 loss non-conference champ
>>63961970
Not to mention that UCF team( in its second year at FBS) was winning at halftime. Sorry, have to see the positives where I can...
>>63962012
They lost to the Citadel.
>>63961994
>mfw Oklahoma BTFOs Alabama yet again and Stoops reminds everyone that the SEC is overrated
>>63961981
Stanford loses, Florida pulls the upset, and UNC squeaks by Clemson. Ohio State doesn't get left out in that scenario.
>>63962017
Jesus man you actually read all of that what the fuck is wrong with you?
Thread reminder of the official guide to who gets in the playoff
>>63960226
>>63960226
>>63960226
>>63962050
Well, I went to UCF, for starters...
>>63961981
you're assuming that Stanford wins
>>63962056
Oh. Condolences on your season, m8.
>>63962050
it's not a lot of writing
>Mason Rudolph out for the year
Welp.
It was fun the time it last.
>>63962129
That bowling green faggot will win the Sammy baugh trophy
s m h t b h f a m
>>63962129
Can I ask how you came to be an OSU fan in France?
>>63962104
>reading any post longer than a couple sentences
shaka
>>63962174
His sister is smashing some guy that goes to OKST
>>63962174
do you even /cfb/??? everyone here knows his story breh (his sister is there).
>>63962249
Man I normally stick to /nfl/
Anyway Roll Tide
t. dad is an alum
>>63962174
his sister is getting Pistol Pete's Pistol.
Guy I know you're just a bunch of shitposting tripfags here to meme around like your shit teams.
But the U is back.
Testeverde will take the Heisman and bring them to a natty that they can be embarrassed in.
>>63962024
>mfw
Is there any non Clemson, Bama, or MSU/Iowa fans that don't want OU to win? You know this is the swaggest team in the nation right senpai?
>>63962275
reminder that the U has no alumni and no stadium and will never be good again
>>63962302
HAHA COOL MEME.
PUT YOUR TRIP BACK ON XD
>>63962288
I am a tOSU fan and I want to see a B1G team win because they are most similar to OSU in culture
>rooting for your rivals!!!!
I don't see any team in the B1G as a rival because OSU's program is clearly on another level above them all. I see them all as pals and hope they do well; it helps OSU's cred indirectly next year as well.
Except UM obviously. Would not want to see them win anything worth bragging about, ever, because they are obnoxious
>>63962174
Like everybody said my sister doing a Ph.D
>>63962024
>>63962288
>>63962328
I'm an OU fan and I'm kind of the same way but not really. Fuck every other team and fuck every other conference. It's all about OU.
I'd prefer other blue bloods winning over Big 12 conference people just because if OU wins 11 games more often than not we going to be right in thick of the nattie conversation regardless of how strong the conference is.
It'd be nice for Texas to be competitive again. If OU doesn't win I think I'd be OK with Clemson winning.
My uncle bet $1000 awhile ago betting on MSU to win the natty.
How retarded was he?
>>63962332
Wow, I didn't know her boyfriend was such a smart guy.
>>63962320
what trip do you think I am? I don't trip
I just don't see why Miami should expect anything more than a team like Boston College or Northwestern or Vanderbilt would. Miami is a small private school. It plays in a stadium an hour from campus to half-full crowds. It's not a sleeping giant; it was an overachiever.
>>63962332
That's cool man, what subject?
>>63961270
I would be shocked if Saban let Cristobal go any time soon. By all accounts he is the best recruiter in the country and maybe the best OL coach as well.
>>63962359
So how does that stop Testeverde from taking them to a natty?
>>63962370
Actually feel free not to answer that, I guess it would be easy for a dedicated person to find her identity using that info
>>63962353
Not retarded at all
>>63962379
Haha yeah ;)
Well there are not a lot of french there tough.
>>63962373
Fuck it I guess it doesn't.
In general they will get second-tier coaches, but I guess you could strike a good one and win anyway.
>tfw Iowa fan
>tfw up at 2:30 am thinking about MSU game
>still wishing we were playing OSU
Mich State has a better defense and Iowa [spoiler]even though any other Hawkeye fan will tell you different[/spoiler] has had a softball schedule all year.
I just don't want them to lose in such a spectacular fashion. Everyone's been hyping Iowa up as a good team but I just see it all falling apart like any incompetent Ferentz team.
I just don't want to suffer one more year after getting my hopes up.
I refuse to get my hopes up.
Hope is dead.
>>63962401
haha fuck me spoilers don't work on a board where spoilers don't matter
guess i'll go watch the corn rise or some shit Iowa people do
>>63962394
Well there's probably enough to make it hard enough without any specifications
I'm at UCLA and there's a ton of kids from Europe and Australia
>>63962358
>>63962347
baylor and tcu get high rankings just so they can justify putting oklahoma in a big game. same works for bama. ohio state. usc. notre dame. it always goes in favor of the big names.
Thing is. Every team in their conference gets a shot at fucking ruining the other teams year. And it happens. A lot. That's why college football is great.
Roll Tide. See you in the national championship Sooners.
who /insomnia/ here?
>>63962592
>he's not blitzed listening to Big Krit waiting to shitpost bout how the Tide is going to Roll.
I hate it for you bro.
Have some tunes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryJuzQwnhVA
>>63962592
>tfw class in 3 hours
>tfw still havent slept a wink
>>63962592
>mfw Thermodynamics, Fluid Dynamics, Environmental Engineering II, Statistics for Engineers, Intro to IR finals next week
Been up since 11:45 PM just laying in bed 2bh
Working on my CFB East/West All-Millenium Teams, here's what I've got so far.
>EAST
QBs: Cam Newton, Tim Tebow, Jameis Winston
TBs: Mark Ingram, DeAngelo Williams, Willis McGahee, Ray Rice
KR: C.J. Spiller
PR: Devin Hester
>WEST
QBs: Marcus Mariota, Andrew Luck, Colin Kaepernick
TBs: Adrian Peterson, Reggie Bush, Darren McFadden, LaMichael James
KR: Justin Gilbert
PR: Maurice Drew
Thoughts?
>>63962604
>listens to hip hop
>bandwagons a school he has never attended
Fucking hell.
>>63962775
>Intro to Interracial
das it mayne
>>63962778
Also,
East HC: Nick Saban
West HC: Pete Carroll
>>63962592
>Have classes at 9am every day of the week
>Have to wake up at 8am to get ready for them
>LITERALLY have not fallen asleep before 4am for the past 3 months
>>63961280
They want to believe so hard.....
>>63961747
See:Iowa.
Bama is statistically the best team this season.
Reminder that tOSU has no chance unless TWO of Bama, Stanford, or Clemson lose
>>63963352
>Iowa
>Good enough to win a title
>literally 0 quality wins in like 10 years
>>63961468
>>yfw your mascot will never be this comfy
can't be as comfy as bevo right now
So if UNC beats Clempson by less than a touchdown, and nothing weird happens in the other CCGs (Bama wins, Stanford wins), who gets the last spot?
>12-1 UNC
>One shit loss (SCAR) and one of the best wins in all of cfb (Clemson). Won its conference. Currently ranked #10
>12-1 Clemson
>Wins over 2 top-10 teams (ND, FSU), with an extremely late but respectable loss. Conference runner-up and would obviously drop from #1.
>12-1 Ohio State
>One decent win (Michigan) and one respectable loss (MSU), but didn't even win its own division. Doesn't play again but is currently ranked #6
>10-2 Stanford
>Forgivable losses to Top-20 teams (Northwestern, Oregon), 2 wins over then-Top-6 teams (#6 USC, #6 ND) and a dominant UCLA win. Conference champion currently ranked #7
>>63963801
*11-2 for Stanford. Too damn early to be writing that up desu
>>63963801
Clemson, UNC, or Stanford are all arguable. tOSU is not
>>63963801
1. Bama
2. MSU/Iowa
3. OU
4. Stanford
5. Clemson
6/7. UNC/OSU interchangeable
>>63963801
1. Bama
2. B10 winner
3. Oklahoma
4. UNC
5. Stanford
6. Clemson
7. Ohio State
8. B10 loser
>>63961308
Zero problems with this. Oklahomo bootyblasts UNCheat, then Ohio State plays Sparty with a competent offensive game-plan and wins, setting up a based blueblood natty that will be repeated next season
>>63963801
Either Stanford, or Clemson.
>>63963801
>Oregon and NU
>forgivable losses
>counting USC as a big win
>forgetting that Wazzu should've beat them
>UCLA
Same faggots that slam all of Bama's wins and their 1 loss to a good team.
>>63963851
>Oklahoma
>still a blueblood
It's taken a meme QB and offense in a conference where their biggest opposition was injured and they still almost lost to a mediocre TCU. And they still lose to Texas. Absolutely no shot.
>>63962347
>If OU doesn't win I think I'd be OK with Clemson winning.
no fuck them. fuck venables for coasting at OU.
Why do people still use the blueblood term? People only spout it when their historically successful team is currently shit to make themselves feel better about the fact that their team is no longer relevant.
It's just as bad as bottom feeders like Mizzou and Ass to mouth spouting SEC SEC even whenm
>>63963903
even when they are like 2-10*
>>63963859
I'm just laying out everything the committee would be looking at. Beating a USC team that was highly overrated at the time shouldn't be a great win, but the box score will say they beat a 6th ranked team.
Also, losing to the #14 and #16 teams in the country ARE forgivable losses to me at least.
>>63961805
>clinging to the half of a natty you won in 97 as your only natty in over 60 years
>have had 4 different head coaches since 2000
>have only won the 3 conference championships since 2000 (none since 2004)
>have yet to appear in a B1G conference championship
>lost 7 of last 8 to "little brother" rival
>have only beaten your main rival 3 times in this millennium in game that is supposed to be the greatest rivalry in all of sports
>only three Heismans
Nebraska tier desu
>>63962852
Have you ever tried melatonin or anything else?
>>63961970
It's not like if UM was chosen to go to the Rose Bowl, they would have been selected as national champs. Ohio State blew the fuck out of USC, and the AP and coaches still voted in Notre Dame and Alabama respectively. They both played in the Sugar bowl, and I believe they were both undefeated, making that a true title game. Notre Dame would go on to win the game take AP #1, while Alabama would be selected coaches poll #1 before the game, giving them a natty* to add to their current total of 15* natties.
>>63962024
I would be fine with Oklahoma winning another natty. They haven't been quite relevant since 2000, and have only been known for choking. I like Bob Stoops, and winning it all this season will put to bed the talk of him leaving. Plus, it sets up for a really good match-up next season, when the two previous CFP national champions line up to play each other.
>>63963903
its an epic meme to keep certain fanbases paying attention
>>63962054
Clemson wont get a spot if they lose. I don't think the committee would let a team stay in the playoffs after losing their last game. If they were to ever happen, I would think humbers 3-4 would all have to lose to teams ranked outside of the top ten
>>63964005
sorry. meant to say 2-4, not 3-4
>>63961970
nebraska had a top 5 offense and defense
michigan had a top 5 d and an average offense
it's not like that would have been an easy win and michigan got shafted
>>63964005
>I don't think the committee would let a team stay in the playoffs after losing their last game
This isnt the BCS era anymore. The Committee has said multiple times its a body of work. If just clemson loses they wont stay in, but they get in if Bama AND Stanford also loses with UNC at 3 and Clemson 4.
>>63963903
I call my team a blueblood, but we've won the national championship in the past 11 months
>>63964126
UNC would have 1 (one) more win than OSU, 1 (one) better win than OSU (vs 1 instead of 15), and 1 (one) conference championship (instead of 0)
Clemson would have 2 (two) better wins than OSU (vs 8 and 9 instead of 15), and 1 (one) more overall win, with a tougher SOS
Please explain using objective facts how OSU has a better resume than either of those two.
>>63964150
>UNCheat
>two fcs schools
>losing to SCar
>playing in the ACC Coastal
>Clempson
>Participation trophy
>two teams from the worst conference into the playoffs rather than two teams from the bet conference
>>63964212
oh so youre just a conference troll, which literally does not matter anymore in the playoff era
>>63964150
better loss than UNC
better SOS overall
pass the eye test way better than UNC
both teams dominated illinois, but tOSU didn't go to OT with fucking Va Tech.
the committee KNOWS UNC will be blown out in the semi finals, and KNOWS tOSU will make it to the championship game.
they already made the mistake of letting the ACC champ in last season just to get exposed.
Also they're ranked 10. You're fucking retarded if you think a conf championship will let them jump 6 fucking spots lol
>>63964380
oh god muh better loss. my sides when kekeyes have to rely on this
Even giving your argument any credence, Clemson still has a better resume with a better SOS
>>63964450
I'm going to be laughing when Ohio State squeaks in after Clemson loses to UNCheat and repeats. I /cfb/'s assessment will eb the sorest ever recorded in history.
>>63962333
i want to be like number 34 when i grow up
>>63964487
I still think OSU needs a Stanford loss this weekend, too, before they sneak in anywhere
>>63962399
not saying miami is a blueblood by any stretch but it's unique in the sense that it is a complete bandwagon school
when/if miami is ever as dominant again as it used to be, it'll be just like the 80s and 90s
every kid wanted to play there
every coach wanted to coach there
every person in south florida wanted to be near it
the program and the city has that allure. richt is a step in the right direction, because with him the school should be perennial ACC contenders and backdoor playoff candidates once every 2-4 years. but he won't take them back to the jimmy johnson era.
in a sense i disagree that miami isn't a sleeping giant because the talent in south florida is enough to create a ridiculously good college football team. if richt harnesses that recruiting potential they will be a 10 win team every single year.
but you're going to need a coach like johnson after richt to start being a stupidly dominant school again. i don't think richt will get it there.
but i'd just take an acc championship at this point
>>63964487
ohio state can't get in without both clemson and alabama losing
>>63961333
>>63963933
Michigan fans most delusional fans in cfb.
>>63964784
Who would get in over them if Bama and Stanford both lost?
>>63962288
Go all the way, soonerbro. You're the real GOAT team, it's time you made than unarguable again.
>Iowa's strength of schedule rank:60
>S-i-x-t-y
>theres 128 FBS teams
Are there people retard enough to believe that if Clemson loses by say 1-3 points. That Clemson will still get the fourth spot assuming Stanford lose as well.
UNC Will not getting into the Playoffs, unless the committee wants to give Bama a bye week.
>>63964849
well bama and stanford then, whatever
point is ohio state can't get in without two non-big 10 teams losing, and one of those teams virtually must be alabama
>>63964910
>8 big ten games
found the problem.
>Iowa's only major motor race is the Iowa CORN Indy 300
>The race is literally sponsored by corn
>halfway through the race every year they bring the President of the Iowa Corn Growers' Association (literally the President of Corn) into the commentary box to talk on live TV about how great corn is for like 30 minutes
Like god damn I get that your state is literally in the middle of fucking nowhere but dont you have anything else?
>SCAR to officially interview Muschamp
Jesus, do people never learn?
>>63965018
who else would take that job
even steve spurrier couldn't win there
>>63965014
Sounds like a comfy state 2bh family
>>63964994
>Big Ten has a total of 5 teams ranked teams
>three of them are in the top ten
>only conference that could possibly put two teams into the playoffs
Weak b8.
>>63965169
>muh sec bias
choosy aren't we
>>63965169
Why does the south constantly get btfo by the north?
>>63965305
are you referring to the 9 years in a row the south won the national championship in the 2000s-2010s?
>>63965377
>are you referring to the 9 years in a row the south was given the national championship through media bias in the 2000s-2010s?
ftfy
>>63961970
>As for 1997, just no. Nebraska played 4 ranked teams, Michigan played 7. Michigan also dominated Nebraska in terms of common opponents (+59 point differential opposed to +31). Let's not ignore the fact that Nebraska also played 2-9 Akron and 5-6 UCF that year while Michigan played only P5 teams. So no, Nebraska absolutely did not have the better resume. All of that being said, I'm still fine with Cornhuskers unironically claiming a shared title for 97 because the fact is they were undefeated - it's just non-Cornhuskers trying to meme Michigan out of a championship despite the fact they objectively had a much better resume any way you look at it.
http://www.tiptop25.com/fixing1997.html
>Just no.
>>63965169
>only conference that could possibly put three teams into the playoffs
ftfy
>>63965527
>being this obsessed
Get over it, you lost
>>63965532
How? That would mean the loser of the B1GCG would either have to move up after a loss or not drop at all
YFW the only conference that could actually get two teams in is the ACC
LOL
O
L
SOS is bullshit honestly.
>team A beats 12 6-6 teams
>team B beats 6 11-1 teams and 6 1-11 teams
I know those wouldn't be exactly equal SOS but the point is RELEVANT games are what matters, not whether you played Hawaii or the Richmond Spiders for your OOC.
And by that measure, Iowa's schedule is damn weak, Alabama's is weaker, Ohio State's is average (with a loss to their most relevant opponent), Clemson's is good, Michigan State's and Oklahoma's is excellent
>>63965553
You played three ranked teams, they played five.
You played one top 10 team that you beat by 5, they played two that they beat by 25 and 30.
>>63965553
>>63965693
Also I'm not that guy, nor do I care about either of these teams, nor do I wish the championship had been unanimous one way or the other since both teams had great seasons. But claiming Michigan had a better case is objectively false.
>>63963851
You're right, it'll be a blue blood natty, but it'll be OU-Bama.
>>63963873
With all this salt you must live in Utah.
>>63965741
The only top 5 team alabama can beat is iowa.
>>63961333
I'll take it
>>63965693
We played 7, they played 4.
>>63965737
It's objectively true. More ranked teams, better against common opponents, didn't played 2-9 Akron and 5-6 UCF one year removed from FCS.
>>63961290
>hiring a recruiter to be your head coach
Have fun with your underachieving 5 stars.
>>63961714
The playoff certainly makes it much more likely.
What respectable programs still dont have a champinoship? Other than Oregon (respectable isnt a high bar here)
>>63965829
Define respectable
>>63965849
realistic shot at a conference title in the next few years
>>63965473
>there are people young enough that they don't remember Ohio State and Oklahoma getting blown out
>claim it was handed to the SEC
Okay. Ohio State got exceptional play from a retarded 3rd stringer for 3 games last year.
>>63965829
>any program that isn't a blueblood or Tennessee/PSU/Miami
>respectable
Nope
>>63965772
It'll be
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. Iowa
4. Oklahoma
Bama beats Iowa, OU gets the revenge kill against Clemson.
OU continues cukcing Bama and improves to 4-1 against them.
>>63965899
>MUH 11 TITLES BEFORE 1950
List of most based college football programs
1.) Michigan State University
1A.) Mississippi State University
1Alpha.) Washington State University
>unironically thinking USC isn't beating Stanford and sneaking in a Roseb Owl win, becoming the greatest ever four loss team
>>63965829
are you talking about strictly a football school? because i don't think there are any strictly football schools that haven't won at least one outside of oregon that can be called "respectable".
oregon is a meme program anyway so its arguable as to whether or not they're "respectable"
>>63965829
Michigan :^)
>>63965978
>be objective college football fan
>see this post
>go look up michigan's titles
>they have one championship in the last 70 years
>it's not even undisputed
>mfw
next edition needs to be ask the bottle edition
daily reminder the big 10 football conference has 1 (one) legitimate national championship in the last 29 years
>>63965957
>USC
>Tumblr file name
>gay picture
Adds up
DAILY REMINDER "P5" "FOOTBALL" HAS 0 LEGITIMATE NATTYS
>>63965018
I do love me some free wins.
Daily reminder that bama is objectively the best team in the nation right now, and therefore underrated at second best.
>>63966114
>>63965018
>city of south carolina
I just hope they dont have to play georgia southern anytime soon
>>63965018
Could they get anybody better?
I highly doubt it
when will the t.b.h meme end tee bee aytch famb?
>>63966130
hire mario christobal. he is a good recruiter.
>>63961325
>miami
AYYYYY bro were going to be so dominant in a year or 2
>>63966138
saban wouldn't let him even talk to miami
why the fuck would he let him go inside the conference
>>63961419
shouldve been butch but im happy with this hire as well
>>63966165
miami was paying sec money. He would have talked to miami regardless of what the cunt satan says.
I just think they want the proven guy. bama cant keep a recruiter like that for long.
>>63966173
I hope someone hires him. proven coach and recruiter.
>>63966130
Bo Pelini, maybe? Muschamp is a confirmed potato and it's mind-boggling that SCar wants to give him a shot.
>brb, kill Florida after the momentum Tebow and Meyer gave them
>brb, Auburn was supposed to be the best team in the SEC but he turned their defense into wet tissue paper
>>63965829
By that definition, I would say Wisconsin, Texas A&M, Virginia Tech, and West Virginia
>>63966207
>will muschamp, defensive guru
>2014 auburn defensive ranking: 66
>2015 auburn defensive ranking: 89
>hey guys we just lost the best coach we've ever had better give this muschamp guy a call he was with mack brown at texas when they were good right
>the city of scar
will muschamp is the biggest fraud in college football but everybody keeps throwing money at him for some reason
>>63966186
then why didn't he take the job? you think he values SEC over alma mater?
or maybe he can recruit but not coach?
>>63966061
1997, 2002, and 2014 were all less than 20 years ago
>>63966284
>1997
>disputed
>2002
>the call
you see anon, "legitimate" is an important word in that post
>>63962401
Fuck off you worthless prick. If you aren't going to be a loyal Iowa fan then here's an idea.
GO ROOT FOR PURDUE.
GO ROOT FOR MARYLAND
GO ROOT FOR RUTGERS
Just fuck off and be a cunt somewhere else you piece of shit.
>>63966224
tamu has a nat'l title
>>63966271
miami never called him.
Hmmm
>>63966293
>disputed
Michigan was objectively better that year
>the call
It was the correct call
>>63966324
/cfb/ which coaching position is higher? south carolina or Miami.
also miami got lucky this with only competeting with south carolina for a coach
>>63966311
>miami never called him
>>63966339
>being deliberately ignorant: the post
>>63966342
Miami, you have a Kliff babby waiting to take you to the playoffs there.
>>63966061
>Thinking pre-CFP nattys count as "legitimate" anymore
B1G is the only conference with a legitimate natty. That's not changing this year either
