One of these threads yo
Also, why exactly is there so much cognitive dissonance amongst the left?
somebody should make a
>ohoh I have nothing interessting to say so let me post this ad hominem picture and circlejerk off it on /pol/
>>76273396
>why exactly is there so much cognitive dissonance amongst the left?
Part of being human is human duality. It's perfectly possible to believe two seemingly different things at the same time, and it can be perfectly valid. The problem with leftists seem to be that they engage in purely binary thinking. Right and wrong, left and right, white and black. I'm noticing a distinct lack of nuance from them, despite them shouting very loudly that the right lacks nuance.
In someone like me, the duality would be agreeing with most leftist policy and idealism, but still siding with right wing ideology. But I can explain it perfectly: The leftists are shedding the policy I like faster than a dog changing coats, and they never put it in practice. On the other hand, I hate mass immigration and supplication to religion (one of my leftist qualities, I suppose), but the left provides this in spades. So I can not be a leftist, precisely because of the leftist ideals I hold. But I can still acknowledge them. I did not drink the Kool Aid, after all. I merely swallowed the red pill.
This seems impossible for a lot of leftists. You can see this in how they shill for radical islam. Not moderate islam, mind you, but radical islam. There are people who consider themselves muslim, but they eat pork and don't pray. It's a cultural identity, not a way of life. But the left will tell you that pictures of pigs and men in turbans will offend ALL muslims. No room for nuance, always appeal to the most extremist common denominator.
Leftists will always say "how can you be non-white/gay/trans/an immigrant/furry/disabled/an Amazonian rain dancer and be right wing?" But this just betrays their own bigotry.
I'm convinced mainstream leftism is just a trick that allowed people to feel good about themselves for "doing the right thing" without doing any of the pesky thinking that comes with it. I've seen people on Reddit talk about protests as if they went to the concert of some band.
This one describes 90% of Reddit leftists.
Sort of related.
STRAWMAN
GET YOUR STRAWMAN HERE
>>76273913
These aren't ad hominem
At worst these are generalizations that still expose the doublethink of liberals
Someone post the illegal Mexican one.
>>76275219
These comics aren't "I AM SILLY" when they are literally quoting shit that liberals say
>>76275731
I know. Hence the qualifier "Sort of related".
>>76275470
literary the latests protest from san jose
>>76273913
>ad hominem
is that the new phrase they taught you in plumber school? You should ask your teacher for extra lessons because you don't know how to use it correctly.
>>76273857
Does their leader really have a PhD in Islamic studies?
>>76276399
yes
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/06/isis-leader-has-doctorate-in-islamic-studies-believes-each-religion-has-its-state-except-islam-and-it-should-have-a-state
>>76273396
>so much on the left
>Conservatives:
>Say guns are a right
>but Healthcare isn't
Not just a view in the US but in many different countries you faggots say this
>>76276485
Kek
>>76275219
It's amazing how this has dropped in quality compared to the current day norm.
I used to think this was hilarious, and well-composed. But even for a Paint comic, it looks terrible. And all it does is say that Paint comics usually employ strawmen. But that is, in itself, a fucking strawman, especially when you start applying it to even one comic that does not use a strawman argument.
>>76275479
Here, there you go. You people don't even know what constitutes the strawman argument. It's ridiculous.
And just shouting "strawman" is an appeal to authority, which is another logical fallacy, because it doesn't explain what is wrong with the argument. Instead you utter literally a single word and act as if that's enough.
>>76275547
What?
>I don't need to show the proof
(The comic implies that those people are just stupid anti-semitists who are spouting bullshit)
>the fact that most people who own most of the media have typical jewish names is a pure coincidence
Every person who was here for more than a week would be able to show the "proof"
>>76276533
>being able to buy/make something yourself is the same as forcing other people to buy it for you
>>76276533
The right to OWN guns is a right.
The right to OWN healthcare is a right.
No one deserves either of these without working for them.
>Also, why exactly is there so much cognitive dissonance amongst the left?
Because it's easy to let others do their thinking for them, which they can then repeat and pretend they're intelligent. Few leftists actually understand how conflicting nearly all their arguments are because they never actually scrutinize them themselves. They just think it feels good and therefore must be correct. Ie: White flight is racism, but white people moving back in is also racism.
And that's basically all that liberalism is. Stupid people pretending they're smart people talking down to other people.
>>76276638
not an argument
>>76276315
kek
>>76276638
Here is this same faggot again.
Is your life so awful that you need to repeatedly come on /pol/ and bitch?
If things are not to your pathetic standards why not fuck off to reddit or whatever pussy netherlands board you came from?
Like the other thread, you need to suck on a tailpipe and do us a favor you turbo-weeb.
>>76276533
Both are human rights but it doesn't mean the government should provide it for you-Steven Crowder
>>76274474
>I'm convinced mainstream leftism is just a trick that allowed people to feel good about themselves for "doing the right thing" without doing any of the pesky thinking that comes with it. I've seen people on Reddit talk about protests as if they went to the concert of some band.
Add on top the whole Virtue-signaling thing, that's pretty much it yeah.
>>76275210
still the best one
>>76276766
Wait how do I actually counter argue the point that Mexicans do jobs that Americans can't do? Sounds pretty accurate.
And don't even try to say it is a non-issue, Germany was about to face how ~60% of their work force is too qualified to perform simple jobs until the refugees happened.
>>76277048
>60% of their work force is too qualified
>too qualified
>>76273794
>>76277048
>Sounds pretty accurate.
It isn't. The Left grossly overstates how much they actually contribute and the only reason they get paid in the first place is because it's cheaper to hire them then buy machines that would automatically.
>>76277161
So the solution is to just hire machines to do the jobs?
Sounds like a pretty fragile argument to be quite honest. Also sounds like it might become a trend which will lead to teenagers and elders being unable to get any jobs at all.
>>76277161
>>76277048
The left also argue that the immigrants are more qualified than the native population, how does that fit into the 60% of the workforce is too qualified?
>>76276795
>>76277293
>The left also argue that...
>it's just one leftist who (surprise) doesn't know what he is talking about
It's funny that this thread is meant to mock bad arguments of the left but you are all doing worse right now.
i have a female friend on facebook that is basically your sjw, hair dyed red, rape culture, liberal arts degree meme. but she likes counter-signal memes for fashy goys on facebook. i don't get it at all.
>>76277048
Legal migrant labor used to do those jobs. Men and women who entered and left legally and who brought wealth home to improve their own countries
Not parasites who sneak into the country and degrade it
>>76277434
>how do I counter this stereotypical argument by the left
>you can't mention any of their stereotypical responses
:^)
>>76277290
>Sounds like a pretty fragile argument to be quite honest.
When they contribute maybe 12% of the fruit supply and most farming is done by agricorps, the only "fragile argument" is that illegals should be hired so that an agricorp can save a few pennies on their bottom line. They're going to get replaced eventually anyway.
Meanwhile they extract $150 billion from our economy every year.
If I have to pay $.50 more for strawberries to keep that money in the country without illegals, I'm okay with that.
>>76273396
>>76277530
They're already on our contry, anon. We're fucked.
>>76277637
If you are arguing with someone, you need to argue against that specific person's arguments, not arguments from another person that just so happens to fall within their own political alignment. That should have been common sense.
>hurr well nice argument
>but
>y'see
>i saw a photo of some dumb leftist holding a poster with some wrong information
>and i will use that poster to prove you rae wrong despite the fact we all know it is bullshit
>because i am an intelectual..........
>>76277564
Now this is actually solid. Thanks anon
>>76277716
Someone make this better
>>76275425
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C52TlPCVDio
>>76277962
Isn't having factual correct statements a good thing?
>>76277783
>maybe if I claim this discussion is about something else I won't sound like a retard
>>76278046
An analogy doesn't need to be factually correct because it is, well, an analogy, being accurate is not the point of it.
>>76278078
Are you ok, Jamal?
>>76277716
>>76277917
> muh christianity!
black-and-white fallacy
>>76278358
>the first ad hominem in the thread happen 60 posts later, by a leftist
Like clockwork
> Racism is a problem in Germany. Taking millions of refugees against the will of the people is certainly the solution.
> We can make it!
>>76276845
Yep.
What else is retarded is people who think they're amazing for being "non-PC" and then they actually have nothing of value to say.
>Yeah fuck niggers they're all just apes and Obongo is a raghead huhuh sorry if that's not POLITICALLY CORRECT enough for ya librulls
> Us Germans have inherited guilt because of Hitler and stuff.
> We have to accept refugees, it's not their fault that their countries are at war.
>>76276845
:^) I like this one
>>76276835
>Is your life so awful that you need to repeatedly come on /pol/ and bitch?
You do realize this same shit applies to, right?
>If things are not to your pathetic standards why not fuck off to reddit or whatever pussy netherlands board you came from?
Says the guy coming into a thread in order to bitch about it. Just leave, nigger! Walk away!
>Like the other thread, you need to suck on a tailpipe and do us a favor you turbo-weeb.
Because it's just you versus the hivemind, isn't it? Yeah, I'm in literally all threads on /pol/ just to make the experience difficult for you. That's my mission in life. You're just that important to me.
>>76278493
That is not ad hominem. Follows the same juxtapose as
>>76273857
>>76274888
>>76275210
>>76275547
And so on
got this one featured on the fashy goys page
>>76278809
It doesn't though.
The argument IS that you shouldn't close your borders and that's what ISIS wants and that people who want to close their borders just don't get understand that.
Who here has argued that they like Trump because he says maga and in what way is this similar in structure to the previous statement?
>>76278809
No it doesn't.
>>76273857 's core argument is pointing out how the leftist is trying to say that someone with a PhD in Islamic Studies doesn't know what Islamism is about, which is very illogical and they need to at least back up their statements somehow, which they don't.
>>76274888 's is core argument is a representation of how silly leftists are trying to do pscyhoanalysis without having any formation or preparation about it.
>>76275210 's core argument is self explanatory and far from an ad hominem, it is, once again, to expose how illogical their suggestion is, because deep inside it actually means "in order to defeat ISIS we must let them win".
>>76275547 is, at best, someone who took /pol/ parody too seriously.
Now, >>76278358 on the other hand has a bunch of ad hominems such as "let's circlejerk here" and "I'll dual this with my anime", not to mention it fails to show any logical flaw with the rightist man's speech because, well, it doesn't really show any arguments, but instead just attempts to make him silly.
>>76279045
>>76279072
Same princple
>Have strawman make some statement
>Makes assumptions about what it thinks to demeans its position
As long as you are initially against the strawman's ideology in the first place, you will swallow the assumptions made
>>76279490
>many of those are strawmans
Woooooow stop the presses
>>76279490
I can actually demonstrate people saying that isis don't actually know what islam is because islam is the religion of peace(tm).
Can you find anyone who poses a similar argument to the one in your picture?
>>76279674
>Gets excited when someone strawmans the left
>Gets upset when someone strawmans the right
This pictures were meant to strawman, I only liked the cognitive dissonance ones, but lately newer ones are more and more pathetic desu
>>76279682
>Can you find anyone who poses a similar argument to the one in your picture?
What picture? You mean about the MAGA posters that conveniently post on an anonymous board?
>>76279490
You are confusing satire with strawmanning. Strawmanning is building up a non-existent argument for the other side and then refuting it, i.e. "knocking down a strawman". Satire is simply making a mockery of something by presenting it in a light that enhances its absurdity.
For instance, in this one where two opinions commonly held by the same party are juxtaposed and worded in a way to highlight their incompatibility and hypocrisy.
>>76279820
Can you read my post for a second instead of strawmanning my post?
Some of those are strawmans but not all of them. And this thread is for strawmans, not ad hominems. Do you want me to contribute to the thread by posting a pic of "ZZBcoQDt is a huge bitch LOL"?
>>76279820
They aren't given as arguments..
>it's another STRAW MAN!!!! AD HOM!!!!!! argument on /pol/
>>76280011
>he says that while posting a blue board pepe
>>76275627
hawkings is a hack even in his own field
>>76275756
>>76275547
>>76276845
>>76279037
Where did you get these from? They're fucking lame.
>>76280068
>Hue
>>76280095
Leftists are so stupid I kind of feel bad for them.
>>76279072
>ad hominem
yeah but the only arguments I see from the other side are ad hominem too. or at best very carefully selective
cherry picking arguments is also harmful to objectivity
>AD HOMINEM
yeah but in such a diverse and subjective field of study as society
you shouldn't ignore the positive effect shifting your point of view might
have on your understanding of the situation
>AD HHOMINEM
look this is ridiculous, calling some idiot a leftist is all right
but calling a rightist an idiot is a logical fallacy, bro do you have autis-
>AD HOMINEM REE-
>>76279843
Call it satire as much as you want, it will never stop being strawman. Most pictures make assumptions of what the target in mind has that may not be true. Your pic is different though, I like these kinds but sadly there are rare now.
>>76279941
>It is ad hominems when i don't like it, strawman when i do.
Sure thing senpai.
>>76279960
None of the pictures here are. It was never designed to
>>76280676
>>76280679
The difference is that one nitpicks their logical arguments and portrays them in such a way that sounds illogical, the other just plain out makes them look ridiculous with personal insults just like "ahha you watch anime"
There's nothing wrong with watching anime by the way
>>76280679
oк
>>76273946
lel
>>76279072
Now this is autism
>>76280775
>doublethinking in action
Mein gott!
>>76280870
Now this is ad hominem
>>76280875
And this is Strawman
>>7620923
And this is fallacy fallacy
>>76280932
Wops, I meant
>>76280957
>>76280932
holy shit, i didn't realized it till now, but you have no fucking idea what a strawman is. This keeps getting better and better
>>76281086
Wait you criticize anime but you post manga pictures? Now that is wrong. And it is a strawman because you are arguing against something I never said while pretending I said it.
>>76280679
Well, some will inevitably wind up being strawmen. But the central part of a strawman is that you invent an argument for the opposition to have. So if you use an argument they already have, but just use it to make them look stupid, that's not strawmanning.
Strawmanning would be more like representing US Democrats as misanthropic babykillers because they are pro-abortion. Possibly even as racists, because black women are the highest abortion demographic. Chuck Asay did a cartoon like that. Now that's a strawman.
Pic related not so much. Those are pretty much directly lifted from leftist political opinion, and only put next to each other with a few pictures. I've heard left wing people make both these arguments in real life. So this is again a juxtaposition.
>>76276845
>>76275756
>>76275547
>>76278358
>>76279037
2.4
>Shills not understanding how to use memes
>>76281136
>implying i agree with any of these pictures
>calling out something is the same as misrepresenting an argument made as another weaker argument to knock it down
Just coz it is doublethink does not make the argument invalid
>>76281360
>doublethink
How does that even work
>>76273396
LMAO. Cognitive dissonance is actually a healthy human response to having two opposing, contradictory thoughts in mind at once. It means you recognize they are contradictory.
What you mean to say is "Why is there such lack of cognitive dissonance," but you didn't say that, because you're repeating things you heard, because you're an idiot.
Please let me know if you have any more unintentionally funny things to say.
>>76275756
I didn't immediately go 3rd Reich, I was pretty far left to begin with when I started seeing the logical conclusion of the liberal mindset.
You inevitably take baby-steps once you get red-pilled and start looking at the facts and arguments until you eventually de-program you emotional aversion to the "far right" label.
In a hegemony I am not even that fashy, I would probably be more center if the world wasn't crumbling around our ears. Until that equilibrium is restored its free helicopter rides for me.
>>76281262
Weakening their arguments or stripping it of its nuances counts as strawmanning senpai
>>76281394
find out yourself
>>76281579
Well I don't feel like it right now
Also google chrome says doublethink is a typo, are you cornered yet?
>>76281531
No, that's not how the definition of a strawman works. It's quite clear that a new argument must be constructed by the person doing the strawmanning. That is what the name implies. The strawman is the fake argument you build.
>A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.
What you propose leaves a gray area that virtually any argument can fall into. By virtue of discussion, nearly EVERY political argument is stripped of its nuances, otherwise our discussions on a single point would be hours long.
>>76273396
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hojlP5Kns8
>>76281635
>doublethink is a typo
pffft AHAHAHAHAHAHA. I am never one to discriminate against flags, but i am very tempted right now.
>wanna post a 1984 or Orwell pic but dont have any.
>>76281761
>Oversimplifying an opponent's argument, then attacking this oversimplified version.
Nuance
>>76273396
what pisses me off the most is that rich, white liberals advocate for diversity, but the people who will actually be around it are poor, working class whites. so the rich ones can smugly say "we want more diversity" while not being exposed to any of it. and then they have the audacity to say that working class whites are racist and uneducated and vote against their own interest
>Also, why exactly is there so much cognitive dissonance amongst the left?
I ask the same about /pol/.
>>76281938
Look, if you don't want to agree with the common definition of the term, that's your business. But if you call something a strawman while it isn't, you're still wrong.
>>76282147
my greentext is literally taken from wikipedia
>>76275219
>make direct citations from actual things people say
>draw a funny face next to it
>all of a sudden it looks like an I AM SILLY comic
Your shitpost said more about leftist rhetoric than any amount of these fashy memes combined could ever hope to accomplish.
>>76281938
doublethink
Well? Got any arguments now?
>>76281427
>It means you recognize they are contradictory.
>cognitive dissonance
>noun
>the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioural decisions and attitude change.
If you're going to accuse people of being wrong it helps if you know what you're talking about
Into the filter you go
>>76273946
based dalai lama
>taking these seriously
>implying any of us would use these in an actual argument
>>76282240
I am content to let you think I am wrong. Savoring a huefag's stupidity and ignorance is sweeter than enlightening one
>>76282381
Nice ad hominem
>>76281427
I love using your name to say retarded things. Not that anything you say isn't retarded.
>>76282200
So is mine.
I mean, I can agree to that. But given that all you actually said was "nuance", I figured the discussion was basically over. I can't really respond properly to a one word post.
>>76282271
Oh, you're going by the dumbass definition. Sorry, I mistook you for a human being that went by the real definition, not the dumbass one. Here's the real one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
Leon Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance focuses on how humans strive for internal consistency. An individual who experiences inconsistency (dissonance) tends to become psychologically uncomfortable, and is motivated to try to reduce this dissonance—as well as actively avoid situations and information likely to increase it.
Let me know if you need any more wrong opinions corrected.
>>76282462
Oh my god stop doing that then I'll never get a good job posting at the 4chan factory if you hurt my reputation
>>76282520
Interpret what you just posted, it means they will either fix it or completely avoid any situation that presents an argument opposing to their view. The second case happens much more often.
>>76282457
>Ad hominen
>tfw you never see the look on a huefag's face when he realized how stupid and wrong he was
>>76275363
i like this one. by the way people these are called smuggies
>>76281394
doublethink is a term from the sadly accurate book "1984".
>>76282634
Nice ad hominem yet again.
>>76273946
mfw liberals have to disavow the Dalai "the Arabics need to hit the bricks" Lama.
>>76282571
Okay. I'd never want to hurt your livelihood.
>>76282509
I have never disagreed with your definition, only that it was too limited. Next time read the whole Wikipedia page before quoting it
>>76282618
Want to know how I know you're not qualified to interpret theory within psychology? LMAO
>>76273396
They put their conclusions before their deductions.
>>76282659
>George Orwell
Oh well, I've read animal farm from the same author and liked it. I'll give that one a shot.
>>76282253
>because it has been debunked
aha.
>>76282714
I see so many liberals say "people only tend to be racist when they live in places where everyone is the same - when they're exposed to more diversity they tend to become less racist"
it is the complete opposite of pretty much all data and reality.
>>76282743
>you're not qualified to interpret wikipedia
Well fuck me in the ass then.
>>76281579
>get blown the fuck out
>LEL IM NOT GOING TO SPOON FEED U LEL LEL
>>76282688
no please dont literally my entire livelihood rests in this name
>>76273396
Why the fuck are liberals so obsessed with "peer-review"? They won't accept any information unless it has been peer-reviewed.
>>76282743
Psychology itself is a sham... Nature had a big study where they couldn't even replicate half of psychology studies.
"Don’t trust everything you read in the psychology literature. In fact, two thirds of it should probably be distrusted."
http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248
>>76282812
More like
>You're not qualified to draw out conclusions based on faulty reading and unfortunate gaps in your education
I appreciate your interest. I wish you luck in all your future affairs
>>76282900
>A discipline is incomplete
>That means all of it is wrong
Boy am I glad nobody listens to you
>>76282921
>gaps in your education
I am in law class right now but the teacher is talking about a goddamn movie so I am shitposting at /pol/.
>faulty reading
It's written in what you mentioned anon
>>76282851
I said I would stop, dumbass. Stop replying to me.
>>76276730
well put
>>76276315
that bitch story pissed me of. it does not matter if you won 100 nobel prizes in physics, you are still breaking the law. no one is above it
>>76282974
Your definition of incomplete is two-thirds fraud?
>>76283021
Nice. That one made me laugh.
>>76282978
>I am in a school, therefore I am a good student
Please pay more attention.
>>76282850
>BTFO someone by being willfully ignorant
Fascinating debating tatics
>>76282998
dude stop bullying me
>>76283074
>One study gets to dictate the future of a discipline
I'm afraid I have bad news.... You're... You're wrong. My condolences to your family.
>>76283249
But they are discussing a movie
And my point is that there can't be a gap in my education if I didn't even finish it yet
>>76282900
Worst of all are "scientific" surveys where they ask 200 people a question and use it to represent all of america
>>76273396
They're contrarians. They don't actually believe in the causes they cry about, they just want to be rebellious without actually getting trouble. They're literally omega as they come.
>>76283324
Somewhere along the lines, you ended up not being able to understand introductory text on Wikipedia.
That speaks for itself. You still don't know what's wrong with your reading of that paragraph and it is kind of impressive. Maybe that kind of stupid is a requirement to get sucked into alt-right movements.
>>76283462
Let me quote
>as well as actively avoid situations and information likely to increase it (the inconsistency)
This is no matter of interpretation.
>>76283315
The fact that two-thirds of psychology studies are false has already dictated the discipline.
Are you memeing cognitive dissonance or something? You can't be this stupid.
>>76284330
>>76284215
>>76284249
>>76284334
>>76284357
>>76284377
>asshurt britbong uses his cancerball images he has saved from the redditball threads he browses
Not even surprised
>>76284408
Wow, that's the first cancerous one that I actually found funny.
>>76284491
>>76284504
>>76274888
kek
isnt this whole thread about knowing how the left ticks though?
>>76273396
When the basis of your ideology is that equality and fairness are a right, you are starting off with core principles that aren't just orthogonal to objectivity and truth, they actually require the suppression of both.
This is the root of all their cognitive dissonance.
why do these threads always get shilled so hard
>>76281502
>National Socialism is leftist
>>76284860
>>76283462
I hope you're baiting because you sound like a fucking idiot
>>76274888
This explains the dutch:
https://www.google.no/maps/@52.7267434,5.7472343,3a,28.2y,284.41h,75.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1skSqVEI8l1UFOFHQDScgFwQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
>>76282253
The concept of biological race has only been dismissed by sociologists, who have no authority on biology.
>>76285256
The concept of race has been dismissed by biologists actually.
>>76273396
>cognitive dissonance
Everything makes sense when you realize they view the world through an anti white prism.
>>76279037
>Posting FBI statistics is cherry-picking
>>76285439
best one so far
>>76285380
*bad biologists
>>76285847
Real talk, this one is dumb as shit.That's exactly what "natural" means. If it happens in nature, it's natural.
The liberal fallacy is to say "...and therefore it's acceptable in human society" Although usually they're saying it in response to a claim that it's unnatural.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpohOP-voQ0
>>76282643
They're called counter-signal memes for fashy goys, but you can call them whatever you want.
Suicide in Greenland is a significant national social issue. According to government reports, between 1/4 and 1/5 of Greenlanders attempt to kill themselves at some point in their lifetime.[1] Greenland also has by far the highest suicide rate in the world: reports between 1985 and 2012 showed that an average of 83 people in 100,000 committed suicide, more than twice the rate of the second placed country.[2]
Greenland is a geographically and culturally isolated nation, as well as one of the coldest and least populous countries in the world. Although facts like these may contribute to suicide-related issues, it is not clear if they have direct influences on Greenlandic suicides. Furthermore, different initiatives have been taken to reduce the suicide rate in the country, such as roadside posters,[3] and a national suicide prevention strategy involving courses, education, local communities and professionals (such as teachers, social workers and doctors) has been initiated.[4]
The number of suicides in Greenland began to rise in the 1970s; it kept increasing until 1986. In 1986, suicide was the leading cause of death in several towns, such as Sarfannguit.[3] In 1970, the rate of suicide in Greenland was historically very low, but by 1990–1994, it had become one of the highest in the world with 107 per 100,000 persons committing suicide per year.[5] A similar relatively fast rise in suicide rates has been observed among the Inuit in Canada.[6][7] Greenland Government data reported in 2010 suggest that almost one suicide occurred a week.[8]
Violent methods were used in 95% of suicide deaths.[5] The most common methods were hanging (46%) and shooting (37%);[5] other methods, such as jumping from heights, cutting with sharp objects, drowning, overdose of medication, and poisoning were also used, but less frequently.[9]
>>76286742
>>76277293
>immigrant with a degree
HAha yeah, because all these thousands of uneducated savages all have degrees and are coming to work in nuclear physics.
The STI joke is so fucking annoying.
>>76287241
>Ayodolf hitler
>>76275756
>>76275547
>>76279037
>>76276845
>>76278358
R E D D I T
E
D
D
I
T
>>76279072
Lol that was fucking autistic but still correct
>>76286313
*biologists who don't fit my narrative
>>76287975
>denying biology doesn't make you a bad biologist
Excellent bait, friendo
Here's your (You)
>>76288047
Scientists must provide actual experimental evidence for their claims, they don't just get given cash to lie.
>le bait
fucking kill yourself
>>76282682
Im sure there was something on twitter about it
>>76275756
I think we can handle that criticism, but people who take the red pill and becomes Nazis usually turns to traditionalism quite fast
>>76273396
>>76275547
>>76275756
>>76276845
>>76279037
>>76282253
I'm liking you more than Lawrence of Arabia right now and that's pretty much the top of my compliments
>>76286394
have to agree with the britbong
one of the things that makes us human is the fact that we did discern us from nature.
>>76278358
>never get educated outaide of /pol/
How do you think /pol/ gets its information?
>>76282253
>debunked
How many of these did you guys make up to make the leftist fags look terrible?
Got to bed, Ghoul.
>>76275756
This is actually quite good, ignore the amerilards oblivious to sarcasm
>>76290405
Is Uruguay a white heaven?
